Sweet, But Worlds Apart From Its Predecessor…

For those unaware ‘Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ ( alternatively known as ‘ 星から来たあなた’ or ‘ My Love From The Stars’) is adapted from ‘ My Love From The Star’ starring Kim So Hyun ( ‘ Dream High’, ‘ Secretly Greatly’ and ‘ It’s Okay To Not Be Okay’) and Jun Ji Hyun ( ‘ My Sassy Girl’, ‘ The Legend Of The Blue Sea’ and ‘ Jirisan’).

‘Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ focuses upon the same basic plot premise as its predecessor . Mitsuru Higashiyama ( Fukushi Sota- ‘ BLEACH’, ‘ Omukae Desu’ and ‘ Avalanche’) is a seemingly ordinary university lecturer, apart from one fact: he’s not human.

Stranded on earth during the edo period, Mitsuru has been forced to blend in with humans for more than 400 years whilst keeping his abilities and identity low-key.

However, everything changes for Mitsuru when he encounters popular and seemingly haughty actress Sasahara Tsubaki ( Yamamoto Mizuki - ‘ Tokyo Alice’, ‘ Perfect World’ and ‘ Ningen Kowai’). Tsubaki and Mitsuru soon find their paths crossing in more ways than one, as Mitsuru finds it harder to keep his secret…

As mentioned previously, ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ is based upon the popular Korean series ‘ My Love From The Star’ and was initially written by award-winning screenwriter Park Ji Eun ( ‘ My Husband Got A Family’, ‘ The Producers’ and ‘ Legend Of The Blue Sea’).

However whilst there are certainly some intriguing things to note about Amazon Prime’s Japanese adaptation ‘Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’, it’s admittedly hard not to notice where the screenwriting felt inconsistent even as a standalone piece.

Naturally this isn’t entirely the fault of writing problems alone. A limited duration length did naturally restrict the abilities to explore plot lines, or counterplots in detail. On the other hand whilst time can be a limiting factor for any production or adapted series, it was still noticeable for viewers that ‘ ‘Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ did little to adapt itself to its limitations.

Whilst the series did admittedly draw greater attention upon the potential romantic relationship of main leads Tsubaki and Mitsuru, the overcommitment for attempting to tie in several unexplored subplots in a short space of time could often make the events of the narrative feel somewhat sporadic and desultory . As a consequence this allowed restricted and limited opportunities in order to explore characters beyond their surface level.

The acting quality of the series is admittedly variable dependent on scenes. Fukushi Sota and Yamamoto Mizuki were fairly decent as our main leads, though surprisingly, despite the talents of both respectful actors , Sota and Mizuki’s onscreen chemistry felt somewhat lukewarm at best.

Admittedly this wasn’t entirely the fault of the actors. Despite several attempts in order to reiterate the importance of the romantic relationship between the main leads in ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’, there were few and far distinguishable or emotive moments in the series where the audience could truly understand the importance or relevance of this relationship.

Of course whilst there were several heartwarming exchanges and insights into the characters at times, the paper thin roles of the main characters could often impact their presence onscreen.

Despite Tsubaki seemingly being an actress who has suffered under false stigmas and stereotypes , it was hard to truly pinpoint moments where audiences saw Tsubaki as a dynamic character, mature or at least be explored with more vulnerable sides. Similarly, whilst Mitsuru is seemingly a character who has carried a seemingly arcane burden of being stranded as an extraterrestrial on earth, Mitsuru rarely seemed to be affected, develop or being given opportunities in order for viewers to digress his current persona or past.

In addition to our main leads, there is also an array of side characters. Whilst some of these side characters are necessary to a certain extent in the events of the series, ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ rarely fleshed out the significance of these particular characters , built up their presence onscreen or at least foreshadowed or tied in certain actions or events surrounding their appearances to make them memorable for the audience.

Then of course there’s the question of pacing with ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’. As mentioned previously, ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ was limited from the outset with having to compact a storyline into a space of ten episodes. Whilst the narrative is certainly expedited by mainly focusing upon the romantic aspect of the main leads, this also manifested as a double-edged sword with execution.

Pacy, engaging and allowing opportunities in order to allow the storyline to progress, but rarely did this allow time for ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ to build upon its characters, plot line or a sense of conflict, dilemmas or obstacles for the main leads. Indeed whilst the drama did attempt to throw in several conflict points by the final part of the series, the finale felt somewhat anticlimactic as a result.

As for the filming quality and cinematography , ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ is admittedly average. The quality, whilst not bad per say, was unimpressively fuzzy in certain scenes for a production released under the name of a top company such as Amazon Prime. In addition to this the absence of a sleek gradient, versatile camera angles as well as absent palettes schemes and even a lack of subtle motifs were prominent as the series progressed.

The OST for ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ was sparsely used in the series. Notably when music was present in scenes, it was often faint and synchronic; attempting to place emphasis on characters or scenes, without always leaving an impactful punch by the end of episodes. Arguably one of the few memorable tracks found in the series was GReeeeN’s ‘ Ryusei no Kakera’; an avant-garde yet surprisingly upbeat melody which played as the drama’s main theme song.

Acknowledging a drama as a standalone piece is always quintessential when talking about adaptations. Admittedly ‘ Hoshi Kara Kita Anata’ did add its own idiosyncratic touches to the storyline by bringing on board the talents of Fukushi Sota and Yamamoto Mizuki as the main leads. On the other hand it’s hard to deny that the chaotic bricolage of the drama’s inconsistent narrative, characters, pacing and filming, couldn’t help but make the series feel as though it failed to live up to legacy of its predecessor and past incarnations. An average and easygoing binge-watch, but perhaps not a worthwhile investment.

Read More

The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure; A Tumultuous High-Seas Adventure?

The journey from screenplay to production has admittedly been a circuitous journey for ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’. Originally intended as a sequel production for screenwriter Chun Sung Il ( ‘ Your Honor’, ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’)’s original screenplay ‘ The Pirates’ (2014), the severe impact of production problems were certainly evident onscreen.

Naturally to understand the root cause of some of the problems with ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ it is important to elucidate that the movie suffered a lot throughout its production.

A notable change of director from Lee Seok-hoon ( ‘ Dancing Queen’, ‘ The Himalayas’ ) to Kim Jung Hoon ( ‘ Petty Romance’, ‘ The Accidental Detective), original stars Son Ye-jin (‘ Crash Landing On You’, ‘ Personal Taste’ and ‘ Something In The Rain’) and Kim Nam-gil ( ‘ Bad Guy’, ‘ Live Up To Your Name’ and ‘ Fiery Priest’) abandoning ship alongside pandemic-induced delays did spell-out a lot of problems for Sung II’s production.

As a consequence of these contributions, ‘The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure’ focused upon an entirely different setup from the first movie. Set in the late 14th century in the early Joseon period, the narrative focuses upon female pirate captain Hae-rang (Han Hyo-joo- ‘ Iljimae’, ‘ W’ and ‘ Happiness’).

After coming into possession of a mysterious treasure map, Hae-rang becomes fixated upon the notion that the hidden treasure was gold sourced from the royal palace and then lost at sea. However Hae-rang is not the only one obsessed over the promise of luxurious valuables . On board her ship is a cadre of bandits, led by ringleader Wu Mu-chi (Kang Ha-neul- ‘ Monstar’, ‘ Misaeng: Incomplete Life’ and ‘ When The Camellia Blooms’).

The self-proclaimed “ Greatest Swordsman in Goryeo”, Mu-Chi begins his schemes in order to launch a coup and take over the ship.

Nevertheless when unwelcome rival Boo Heung Soo ( Kwon Sang Woo- ‘ My Tutor Friend’, ‘ Stairway To Heaven’ and ‘ Queen Of Mystery’) arrives on the scene with a keen interest in competing for the treasure, Mu-Chi and Hae-rang may just be forced into an allegiance of sorts, as betrayals and twists soon come their way…

One of the most problems with ‘The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ came through its script. As mentioned previously, the production was naturally caught in a rut after Chung Sung II was forced to rewrite parts, recast and subvert the storyline in a very short space of time.

However whilst certain excuses can be given for the film’s troubling filming and writing schedule , it’s hard to truly justify the film’s unmodified and particularly cataclysmic opening act. A barrage of rushed character introductions, predictable betrayals, sudden flashbacks and dream sequences are crammed forcefully into a very short space of time .

Indeed, instead of spreading out the narrative and allowing the structure of the film to feel circumstantial and well-paced, ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ admittedly felt somewhat disorientating and chaotic in its first half.
The second-act admittedly was less anarchic and did allow some opportunities in order to tie together a form of coherent plot, but still due to the poor buildup and structure of the movie, the final act of ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ was somewhat risible.

Of course it’s wrong it’s wrong to entirely suggest that ‘ ‘The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ wasn’t an enjoyable movie at times. Whilst it’s gnawing inconsistencies of pacing and writing were evident, ‘The Pirates: The Last Treasure’ was still fast-paced, entertaining and adrenal-infused with its swashbuckling bravado and overindulgent CGI.

Then of course there’s our main cast. Aside from some inconsistent acting moments at times in ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’, Han Hyo-joo was fairly solid as main female lead Hae-rang, whilst costars Kang Ha-Neul and Kwon Sang Woo were fairly decent also.

On the other amongst the jam-packed action of ‘ The Pirates: The Last Treasure’, the array of characters onscreen felt often vacuous. Absent opportunities in order to explore or flesh out characters, in particular how a young woman became a pirate captain, was rarely developed beyond its surface level plot hook.

As for the cinematography, ‘ The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure’ offered viewers with a high-budget bonanza under the directing reigns of Kim Jung Hoon. The overall product glossy but often heavily indulging upon CGI en masse without a greater focus on shots or the art of capturing the characters in more subtle detail. The OST is an odd accumulation of tremendous scores, alongside upbeat modern bops; a surreal mixture which whilst working effectively in parts, could feel somewhat out of place in other scenes.

‘The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure’ attempted to offer viewers with a fun and action-engaged plot throughout its 126-minute duration. Nevertheless, despite some engaging performances by our main cast and some fast-paced action sequences , ‘ The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure: often felt as though it was a chaotic bricolage of poor-pacing, story direction and enforced tropes .

For those willing to overlook the flaws of ‘ The Pirates: The Last Royal Treasure’, the movie offered viewers with a disorderly swashbuckling adventure filled with daring laughs and fight scenes as well as hare-brained escapades along the way…

Read More

Will ‘ Ghost Doctor’ Truly Haunt You?

Rain is back. This time in a melodramatic medical-supernatural drama which whilst casting its net far and wide towards a wider audience demographic , isn’t without its flaws either.

The plot is set mainly around a working hospital. Previously mentioned Superstar singer-actor Rain stars as Cha Young Min; a first-rate doctor who is renowned in the hospital for his prodigal skills. However despite his impressive clinical acumen, Young Min is notorious for his cold personality and acerbic tongue directed towards colleagues and patients alike.

Nevertheless, everything changes for Young Min when he’s involved in a fatal accident. Whilst his physical body is rendered in a comatose state, Young Min discovers that he is now stuck as a living ghost anchored to the grounds of the hospital.

Perhaps by a whim of fate, Young Min stumbles upon a shocking revelation: he can possess the body of amateur resident doctor Ko Seung Tak ( Kim Bum). The grandson of the hospital’s founder,
Seung-Tak is nearly Young-Min’s polar opposite. He’s laidback, disengaged with his duties as a doctor but secretly cares deeply for the well-being of his patients and wards.

