Rinchen14

why are you talking if you're not interested???

1. You insulted me when you told me to watch porn. That was unnecessary and disrespectful. You also told me how I should write my review next time, which crosses the line between sharing your opinion and trying to control someone else's.

Seriously, did you really think about and understand what I wrote?

After reading your attitude, I felt it necessary to give you the thumbs-up.
Yes, I did, and it's not an attack on your personality, but a thumbs-up.
I don't deny it, but you got so worked up about it that I assumed you were under 18, and that's why I told you what you were doing here.

2. What you wrote is your personal opinion, and that's perfectly fine. As you said, sex isn't the most important thing for you when it comes to feeling connected. That's your opinion, and I respect it.

That's exactly what I do if you read what I've written more closely.

What do you think intimacy is?

3. For me, intimacy can be an important part of emotional storytelling, and I will continue to include this perspective in my reviews.

I didn't mean anything other than intimacy.
Well, apparently this meaning is also foreign to you.
Because intimacy doesn't mean sex.
Sex isn't intimacy because you have it with many people; many have sex just for satisfaction, and some do it unwantedly. So it has nothing to do with intimacy.
Intimacy is sharing your deepest thoughts and feelings, whether good or bad.

4. You don't have the right to tell me what I can and can't write.

Did I really do that???

I want an accurate perspective. Not one you're imagining.

5. Reviews are personal reflections, not group assignments.

Hello???
What group tasks???
Do you really know nothing about this difference?
Just clarify once again what an evaluation and your own opinion are!!! Because it clearly says "reviews."
Wiki explains: They analyze the content of scientific findings, cultural creations, and consumer goods and generally evaluate them based on objective and professional standards.
My explanation: An evaluation is the average summary of morality, psychology, and logic from all perspectives.
Maybe you should learn more about languages ​​and what the actual meanings of words actually mean, but England is lagging behind in that anyway.
Instead of correcting the meanings of individual feelings and actions, new words are invented that imply that individual self-protection measures are wrong.

I also notice how superficially you personally answer, but you personalize the average assessment, because another person doesn't have your feelings, enjoys what you personally see, and is disappointed by your narrow-minded behavior, which doesn't include all perspectives but only the one "your own."

Before I forget again, when you assign the number of stars for a series, in your opinion, there's a field that also asks for your opinion. The large one below is where your opinion belongs.

This is intended for judging the series on its own.

If you still don't understand that, read up on the language.

6. You have your voice; I mean, that's how open discussion works.

Well, at least you know what discussions are. And where can you have them, do you know that too?

7. Insulting
Half of what she says doesn't make sense anyway. We have better things to do.

Well, maybe that's because accuracy is paramount in my country, and therefore the language is also precise.

For example, we're not cold just because our bodies are cold.
For you, you, and you, we have precise terms.
And, most importantly, we don't convey any possible hidden potentialities with our words.
And the fact that you don't understand what I mean clearly shows that you have less of a clue than you thought.

And precisely because we are so precise, direct, and open, I wanted to be the first to post this on

NLE VIP 4 days ago

Telling me to watch porn is immature and utterly disrespectful. You are commenting on an R18+ series that clearly includes NC scenes. If adult content offends you so deeply, then perhaps you shouldn't be here in the first place. No one forced you to read my review, and certainly no one asked for your moral lecture.

write.

When inexperienced people share their own experience in an assessment that claims a general view that expresses only one thing, how do you think others would respond?

400, mind you - BL???
First-class works???
"Kinnporsche" who take off their shirts despite handcuffs and find a lagoon on a mountain???

Have fun with "Until We Meet Again," "Cherry Blossoms After Winter," and "We Best Love: No. 1 For You Special Edition"
We Best Love: No. 1 For You - Special Episode 6.5
We Best Love: Fighting Mr. 2nd Special Edition
We Best Love: Fighting Mr. 2nd - Special Episode 6.5"

You need to see sex that isn't even particularly offensive to be able to understand feelings???
Not to mention that most of the sex shown is just plain old sex.
Physical connection, just a little tip on the side, includes touching, not just sex that makes it clear you're just in the mood.
That's how almost all sex is portrayed, anyway, not that you're attracted to the other person, because that would be emotionally reasonable.

Realism and maturity???
Wow - amazing, are you aware that everything you see isn't even remotely realistic?

That would be maturity, then.

You don't really know much about intimacy if you think it's a part of sex or nudity.

Do you know what emotional connection is called???

I love people who rely on other people's opinions instead of themselves, especially when they're disguised with a touch of exaggeration.

I didn't attack you personally, I just repeated what you said from my own mouth and asked you to respect the difference between judgment and your own opinion and to really write it down where it belongs.

Your authority isn't there to manipulate others.

So one-night stands show you a deep connection???
I pity you for your lack.
No wonder there's less and less empathy in humanity.

Grow up mentally.

ich auch nicht.
ach komm schon,
wein nicht, die besten jahre kommen noch glaub mir.
du bist defenetif junger wie ich.

To write a review you don't need to know what others think of the series, but rather have the understanding to look at everything from different aspects, from an intellectual, moral and logical perspective.

