Danny Millo

He is an extraordinary actor. And I hope he comes back because he is awaited by millions of international fans.

I think they react this way because they cannot sustain the discussion with real arguments and evidence, but only with gossip and perverse words. These types of subjects probably capture their attention because their level of maturity and understanding is limited. In the absence of real studies, they cling to imaginary “diplomas” to try to give themselves an authority that, in fact, they do not have.

How can you draw such conclusions when even from the evidence released by her mother In a memo claimed to have been sent to the actor on September 28, 2017 we could see that KSR's letter said "I have been hurt by many men so oppa i want to be with you". If she had other previous relationships, why would you accuse Kim Soo hyun of having a relationship with her when she was a minor? Why don't you accuse the others, since they were only in her life before Kim Soo hyun? Are you omitting this on purpose because you absolutely want to accuse him? What does say this about you?

According to lawyer, the bereaved family has distributed materials about the deceased’s private life that are unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun, ignoring repeated requests to protect her honor. The texts portray emotional instability and dependence on men and contradict other allegedly authentic materials, indicating deliberate manipulation.
Lawyer emphasizes that the family continues to present themselves as victims and has threatened disciplinary action against critics. In light of these facts, the responsibility for defamation and public opinion manipulation lies with the family.
Even if they attempt to present false materials as “evidence,” falsehoods do not become truth.

[Immoral behavior of the bereaved family who distort and spread the deceased’s private life unrelated to the actor, and their legal responsibility – request for media investigation]
Two weeks ago, I publicly requested that the bereaved family refrain from distributing any writings or materials unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun if they truly intended to protect the deceased’s honor, to prevent further offenses and secondary harm to the actor. I also asked fans not to unnecessarily provoke the deceased’s family.
Nonetheless, yesterday, the bereaved family directly distributed to the media materials regarding the deceased’s private life, entirely unrelated to actor Kim Soo-hyun, prominently using the title “Saeron’s Mother.” This behavior is very similar to their bizarre actions in March, when, in collusion with Gaseyeon (an online media outlet), they created and circulated an AI video of the deceased for image-making purposes.
1. Malicious actions forcing a link to the actor
I criticized the bereaved family yesterday for irresponsibly ignoring my warnings and requests and publicly releasing source-unknown writings, artificially connecting them to actor Kim Soo-hyun. The family knew that the content portrayed the deceased as “unable to live without a man, as if suffering from bipolar disorder,” yet they still distributed it, associating it with the actor.
If the writing released yesterday was truly authored by Kim Saeron in her second year of high school, it describes her emotional suffering over romantic relationships and ends with a bizarre laugh such as “ㅎㅎㄹㄹㄹㅎㅎㅎㅎㅎㄹㄹㄹㄹ…”. Anyone reading it would perceive emotional instability or bipolar traits. I personally found it deeply unsettling.
The released text was not the version the family initially intended to disclose, and I know firsthand that the family had considered carefully whether to make it public, which proves they understood the serious harm it could cause to the deceased’s honor. Indeed, there had already been tabloid-like rumors stating that the family possessed materials that could make the deceased appear as a frivolous woman regarding men.
Despite knowing this, the family ultimately released the material, seemingly to sway public opinion ahead of the investigation results, sacrificing the deceased’s honor in the process. The responsibility for portraying a minor deceased as “emotionally unstable and dependent on men” lies solely with the family.
2. Contradictions between materials and clear evidence of deliberate false information dissemination
Furthermore, the text released by the family directly contradicts other content they claimed was a threatening handwritten letter from the deceased (to her first and only love, a six-year relationship since middle school).
Because the family collected photos and chat logs from the deceased’s phone and cloud, without being able to identify any specific male, they attempted to attribute everything to a single person, resulting in materials with no consistency.
The family already knew that the false letters and statements used in March 2024 to cancel a debt of 700 million won were fabricated. The text released yesterday serves as further proof. This demonstrates that the family acted intentionally, effectively admitting their awareness of falsity.
3. Position and plan regarding the exploitation of the deceased minor’s private life for public manipulation
The family’s recently announced statement reflects no self-reflection and is purely an attempt to play the victim. Instead, they continue to threaten me, even mentioning potential bar association disciplinary action.
Initially, I planned to minimize responses, but given their two-day pattern of public manipulation, I have decided to actively respond through the media against defamation and opinion manipulation.
If the family continues to trample on the deceased’s honor, I will have no choice but to seriously consider revealing evidence about the deceased’s real life and family relationships, which have until now been protected. I still hope this can be avoided, but the situation is becoming unavoidable.
I will soon release an official statement regarding the family’s recent statement.
Even the absurd discussion about cats at the beginning leaves me frustrated. (Photos that fans found in just a few hours are attached. If they are incorrect, the family may refute them.) The number of cats and their names are very well known by the deceased’s sibling. If the family still issued a false statement, this again constitutes clear evidence of deliberate falsity, A.I., criminal intent.
Even if the family tries to claim materials unrelated to the actor as “evidence” and adds another 100 lies left by the deceased, falsehood does not become truth.