As Young-Min and Seung Tak are forced to share the same body, they begin to help one another grow as well as unravel suspected foul-play in their midst…

Screenwriter Kim Eun Hee is likely most known for her previous works ‘ Winter Sonata’ (2002), ‘ My Fair Lady’ (2009) and ‘ Live Up To Your Name’ ( 2017).

Similar to her previous repertoire of melodramas and cliche-ridden narratives, ‘ Ghost Doctor’ isn’t inescapable from its shoehorned storylines or some character archetypes. The villainous motives and goals of the antagonists could feel somewhat monotonous, whilst the attempts to influx subplots with romantic chemistry between the main leads and their potential love interests could feel vapid also.

Of course this isn’t to entirety critique Eun Hee’s screenplay. Whilst there were noteworthy niche moments , there were some refreshing takes upon niche character tropes; Seung-Tak ( as the “ affluent heir”) standing out in particular.

In addition to this under the directing reigns of Boo Sung Chul ( ‘ My Girlfriend Is A Gumiho’, ‘ The Heirs’ and ‘ Your Honor’), ‘ Ghost Doctor’ is able to maintain a crisp narrative with enough bromance, arbitrary medical knowledge terms and vocabulary and comic relief thrown-in order to keep viewers entertained.

Whilst there are notably moments where the series could darken quickly under the weight of the established supernatural and medical subtext, the series rarely delved deeper beyond a basic plot-level into these issues. Naturally this allowed more opportunities in order to offer lighthearted respite, but did provide fewer narrative moments in order to truly diverge further away from niche setups or tropes also.

Then of course there’s the discussion surrounding cast choices. Indeed, the casting choices of a-listers Rain ( ‘ Full House’, ‘ I’m A Cyborg, But That’s Okay’ and ‘ Please Come Back, Mister’ ) and Kim Bum ( ‘ Boys Over Flowers’, ‘ Mrs Cop.2, and ‘ Tail Of The Nine Tailed’ ) as the main leads will likely remain one of the major attractions of the drama.

Kim Bum and Rain offered fairly solid performances throughout. Whilst overblown script moments and dialogue was admittedly apparent at times in ‘ Ghost Doctor’, the duo’s onscreen bromance was one of the surprising highlights of the series.

Costarring alongside Bum and Rain was singer-actress Uee ( ‘You’re Beautiful’, ‘ Ho Goo’s Love’ and ‘ Marriage Contract’) as main female lead and Young Min’s old flame from the past, Dr.Jang Se Jin.

Whilst Uee’s performance was decent, her character’s development was admittedly greatly restricted by plot. Angst-ridden opportunities in order to explore the seemingly egocentric Young Jin’s backstory, gave way to notable inconsistencies between wasted character development moment for Se-Jin, as well as notably lukewarm chemistry between Uee and Rain onscreen.

Alongside Uee, there is also idol-actress Son Na Eun ( ‘ Twenty Again’ , ‘ Cinderella and the Four Knights’ and ‘ Dinner Mate’) as Seung Tak’s potential love interest Oh Soo-jeong. Na Eun’s onscreen chemistry with Bum was admittedly sweet in parts, but slightly inconsistent; lacking screen time in order to explore Soo-Jeong as a sentient character, as we as delving deeper into their potential relationship.

However, a shoutout must be given to supporting cast members playing the meddlesome “ ghosts” Im Bo Mi ( Yoon So Hee- ‘ Sword And Flower’, ‘ Witch’s Love’), Choi Hoon Kil ( CIIPHER’s Choi Seok Won- ‘ Phantom School’ ) and Hwang Kook Chan ( Han Seung Hyun- ‘Haechi’), with actor Sung Dong-il( ‘ Miss Hammurabi’, ‘ The Cursed’ and ‘ Pawn’) particularly standing out as mysterious ghost at the hospital, Tess. Yet similar to other characters in the series, the subplots and backstories surrounding the ghosts were only brought up when necessary; compacted and intriguing side stories, but nevertheless restricted within the compacted narrative.

‘ Ghost Doctor’ notably differs greatly between its first-part and second-half. The first-half spent time tried to build up dilemmas and characters, whilst the second-half attempted to heighten and intensify the obstacles set out for the main leads.

Naturally this did emerge as a double-edged sword for the execution of the narrative. It allowed some time for viewers to get to know characters and setups, but it could often feel as though by the halfway point , the intense and climatic buildup were somewhat fizzled out and disengaging for audiences .

Conniving Vice President Han Seung-won ( Tae In Ho) served as one of main antagonistic forces of the storyline. Whilst his limitations to fulfil his
role as one of the main plot obstacles are explained, Seung-Won was the epitome of “villainy for the sake of it”; heinous and manipulative, but rarely possessing an edge of fleshed-out characters, or decisive motives along the way.

As a consequence the latter-half of the series admittedly felt somewhat rushed and disorientated in parts. The attempts to drag out certain plot points and scenarios often led to the second-half feeling stretched too thin. The antagonistic and potential climatic buildup felt bedraggled in later episodes by an attempt to quickly wrap up events also.

Under the directing reigns of Boo Sung Chul, ‘ Ghost Doctor’ notably possessed a glossy tone. It did become apparent at times that the editing for the series was somewhat amateurish in parts. During certain episodes of ‘ Ghost Doctor’, a seemingly professional and slick sequence could be suddenly be debased by the presence of unsystematic editing in-between scenes and sequences.

Of course this isn’t to say that the cinematography was unwatchable or entirely mediocre. The filming quality was still professional, if a little uninspiring at times with limited camera angles and tones rarely standing out.

The accompanied OST offered viewers with an array of dulcet soundtracks . Whilst some of these tracks could admittedly feel a little generic, there were a small number of impressive compositions placed during key moments and scenes, such as CNU ( of B1A4)’s vocal and instrumental version of ‘ Fly Away’.

‘ Ghost Doctor’ is highly reminiscent of the offbeat series of supernatural and fantasy K-dramas which arose in popularity during the 2010s. Naturally anticlimactic and limited writing opportunities did serve as one of the drama’s prominent letdowns . However, whilst the ending certainly delivered a sweeter tone for viewers, lacklustre romance and certain writing moments may be disappointing viewers also. Certainly a decent binge-watch.

Read More

The Futuristic Vampire Gang Thriller, Which Failed To Deliver An Impactful Bite…

At the heightened craze of vampires flicks and blazing gun thrillers, notorious 1990s " pink film" co-screenwriter and director Takahisa Zeze decided to cash in both genres with ‘ Moonchild’ (2003); a 2 hour trope-worthy film filled with an intriguing premise and characters , as well an array of questionable acting performances and narrative execution.

The movie is set in an alternative timeline where in the year 2014, Japan begins to suffer from economic collapse. As a consequence, myriads of Japanese citizens emigrate to mainland China in order to escape economic ruin.

Set against the backdrop of the fictional ‘ melting pot’ Chinese town of Mallepa, the main narrative focuses upon a trio of orphaned boys. Sho ( Kanata Hongō- ‘ The Prince Of Tennis’, ‘ Nana 2’ and ‘ Himitsu no Hanazono’) is the head of the group, whilst his younger brother Shinji and Toshi are fellow members.

Shinji ends up landing the group in hot water when he steals a briefcase filled with money from a notorious hood gang. Fortunately, Shinji, Sho and Toshi are protected by the mysterious vagrant and later-revealed vampire Kei ( L'Arc-en-Ciel and Vamps’ vocalist Hyde- ‘ Last Quarter of the Moon’).

A time-skip several years into the future reveals Sho to be in his early twenties ( idol-actor and screenwriter Gackt- ‘ Tonde Saitama’, ‘ Sengoku Basara’ and ‘ Time Spiral’). Acting as the leader for his own small gang consisting of Toshi ( Yamamoto Taro- ‘ Battle Royale’, ‘ Secret Love’) and Kei.

However Sho ends up running into trouble along the way when he becomes acquainted with Song ( Wang Leehom - ‘ Love In Disguise’, ‘ Forever Young’) and his sister Yi-Che ( Zeny Kwok).

Whilst Sho ends up struggling between his growing feelings for Yi-Che, rising tensions between old friends and betrayals, Kei begins to struggle against trying to resist his bloodlust and vampiric urges also …

Co-written by director Takahisa Zeze, main actor Gackt and Kishu Izuchi, ‘ Moon Child’ attempted to combine the adrenal-infused thrill of shootout movies, sci-fi futuristic worlds, vampiric-horror flicks and pining romance tales in a movie which attempting to appease to everyone, often failed to deliver a cohesive narrative along the way.

Undeniably there are intriguing elements surrounding ‘ Moon Child’ behind the over-the-top makeup and idol clothing aesthetics of Gackt and Hyde onscreen.

Patchy elements surrounding Kei’s creator vampiric Luka ( Kishu Izuchi) were intriguing, the subtext and evident messaging towards an emerging Pan -Asian society ( particularly enforcing a timeless allegory towards the rise, virtues and flaws of fusion cultures, immigration and poverty in other countries) and the reiteration on the horrors of violence are prominent in parts of ‘ Moon Child’.

On the other hand ‘ Moon Child’ and its array of gun-wielding chic gangsters occupying the periphery of the storyline were often absent of cause, sentience and personal drive.

Sho’s seemingly " burning" feelings for main love interest and doe-eyed Yi-Che were tepid to say the least. Aside from some hinted causes of physical attraction, it seemed ironic that Gackt’s onscreen chemistry with costar Hyde was arguably more passionate than his character’s ” soulmate" and costar Zeny Kwok’s onscreen persona. (Often leading to a somewhat unintentional homoerotic subtext behind Kei and Sho’s interactions. Ironically, this relationship probably would’ve been more dynamic than the established lukewarm chemistry between Yi-Che and Sho.)

As suggested, Song is one of the main antagonistic forces in the series. However rather than being a merciless force to be reckoned with or possessing an ineffable charismatic charm for audiences to make him memorable, Song possessed only one quality; to act as a threat and then fizzle out as quickly as he’d appeared onscreen.

Of course Song isn’t the main focus of the narrative. However considering his role in later events of the storyline as well as the notable absence of foreshadowing or drawing attention for viewers towards his onscreen presence, Song was a notably generic antagonist due to his anti-climactic exit by the latter-half of the movie.

The acting performances of the series are admittedly a mixed-bag. It’s wrong to make out these performances were "dire" or entirely "egregious " in the long-run, but it could often become a grating experience for viewers to witness inconsistent line deliverances and acting performances onscreen.

As for the challenge of pacing, ‘ Moon Child’ could often misstep its execution- cramming multiple genres, storylines, constant time-skips and shifts even into a 120 minute film could often feel somewhat overblown. Whilst the narrative was able to attain a certain entertaining edge from
subverting it’s tedious opening to a pacy and adrenal-infused storyline, Zeze rarely placed emphasis upon the art of " less is more".

As a consequence rather than reducing the movie’s length or themes in order to subtly focus upon a limited yet insightful scope of plot and characters, ‘ Moon Child’ became entrapped in its own self-made Gordian knot of cutout cliches, archetypes and incoherent plot logic from beginning to end.

The cinematography of ‘ Moon Child’ under Zeze’s directing reigns is admittedly an odd accumulation of amateurish shaky angles and shots during epic fight sequences, as well as some surprisingly stunning and impactful symbols placing emphasis upon the old cliche of cyclical narrative symbolism.

‘ Moon Child’ is a classic reflection of the culture of throwaway 2000s productions. Whilst Zeze’s move could be entertaining in parts with a particularly bittersweet ending , ‘ Moon Child’ often felt as though it bit off more than it could chew at times. Choppy execution, inconsistent pacing alongside a potentially intriguing premise with a multitude of loose and messy plot ends rarely helped viewers to feel connected or involved with ‘ Moon Child’’s world building. The acting rarely possessed solid deliverance throughout and in between over dramatic line deliverances and dialogue, the generic array of characters rarely left an everlasting impression for audiences either. Overall whilst ‘ Moon Child’ isn’t a bad watch, the movie is easily overshadowed by its lacking definitive qualities also.

