oppa_

Despite being a developed country, South Korea still struggles with deeply rooted patriarchal norms that shape how women are perceived — not as equals, but often as objects of male sexual desire. This is reflected not just in private attitudes, but in popular media, workplace culture, and even the legal system.

1. Women as Sexual Objects

K-pop and entertainment industries heavily sexualize young women. While it may appear glamorous, female idols are trained to appeal to male fantasies, and their image is tightly controlled by male-dominated management.

The “male gaze” dominates Korean media — women are portrayed more for their appearance than their intelligence or autonomy. TV shows, dramas, and advertisements routinely depict women as submissive, cute, or available.

In daily life, women face constant objectification — from unsolicited comments on appearance to inappropriate touching in crowded places. There's a normalized culture of men commenting on or feeling entitled to women's bodies.


2. The Rise of Digital Sex Crimes

South Korea has faced an epidemic of spycam (molka) crimes, where hidden cameras are installed in toilets, hotel rooms, or public places to film women without consent. Victims rarely get justice, while perpetrators often receive mild sentences.

Nth Room Scandal: A 2020 case where hundreds of women (some underage) were blackmailed into filming degrading and violent sexual content. The content was distributed online. The public was shocked not only by the scale of the abuse, but also by how slow and soft the justice system was to respond.


3. How Rape Victims Are Treated

Victim-blaming is rampant. Women who report rape are often asked about their clothing, behavior, or sexual history. There's a strong cultural tendency to shame women for “damaging” a man’s future or reputation.

Police and legal bias: Authorities frequently doubt or downplay victims’ statements, especially if there is no physical evidence (which is common in sexual assault). Instead of focusing on trauma, investigations often feel like interrogations.

Many victims don’t come forward out of fear of social stigma, career damage, or even being sued for defamation by their attacker — yes, that happens.

Statistical reality: According to Korean Women’s Development Institute, fewer than 10% of rape cases result in conviction. And even then, sentences are often light — a few years at most.


4. A Society Still in Denial

While younger generations and feminists are pushing for change, South Korea has also seen a backlash against feminism. Feminist voices are often mocked or silenced, and women who speak out — especially public figures — face brutal online harassment.

The government has at times minimized women’s concerns, and public policy responses often lack urgency.



---

In short, South Korea’s modern economy and infrastructure coexist with a culture where women are still objectified, and victims of sexual violence are often re-traumatized by the very institutions that should protect them. Change is happening, but resistance is strong — especially from the powerful forces that benefit from maintaining the status quo.

Despite being a developed country, South Korea still struggles with deeply rooted patriarchal norms that shape how women are perceived — not as equals, but often as objects of male sexual desire. This is reflected not just in private attitudes, but in popular media, workplace culture, and even the legal system.

1. Women as Sexual Objects

K-pop and entertainment industries heavily sexualize young women. While it may appear glamorous, female idols are trained to appeal to male fantasies, and their image is tightly controlled by male-dominated management.

The “male gaze” dominates Korean media — women are portrayed more for their appearance than their intelligence or autonomy. TV shows, dramas, and advertisements routinely depict women as submissive, cute, or available.

In daily life, women face constant objectification — from unsolicited comments on appearance to inappropriate touching in crowded places. There's a normalized culture of men commenting on or feeling entitled to women's bodies.


2. The Rise of Digital Sex Crimes

South Korea has faced an epidemic of spycam (molka) crimes, where hidden cameras are installed in toilets, hotel rooms, or public places to film women without consent. Victims rarely get justice, while perpetrators often receive mild sentences.

Nth Room Scandal: A 2020 case where hundreds of women (some underage) were blackmailed into filming degrading and violent sexual content. The content was distributed online. The public was shocked not only by the scale of the abuse, but also by how slow and soft the justice system was to respond.


3. How Rape Victims Are Treated

Victim-blaming is rampant. Women who report rape are often asked about their clothing, behavior, or sexual history. There's a strong cultural tendency to shame women for “damaging” a man’s future or reputation.

