yes, but why does gay content have all these labels? it's obvious that the origin is homophobic, heterosexual…
The only one angry here is you, just look at the way you treated the other commentator, we're in a forum debating a certain subject, everything is and should be questioned and if it's not good it should be changed.
yes, but why does gay content have all these labels? it's obvious that the origin is homophobic, heterosexual…
most straight kdramas are unrealistic fantasies, so much so that in my country there's a discussion so that straight women don't think that Koreans are fairytale princes...and, historically, “stories directed at women” are treated as inferior, a romance book is supposed to be inferior to a book about war.
yes, but why does gay content have all these labels? it's obvious that the origin is homophobic, heterosexual…
"Tell me how many gay people can realistically relate to kinnporsche? While its my favourite drama of all time it hardly addresses gay issues." that's why I said fantasy stories, surreal, fiction also exists among heterosexuals
i noticed that the use of labels such as "bl/gl/yaoi/yuri/gay/queer" or any labels at all has been called into…
yes, but why does gay content have all these labels? it's obvious that the origin is homophobic, heterosexual stories don't have all these labels, and another thing hetero content also has fantasy and non-fantasy, I don't understand all this drama about it Love in a Big City has its importance and so does Kinnporshe