The foreshadowing of the events in todayâs episodes were so brilliant. Classic Kang Full moves.
- Detective friend Jung Hyeok was shown to have a similar isolated personality keeping his distance from the world. - The subplot of stalker and Yuna who got injured and who liked the detective got injured as per the Witch theory. - So he felt guilty and has emotional connection with the victim. - Dong jin probably knew this from college.
Add on if Iâve missed anything, Iâm sure there will be more.
From what has been revealed so far, those accidents that happen was not just around Mi Jeong. Even the Detective friend of his has a similar curse around him. Dong Jin was collecting data on him as well. Now we have to see how the rest of story unfolds.
Um sorry no...there is Only one predatory Gender...and that is Men. Women are stupid ass dick riding bitches for…
I would never say both are equally capable đ The crux of the matter is KSH needs to be convicted for his crimes and hope this wonât get settled without a proper investigation.
I didnât mean to offend or attack youđ Since a week this issue has taken a toll on my mind. Iâm not a KSH fan or anything, just that the news was disturbing. Anyway thanks for having a civil discussion.
Um sorry no...there is Only one predatory Gender...and that is Men. Women are stupid ass dick riding bitches for…
Iâm a male and I have male friends whoâs calling out on KSHâs crimes and needless to say there will be others who will do the same.
Female autocrats like Queen Mary I of England, Catherine the great of Russia and more were capable causing havoc and deaths. I do agree men are inherently capable of doing gruesome acts but just like how all women need not be apologetic due to acts of certain number of women, I feel the same when it comes to men. Bad people needs to be accountable for their actions.
In cases of grooming itâs almost always men and seldom women, how many cases do we have like the French president?…
I agree with most of the things what you said.
Regarding the parents, I know the parents have best interest to send their children to stardom and success but had they known about this and if they have turned a blind eye to it they are also a huge part of the problem.
I just hope the deceased Kim Saeronâs name wonât be tainted even further. Someone whoâs as influential as the accused can get away with anything, sad nature of the world we live in.
Um sorry no...there is Only one predatory Gender...and that is Men. Women are stupid ass dick riding bitches for…
Iâm not denying the fact are men are predatory well infact itâs scientific.
But here's the thing: just because there's a biological instinct doesnât mean all men act on it. Their behavior is heavily influenced by social norms, culture, and personal values, which teach them to respect others, seek mutual consent, and control these instincts.
Plus, each person is different, things like upbringing, personality, and life experiences play a big role in how someone behaves.
Just like how men are capable of doing the above listed things by you, women are capable condoing such acts, doesnât make them any less of an evil. Bad acts are bad acts is all Iâm saying.
Thatâs exactly what I was saying! Itâs not just men defending him, in fact it's many of his female fans, blinded…
The biased fans called her an attention-seeker when GM denied dating rumours back when she was alive. The judgmenent is so clouded that they canât even comprehend their mind enough to raise a suspicion why did they deny the allegation and lie about them not dating back then and now agreeing to a relationship when she turned into a âtechnicalâ adult is very much saying itâs just a last resort for further damage control.
Iâm not here to pick an argument and hopefully youâll understand what Iâm trying to say after reading the comments.
To those who claim that it's always men, or the classic "man or bear" situation, it's mostly women whoâs defending his actions. At the core, it all boils down to a simple truth: when human beings, regardless of gender, forget the line between sanity and morality, they all fall into the same category of being harmful individuals.
Ultimately, the true issue lies in the failure to recognize the moral line between acceptable behavior and harmful conduct. Regardless of gender or biological instincts, when people forget or ignore the distinction between right and wrong, they become harmful individuals.
In the end, it's not about gender; it's about the choices we make and the responsibility we take for our actions. So kindly refrain from the generalisation and rather focus on person who has commited the act.
It's disturbing when people try to justify or downplay something as serious as grooming. The fact that their story has shifted over time, first denying the relationship entirely and now falling back on a "technicality"âonly makes it more suspicious. It raises questions about what really happened before she turned 18 and whether there was a pattern of manipulation or inappropriate behavior leading up to it.