The claims that the names of the cats were changed from “Patteok” and “Kkultteok” to “Dal” and “Gureum” because of Kim Soo-hyun are factually unfounded and cannot be supported by objective evidence. From publicly verifiable data (news articles and old social media posts), it is clear that:
-- The actual original names were “Chaltteok” and “Hotteok”, not those cited in the accusations.
--There is no evidence of a “renaming,” as the names Chaltteok, Hotteok, Dal, and Gureum coexisted and were publicly mentioned by Kim Sae-ron between 2018–2020.
--There are documented mentions indicating that Dal and Gureum were already 1 year old in March 2019, which completely invalidates the timeline invoked by the accusers.
The attempt to construct a supposed relationship between Kim Soo-hyun and Kim Sae-ron by interpreting the names of animals does not constitute evidence, but speculation, with no probative value. Moreover, public information suggests that if these names could be associated with a real person, they appear to be much more closely linked to an idol member, with whom Kim Sae-ron seemed close both during her minor years and afterward. This directly contradicts the direction in which suspicions are being forcibly oriented.
Therefore, using the cats’ names as “evidence” constitutes:
--a distortion of facts,
--a speculative construction,
--and an attempt to manipulate public opinion.
Turning private and legally irrelevant elements into pseudo-evidence does not constitute a valid legal argument.
The conclusion is clear: Credible accusations cannot be built based on symbolic interpretations of the names of animals.
Responsibility for spreading these claims lies both with those who formulated them and the media outlets that reproduced them without minimal verification of the facts.

OLD ARTICLES:

“Snail Hotel” – Kim Sae-ron Seen with Her Adorable Cat
Reporter: Park Hanna, September 12, 2018, 16:49
Kim Sae-ron, known for her beauty and close relationship with her family, frequently posts on SNS expressing her love for her parents and siblings. In one post, she writes “our little darling” and shares a photo of her cat.
Kim Sae-ron’s cats, named Chaltteok and Hotteok, also draw attention for their subtle and charming demeanor.

Kim Sae-ron Shows Off Her Smart Pet Owner Life, Home Looks Like a Hotel
(OSEN) Reporter Park So-young, April 21, 2020, 17:59
Actress Kim Sae-ron shared a glimpse of her clever life as a pet owner.
On the 20th, Kim Sae-ron posted a photo on her Instagram with the message: “Staying at home with Gu and Aron.” In the photo, she is holding her cat while also holding a bag of snacks.

https://kbizoom.com/song-min-ho-has-a-weather-tattoo-on-his-neck-and-circles-the-rain-symbol-when-he-is-not-in-good-condition/

https://www.allkpop.com/article/2025/05/late-actress-kim-sae-ron-reportedly-dated-a-popular-idol-member-around-2018

The same rule applies to you: you don’t know him either, yet you try to slander him. Support never causes harm, while toxicity and defamation have real consequences

I am Korean, and I need to say this clearly.

Kim Soo Hyun Was Never Given a Fair Chance
- How a Witch-Hunt Began and Why a Lawyer Added Fuel to It

1.
When the controversy involving Soo Hyun and the late Kim Sae Ron began, online platforms treated him as guilty before any facts were confirmed. AI-edited audio, misleading photos, and his repeated denials were ignored.

What happened was a clear witch-hunt and large-scale cyberbullying that eventually forced him into a tearful press conference

2.
At that time, attorney Lee Don Ho livestreamed the press conference. Many viewers felt his tone was mocking.

His thumbnails used phrases like “full makeup” and “crying hard” and even words like “redemption plan” which made Kim Soo Hyun look as if he were already a criminal.

