The documents you are referring to aren't in the link you posted. Meaning there is no conclusive evidence that this person indeed worked with SYJ. Furthermore, even if this person worked with her, no evidence has been shown to support their claim. So it can be truth as well as be pure fabrication. Some people are capable of making up some dirty s**t to drag someone down (see the Park Hye Soo bullying scandal were it was said that the alleged victims were in fact her abusers).
I invite you to research what is "Yellow journalism", you will know that not everything that's published is based on the truth.
Finally, You have your opinion which seems set to condemn SYJ with what you read online while I have mine which consist on giving her the benefit of the doubt as long as there won't be more conclusive proofs. Let's agree to disagree.
For you. Like I said several times in my previous comments. While one person defamed her anonymously and thus didn't take responsibility for their words, another showed support and even posted pics to support their claim.
Point 3 of my previous message. While one person defamed her anonymously, another talked about her 5-year work experience with Seo Ye Ji in a favourable manner. Said person even posted pics to prove she indeed worked closely with the actress...
How childish that you think that she needs treatment because you're most likely confused about Seo Ye Ji -the actress- and Ko Moon Young -the character she played in IOTNBO.
A single exchange of messages (one conversation) isn't and will never be ground to deem someone crazy or in need of counselling. It doesn't determine how they lived their relationship either.
In which world one conversation can lead people to deem a person or a relationship toxic ? Can text messages convey the tone in which it was said ? Do you have the full history of the conversation to be able to say that she was toxic ?
We don't know anything so it's smarter to wait and see what will happen instead of defaming anyone.
1. Where in my comment did I say she did it on impulse ? Please quote the exact part you are referring too.
2. Both her and her ex asked each other not to do skinship at the time. But history shows us that while she successfully completed lawless lawyer KYH bailed. He had mental health issues which he recognized and he himself said he was responsible for his own behaviour.
3. You took the time to talk about the anonymous post that was made about her being awful to the staff but conveniently overlooked that staff members defended her and said she was pleasant.
4. I'm a careful person and prefer to get the full account of the story before making a judgment. People were quick to condemn Kim Hyun Joong back when his scandal of abuse broke out in 2015. It was only in 2020 that his ex was found guilty of fraud and extortion. Kim Hyun Joong will never get that time back. 5 years is a lot for an actor and it hit his career hard.
5. Know that in showbusiness you can be an easy target if you shine too bright and/or offend the wrong person. It might be the case here but we might never know as this is a very opaque industry. 6. I'm not your friend so don't refer to me as crazy.
People talking about toxic relationship when it was about thrust issues. She's right not to issue any apology if she didn't do anything wrong. Apologizing will validate she's In the wrong when she might not be.
It's interesting to see people condemning others because of posts that was published anonymously on the Internet. It's at best naive, at worst... There is so much possibilities as to why all this is getting out now when she was on a high career wise. The timing is so weird...
I hope the truth will prevail and that those having slandered her will be prosecuted. It's tiring to see people having their lives destroyed for lies or stuff they did in their youth -when their brain wasn't even fully developed.
I personnally disagree with your review. I can understand that you might have disliked the drama but a 17 year old woman marrying a man who might not even be forty yet was nothing surprising in this era.
I I don't think that drama was supposed to be extraordinary. The drama was supposed to show mostly the struggles who took place in a high-ranking family more than the political struggles the male lead faced -even though the Ou's family shenanigans were the backdrop of the story and that they heavily influenced the leads life. As such, the filmmaking was understated and slow-paced it gave this drama a more realistic feel as it wasn't mostly about action and politics -in fact though we heard of the emperor and his edicts, we never onve saw him or heard his voice.
I see you didn't get past the first episode so that's why you might think the ML is lecherous by having 3 concubines and his wife. You might have understood his reasoning better had you gone beyond one episode.
Cute watch but they could have explored the married life of the couple more. They didn't know each other and thus have to adjust to one another. It would have been good to see that imo
Some of these comments are so insensitive.Some people are sad that the male lead is getting replaced and now they…
If people don't want to watch it anymore that's their prerogative. No need to get all pissy about it. In which universe does dropping this drama means being insensitive about bullying ?
