Thanks Kyubin, and you're welcome. It does feel hostile here, especially in the early days when I was learning the site's weirdnesses around edits by trial and error and for the most part being left to work out what I'd done wrong on my own. And that sinking feeling of an "Your edit has been rejected" message.
I've had the experience of more accurate, detailed and sourced (press release from the organisation) information being rejected for bare bones hardly anything at all because that was accepted first.
I'm persevering now because I'm really enjoying older or less known Thai films. They often have sparse pages here, I'm disabled, have too much time to fill, could do with a sense of purpose and I'm careful, so I'm a good person to help make those pages more interesting for others. Might only be a handful of people who care, but maybe the more widely-used romanisations I've found in my searches (MDL's rigidity sometimes means this site is the ONLY use of a romanisation) will help someone else find the film for themselves and their day will be a bit brighter for it.
They put up so many obstacles to this. I know it's supposed to be about mods not having time, but this is a site where they persist in keeping a very visible "or add tags" on every title's page yet only accept tag edits through Edit (not Tags) but Genres, which then requires a mod to send out instructions every time someone suggests a tag through the very visible "or add tags" on the title's page so idk.
Anyway, if we get votes through contributions, does that mean reviews, edits or both? I have a 2003 comedy to try to get into the database and there are more I could review. My next two votes will go here because I want MDL to be the best it can.