A video titled “Even if he met a middle school girl, punishment is difficult” created a harmful misunderstanding, even though no such meeting was ever proven. A single phrase distorted public perception.

3.
Because a lawyer’s voice carries authority, reactions like his give online mobs justification. He continued posting videos and shorts about the press conference, and fans told me they felt he was benefiting from growing traffic. Some said they were shocked to see him pleased when his content appeared on TV.

4.
From the beginning, I saw the presumption of innocence collapsing. The truth was getting buried under edited clips and speculative narratives.

I defended Kim Soo Hyun not because it helped me but because it was the right thing to do. What I saw was a man overwhelmed by misinformation and public pressure.

5.
This issue goes beyond one actor or one lawyer. As YouTube sensationalism grows, some attorneys now rely on viral outrage instead of professional judgment. This harms public trust and damages the legal community. The Korean Bar Association should address this seriously and protect the integrity of the profession.

Justice should not be shaped by algorithms or public anger. It must be based on facts and fairness.

--
Kim Dohyung (Dangbussam)
FA Inc.
Nov 25, 2025

Let’s talk about you and your character. The pattern is simple: slander and gossip are your habit, the same mechanism you use in everyday life = neighbor, colleague, relative = there is always someone to “diminish.” Not because that’s how they are, but because that is the only position in which you exist. What you say about Kim Soo Hyun is not about him; it describes exclusively your mental process: the need to turn people into subjects of gossip, your nourishment. In this world there are many like you, people who live off denigration, who have no substance, who only destroy through words because they truly have not achieved anything remarkable in their lives.
Everything you wrote here is your complete portrait. Not that of the one you name. Your character is not defined by what you elevate, but by the malice you throw around.

If you are neutral, how is it that you only repeat the accusations that were made against Kim Soo Hyun, even though there is already enough evidence that these accusations are false?

You say that Kim Sae Ron died “on his birthday.” It was about her 20th suicide attempt, can you claim that all the other attempts were also on his birthday?

Why don’t you mention the failed marriage with an abusive husband and the suspicion of an abortion which deepened her depression?

Couldn’t her decision have something to do with the fact that although she tried to return to her profession after the DUI, she couldn’t, and the café business couldn’t be started?

But the cyberbullying she suffered during all the period after the DUI and the debts she had, as well as the psychiatric treatment she had to take and the failed nightmare marriage, doesn’t that make you think she had deeper problems than a relationship that ended five years ago?

Why should his crying at the press conference be analyzed? How do you explain that any normal person would react emotionally if dragged into a massive public scandal, with unfounded accusations and huge media pressure? Can that be considered an act that harmed someone?

What do you think about the fact that all online accusations against Kim Soo Hyun were spread based on rumors and lies, and when verification of the evidence on which he was accused was requested, the accusers refused to hand over the evidence for authenticity verification? Doesn’t that raise serious questions?

The photo attached to the 2016 KakaoTalk conversation turned out to have been taken in 2020. If it was a real conversation, why did the photo have to be falsified?

Why didn’t the accusers hand over the phone for official verification and to bring justice to the deceased, if the evidence is real?

Wouldn’t it be normal for the evidence to be analyzed before drawing conclusions and accusing someone?

If all the evidence released publicly turned out to be false, should we all still accuse him? Wouldn’t it be normal for there to be voices in favor as well, who analyze the situation objectively and support his defense?

If the interpretation of emotions and reactions is done without verified evidence, don’t you think that a person can quickly be turned into a scapegoat, even if the real truth is much more complex?

His lawyer emphasized that defamation based on lies must be fought. How do you justify the continuation of the accusations when his defenders have presented concrete evidence that demonstrates the falsity of the rumors and AI accusations?

Finally, how can you claim that the online accusations reflect reality, when the full context, her family, her husband, the public pressure, and the industry, is ignored, and when the existing evidence has been proven false?

And if you wanted to have a neutral message, how do you explain the condemnation you already made through the statement: “he is not the only one to be responsible for her death even if he is really involved.” On what do you base the last part in which you say that he is really involved when all, absolutely all, the evidence with which he was accused turned out to be false?