Read More

Will ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ Treat Your Expectations?

TVING originals have long been held in regard by critics and viewers alike for slick cinematography and shots. However, ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ was an odd anomaly. The series’ shaky camera shots and editing presented the series as surprisingly mediocre for a TVNING original; a low-budget sitcom which whilst heartwarming in necessary parts, often struggled to truly deliver the last laugh.

Adapted from former doctor Jang Bong-Soo’s popular webcomic, the series revolved around Doctor Park Won Jang ( Lee Seo-jin); a seemingly third-rate doctor who has just opened his first medical clinic.

Despite constantly worrying about his recent onset of alopecia and his wife Sa Mo-Rim’s ( Ra Mi-Ran) overspending , Doctor Park’s dreams of becoming an affluent doctor are soon scuppered when his patient numbers begin to dwindle. Determined to turn things around, Doctor Park decides to do his utmost to save his clinic, even if it means unintentionally making things worse along the way…

Perhaps one notable thing to comment about the series is that ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ is a fairly lighthearted series for the most part. Whilst the series does delve into some darker and angst-ridden subject areas at times ( especially by the latter-half), screenwriter and director Seo Joon Bin was able to uplift the mood of the series with regards to one of the drama’s most questionable presences; the comic relief.

Admittedly it isn’t out of the question for a comedy series to experiment and diversify between different formats. This can often allow a series to reiterate satire, offer angst-free respite or even play around with wry comedy.

However one of the most apparent faults with screenwriter Joon Bin’s style is attempting miserably to strike a balance between being a jovial sitcom (fourth wall-breaking and comical setups ) and a more bittersweet , satirical brand of comedy ( particularly with its jokes surrounding capitalism, brands, medical condition and South-Korean work and social culture) but ended up doing both formats a disservice.

Admittedly ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ did attempt to offer viewers some emotional punches- a revelation from Dr.Park’s “tragic” past, several angst-ridden moments as well as a surprisingly uplifting and crisp ending along the way were specifically placed to evoke a twinge of sympathy and pity for viewers. Nevertheless, heartfelt moments were admittedly less impactful in the the long-term memory of viewers who will likely forget these moments after completing the series.

Lee Seo-jin ( ‘ Damo’, ‘ Yi San’ and ‘ Marriage Contract’) starred as main lead Park Won Jang, whilst costar Ra Mi-Ran ( ‘ The Himalayas’ ’, ‘ The Avengers Social Club’ and Black Dog ‘ ) played Won Jang’s wife and main female lead Sa Mo-Rim. Respectfully whilst both main leads’ performances could across as somewhat corny in parts, Ra and Lee offered solid performances throughout, with Ra Mi-Ran notably adding a surprisingly endearing charm to her onscreen persona.

The supporting cast offered decent performances. Whilst there were admittedly some strained deliverances of dialogue and acting, the supporting cast were able to offer some surprising charm during other moments in the drama.

In particular, the supporting cast included Cha Chung Hwa ( ‘ Harmony’, ‘ Black’ and ‘ Pawn’) as witty head nurse Choi Mi Young, Shin Eun Jung ( ‘East of Eden’, ‘ Faith’ and ‘ Navillera’) starring as angelic-faced yet acerbic- tongued Dr. Sun Woo Soo Jin , Kim Kwang Gyu ( ‘ Friend’, ‘ Scent Of A Woman’ and ‘ I Can Hear Your Voice’) playing mixed coffee-enthusiast , obstetrician and gynecologist Ji Min-Ji, Jung Hyung-Suk ( ‘ A Mystery Of The Cube’, ‘ The Banker’ and screenwriter and director for ‘ The Land of Seonghye’) as director of the urology department, whilst Seo Bum Jun ( ‘ Nevertheless’, ‘ Rookie Cops’) played the head nurse’s son and Joo Woo Yeon as well as child actor Kim Kang Hoon ( ‘ Mr Sunshine’, ‘ When The Camellia Blooms’ and ‘ Racket Boys’) took on the roles as Park’s two sons.
Due to the short length of the series, ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ is able to maintain a pacy speed throughout its duration. Naturally, the expedited narrative pacing did create a double-edged sword; fast-pacing helping to deescalate potentially tedious setups and scenarios, whilst sadly rarely giving opportunities and time to explore its odd array of characters and potentially tour de force moments either.

The cinematography of the series is notably a mixture of amateurish and surprisingly basic shots, as well as some insightful glimpses into the lives of our main characters. Whilst simplicity isn’t always necessarily bad per say, it could sometimes reduce opportunities in order to explore the intuitive shots or boast slick and unobstructed editing and cutting. The OST is also notably faintly memorable for viewers; helpful for promoting emotive moments and tones, but rarely delivering an impactful presence either.

Uplifting, lighthearted and melodramatic in parts, ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ is specifically what it says on the tin: a social comedy about a mediocre clinic with an array of eccentric characters being introduced onto the scene. The acting performances are decent enough but the deliverance of comic relief is admittedly variable. Perhaps the comical exchanges will generate a few laughs for audiences, whilst others may be dissatisfied by the generic setups and comical elements along the way. Overall, ‘ Dr Park’s Clinic’ is a decent binge-watch; watchable but lacking a certain memorable edge also.

Read More

‘Fishbowl Wives’ ; A Worthwhile Watch, Or A Waste Of Precious Time?

‘ Kingyo Tsuma’ ( alternatively known as ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ or ‘ 金魚妻’) is adapted from the eponymous psychological work by Kurosawa R . A mature and a surprisingly dark insight at times into the world of marriage, affairs and domestic abuse, ‘ Kingyo Tsuma’ is an intriguing if somewhat unrelieved portrayal into the fishbowl-like environment of main female lead Sakura Hiraga ( Shinohara Ryoko).

Hiraga is seemingly living the dream. She’s married to affluent hair stylist Hiraga Takuya( Ando Masanobu), she lives in an opulent penthouse apartment and she is envied by almost everyone that she knows.However as the saying goes: the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence.

Unbeknownst to others, the seemingly perfect Sakura Hiraga is an abuse-victim. Attacked physically and verbally by her husband on a regular basis, Hiraga likens herself to a goldfish stuck in a fishbowl; trapped in an inescapable situation with no way out.

It is due to her fascination with goldfish that Hiraga ends up encountering Toyoda Haruto ( Iwata Takanori). Toyoda is a kindhearted and younger man who owns a pet shop. After becoming enamoured by Hiraga, the female lead begins to question whether Todoya could be the key for her escaping from her megalomaniacal husband.

Screenwriter Tsubota Fumi has numerous works accredited under her name. Previously having worked upon ‘ Will I Be Single Forever ?’ (2021), Ojisan wa Kawaii Mono ga Osuki’ (2020) and ‘ Colorful Love: Genderless Danshi ni Aisareteimasu’ (2021), Fumi has notably had previous experience with adapting or writing somewhat “ avant garde” or unconventional screenplays.

This isn’t to entirely critique Fumi’s screenplay or the leadership of directors Matsuyama Hiroaki ( ‘ Mystery To Iunakare’, ‘ Switched’, ‘ Nobunaga Concerto’ ) and Namiki Michiko ( ‘ Mirai Nikki’, ‘Soredemo, Ikite Yuku’, ‘ Ichikei no Karasu’). The series did an excellent job through the writing reigns of Fumi and Hiroaki and Michiko’s lens perspective of making viewers feel uncomfortable during key moments. The topics exploited onscreen particularly revolving around infidelity, debauchery and domestic abuse could often purposefully make the viewer feel almost voyeuristic.

In addition to this it was apparent that ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ offered some wry and witty attempts at comic relief- a droll comic exchange or setup evidently drawing attention away from tense or angst-ridden moments in the series. However where ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ could admittedly feel somewhat limited was through the direction of writing .

The performances given by the main cast are certainly solid, with Shinohara Ryoko and Iwata Takanori particularly stealing the spotlight during tense or tour de force moments.

On the other hand whilst both leading actors’ idiosyncratic performances were certainly good, the onscreen chemistry between Ryoko and Takanori was admittedly somewhat stunted and inconsistent in parts .

Perhaps this isn’t entirely the fault of the actors. Whilst there is supposed to be an awkward barrier between their onscreen characters due to their respected age gap, it was often hard for viewers to truly engage with this “ developing” relationship due to the characters rarely having a lot of personal drive. ( Particularly with Sakura Hiraga. Although the female lead does develop and does make some life-changing decisions, there were many elements surrounding her seeming “ disregarded” dreams, her first meeting with Takuya as well as trauma which were often widely disregarded and limited opportunities in order to flesh out her character.)

Naturally this also had a knock-on effect with the plot. One of the focal and major drives of ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ narrative came through Hiraga and Haruto trying to find happiness. Whilst we did see opportunities as viewers towards Haruto and Hiraga’s feelings for one another blossoming and the impact of their relationship upon plot, the somewhat lukewarm venture into the characters’ mutual growth and chemistry with one another did restrict dynamic engagement with the audience.

As for the progression of the narrative, ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ is truly a trial of patience. Even for an eight episode miniseries the plot could feel somewhat tedious in parts and slightly dragged out. Admittedly the series did attempt to offer some distributed screen time upon the subplots revolving around Hiraga’s acquaintances, but due to limited screen time, these storylines felt somewhat rushed and sporadically placed.

The delivered ending is admittedly dependent on viewers’ expectations; some possible enjoying the bittersweet note and imagery, whilst others feeling somewhat disappointed by the lack of a concise conclusion.

Under the directing reigns of Hiroaki and Michiko, ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ is notably an assortment of bright palette schemes, symbols and motifs. ( One of the most reoccurring motifs throughout the series evidently being the goldfish; an important plot device for the main characters, as well as a symbol of irony and foreshadowing). In addition to this the OST is notably subtle yet synchronic with key scenes; somewhat generic in parts, but helping to heighten certain scenes also.

‘ Fishbowl Wives’ offered viewers with aesthetically pleasing scenes and decent performances by the cast. However whilst the series did offer viewers with an intriguing plot premise, ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ slowly began to meet its cataclysmic downfall as the series progressed. The ending of the series will certainly differ for audiences dependent on expectations, but helped to reinforce the assertion that ‘ Fishbowl Wives’ struggled at times to escape its own bubble of writing limitations also.

Read More

Is There A “Trace” Of Hope With Actually Trying To Watch ‘ Tracer’?

Procedural dramas, particularly ones revolving around mundane subject areas such as tax evasion or bureaucracy, can be a bore for viewers. However whilst ‘ Tracer’ is still not unable to evade its more tedious moments, under the directing reigns of Lee Seung Young ( ‘ Voice 2’, ‘ Missing Noir M’) and the writing tutorage of Kim Hyun Jung ( ‘ Who Are You: School 2015’), MBC’s ‘ Tracer’ possessed a surprisingly rigid plot motive from beginning to end.

The drama focused primarily upon male lead Hwang Dong-Joo ( Im Shi-wan). Formerly a disreputable accountant with his own personal vendetta , Dong-Joo ends up working as an investigator for the National Tax Service (NTS). However instead of ending up in a reputable and prestigious department of the NTS, Dong-Joo ends up being sent to division five; a dumping ground for undesirable and difficult cases by other departments.

Alongside the help of team investigator Seo Hye Young ( Go Ah-Sung), Chief Oh Young (Park Yong-woo) and his extensive knowledge into the field from his past , Dong-Joo is determined to stop at nothing in order to enact his own personal justice.