Police and legal bias: Authorities frequently doubt or downplay victims’ statements, especially if there is no physical evidence (which is common in sexual assault). Instead of focusing on trauma, investigations often feel like interrogations.

Many victims don’t come forward out of fear of social stigma, career damage, or even being sued for defamation by their attacker — yes, that happens.

Statistical reality: According to Korean Women’s Development Institute, fewer than 10% of rape cases result in conviction. And even then, sentences are often light — a few years at most.


4. A Society Still in Denial

While younger generations and feminists are pushing for change, South Korea has also seen a backlash against feminism. Feminist voices are often mocked or silenced, and women who speak out — especially public figures — face brutal online harassment.

The government has at times minimized women’s concerns, and public policy responses often lack urgency.



---

In short, South Korea’s modern economy and infrastructure coexist with a culture where women are still objectified, and victims of sexual violence are often re-traumatized by the very institutions that should protect them. Change is happening, but resistance is strong — especially from the powerful forces that benefit from maintaining the status quo.

You're not describing reality — you're describing a fantasy wrapped in PR. The so-called "civilized OECD" nations that you admire were built on centuries of barbarism, colonial exploitation, and economic violence, not on some magical values of justice and fairness.

Let’s take your poster child of “civilized justice” — the United States. It’s not a democracy anymore; it’s an oligarchy. Political power is bought and sold openly. If Elon Musk or any billionaire can tilt elections with money, don’t pretend that courts are sacred. Citizens United legalized corruption by calling it “free speech.” You think South Korea’s system is untouchable? If money can influence the White House, it sure as hell can buy a judge in Seoul — probably on a discount.

“Civilization” in this context means sanitized control by elites. These systems are only smooth if you're at the top or benefit from the illusion. And when you say South Korea can’t be called out because “others are worse,” that’s not an argument — it’s deflection. Justice isn't about comparing wounds; it's about acknowledging rot wherever it exists.

So no — calling these OECD nations “civilized” is just dressing up power and privilege in pretty language. They are not above criticism, and they're certainly not models of flawless justice.

After the terrible performance in Dear Hyeri.

OECD has nothing to do with justice
OECD is a economic organisation which might be useless against TACO,
What is point of linking it with justice system of rape heaven south korea.

Oh of course, because in today’s justice system, it’s always the rich, powerful man who's magically innocent and the poor, traumatized victim who somehow ends up being the criminal. Classic plot twist.

How does medical center allow it without second parties consent
She and her ex husband can have understanding and him being okay with it afterwards. Is there personal decision
But how come medical center that implant IVF have such low level of ethics ?

Mostly good acting. I particularly liked Gong Hoo-Jin. Super good job! Lee Min-Ho was good too, but the way his character was written made it hard to like him in this role (not his fault!).

Not reading the script but just doing it to get some money for his old wrinkles face to get some botox is his fault.
He must be desperate for those pennies

Very sad ending which I did NOT like at all. I'm not saying it's "bad" but I don't watch 16 hours to be bummed at the end.
A woman like her deserve that ending so only thing that was good in it was it's sad ending

It deserves 0 but MDL doesn't allow that so it got 1-2

Over and over we are told of the importance of giving life a chance while through a character's selfishness or singlemindedness lives are put at unnecessary risk.
Only new life matter, old people should just die for a cheater couple

Well her career was nothing more then a cheater woman, who seduces other woman's finance for sex.

No wonder south korea's birth rate improve after this drama 😜

it was basically a fraud marriage without disclosing his marital status and his children whom that woman become mother of without her knowing anything.

Yes, exactly—that’s what I was trying to say. From his side, he wasn’t trying to destroy her or harm her deliberately. But being married doesn’t automatically stop someone from feeling tempted or acting out of lust or selfishness. Men like him often think they can get away with subtle flirting or even start something like an office affair or a drunken one-night stand, especially if they believe the other person is interested.