In what way did I just insult you???
And don't tell me it was the sentence I took out. I want a correct answer.
I corrected my comment, and yet your opinion, which is contained in a review, says that because the sex scenes were presented so well, it expresses a deep connection. Sorry, for me, sex isn't what counts when it comes to feeling connected.
Because if we're realistic, most of the sex shown is simply an expression of desire for sex, not intimacy with one another. But that's how it has to be presented so that even the worst series can move up.

and this is about the general opinion and not your own

everyone is talking about the chemistry between the couple and how emotional the male actors are. I was so happy to see a remake, especially because remakes always have a great surprise in store, but here???
I desperately searched for a connection between the two until the end
This is all so disappointing.
One half was overdramatized and the other was sold off for less than its value.
The island and its significance.
Couldn't they have simply grabbed the set and traveled to a beautiful island? And what about the first glimpse of the sea, covered by a stone wall? Not least the surprise that allows a small glimpse from above of the sea with a black beach. The meaning of the names is as insignificant as the existing beach.
The kitschy jewelry for girls.
The biggest tattoo in the world, so ugly, that black spot in the middle. Why are there two feathers? How about a curved feather that curves into an S and the other curved question mark side has already been painted.
Use your imagination, it's all just acting.
As the actors made clear, the emotions don't just come from words; you have to actually believe what's being said. Not to mention the chemistry between the couples.
It went too fast, so all that was left was the aesthetics of sex. Not the act itself, and not what happened during it.
I thought something from Japan would be thrown in somewhere, but no. Definitely not a remake. Because the most important points have already been trashed and not surpassed.

But hey, that's enough for kids. They hardly have any experience.

If you're only interested in the sex, which is also boring, that's in this series, you can watch it. If you're interested in real feelings, you should watch the first edition.
In this series, no real emotions are expressed, nor are they exaggerated.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

You shouldn't ask others, but rather assess this yourself.

If you're only interested in the sex, which is also boring, that's in this series, you can watch it. If you're interested in real emotion, you should watch the first edition.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
Watch porn if that's all that matters to you.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

Could you please write your opinion in the comments below.
This section is intended only for reviews, and I strongly assume you know what a review is.
And just in case, for the next review, you shouldn't go by your own opinion because you're neither the advertiser nor the sponsors, so judge it based on the general public.

glaub mir vor kurzen hatte ich eine geschichte begonnen zu lesen
die ich letztendlich abgeprochen hab
sakastisch - darin war es klasse mit den waffen einer frau seinen freund zu erpressen. ???
und man must sich nicht einmal dafür entschuldigen, da das scheinbar total ok ist. ???
mal abgesehen das der gegenüber sich die ganze zeit entschuldigt.

also meiner sicht her sind das die fettesten emotionalsten erpessungen die man nicht tun sollte, überhaupt ist lügen, bedrügen, verschleiern und vormundschaft entreisen totaler geistiger quatsch. wer glaubt das das vollkommen ok sei weil er bis jetzt noch nicht damit auf die f... geflogen ist, wird sich umschauen wenn es soweit ist. wer das tut verletzt sich selber und nicht andere.

ich auch nicht wer mag schon selbsüchtige persönlichkeiten

1. - And this very explanation of yours says exactly what I've been saying all along: you only like the actors in these personalities. -

I'm not sure if that is right or not, I never really paid attention, though I do know I don't like roles where the actor (any Fave or not) plays an ass-hole kind of one. I just don't like ass-holes in general, so I can't in shows either. lol
1. XD who likes them but just ignore it and look at the acting
2. - But if you don't like the opposite personality roles of your favorite actors and you don't want to put yourself in that role, you can't make a judgment just so the actor plays your preferred personality role. That doesn't define an actor; an actor can play different personalities. Which, in my opinion, he did well. -

I like different kinds of roles, they don't have to alway play a role I like best, because I like different kinds of roles, it all just depends on a few things at the time of watching to how I will feel about that role of the actor. If that makes any sense.
2. I think I understand, but shouldn't a series distract you rather than convey feelings that have nothing to do with it?
2.a If I made it seem like I didn't think Nat didn't do well or if I said anything like that I didn't mean he didn't do well in that role,
2.a No, you didn't,
2.b I myself just didn't think that role was for him, so I wouldn;t say he did great in that role.
2.b and that's what our conversation is about.
2.c so I wouldn;t say he did great in that role. Though this is all my opinion I know others think he did a great job and I'm not saying they are wrong, but I don't want it to seem like I though he did a bad job, because I don't think he did.
2.c You wrote an ASSESSMENT
in which, instead of representing the general view, you judged that he shouldn't play such roles.
That's not an assessment, but your opinion, which isn't part of a judgment.
An assessment is rational and objective, not a personal point of view.
3. - Just like many people think the worst actor is the best just because he's the most handsome.
??? -

I don't see looks, well I do but not to base their acting on, I look at the acting itself not the looks of someone, Unless it is Dunk , I over look things with him nI know I do, but he has come a long way, so thast says alot... I got off track, sorry. Looks are good to have, but that does not mean you can act, acting is acting.
3. that was just an example/comparison
3.a Though I do know some who don't go by acting but by looks.
3.a That's exactly what I mean, and that's why there are so many irrational decisions.
Just because this personality doesn't appeal to YOU, you can't JUDGE for the general public.
Do you understand?

Well, I see more of your greatest actors here than anything else, and if you want to make a list for yourself, that's totally fine, but there are enough lists for voting.

ich nehm alles genau und exstrem toxisch würde ich das nicht benennen, denn sie hat ihn ja nicht eingespert oder die ganze zeit überwacht und bestimmt was er überhaupt machen darf aber vom auftreten ihres sohnes scheint er weniger der typ der das mit sich machen lässt, aber ja sie hat wie fast jede mutter diesen helikoptersyndrom

Don't you take notes? Somewhere, written or recorded, where you can find the actors' TV series?

Did I express that the way you think or feel is wrong? Sorry, I didn't mean that, not at all.
I just wanted to show the side you're not seeing.
And this very explanation of yours says exactly what I've been saying all along: you only like the actors in these personalities.
But if you don't like the opposite personality roles of your favorite actors and you don't want to put yourself in that role, you can't make a judgment just so the actor plays your preferred personality role. That doesn't define an actor; an actor can play different personalities. Which, in my opinion, he did well.
Just like many people think the worst actor is the best just because he's the most handsome.
???