Kim Hyun Jung’s screenplay is notably dark in parts as well as primarily fixed upon the objective of the storyline. Whilst there are admittedly moments where certain overblown dialogue exchanges , Hyun Jung’s personal touch towards the series’ notably heartfelt plot moments and subject areas was surprisingly subtle, yet effective.

Arguably one of the star attractions of ‘ Tracer’ came through the casting choices. Im Si-Wan ( ‘ Misaeng: Incomplete Life’, ‘ Hell Is Other People’, ‘ Run On’) is particularly brilliant onscreen as main lead Hwang Dong-Joo;adding a surprising touch of charisma towards his role as the antiheroic main lead.

Costarring alongside Si-Wan was Go Ah-Sung ( ‘ The Host’, ‘ Snowpiercer’ and ‘ Samjin Company English Class’ ); a hesitant yet virtuous individual in the NTS, Park Young Woo (‘ Ditto’, ‘ My Scary Girl’ , ‘ Hwayi: A Monster Boy’ and ‘ Late Spring’) took on the part as the ridiculed yet talented Chief Oh Young, whilst Son Hyun-joo ( ‘ Tazza’, ‘ Secretly, Greatly’ and ‘ Empire Of Gold’) played antagonist and director of the Central Regional Tax Office, In Tae-Joon. All of the main cast were brilliant as our main leads; helping to flesh out and add a dynamic charm towards their onscreen personas.

However within the execution of ‘ Tracer’, the pacing could notably present a pitfall also. The drama’s attempt to stimulate the storyline’s narrative could often leads to the motives of characters, or the roles of key players rarely feeling elucidated. Perhaps this was also a consequence of a nonlinear narrative; rarely allowing certain moments for viewers to sit back and take in in the events of the storyline.

However perhaps one of the saving graces for ‘Tracer’ came through screenwriter Kim Hyun-jung’s ability to intertwine niche and predictable setups against moments which allowed opportunities to explore the wider scope of Dong-Joo. Whilst Hyun Jung could sometimes fall into a slightly cyclical pattern of a “ new dilemma” forcing Hyun Joo to keep on his toes, this did highlight diverging writing niches of characters being merely plot devices. Instead Hyun Joo and the supporting characters of the series were involved and attached towards the events and processes of the storyline; allowing opportunities in order to explore certain elements of character depth.

The dialogue is admittedly overblown in parts. However Hyun Jung did include some surprisingly witty and sardonic responses for Dong Joo, helping to personify his unpredictable nature to audiences throughout the series. The comic relief present in ‘ Tracer’ is notably an odd mixture between ferocious insults and name calling, as well as lighthearted and somewhat benign exchanges also.

‘ Tracer’ isn’t a series that will suit everyone’s personal tastes. However whilst ‘ Tracer’ focuses upon a notably mundane and simplistic formula, the execution of the narrative is surprisingly tactful. The acting performances are brilliant and solid throughout and whilst the finale helped to setup events for season two, ‘ Tracer’ is notably not without its more evident writing flaws here and there. Overall the first part of ‘ Tracer’ is notably a dynamic mixture of revenge, angst and wit in order to create a surprisingly entertaining drama along the way.

Read More

Is ‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’ Actually Worth Watching?

Produced as an original miniseries by Naver TV Cast, ‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’ ( ‘돈 라이 라희’) is a fairly lighthearted yet niche setup with an abundance predictable cliches along the way.

The series focuses upon the titular female lead and influencer Noh Ra Hee ( Kim Na Hyun). Despite having other 100,000 subscribers and a popular image, Ra Hee struggles to maintain her perfectionism . Instead Ra Hee has turned to fabricating a web of lies in order to boost her influencer persona. However when a particular lie leads her to running into childhood friend and her first love Seol Ho-won ( Kim Ji Woong), Ra Hee finds it even harder to keep her hidden secrets …

‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’ is notably a simplistic and lighthearted concept. Whilst the series was surprisingly compacted into its short duration time of four episodes, this did admittedly present a double-edged sword. A shorter and easygoing setup allowed the miniseries’ narrative to be expedited and wrapped up quickly, but it also highlighted a major dilemma also; there was no real sense of impending doom or growth ( even in a short space of time) for the characters.

It is important to reiterate that ‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’’s storyline and execution was limited from the outset with only four episodes . On the other hand whilst extended time can be a contributing factor towards writing a detailed and well-executed plot, certain short stories and mini dramas have proven time and time again that writing and the usage of plot is key also.

One of the most notable things about ‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’ is that even in a very short space of time, the series often struggled with trying to buildup the dilemma surrounding Rahee. Of course this isn’t to say it wasn’t apparent from the outset or nonexistent but aside from some cutesy exchanges between Ho-Won and Rahee onscreen, a multitude of selfies taken by Rahee, or a heart to heart chat with Rahee’s close friend Go Min-yeong ( Choi Yeon Soo), it was hard to really pinpoint precise moments ( aside from the final episode) when the storyline really permitted a climatic build or sense of unease for the audience.

The acting of the miniseries is admittedly decent enough. There were admittedlt a few abrupt moments of awkwardly delivered dialogue and interactions but the main cast, specifically Kim Na Hyun and Kim Ji Woong, were certainly charming enough.

Former SONAMOO member and actress Kim Na Hyun ( ‘ The Miracle’, ‘ Café Kilimanjaro’) played main female lead Noh Ha Ree.

As a character, Ra Hee is fairly hard for audiences to warm up to. Initially whilst she is supposed to be haughty, fractious and evidently flawed through her multiple shared falsehoods, it was difficult to really feel pity for Ra Hee during seemingly sympathetic moments in the final part.
Perhaps one of the key reasons for viewers feeling somewhat disengaged from this seemingly “ quintessential” character came through the fact that there were few redeeming moments or even opportunities to see past Ra Hee’s false pretences early on.

Of course throughout the narrative, we are supposed to see Ra Hee “ grow” by her rekindled feelings for Ho-won as well as her confession in the final course of the narrative. On the other hand whilst this did resonate a certain sympathetic tone with audiences, it was hard to really grasp how Ra Hee truly matured or developed as a character, or at least painted in a more sympathetic light early on by foreshadowing or trying to build up her storyline subtly more even in a short space of time.

Costarring alongside Kim Na Hyun was idol-actor Kim Ji Woong ( ‘ The Sweet Blood’, ‘ Kissable Lips’) as leading man Seol Ho-Won.

Reserved, slightly brooding, good-looking and altruistic, Ho-Woon embodied all of the stereotypical tropes surrounding a main lead and a potential love interest with differing results. Whilst is arguable that Ho-Woon was a a necessary component for the events of storyline and for Ra Hee’s character , Ho-Woon was a shoehorned archetype. He was kindhearted and sweet but aside from his ambivalent feelings for Ra Hee and helping her in different ways, Ho Woon rarely had prominent flaws or at least notable drives as a character. Instead Ho Woon came across as a carte blanche main male lead; necessary for keeping the plot afloat, but rarely sticking out as a sentient or driven character.

On the other hand it is undeniable that the chemistry between lead actors Kim Na Hyun and Kim Ji Woong was prominent throughout the short series. Despite some limited dialogue and situations, Na Hyun and Ji Woong were able to power through with surprisingly natural and coherent chemistry from beginning to end.

The quality of production and filming is admittedly to be expected for a miniseries. ( Although notably slightly glossier than some productions due to the corporate funding by Naver.) It’s slightly limited by settings and quality of camera angles and gradients in parts, but certainly not bad either.

Overall ‘ Don’t Lie, Rahee’ truly epitomizes a “ binge-watch” miniseries; shortly compacted into less than twenty minute episodes and easy enough to watch in one sitting. The acting is solid enough and whilst there were a few questionable moments, the chemistry between our main leads was surprisingly dynamic. The storyline is limited by certain elements of writing, execution and buildup, but did offer enough opportunities in for those willing to disengage and embark into a lighthearted and fluffy viewing session.

Read More

Let’s Talk About ‘ Love And Leashes’, Baby…

“Controversial”, “risky” and “unconventional” are some of the immediate buzz-words which come to mind when talking about Netflix’s South-Korean movie ‘ Love and Leashes’.

Directed by Park Hyun Jin( ‘ The Color Of A Woman’) and based upon the webtoon ( 모럴센스), ‘ Love and Leashes’ focuses upon office worker Jung Ji Hoo ( Lee Jun Young). Clean-cut, professional and adored by his female coworkers, Ji Hoo has always been able to maintain his prudish persona . However in reality “prim and proper” Ji Hoo hides a deep secret from his peers; he’s a BDSM enthusiast.

When bemused coworker Jung Ji Woo ( Seo Hyun) unknowingly stumbles upon his salacious desires through an open package, Ji Hoo soon finds his sexual fantasies awakened when he enters a consensual-contractual “slave and master” relationship with his coworker. However as their risqué relationship begins to play out, Ji Woo and Ji Hoo soon finds themselves questioning their sincere feelings for one another along the way…

Perhaps one of the most notable things which should be said about ‘ Love and Leashes’ is that it is a daring concept . Topics of sexual and amorous relationships have certainly been explore beforehand in South-Korean productions such as ‘ You’re My Pet’ ( adapted from its Japanese predecessor ‘ Kimi Wa Petto’), or more sardonically throughout ‘ The Handmaiden’ , ‘ Thirst’ and ‘ Happy End’ . However due to a respectfully conservative atitude towards sexual content in South-Korean culture and media , it is still slightly unusual to see this topic addressed in mainstream popular culture .

Despite its eyebrow-raising premise, ‘ Love and Leashes’ surprisingly starts off as a somewhat lighthearted rom-com and office drama. Jung Ji Hoo is established as a smooth-talker and highly liked by his superiors who tries to avoid conflict, whereas Jung Ji Woo is an “ everyday” office worker with a slightly stubborn streak. ( Helping viewers to understand the dynamic between the characters as well as foreshadow their later roles within their racy relationship.)

However despite the somewhat niche early setup, ‘ Love and Leashes’ wasn’t afraid to delve slightly deeper into some issues in the workplace- sexism , prejudice as well as several references towards homophobia and sexual harassment , bustling their way into the film’s early workplace vernacular .

Nevertheless whilst praise must be given towards director Park Hyun Jin’s open address of these current issues early on in the film’s narrative , it is hard to ignore that these references were rarely touched upon after their initial use. ( In theory this dynamic could’ve easily been explained more within the nature of the narrative.)

Yet ‘ Love and Leashes’’ seemingly mundane workplace setup soon begins to into an amalgamation of lighthearted and riskier comedy after main female lead Ji Woo stumbles upon the package.

For those expecting ‘ Love and Leashes’ to be a series revolving entirely around erotica and debauchery, it is noteworthy that ‘ Love and Leashes’ is predominantly a romantic comedy. Risqué and sexually suggestive jokes and setups were mainly used as the necessary pretext behind a surprisingly warm-hearted romantic love story for the main leads.

Naturally this isn’t to say that Park Hyun Jin wasn’t afraid to delve deeper into depicting the misconceptions and taboos surrounding fetishises, hedonism and casual relationships. The narrative would often diverge away from the typical tropes surrounding setups of sexual fantasies being “ nauseating”, “ unhealthy” or “ encouraging sexual abuse”, by instead shedding light into a fairly positive, consensual and healthy relationship between the main leads .