Sad that I have to drop it but I won't watch a denatured drama. They are donna remove the ML for the next 3 episodes ans have him replaced by someone else.... I won't be able to get into it anymore. It's sad because I was really into it.
If the ratings follow and that it gets good reviews, I might reconsider
wait what masked villain? was i not paying attention lol
The one who hit the the Babel Group's Head (Kwak Dong Yeon) on the hockey ring. It means there is someone above him. I'm pretty sure it's Ok Taec Yeon because he wouldn't have signed a drama to play the role of the silly trainee.
Looks like you're here just to hate when you should know better than to use someone's age against them.
It's all about taste. If she/he doesn't like mature women with younger men then that's her prerogative. She shouldn't be judge because of that especially since watching a drama is first and foremost something to enjoy. If shes uncomfortable then she doesn't have to force herself to watch it and she shouldn't be shamed.
shown to support their claim. So it can be truth as well as be pure fabrication. Some people are capable of making up some dirty s**t to drag someone down (see the Park Hye Soo bullying scandal were it was said that the alleged victims were in fact her abusers).
I invite you to research what is "Yellow journalism", you will know that not everything that's published is based on the truth.
Finally, You have your opinion which seems set to condemn SYJ with what you read online while I have mine which consist on giving her the benefit of the doubt as long as there won't be more conclusive proofs.
Let's agree to disagree.
For you. Like I said several times in my previous comments. While one person defamed her anonymously and thus didn't take responsibility for their words, another showed support and even posted pics to support their claim.
A single exchange of messages (one conversation) isn't and will never be ground to deem someone crazy or in need of counselling. It doesn't determine how they lived their relationship either.
In which world one conversation can lead people to deem a person or a relationship toxic ? Can text messages convey the tone in which it was said ?
Do you have the full history of the conversation to be able to say that she was toxic ?
We don't know anything so it's smarter to wait and see what will happen instead of defaming anyone.
2. Both her and her ex asked each other not to do skinship at the time. But history shows us that while she successfully completed lawless lawyer KYH bailed. He had mental health issues which he recognized and he himself said he was responsible for his own behaviour.
3. You took the time to talk about the anonymous post that was made about her being awful to the staff but conveniently overlooked that staff members defended her and said she was pleasant.
4. I'm a careful person and prefer to get the full account of the story before making a judgment. People were quick to condemn Kim Hyun Joong back when his scandal of abuse broke out in 2015. It was only in 2020 that his ex was found guilty of fraud and extortion. Kim Hyun Joong will never get that time back. 5 years is a lot for an actor and it hit his career hard.
5. Know that in showbusiness you can be an easy target if you shine too bright and/or offend the wrong person. It might be the case here but we might never know as this is a very opaque industry. 6. I'm not your friend so don't refer to me as crazy.
She's right not to issue any apology if she didn't do anything wrong. Apologizing will validate she's In the wrong when she might not be.
It's interesting to see people condemning others because of posts that was published anonymously on the Internet. It's at best naive, at worst...
There is so much possibilities as to why all this is getting out now when she was on a high career wise. The timing is so weird...
I hope the truth will prevail and that those having slandered her will be prosecuted.
It's tiring to see people having their lives destroyed for lies or stuff they did in their youth -when their brain wasn't even fully developed.
I I don't think that drama was supposed to be extraordinary. The drama was supposed to show mostly the struggles who took place in a high-ranking family more than the political struggles the male lead faced -even though the Ou's family shenanigans were the backdrop of the story and that they heavily influenced the leads life. As such, the filmmaking was understated and slow-paced it gave this drama a more realistic feel as it wasn't mostly about action and politics -in fact though we heard of the emperor and his edicts, we never onve saw him or heard his voice.
I see you didn't get past the first episode so that's why you might think the ML is lecherous by having 3 concubines and his wife. You might have understood his reasoning better had you gone beyond one episode.
In which universe does dropping this drama means being insensitive about bullying ?
If the ratings follow and that it gets good reviews, I might reconsider
I'm pretty sure it's Ok Taec Yeon because he wouldn't have signed a drama to play the role of the silly trainee.