Truth Dares

What constantly springs to my mind whenever this puritanical shitshow starts what these peeps would say to the real-life couple Both and Newyear. Their age difference is significantly lower but it is still 7 years and they got together when Newyear was 17 (technically minor) and Both was 24 (technically adult).

They have been happily together for 12 years now and if the law of same sex marriage really takes effect soon (x fingers) they are more than like to to get married as well.

May I ask these Karens if they trashed them too and called their beautiful love and relationship gross, creepy, pedo, etc? That is when they usually evaporate like fart in a sea storm.

Stay with me is NOT bromance.

These meltdown drama queens are usually uptight, neo-victorian western schoolgirls who literally enjoy transgressive pearl-clutching, that is what they live for. And while they love sprinkling their bs with fashionable lingo of various aspects of sexual assaults they are also ignorant and totally clueless. They don't even know that paedophile means being sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children and a 16 years old minor guy above age consent limit is nowhere near belongs to this category. Even if they had sex in real life that would not be illegal.

This whole thing is ridiculous and hypocritical to the core. So at the age of 14, Jodie Foster can play a chain-smoking, seasoned teenage prostitute who has shagged with half of New York in Taxi Driver in such a way that she was nominated for an Oscar. Macaulay Culkin can play an evil serial killer at the age of 13. But for a 16-year-old to play another 16 or 17-year-old, who has homoerotic kink thoughts, perversions, and subsequent actions to follow, like bed scenes, that is the end of the world. Because 16-year-olds never think like that, let alone doing it before blowing out 18 candles on their birthday cakes. The entire moanfest is about their own phobias. They want to desexualize everyone under the magical number of 18 (as if the maturity of each person were defined by this arbitrary number, we all know some are mature at 16 and some are not even over 20) for the peace of their prudish minds. If anything is sick than that is. I see the one who wanted to call the police on you has Jeff and Barcode in their profile pic. You really cannot make this up.

Feck off, imbecile.

Then educate yourself about the difference between so called "real life children" and post-pubescent minors above age consent, especially in terms of legal capabilities and IQ+EQ differences. Those who cannot make this distinction are per definition prudes. You're welcome. Furthermore we all know that so-called "concern" - which this 16 years old does not need and has not asked for, let alone any of you to butt in his business - is nothing but virtue signalling and play-acting faux outrage for self-appreciation.

Another reassurance that sane people should not give a flying feck about the overwhelmingly asinine comments of this site. I purposefully avoided it to judge it myself. Now I looked back some and goodness me...

Nothing world-shattering and sometimes a bit elongated, but it was a charming, nicely done, thoroughly lovely slice of life romance with amiable performers.

The ending very obviously suggests an upcoming second season but even for those who could not figure it out (though not a rocket science) should be clear about it by the QA after the finale. But why would they bother some fact-checking instead of moaning, sure.

And here come the apoplectic prudish BL Karens in a row with their panties twisted around their necks. Pass the popcorn.

And the reason? Just because some prudish A-holes pulled that out of their arses? Mind your own business.

It was so frigging obvious that episode 4 was not the final, from the way it ended and from the way Sukfilm heralded it in its channel, never calling it final, but the belligerent fucktards run here knee-jerk to vomit their ball out and downvote an otherwise decent, if not outstanding series. What an emetic snake pit this site is, goodness me.

You have used a term incorrectly and you were corrected. When this happens to me if I made mistakes, like everybody does, I usually say "Thank you, I should have used the right term". That is also an option for a possible reaction, assuming someone is intelligent and adult enough, instead of making a tantrum that somebody dared to correct me.

By using this term incorrectly you wrongly label totally legal and morally impeccable relationships, like the 12 year-old relationship of Both and Newyear who got together when one of them was a minor, as paedophilia. It is not hard to see why it is important, especially nowadays when everyone just throws the "paedophile" stamp around like pepper on food. Hopefully now you understand it. Bye.

"adults and minors because that’s pedophilia" That is what you wrote. It is factually wrong.

Get your medication fixed.

Get your facts straight. Paedophilia is when adults have sexual attraction to prepubescent kids, not minors. Adults and minors is NOT paedophilia. Actually it is even legal when the minor is above the age consent defined by that particular country.

As for the last scene, I am undecided whether he moved out or was he in the same condo. I was also wondering whether it was supposed to be a different condo but shot at the same one with different lighting (budget). But at the end of the day, it is not even that important. It could have been the same condo too, the day after. The importance of the phone call is the relevance: the sign they carry on.

Daily misuse of buzzword "toxic" ticked. Sweet dreams.

There were no 3 endings. The 3 scenes came in a row, in chronological order. On their way back home in the park they agree that YD moves out and SH keeps in touch with him. Then they go home and spend a night together, also agreeing they try to get back together (but not immediately, their agreement in the park is still valid), and then the third scene is about SH calling YD and asking how he was, inviting him for dinner, so SH gives YD a sign he no longer avoids him.

They practically agreed they start "seeing/dating/getting to know" each other. I think the way we define this procedure is almost irrelevant. They realized that their life could be better if they try together but at the same time they both know it is a long way to go. SH needs some space and figure himself out without having to be fully responsible for others like he used to be for his parents, while YD has to learn how to love himself and stand on his feet without leaning on and supported by those around him. And first of all, both have to overcome their gloomy past.

Seriously my mind boggles and explodes that peeps blame it on the low-budget, the production, the script, whatever that they could not grasp the point which was very well-told and eruditely articulated, just because the screenplay did not spoon-feed them by showing a displayer like "Hey man, here comes the message, read my lips".

It was an excellent drama from start to finish. Mind-blowing acting, sufficiently dark atmosphere, a brilliant animated intro, etc. I particularly loved their interesting dynamics, how they portrayed the complex way they tried to show care for each other while simultaneously hiding their feelings. They managed to compress so much emotion, feelings, character development into 5*20 minutes that it is on its own worth the adulation.

I would say a wispy, bittersweet but definitely optimistic ending. Their final conversation - on their way home and then by the bed - was all about their attempt to try while knowing they both have loads of packages to carry.