Yet when the film’s narrative wasn’t driving home messages about sensuality or comic relief, ‘ Love and Leashes’ did surprisingly touch upon some sentimental moments surrounding its main characters. In particular this became apparent through . Ji Woo’s uncertainty and gradually growing mixed feelings for her coworker , as well as Ji Hoo’s own struggles with his dating life. However whilst these elements of the storyline were present in ‘ Love and Leashes’, the backstories and problems surrounding the characters were often limited and subdued by the plot. As a consequence it could often feel as though our main leads were roughly sketched out as individuals; necessary plot devices for keeping the storyline afloat, but rarely being given definitive sentience also.

Of course it is hard to ignore the somewhat controversial casting choices also. Former U-KISS member Lee Jun Young ( ‘ Class of Lies’, ‘ D.P’, ‘ Imitation’ and ‘ Let Me Be Your Knight’ ; plays the unusual role of main male lead Jung Ji Hoo, whilst costar and Girl’s Generation’s Seo Hyun( ‘ Private Lives’) takes on the role as main female lead Jung Ji Woo. However despite the somewhat surprising and controversial cast decisions, Seo Hyun and Lee Jun Young were delightful as our main leads. ( Both actors also openly spoke in interviews about their initial surprise upon reading the context of the script, alongside their enjoyment at being able to take on different roles.)

Admittedly the onscreen chemistry between both stars felt somewhat stunted in early parts of the film. Initial “ role play” scenes came across as awkwardly delivered for audiences ( in particular one scene surrounding Jun Young attempting to literally embody a “ dog”). However as the narrative progresses and allowed opportunities for their characters to grow, their chemistry did become more apparent.

The pacing is admittedly tightly-packed in the first half. Whilst this did allow opportunities in order to delve deeper into the characters’ relationship and certain issues, it did provide to be a double-edged sword. This is mainly due to the fact that the second half downplayed the pacing with a notably slower and sharper focus upon the bittersweet elements of the characters; prominent but admittedly rushed in the course of the movie. The attempted climax served in the latter-half felt somewhat anticlimactic. There was little buildup or foreshadowing and whilst the ending did serve a somewhat cheerful resolution for the events of ‘ Love and Leashes’, viewers may feel a little disorientated in parts with the storyline.

Under the directing reigns of Park Hyun Jin, ‘ Love and Leashes’ was notably a multitude of slick and professional cuts, scenes, editing and gradients. Notably Hyun Jin placed heavy focus upon the contrasting tones of minimalistic everyday life and the office, against the lustful neon, vivid and lively palettes surrounding Ji Hoo and Ji Woo’s role play sessions. ( One of the most striking scenes of the film came through Ji Hoo’s birthday “ present” . Against the pallid tones of the room’s surroundings, Ji Hoo’s present in an unopened black box, a pair of patent ruby red heels, greatly sticks out for viewers to visually engorge.)

It is notable that the OST is sparsely placed in the movie. ( Aside from the opening credits, emotional buildup moments and the ending.) Instead under the directing reigns of Park Hyun Jin, ‘ Love and Leashes’ is predominantly focused upon the characters’ dialogue exchanges and interactions. When the OST is present it is climatic; helping to reflect the emotional scope of characters and situations.

Despite its unusual setup and premise , ‘ Love and Leashes’ was foremost a love story between its main leads. It is arguably one of Netflix’s riskier moves from South-Korean production in recent years. Nevertheless despite the somewhat expected controversy surrounding the movie’s casting choices, Seo Hyun and Lee Jun Young’s onscreen chemistry and performances were solid and dynamic. The themes surrounding ‘ Love and Leashes’ are versatile if somewhat stunted in parts, but surprisingly delivered a sweet and risqué romance along the way.

Read More

‘ Dear Ex’; A Surprisingly Heartwarming Film…

Directed and cowritten by Mag Hsu and Chih-Yen Hsu as well as screenwriter Lu Shih Yuan, ‘ Dear Ex’ is a movie which will likely not appeal to everyone with its soap-opera style cliches and setups.

However despite some notable flaws and inconsistencies which could be found in ‘ Dear Ex’, the prominent messaging placed upon real-life issues such as homophobia , love, intolerance, teen-angst and familial relationships, arguably presented a somewhat niche plot line with an air of gritty complexity and heartfelt moments along the way.

After his father Zhengyuan (Spark Chen) dies of cancer, it is revealed that the beneficiary of the will is not Cheng-xi ( Joseph Huang) but Jay (Roy Chu), his father’s gay lover. Embarrassed and angered, Cheng-xi’s mother Liu Sanlian (Ying-Xuan Hseih), desperately tries to reclaim her late husband’s money, in order to afford her son’s tuition and the family’s cost of living — a process that alternately entails coercion and attempted blackmail.

Yet Cheng-xi, fed up of his mother’s manipulation , opts to live with free-spirited Jay instead. As Cheng-Xi and Jay become surprisingly close during their cohabitation, Cheng- Xi soon begins to question his loyalties towards his mother and his previous beliefs .

Directors Chih-Yen Hsu and Mag Hsu present ‘ Dear Ex’ with a melodrama edge. Nevertheless during quintessential moments, the directors aren’t afraid to place emphasis upon the narrative’s complex edges; the deeply fraught family history, Sanlian’s feelings of fury and rage by her husband’s decisions and affair, as well as the tragic decline of Zhengyuan’s health and spirit. In particular Sanlian’s change from the niche archetype of the overbearing mother and wife during her initial introduction, allowed opportunities for the directors in order to flesh-out her character as the storyline progressed.

Despite thematic themes hinting that ‘ Dear Ex’ should be a coming of age movie for Cheng-Xi, Chih-Yen Hsu and Mag Hsu placed greater emphasis upon tragic and ill-fated romances and immense pathos for its array of onscreen characters with equal sympathy. However despite Taiwan’s liberal stance upon same-sex marriage and LGBT rights, the movie still highlighted the presiding underbelly of prejudice within Taiwanese culture and society- homophobia and gay slurs often arising during key moments in order to expose this. In addition to this, ‘ Dear Ex’ also allowed some golden-opportunities for character development. One of the most intriguing and climatic in the movie’s narrative surrounding the rocky relationship between Jay and Sanlian; merging from contempt, to animosity before developing into mutual sympathy.

However whilst the non-linear narrative gave a smoothly edited storyline, ‘ Dear Ex’ could often lean into greater problems of incoherent plot holes. Despite some desperate attempts in order to wrap up certain key plot points, viewers were often left in the dark towards reasons and drive within the narrative. ( In particular the decision for Jay to become the main beneficiary, excluding Cheng-Xi entirely.)

The acting performances of the series are solid. Admittedly there were certain line deliverances which could feel somewhat enforced or lacking tact, the main cast were decent enough onscreen. Child actor Joseph Huang and actor Roy Chiu were particularly dynamic onscreen ; offering surprisingly emotional yet dynamic performances throughout the movie.

The pacing of the movie is slow in parts. Naturally it is arguable that certain scenes had to be slowed down in order to focus and build upon characters. On the other hand whilst the storyline did offer some expedited storyline moments, the inconsistent balance could sometimes limit opportunities in order to patch up weaker moments of dialogue, plot holes and character writing also.

Aside from integrating an array of flashbacks into the narrative, it is undeniable that under the directing reigns of Chih-Yen Hsu and Mag Hsu, ‘ Dear Ex’ is visually aesthetic . The emphasis upon vivid palette schemes are brought to life through emerald, scarlet and ruby red tones- helping to bring to life the emotional scope of the movie’s characters. In particular the usage of childish doodles surrounding Cheng Xi, amateurishly superimposed in parts, undeniably helped to captivate the medium for Cheng Xi’s transition into adulthood alongside his ideologies throughout the course of the film. The OST was notably subtle throughout its usage in the background of scenes; a little insipid in parts, but synchronic nonetheless.

Overall ‘ Dear Ex’ is admittedly a niche setup with seemingly archetypical characters and relationships. On the other hand whilst the movie could often fall into the pitfall of barely fleshed-out narrative points, Chih-Yen Hsu and Mag Hsu’s ‘ Dear Ex’ was a surprisingly exposure into the mindsets of its intriguing array of characters, as well as a societal critique into the clashing traditions of new and old in Taiwan. ‘ Dear Ex’ is undeniably flawed in parts, but is surprisingly heartfelt at times also.

Read More

Reviewing In Retrospect; ‘ Hana Yori Dango’

Four years after the Taiwanese hit series ‘ Meteor Garden’, Japanese network TBS finally commissioned the rights for adapting their own series based upon mangaka Yoko Kamio’s ‘ Hana Yori Dango’.

Despite the critically-mixed 1995 Japanese movie sharing the same title, TBS’ ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ marked the first domestic and televised production adaptation of Kamio’s manga onscreen .

After the unimaginable success across Asia of ‘ Meteor Garden’, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ was undeniably left in its predecessor’s shadow. Nevertheless whilst perhaps ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ did struggle to attain the same international success as the Taiwanese adaptation, the Japanese series was well-received domestically as well as amongst small circles of international drama enthusiasts at the time.

The series marked the breakthrough roles and the array of talents from several young and familiar faces in the Japanese acting industry ( especially Inoue Mao, Matsumoto Jun and Oguri Shun), as well as gain successful popularity through a sequel season and a movie adaptation also. However despite the drama’s praiseworthy reception for being one of the most “ underrated” adaptations, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ cannot escape from its flaws either.

Similar to its predecessor( ‘ Meteor Garden’) and its source material, TBS’ ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ reimburses the “ Modern Cinderella” tale with “ mundane” main female lead Tsukushi Makino ( Inoue Mao). Makino is an ordinary middle-class girl who attends the elitist and and private Eitoku Gakuen through an acclaimed scholarship. However despite the prestige for attending the school, Makino is regularly sickened by the materialistic beliefs and principles of her wealthy classmates. Determined, Makino pledges that she’ll keep her head down until graduation.

However despite her obstinate decision, Makino’s plans are soon scuppered when she ends up befriending Sanjo Sakurako ( Sato Megumi). Sakurako ends up on the wrong side of the notorious Tsukasa Domyouji ( Matsumoto Jun). The conglomerate heir of one of Japan’s richest families and the ring leader of the school’s notorious clique, the F4, Tsukasa is renowned for his merciless bullying tactics . In particular, Tsukasa is associated with sending his signature “ red card”; the recipient being instantly labelled as a social pariah by the rest of the school.

Unable to sit back and watch her new friend suffer, Makino declares war on the leader of the F4. Nevertheless despite Tsukasa’s red card and bullying schemes , Makino finds comfort and determination to carry on through her crush on mysterious and suave F4 member, Hanazawa Rui ( Oguri Shun).

Meanwhile Tsukasa’s growing contempt and fascination for the female lead soon provides to complicate matters further, as Domyouji Tsukasa finds himself falling in love with Makino Tsukishi. As Makino finds herself torn between her complicated feelings, Tsukasa’s estranged and fierce mother Domyouji Kaede ( Kaga Mariko) proves only to complicate matters further…

Adapted to the small screen by a small screen of different directors ( Katayama Osamu, Ishii Yasuharu and Yamamuro Daisuke) and screenwriters ( Takuma Takayuki, Fujimoto Yuki, Takahashi Natsuko and Arai Shuuko), ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ has often been cited by aficionados of the franchise as one of the most “ faithful” adaptations to date. ( Although the series does notably adapt and tweak certain events from the manga in order to expedite storyline.)

The series is notably lighthearted and niche in parts. The comical elements of the series rely heavily upon sociocultural and sociolinguistic jokes which whilst offering certain comical relief , can be harder to grasp for audience members unfamiliar with Japanese culture.( One of the most notable gags in the series found through the original manga joke surrounding Tsukasa’s malapropisms, the “lessons” taught by Makino’s father [ Kobayashi Susumu] to her younger brother Makino Susumu [ Tomiura Satoshi] , as well as Tsukishi’s boss and dumpling store owner Sengoku Sachiyo[ Kato Takako]’s “eventful” past with famous celebrities.)

