The ML is just obsessed with snakes he uses them to host underground battles and gambles on them so his father decided to confiscate his rare snakes without his son knowing, so he can take his life seriously and get a gf and start working in his father's company.
I get and respect that everyone has their own preferences and opinions, but calling a series a “complete failure” after watching just 10 minutes — because of a snake — really isn’t a fair or helpful review. People reading these reviews are looking for genuine insight into the story, acting, direction, pacing, or even cinematography. This doesn’t do that it's not a review but a hate comment there's rules to submit one.
It’s fine to not like certain elements, but basing a 1-star rating across every category on a personal dislike (especially in a show that’s only two episodes in) just feels rushed and unprofessional. Maybe give it more than a few minutes before writing it off completely.
I don't like toxic characters much they PISS me off easily but that doesn’t mean a good plot won't come out of it, I think plot wise their story could have potential of how did they get to this point and how it'd develop in a serious way.
Not sure why you're referring to the director making it bad. The director only directs scenes he doesn't write…
Speaking from experience and an industry standpoint, directors play a central role in shaping nearly every aspect of a series production to make it engaging, regardless of the original story. This includes guiding or even reshaping the script if they find it lacking. While screenwriters handle the core writing, it’s common especially in companies like GMMTV for directors to be actively involved in story development, structural refinement, and pacing. Their visual literacy and understanding of cinematic language often drive narrative decisions, ensuring the script aligns with the intended tone, blocking, and overall theme. That’s why the director’s name typically stands out in the credits the final product is a direct extension of their creative vision and comprehensive oversight across all departments.
2 
9 
1 
1 
1 
It’s fine to not like certain elements, but basing a 1-star rating across every category on a personal dislike (especially in a show that’s only two episodes in) just feels rushed and unprofessional. Maybe give it more than a few minutes before writing it off completely.
"EP 1 is 47, ep 2 - 38
EP 3 and 4 - 25 mins"