Even if they technically started dating at 18, it doesnât erase the possibility that grooming occurred beforehand. Itâs frustrating to see some people prioritize legal loopholes over moral responsibility.
Idolizing celebrities and assuming theyâre flawless is a mistake. Theyâre human and capable of wrongdoing, so when they cross ethical or legal lines, they must be held accountable like anyone else. Fame shouldnât excuse misconduct.
We need to recognize that celebrities are not the personas they presentâpolite and humble on the surface, but their true thoughts and actions remain largely unknown.
A troubling trend on TikTok and Reels is people posting videos of other celebrities with captions like, "If they ever do something shady, itâs over." This raises questions about selective moralityâwhere outrage depends on who commits the act rather than condemning the wrongdoing itself. It suggests that crimes are excusable as long as theyâre not committed by oneâs favorite idols or actors, which is a dangerous mindset.
Ultimately, I hope the full truth comes to light, the victims find peace, and the accused are held accountable if found guilty.
Did the writers forget it was a Sci-Fi horror midway and turned it into a psychopathic genre? They baited us till episode 9 to give us an ending made me say âWhat the shiballl?â every other second.
- The subplot of stalker and Yuna who got injured and who liked the detective got injured as per the Witch theory.
- So he felt guilty and has emotional connection with the victim.
- Dong jin probably knew this from college.
Add on if Iâve missed anything, Iâm sure there will be more.
I didnât mean to offend or attack youđ Since a week this issue has taken a toll on my mind. Iâm not a KSH fan or anything, just that the news was disturbing. Anyway thanks for having a civil discussion.
Female autocrats like Queen Mary I of England, Catherine the great of Russia and more were capable causing havoc and deaths. I do agree men are inherently capable of doing gruesome acts but just like how all women need not be apologetic due to acts of certain number of women, I feel the same when it comes to men. Bad people needs to be accountable for their actions.
Regarding the parents, I know the parents have best interest to send their children to stardom and success but had they known about this and if they have turned a blind eye to it they are also a huge part of the problem.
I just hope the deceased Kim Saeronâs name wonât be tainted even further. Someone whoâs as influential as the accused can get away with anything, sad nature of the world we live in.
But here's the thing: just because there's a biological instinct doesnât mean all men act on it. Their behavior is heavily influenced by social norms, culture, and personal values, which teach them to respect others, seek mutual consent, and control these instincts.
Plus, each person is different, things like upbringing, personality, and life experiences play a big role in how someone behaves.
Just like how men are capable of doing the above listed things by you, women are capable condoing such acts, doesnât make them any less of an evil. Bad acts are bad acts is all Iâm saying.
To those who claim that it's always men, or the classic "man or bear" situation, it's mostly women whoâs defending his actions. At the core, it all boils down to a simple truth: when human beings, regardless of gender, forget the line between sanity and morality, they all fall into the same category of being harmful individuals.
Ultimately, the true issue lies in the failure to recognize the moral line between acceptable behavior and harmful conduct. Regardless of gender or biological instincts, when people forget or ignore the distinction between right and wrong, they become harmful individuals.
In the end, it's not about gender; it's about the choices we make and the responsibility we take for our actions. So kindly refrain from the generalisation and rather focus on person who has commited the act.
Even if they technically started dating at 18, it doesnât erase the possibility that grooming occurred beforehand. Itâs frustrating to see some people prioritize legal loopholes over moral responsibility.
Idolizing celebrities and assuming theyâre flawless is a mistake. Theyâre human and capable of wrongdoing, so when they cross ethical or legal lines, they must be held accountable like anyone else. Fame shouldnât excuse misconduct.
We need to recognize that celebrities are not the personas they presentâpolite and humble on the surface, but their true thoughts and actions remain largely unknown.
A troubling trend on TikTok and Reels is people posting videos of other celebrities with captions like, "If they ever do something shady, itâs over." This raises questions about selective moralityâwhere outrage depends on who commits the act rather than condemning the wrongdoing itself. It suggests that crimes are excusable as long as theyâre not committed by oneâs favorite idols or actors, which is a dangerous mindset.
Ultimately, I hope the full truth comes to light, the victims find peace, and the accused are held accountable if found guilty.