Nevertheless despite some over-the-top jokes within ‘ Hana Yori Dango’, the narrative could surprisingly take a wistful edge at times also. Domyouji’s estranged relationship with his mother is brief yet subtly tumultuous for audiences, whilst the throbbing teen-angst surrounding Makino’s feelings and Hanazawa Rui’s unrequited love for his sister-figure Todo Shizuka ( Sada Mayumi), is given a bittersweet presence within the events of the narrative.

On the other hand it’s undeniable that ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ isn’t a storyline inescapable from predictable and shoehorned tropes. The events surrounding the female lead’s “ dilemmas” as well as the archetypes of “ niche bullies” or “ twists” often led to predictable outcomes. As a consequence, it was apparent that ‘ Hana Yori Dango’’s heavy reliance upon themes surrounding bullying, assault and blackmail were
quintessential for the events of the storyline, but were given a ham-fisted approach by the writers.

Despite Mao Inoue debuting as an actress around the age of five, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ is still considered one of Inoue’s breakout roles playing main female lead Tsukishi Makino. The young actress’ performance is admittedly slightly exaggerated in parts with certain line deliverances and comical dialogue exchanges often falling flat at certain times . Nevertheless, Inoue Mao was able to carry on through her performances during some of the drama’s more sincere and heartfelt moments with a dynamic charm.

As a character, Tsukishi Makino is notably headstrong, resilient as well as kindhearted. Whilst it is important to respect that other incarnations of the character are variable and independent from one another, it is notable that Makino’s inability to bend so easily at first to the will of Domyouji Tsukasa gave her a slightly more tactful and resilient edge at times than other versions. On the other hand similar to numerous counterparts, Makino could often feel as though she was somewhat dulled by her greater character drives and goals outside of her “ potential” love interests.

Costarring alongside Mao was Matsumoto Jun. A member of the famous ARASHI boyband, Matsumoto Jun’s performance as Domyouji Tsukasa was admittedly heartfelt as well as somewhat dull in parts. Jun’s comical or lighthearted exchanges could sometimes lack finesse. On the other hand Jun’s prior acting experience in dramas such as ‘ Gokusen’ seemed to come to good use during heart-wrenching moments of the series, by adding an angst-ridden charm to his onscreen persona also.

Domyouji Tsukasa is an interpretative character for screenwriters and directors alike. However Tsukasa’s character archetype has notably fallen into two categories throughout past adaptations; fractious, jovial and angsty, or satirical, brooding and unpredictable. As it happens Jun’s Domyouji Tsukasa notably fell into the latter category for most of the series. ( Similar to his manga counterpart.)Tsukasa did notably have his “ darker” character moments, but the screenplay was heavily focused upon presenting a more lighthearted as well as a “ complicated” familial scenario for Tsukasa. However similar to his manga counterpart and other adaptations, Tsukasa’s greatest character flaw could often be found through his inability to truly repent or be remorseful over his actions or treatment of others; offering limited character development at times for the male lead.

Then of course there’s Oguri Shun as second male lead Hanazawa Rui. Similar to his costar Mao Inoue, Shun’s acting career began during his childhood. On the other hand prior to his role in ‘ Hana Yori Dango’, Shun notably took on the roles of “unusual” characters such as his parts in ‘ Great Teacher Onizuka’, ‘ Summer Snow’ and ‘ Gokusen’.

Whilst playing the role as suave and mysterious Hanazawa Rui was certainly not a stretch for Shun, it seemed an unusual casting choice and decision for the actor to take on a “romantic potential love interest” role which could’ve easily been one-dimensional. Although Shun’s performance is somewhat limited in parts by dialogue and interactions, the acting surprisingly gave the second male-lead a charismatic and beguiling charm for audiences.

Hanazawa Rui’s onscreen counterparts have always differed. Whilst certain adaptations have depicted Rui as sweet, easygoing and somewhat flatline second male lead, others have stayed more faithful to the original manga by depicting Rui’s mysterious, cool-headed and taciturn personality. Naturally the Japanese version of Hanazawa Rui does make some nuanced changes towards Rui as a character in comparison to his predecessor and manga counterpart. On the other hand whilst Rui had his own character drive and a battle of ambivalent feelings, the second male lead could feel somewhat shoehorned into the plot through various scenarios as the narrative professed.

The chemistry between our main leads is admittedly variable. Whilst there are heart-wrenching and lighthearted moments where the onscreen chemistry between Shun, Inoue and Matsumoto could feel natural and concise, there were other moments in the series where this could feel limited and slightly stunted by plot.

Aside from the main cast, there is also Mimasaka Akira ( Abe Tsuyoshi) and Nishikado Sojiro ( Matsuda Shota), fellow F4 members, who whilst gradually developing an unlikely friendship with Makino and necessary at times for major plot dilemmas , could often feel somewhat staid and shoehorned into scenarios. Similar to the flawed position of Sojiro and Akira, there is also Makino’s best friend Matsuoka Yuki ( Nishihara Aki) and Tsukasa’s older sister, Domyouji Tsubaki ( Matsushima Nanako); supportive and kindhearted characters , but rarely having sentient character-drive also.

Hana Yori Dango’s narrative notably follows the first major arc of the manga with a fair degree of accuracy . ( Although notably certain minor events and characters are left out or tweaked.) The storyline is notably fast-paced during initial events and is mainly pacy in parts. Nevertheless by the halfway mark, the narrative notably slows down in order to focus on a dragged-out plot dilemma as well as the gradual events leading up to the finale. Whilst this wasn’t entirely a bad writing decision per say and did allow opportunities in order to focus on sentimental elements of the storyline, it could often create a slightly grating experience in parts for viewers by the second-half.

Under the directing reigns of the trio,’ Hana Yori Dango’ is notably an eclectic array of slick editing and shots as well as somewhat amateurish and sloppy editing techniques. Of course whilst it is important to review this in retrospect, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ could still feel dated at times with its filming even for a 2000s drama. Nevertheless it is notable that despite some dated technology for modern viewers, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ is one of the few adaptations in the series which helped to captivate the authentic wealthiness of its characters through flashing well-known haute couture fashion brands onscreen. ( TBS’ sponsorship deals certainty paid off well .)

The OST is also very memorable, especially the array of instrumentals- mostly variations of the same theme. Whilst some of these tracks could often blend into one another, one of the most striking tracks during heartfelt moments of the drama came through a euphonious version of the theme, ‘ Blue Mind’; climatic, heartwarming and surprisingly subtle.

Overall ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ offered viewers with a luxurious and fairly faithful adaptation of Kamio’s beloved franchise. Whilst modern viewers may struggle to relate towards the somewhat insipid presentation of themes, shoehorned tropes and dated technology, ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ does offer viewers with a somewhat simplistic and bubbly charm. The acting is decent enough and whilst there are some inconsistencies at times, the onscreen chemistry between Matsumoto and Inoue is surprisingly sweet and engaging. The ending of the series offered viewers with a cliffhanger. Whilst this did allow the drama to setup events for the sequel season, it did admittedly leave the finale of ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ slightly rushed in parts. Nevertheless ‘ Hana Yori Dango’ was a surprisingly decent adaptation with a surprisingly engaging charm and appeal for audiences.

Read More

‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’; Intriguing Premise, But Relentlessly Dragging…

Korean folklore and mythology paired together with elements of horror and fantasy are certainly not new to the world of K-dramas. From director Jang Young-woo(‘Mr. Sunshine’, ‘Sweet Home’, ) alongside screenwriters Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won ( ‘The Guest’), ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ offered viewers with a seemingly woeful revenge fantasy epic. However whilst the intriguing premise and impressive cast lineup will certainly hook and entice viewers, ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ ‘ lacklustre plot , pacing and character-writing became more prominent as the storyline progressed.

In the early exposition of the narrative , Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won attempted to foreground the events from six hundred years ago surrounding the inauspicious birth of main lead Dan Hwal ( Lee Jin-wook). Deemed cursed, Dan Hwal is transformed into a bulgasal ( a vampire-like immortal creature that feasts on human blood), while heroically fighting monsters as a solider. Hwal is determined not to throw away his humanity and seeks out revenge against the former-bulgasal who cursed him. No longer a prisoner of mortality and time, Hwal desperately seeks out the creature’s reincarnations throughout the centuries.

A present day time-skip reveals to the audience that Hwal believes that he’s found the former-bulgasal’s current incarnation Min Sang-Woon (Kwon Na Ra) . However there’s a catch; Sang-Woon is a mortal human. Together with her sister Min Shi Ho ( Gong Seung Yeon), the siblings have spent most of their childhood running away from monsters that most would only believe existed in fairytales. Sang-Woon soon finds her life ineffably intertwined with the monster who she’d be told to fear the most; the bulgasal. Hwal and Sang-Woon find that fate has had a mysterious way of bringing them together as past incarnations of people from the past soon enter their lives. However, the mysterious appearance of sadistic bulgasal Ok Eul Tae ( Lee Joon) soon threatens their fates. With his personal vendetta and morbid fascination with Hwal, Eul Tae is determined to stop at nothing to enact his own revenge.

While screenwriters Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won do give comical moments throughout the drama it is important to establish that these are sparse and spread out. ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ isn’t a series for the lighthearted . The storyline focused upon elements of grim suspense ( particularly through the appearance of the monsters)as well as gratuitous gore . Nevertheless despite some stunning aesthetics surrounding fight scenes, the abundance of explicit violence in director Jang Young-woo’s fantasy series has been received with mixed reception also.

Naturally it isn’t out of the question for a series that primarily focuses upon blood-drinking entities and malicious monsters to delve into bloodthirsty scenes. In fact it is even arguable that the absence of violence from the series would not have allowed director Jang Young Woo to have a wider scope towards exploring and captivating the tainted and savage world of the characters.

On the other hand for a series which attempted to present itself as an narrative immersed with complex and psychologically conflicted characters, it felt odd that ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’’ heavy reliance upon gore and violence for shock-value thrills would rarely allow opportunities in order to flesh-out weaker characters, plot holes or quintessentially deliver an impactful coup de grâce by the ending of the series.

The acting of the series could admittedly have several slip ups with line deliverances but the main cast were fairly dynamic onscreen. Actor Lee Jin-Wook has long been typecast in rom-coms . However, since his venture into different genres through ‘ Voice’ and having previously worked alongside director Jang Young-woo in ‘ Sweet Home’, it should come as no surprise to viewers that Jin-Wook carries himself well onscreen as main lead Hal. The actor added a surprising touch of heartache and mystery to his onscreen persona which, whilst slightly limited by the scope of script, did give Hal an intriguing streak for audiences .

Mysterious, reserved and powerful, Hal is an intriguing main character with many notable flaws and strengths. Despite his curse Hal is able to retain his humanity due many personal drives throughout the series. Nevertheless whilst Hal’s motives were admirable, there was always a slight sense of dull focus upon Hal truly struggling or being presented with more conflict ( due to initial foreshadowing) with his primal instincts . Of course whilst there is the argument that Hal may have used six-hundred years to practice self-restraint, but, it did seem odd that this wasn’t a conflicting trait for a character to struggle more ( even in flashbacks) with an obstacle against his seeming crusade to regain humanity throughout the storyline .

This could’ve easily been presented even in his seeming complicated antagonistic counterpart Eul Tae; a bond which whilst necessary for plot-drive rarely delivered an impactful blow. In addition to this even as someone who was ‘detached’ from human history, it seemed an odd plot fall that Hal rarely gave insight into meeting past incarnations, figures or people throughout this period of time.( Aside from the initial exposition and some brief “ historic” photos shown between the past and present .)