Listen carefully. You should be ashamed of yourself for throwing accusations without any basis, built on gossip and internet rumors. If you’re so sure of what you’re saying, go to the police with concrete evidence, not with fabrications. Kim Soo Hyun is not a pedophile, no matter how much some of you would like to tarnish his image.
All this “defamation” started online, out of nothing, and until now no authentic evidence has appeared. Neither the “thousands of photos,” nor the “stolen phone,” nor the “pink diary,” nor the “eight witnesses” have ever been seen. It was all just another story straight out of YouTube built on fake scandals and manufactured drama.
And let’s be clear: if there had been real evidence, there would have been no need to buy an AI recording, right? But when the truth is missing, all sorts of pathetic manipulation attempts appear, where the greedy family and Garo play the main roles.
The truth is not proven through their cheap theater, but through facts. And so far, the facts are missing. Before you write something, think about it.
The truth doesn’t need a show, it stands through confidence of the one who knows he’s clean.
Stop feeding the lie. Respect is earned through dignity, not through scandal.

Let’s be realistic: the only ‘sin’ of Kim Soo Hyun was that he had a brief relationship with her years ago. She got married, divorced, had another boyfriend, and tried to take her own life dozens of times. Do you think all of this happened on his birthday? Obviously not. The heavens do not deal with gossip and lies, but with the truth. If anyone deserves to be judged, it is the ‘fake aunt,’ the charlatan Garosero, and the greedy family who manipulated everything, exposing her messy life. KIM SOO-HYUN is just a victim, an innocent soul caught in a manipulation. So stop with the baseless accusations and let the truth speak with real evidence, not invented and falsified to fit the narratives of the true criminals.

They are scoundrels, I can’t call these filth who call themselves people anything else. A fee of 20% without any court action is not a fee for legal services, it is a tribute. It is a tacit acknowledgment that the payment is made to put an end to pressure, not to honor a contract or a sentence. It is, in essence, the mechanism of a blackmail machine. The use of social networks and certain YouTubers as instruments to amplify false accusations shows with surgical precision that the goal is not justice, but the destruction of reputation. It is a tactic of dirty gardening: you plant inventions, let them take root in the public space, and then demand money to pull them out. The fact that Kim Soo Hyun had the strength to say “no” and not let himself be blackmailed exposed the whole scheme. He tore down the façade and revealed the mechanism. Looking at the whole picture, I see a clear, coordinated, and very aggressive attempt at extortion. And for that, the answer is: A criminal investigation. Period.

It’s incredible how some people completely lose their minds just to throw insults. I don’t know what you think you gain by writing something like this, but know that you won’t find any support or validation here.
Throwing serious accusations without real evidence doesn’t make you important, it makes you pathetic and miserable.

So keep your theories to yourself and learn not to judge people based on rumors or other people’s nonsense.

Bro, I can’t believe what I’m reading. 16 cases?! How is it possible that the 5 cases involving Kim Soo-hyun are the ones still on hold. The lawyer clearly said that we are dealing with a huge, nationwide fraud. And honestly, everything related to KSH seems obviously fabricated, the evidence from Garo0 turned out to be falsified. Then why wasn’t Kim Soo-hyun’s case sent first to the special team. Why is the very case in which the evidence was proven false being delayed. It’s hard not to wonder: who is protecting Kim Se-ui? Who has enough influence to block the investigation even when everything is so obvious? Something is definitely not right here.

I am disgusted by how much lies have been built around KSH.

Based on the information presented, there are several inconsistencies in the alleged relationship between Kim Soo Hyun and the deceased person: the messages and photos appear to be false or taken out of context, and some situations do not match his military schedule. Additionally, it is shown that the person was involved in another problematic relationship and was going through personal trauma. Overall, the data suggest that the accusations against KSH are not supported by clear evidence.

His lawyer is doing a great job.

He's an incredibly hardworking guy, I'm fascinated every time I read about him. He deserves all the respect.

Oh, dear, let me explain something, because it seems you missed the lesson about respect and reality. When you call Kim Soo Hyun a “murderer" without evidence, without an investigation, without any court decision, you are not “honest”, you are just irresponsible. In the real world, not the one in comments, guilt is determined with evidence, not with gossip and frustrations. Kim Soo Hyun has not been accused, investigated, or convicted of anything. Absolutely nothing. So what you said is not an “opinion,” it is slander in every sense, but said with the confidence as if you were the internet’s prosecutor. You have two options: 👉 have evidence➖go to the authorities. 👉 have no evidence➖go to sleep. Because between “truth” and “your big mouth” there is no gray area. The truth has facts. You have… comments.