Then of course Jin Wook’s costar Kwon Na Ra as the main female lead of the series. A former idol, Na Ra’s acting portfolio from ‘ My Suspicious Partner’ and ‘ My Mister’ to ‘ Doctor Prisoner’ and ‘ Itaewon Class’ , has certainly given an opportunity for Na Ra to express her eclectic range of acting abilities onscreen. The actress added a surprising level of angst and mystery onscreen helping to convey a natural and mysterious charm to her onscreen role as Min Sang-Woon. Nevertheless, whilst Na Ra is a dynamic actress , her character was arguably very limited by the writing .

It isn’t necessarily bad per say how the drama’s narrative introduced us to Sang-Woon and her sister through initial flashbacks. It allowed us as viewers to comprehend the world that Sang-Woon and Shi Ho have been forced into as a consequence of impending fate, as well as foreshadowing her initial meeting with the main lead . On the other hand, here’s where we do hit a pitfall with Sang-Woon as a character; she’ never really feels as though she has a personal-drive, definitive flaws or goals. It is arguable that perhaps Sang-Woon’s main goal has been to protect her sister and her naivety has proven to be one of her downfalls. On the other hand for a character brought up under unusual circumstances, it seemed odd that the drama rarely pointed out Sang Woon truly being shaped or affected by her environment. Even if her gullible nature is viewed as an arguable weakness of her character, it seem bizarre that other characters ( especially her sister) didn’t point this out or at least draw expectations towards her personality being different from her seemingly “abnormal” upbringing.

Sang Woon and Hal’s unusual bond is presented as seemingly one of the major driving forces of the series. Whilst there is arguably a slight romantic tension between Jin-Wook and Na Ra’s onscreen personas, their relationship is platonic for the most part. Nevertheless whilst it was intriguing to watch Hal and Sang Woon’s bond develop from animosity to sincere trust, both main leads’ relationship could often feel somewhat
stagnant at times. This seemed to come as a result of both main leads’ interactions often feeling enforced and shoehorned into plot setups. As a consequence , this allowed limited opportunities in order to flesh-out characters outside of the “ main events” of the narrative.

Then of course there’s the discussion surrounding Ok Eul Tae. A-lister Lee Joon is no stranger towards taking on different roles throughout his acting career, and his part in the series as Hal’s fellow bulgasal and opponent, Ok Eul Tae, was no exception. Joon added a somewhat twisted charisma to his onscreen persona; likely to shock and intrigue viewers of equal measure.

As an antagonist, Eul Tae is supposed to serve as Hal’s opposing counterpart; he’s sardonic, remorseless and unpredictable. In order to reiterate the opposing natures of Eul Tae and Hal beyond spoken words, director Jang Young-woo would often cleverly place heavy focus through camera angles upon the characters’ clothing. Eul Tae’s bright, expensive and somewhat gaudy suits presenting his illusive personality, whilst Hal’s somewhat drab and dull attire highlighted the main lead’s honest nature.Nevertheless whilst Eul Tae acted as the necessary “ driving force” of the events of the series, the main antagonist rarely left an everlasting impression upon audiences due to often being present as shoehorned “ for the sake of evil”. His rivalry, origins and intrigue surrounding another bulgasal could’ve easily been the most intriguing element in the series. However, lacking opportunities to truly delve into character parallelisms and differences between the main lead, the antagonist and other side character presented few opportunities to make Eul Tae a truly terrifying or well-defined opposing threat. As a consequence Eul Tae could often feel akin to a plot device “ dilemma”; easy to thrown into the equation to present conflict but rarely possessing a definitive edge.

Actress Gong Seung Yeon ( ‘ Are You Human?’, ‘ Circle’ and ‘Flower Crew: Joseon Marriage Agency’) takes on the role as Sang-Woon’s level-headed sister Shi-Ho.Shi Ho was notably intriguing due to her contrasting personality-type to Sang-Woo; she’s less naive, reserved and observant also. On the other hand whilst Shi Ho did serve her necessary purpose for “ plot drive” and revelations in the series, the second female lead could rarely feel entirely sentient due to her lacking opportunities to truly grow or be defined by her own personality traits. ( In particular a massive plot revelation surrounding Shi Ho was left greatly abandoned after its initial use in the series.)

Additionally there’s Nam Do Yoon ( Kim Woo Seok). Whilst Nam Do Yoon was necessary for adding “ shocking twists” in an attempt to keep the plot afloat a, it often felt as though these revelations were predictable outcomes . Screenwriters Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won seemed to create Do Yoon purely on the basis of plot-motivation; attempting to shock and surprise viewers with Do Hoon’s revealed reasons and motives for being in the storyline, but lacking the element of shock or an emotive punch due to lacking foundations surrounding Do Yoon as a character from the outset. Kwon Ho Yeol ( Jung Jin Young) and Hye Suk ( Park Myung Shin) also presided in the supporting cast ; potentially playing intriguing characters, but rarely having personal character-drive.

The pacing of the narrative was admittedly not one of the drama’s fortes. Whilst a pacy opening gave leeway towards downplaying later elements of the storyline in order to build suspense, ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ notably fell into the trap of repetitive storyline events. Potentially intriguing opportunities in order to build up characters’ personalities, backstories or even relationships were cast aside in order to make way for a gradually dwindling “ threat” in each passing episode. However rather than attempting to at least create a fearsome presence for the antagonistic force onscreen, ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ notably became hooked on tiresomely dragging out events beyond their expiration date.

Under the directing reigns of Jang Young-Woo, ‘ Bulgasal:Immortal Souls’ was notably stunning in parts. The figures and supernatural entities from Korean mythology found throughout the storyline had notable aesthetic and visual influences from Guillermo Del Toro’s ‘ Pan’s Labyrinth’ and Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won’s previous supernatural-horror project The Guest’ onscreen. In addition to creature visuals, the cinematography was a notable highlight with beautifully filmed shots of snow-filled landscapes and scenery often predominating scenes. However despite some gorgeous filming techniques, ‘ Bulgasal:Immortal Souls’ was slightly degraded by its somewhat shoddy CGI and choppy editing; often taking away from potentially stunning and emotive moments of the series.

The OST is notably synchronic with a lot of fight or tense scenes. It does not particularly distract the audience with vocal tracks but rather instrumentals; quintessential for helping to build up tension or reflecting the inner- turmoil of the onscreen characters, but rarely giving an impactful deliverance also.

‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls ’ attempted to give viewers a terrifying and thrilling fantasy horror epic. Interweaving the classic cliche in recent fantasy shows of mostly modern settings against Korean mythology, ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls ’ ‘s potentially intriguing screenplay by Kwon So-ra and Seo Jae-won was greatly let down by the direction of plot. Instead of allowing golden opportunities in order to explore multilayered characters, world-building and a tense storyline, the drama’s layout instead delivered a somewhat niche and shallow array of characters who lacked creative flare, as well as a narrative filled with plot holes also. The ending of the series was notably anticlimactic; rushed in an attempt to wrap up several key plot points, but failing to tie up a satisfying outcome for the plot and characters. Overall, ‘ Bulgasal: Immortal Souls’ was an generic and somewhat niche supernatural series; watchable for those willing to disengage during a binge-watch session , but filled with wasted potential also.

Read More

A ‘ Door’ Into The Realm of Disappointment…

Based upon the eponymous novel by Robert A. Heinlein, ‘ The Door Into Summer’ ( alternatively known as ‘ Natsu e no Tobira: Kimi no Iru Mirai e’ or ‘ 夏への扉 キミのいる未来へ’) seemed to initially offer viewers an intriguing premise under the directing reigns of Takahiro Miki and the writing of Kanno Tomoe.

However despite the movie’s impressive plot premise and the casting choice of renowned actor Kento Yamazaki ( ‘ Orange’, ‘ Alice In Borderland’, ‘ Death Note’), ‘ The Door Into Summer’ soon suffered greatly under the aimless direction of plot holes, lacklustre genre exploration, character and plot growth as well as pacing also.

The movie initially focuses upon young scientist Takakura Soichiro ( Kento Yamazaki). Trying to complete the research of his late paternal and mentor figure Matsushita Kazuto ( Hidekazu Mashima) upon plasma research in 1995, Soichiro’s plans are scuppered when he’s betrayed from the shadows and loses control over his research . With no other options, Soichiro is subdued into a cryogenic chamber. Waking up nearly thirty years later in 2025, Soichiro discovers that the world has changed significantly as he desperately tries to find a way back to 1995…

Perhaps one of ‘ The Door Into Summer’’s greatest downfalls and arguable strengths came through its emotive moments. Admittedly it isn’t out of a question for the science-fiction genre to explore and widen the scope of expectations with presenting the emotional conflicts and struggles of humanity. In particular one of the most heartfelt moments of ‘ The Door Into Summer’ came through Soichiro’s relationship initially in 1995 with his adopted feline friend Pete and being able to relate to his cat’s emotional struggles. In the latter-part of the series this relationship was replaced by Soichiro’s android friend PETE ( Fujiki Naohito); one of the few characters who could offer viewers surprising comic relief and emotional complexity at times also .

Nevertheless ‘ The Door Into Summer’ was a storyline that was supposedly focused upon elements of time travel and pseudo-science. However whilst the lingering presence of humanoid robots and time travel are intriguing plot hooks for viewers, Kanno Tomoe’s screenplay greatly struggled under the cataclysmic weight of plot inconsistencies and lacklustre loopholes as well as logic .

One of the major problems of Tomoe’s world-building and “factual “ science came through its lacking and quintessential presence in the main events of the storyline. Perhaps the major source of the problem can be found that ‘ The Door Into Summer’ was heavily dominated by its emotional aspects. However rather than using this as an opportunity to explore characters or even widely offer an edge of complexity towards Soichiro, Kanno Tomoe ladened the narrative in parts upon Soichiro’s insipid, potential romantic relationship with main female lead Matsushita Riko ( Kiyohara Kara).

This was a notable flaw throughout Miki’s movie; there was rarely a sense of plot. Seemingly quintessential characters and events were rarely developed and whilst the movie did attempt to present a gradual “ villain” , ‘ The Door Into Summer’ could often feel aimless and directionless within its messaging and plot development. In particular the ending of the movie notably presented the outcome of the plot’s aimless narrative with an anticlimactic and lacklustre conclusion.

In addition to this there’s also the issue of the lacking opportunities to really flesh-out characters and in particular the main male lead of the series. For a a main character who is supposedly constantly looking towards advancement , Soichiro’s uninspiring and tailored reaction towards the near-future, technology and the world around him felt somewhat regimented rather than befitting for his seeming character archetype.

The acting of the series was admittedly a slight mixed-bag. Kento Yamazaki’s role as Soichiro was admittedly somewhat uninspiring with certain line deliverances feeling enforced. The supporting cast such as Matsuhhita Riko played by Kiyohara Kara and Natsuko as Shiraishi Rin in particular were decent enough with their performances but rarely brought forwards a dynamic charm due to limited screenwriting opportunities. Perhaps one of the few standout performances of ‘ The Door Into Summer’ was Fujiki Naohito as PETE but due to limited dialogue and depth opportunities, Naohito was rarely a wider scope to exploring his onscreen persona with tact.


Perhaps one of the few saving graces of ‘ The Door Into Summer’ under the directing reigns of Takahiro Miki came through the movie’s impressive and glossy CGI, cinematography, slick shots and fuzzy retro and nostalgia shoots also. Although admittedly a somewhat generic approach with certain filming techniques, Miki did help to captivate a certain aesthetic throughout the filming of the series. The OST of the series was slightly dull in comparison to the slick shots of the movies; synchronic in parts, but rarely giving viewers an opportunity to feel the emotional weight and impact of scenes either.

Overall ‘ The Door Into Summer’ is a film which whilst boasting some impressive filming shots, scenery, CGI and some familiar faces, often felt heavily burdened by its writing. The elements of science-fiction present within the narrative of the film are approached tactlessly with aimless plot motivations rarely giving further insight into the growth of characters or tension either. The ending of the series will likely offer viewers with a final admittance of the narrative’s disappointing deliverance despite its unlimited potential.

Read More

‘ Snowdrop’; Where To Begin With One Of 2021/22’s Most Divisive Dramas…

It isn’t uncommon for dramas to sometimes land themselves in hot water over various scandals in South -Korea and JTBC and Disney’s ‘ Snowdrop’ is no exception to this problem . Of course, this shouldn’t prevent viewers from enjoying a series or affect the overall quality .

The storyline of ‘ Snowdrop’ was intriguing, the casting choices are certainly impressive and there are admittedly some surprisingly impactful tour de force moments also. On the other hand, it’s hard not to address one of the biggest elephants in the room surrounding ‘ Snowdrop’’s mixed-reception and controversy; the storyline’s time-setting and take upon historical events.

The backdrop of the narrative focuses upon the precursor events leading up to the historical 1987 political movement in South-Korea. Eun Young-ro ( Jisoo) is a student at Hosu Women’s University and the daughter of the director of the Agency For National Security Planning (ANSP) Eun Chang-soo (Heo Joon-ho). After a blind date, Young-ro ends up meeting the mysterious Im Soo-ho (Jung Hae-in). A man of few words and having previously studied abroad at a prestigious university in Berlin, Soo-Ho captures Young-ro’s interests with his like-minded tastes and philosophies . However after Soo-Ho stumbles through a window at the university, covered in blood and wounds, Young-ro is forced to face some shocking truths and revelations about her crush Im Soo-Ho…

It is important to note that whilst there are some inescapable elements of “fluffy” and lighthearted romance in ‘ Snowdrop’, venerable screenwriter Yoo Hyun Mi (‘Bridal Mask’, ‘ SKY Castle) and director Jo Hyun Tak ( ‘ Who Are You?’, ‘ SKY Castle’) mainly focus upon the network of political mind games and tension throughout the storyline . In particular, screenwriter Yoo Hyun Mi adds a notably sardonic tone towards political strife and satire in 1980s South and North Korea.

On the other hand, Yoo Hyun Mi often seemed unsure at times towards the direction of the drama. Whilst it isn’t out of the question for a series to attempt to relieve tension with lighthearted banter, niche setups and comic relief, the screenwriter could often overplay at times somewhat fractious comedy and scenes without interspersing this into the storyline with more tact. In addition to this there is admittedly a complex issue to bring up surrounding the wider controversy of the drama; the fictional take upon real-life events and figures.

The series often attempted to depict important figures and events with a certain artistic licence. Whilst it is arguable that a lot of the storyline events were only loosely based upon the memoirs of a former POW and were never supposed to be a “fly-on-the-wall” depiction of events , it is still a sticky situation when viewers become aware of the actual historical context. ( In particular, the drama’s somewhat “glossy” depiction of tragic historical figures, groups and events without acknowledging brutal realities. )

Controversy aside , ‘ Snowdrop’ admittedly offered viewers a fairly impressive casting lineup, specifically with BLACKPINK’s Jisoo, rising star Jung Hae-in and A-lister Yoo In Na drawing attention for viewers .

BLACKPINK’s Jisoo starred as the main attraction of the drama as main female lead Eun Young-ro. Whilst Jisoo’s initial performance was admittedly somewhat questionable, the BLACKPINK idol’s acting debut was certainly decent enough with an ability to capture an emotive edge to her character in later episodes.

Costarring alongside Jisoo was main male lead Im Soo Hoo as Jung Hae-in ( ‘ D.P’, ‘ Prison Playbook’, ‘ Something In The Rain’). The actor is no stranger towards taking on versatile roles and whilst there were moments that Hae-in’s delivered dialogue could feel somewhat stiff, Hae-in was able to add a surprisingly complex charm to his onscreen persona.

The chemistry between our main leads is admittedly mixed at the best of the times. Whilst the events surrounding Jisoo and Hae-in’s onscreen counterparts are quintessential towards the main storyline, the actors’ onscreen chemistry could feel somewhat stunted due to few opportunities in order to explore the scope of their characters’ onscreen relationship.

Yoo Hyun Mi’s pacing of the series was variable. Whilst she allowed some opportunities to see tension buildup and gradual events unfold, the attempt to drag -out plot points even in a space of sixteen episodes, could often lead to events of the narrative feeling somewhat tedious and dull. In particular, screenwriter Yoo Hyun Mi fell into a notable habit of inducing a tense plot point, climatically building up events only to deliver a somewhat anticlimactic and trope-induced result and then repeat. ( In particular, the conclusion of the series suffering from the full weight of Hyun Mi’s formula.)

Nevertheless it is noteworthy that under the directing reigns of Jo Hyun Tak, the filming of ‘ Snowdrop’ is professional, slick and stylistic. The oozing tone of gradients and camera shots helped to convey the tension of key plot points and in addition to the emotive OST composed by Kim Tae Seung, helped to present ‘ Snowdrop’ with an aesthetic flare.

Jo Hyun Tak and Yoo Hyun Mi’s ‘ Snowdrop’ is a series which will likely satisfy and displease viewers of equal measure. The controversy surrounding the drama’s depiction of historical events is an unavoidable issue. On the hand whilst ‘ Snowdrop’ did boast a star-studded cast, a venerable screenwriter and director behind the scenes as well as some emotional punches , the drama did admittedly still suffer under the weight of poor-pacing, predictable setups and lacklustre opportunities to explore characters and impactful events ( including the ending) with more depth. Controversial, emotive yet somewhat niche in parts, ‘ Snowdrop’ is a drama which whilst watchable, will still divide audiences greatly…

Read More

All Of Us Are Dead; A Brainless Gore Fest, Or A Brutal Survival Story?

The increasing popularity of the zombie genre in South-Korean media since the days of Park Joo Seok’s ‘ Train To Busan’ (2016) has exceeded no bounds. Indeed, Netflix’s latest venture into the world of zombies, ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’, enjoyed making several ironic and passing popular-culture references to the heavily influential zombie flick . Nevertheless director Lee Jae Gyo and screenwriter Chun Sung II’s zombie survival series , ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ , delivered a grisly and somewhat niche insight into the world of zombies, teen-angst and everything in-between…

Based upon Joo Dong Geun’s popular and original webcomic ‘ Now At Our School’, the twelve-episode Netflix series begins on a rainy rooftop in the fictional South-Korean province named Hyosan. A group of high school bullies ( “ iljins”) are shown to be relentlessly tormenting their fellow classmate, Jin-Su. Yet as their punches and beatings become notably more savage and violent , Jin-Su’s reactions to the conflict gradually change also. The gentle pleas of the meek teen suddenly turn into savage and animalistic snarls as Jin-Su’s gentle attitude soon begins to mimic an untamed and feral beast.

After the aftermath of the violent fight scene, viewers are left shocked but aware of the gradual domino effect as revelations and further mysteries are soon brought to light.

A time-skip forwards to the beginning of a new school day at Hyosan High School, brings forward the viewers’ attention towards Kim Hyeon-ju (Jung Yi-seo), an inquisitive high-school student , who unknowingly becomes patient zero to the mysterious zombie virus. Unsurprisingly, it is only a matter of time before there is a sudden snowball effect of rising infections throughout the school.

Caught up in the maelstrom of pandemonium and hysteria, the remaining survivors, including Chung-san (Yoon Chan-young), On-jo (Park Ji-hoo), Nam-ra (Cho Yi-hyun), Lee Soo-hyuk (Park Solomon), Yoo Gwi-nam (Yoo In-soo) and Lee Na-yeon (Lee Yoo-mi) , are left to grapple with unimaginable horrors, sacrifices and truths along the way…

‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ isn’t a series for the lighthearted. Bloodthirsty and brutal from beginning to end, Chung Sung II’s screenplay was gratuitously gory, disturbing and not afraid to delve into some darker subject areas either. However, whilst gore and bloodshed is to be expected in a storyline revolving around the flesh-eating undead, ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ often felt somewhat distracted by its own investment into grotesque and shock-value carnage also. As a consequence, this notably presented limited opportunities into enforcing pathos and sentimental value for viewers towards its wide ensemble of main characters.

The acting range of ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ was a slight mixed-bag. The main cast, specifically Cho Yi-hyeon, Lee Yoo-Mi and Yoon Chan Young, were undeniably dynamic and brilliant onscreen. On the other hand, certain performances from particular costars could feel somewhat inconsistent due to a mixed range of line deliverances and acting abilities also.

Nevertheless despite some arguably questionable moments of implicit violence, ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ did surprisingly offer some crisper moments of respite also. Heartfelt interactions and teen-angst allowed golden-opportunities to exploit the unspoken realities of teenage shenanigans- bullying, social hierarchies, blackmail, peer pressure and sexual assault were notably addressed and touched upon within the drama’s social commentary. However despite certain commendation being deserved towards Chun Sung II and director Lee Jae Gyo‘s tackled subject areas , the attempt to tackle copious amounts of different topics take on against a dystopian zombie apocalypse backdrop, often led to a somewhat ham-fisted approach towards potentially impactful and prominent messages and critiques. In particular by the finale of the series, the overindulgence of subject areas began to slowly slip through the cracks and gave way to the sheer pandemonium of gritty teen-angst.

As for the delivered pace of narrative, Chung Sung II’s screenplay was notably fast-paced and adrenal-infused during initial episodes. However after the fanatic chaos of initial episodes, screenwriter Chung Sung II began to notably downplay chase scenes and conflict in order to draw further attention towards the setups, dilemmas and scenarios of the plot instead. However, this screenwriting decision did present a double-edged sword for the narrative; insightful moments focusing on the storyline did allow opportunities to explore the scope of characters and subplots, whilst also being heavily burdened by a repetitive pattern of storyline events in later episodes.

In particular this became noticeable the following setup; the ragtag team of teens would become wary of one another and drift apart, an external conflict would force them to band together again as a team, a member of the team would decide to embrace their inner-messiah and self-sacrifice themselves, before a teary and angst-ridden resolution would turn the mood somber as the characters remembered their fallen classmate, and then repeat.

Nevertheless, director Jae Gyu’s eye for detail was admittedly fairly commendable within the chosen filming techniques under his directing reign. Whilst the single-camera setup was admittedly a minimalistic approach to filming, Jae Gyu’s usage of changing gradients, darkening tones, angles and key and unobtrusive focus upon the characters and scenarios will truly immerse viewers into the events of the series. The usage of an OST was notably comprised mainly of instrumentals- hoping to draw attention in particular to a synchronic usage of music and imagery, rather than lyrics alone.

‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ offered viewers with a bloodthirsty and angst-ridden zombie drama which whilst certainly delivering an impactful bite into social themes, brutality, imagery and tension, the series often felt as though it but off more than it could chew at times within a lacking scope of character development, writing opportunities and divergence. The ending of the series was notably an unexpected twist which highly delved into a notably more somber tone. Whilst the finale may differ for viewers dependent on expectations, the conclusion certainly did leave some intriguing food for thought also. Overall ‘ All Of Us Are Dead’ is a pacy binge-watch; notably without its questionable flaws, repetitiveness and tropes, but tense enough to keep viewers hooked upon shock-value and adrenaline also.

Read More