In this case, he completely misread her and when things didn’t go as he wanted, he was humiliated. Instead of taking responsibility for what he did or how he acted, he shut down and left her to deal with everything on her own. Not because he wanted her to suffer—but because he was scared. Scared of being exposed, of facing his wife, and of owning up to what he was actually trying to do.

So, to protect himself, he went into defense mode and ended up shifting the blame onto her. That’s what makes the situation even worse—his silence and avoidance weren’t just about guilt, they were also a way to survive and maintain his reputation, even if it meant she got hurt in the process. That’s why I think he’s not a pure villain, but definitely morally weak and selfish.

Yes, I understand now that the real issue is that he framed her, allowed damaging rumors to spread, and even let his wife publicly humiliate her—all without ever stepping in to clarify the truth. That was cruel, and it’s obvious he took advantage of his higher position to punish her socially and emotionally. And sadly, everyone around her played along without ever hearing her side.

I see him clearly as someone who wronged an innocent woman. He should absolutely be held accountable—for workplace bullying, defamation, and abuse of power. That’s where his guilt lies.

But what I was trying to say is that what he did doesn’t quite fall under sexual harassment, at least not in the legal or direct sense. She was never touched, coerced, or propositioned. The rumors and mistreatment weren’t initiated for sexual gain, even if they gave off that implication. So her accusing him of sexual harassment might appear as if she’s trying to label him as a predator to destroy his image, which can be dangerous—especially when the actual wrongdoing (defamation and bullying) is already serious and valid enough on its own.

Of course, that doesn't mean she’s exaggerating everything or that her trauma isn’t real. She’s clearly being harassed in her workplace, emotionally and professionally. I just feel we should be precise in naming the kind of abuse happening—so it can be addressed correctly. That’s all I was trying to say.

in court, this kind of claim wouldn't hold because legally, sexual harassment requires either unwelcome physical advances, clear verbal conduct of a sexual nature, or a power imbalance being used specifically to obtain sexual favors. But in this case, she was the one who leaned in first (even if it was innocent), and there was no kiss, no touch, and no direct proposition.

His defense lawyer would absolutely tear that apart, probably arguing she initiated closeness, and everything else was just misinterpretation or office gossip. That doesn’t mean she wasn’t mistreated — but legally, sexual harassment is a very specific charge, and what happened doesn’t meet that threshold. He should be sued for office bullying, defamation, and abuse of power, not for a crime he didn't commit.

maybe he is still promising minor girl roles in his dramas.

at least he provide free minor girls to other pedos in cast

What can I do? That’s exactly the issue — shows like Love Alarm and many others blur the lines between sexual assault and romance, just because the guy is conventionally attractive. A kiss without consent magically becomes “romantic” if he looks good and broods a little. And the worst part? Viewers eat it up.

So now we’ve got a generation of self-centered narcissists who believe that as long as they’re good looking, any move they make will be seen as “passion” — not harassment. That’s not just bad storytelling, it’s dangerous messaging.

So yeah, I’m not mad at shows that actually teach consent. I’m mad at the hypocrisy — the double standard that excuses harassment when it’s done by a handsome lead, and then crucifies others for far less when it fits the narrative.

If we’re going to teach consent, then let’s actually teach it — consistently. Not just when it’s convenient or when the guy isn’t wearing a leather jacket and smirking.

He was literally asleep when she leaned way too close — whether she meant well or not, invading someone's personal space like that is still a choice. He misread it in that moment, thought she was making a move, and the second it was cleared up, he backed off. He never even kissed her — he tried to, because of a misunderstanding. There was no assault. No force. Just a moment of awkward confusion.

Now suddenly she wants to press charges? That feels less like justice and more like revenge.
It’s like two coworkers flirt, drink, kiss — date for a month — and when it ends badly, one suddenly rewrites that first kiss as non-consensual. That’s dangerous.

Misunderstandings happen. But reframing consensual or unclear moments after a fallout just to hurt the other person isn’t empowerment — it’s manipulation.

And the irony? You people are out here trying to frame a fictional character for sexual harassment when it didn’t even happen — but turn around and defend actual predators like Lee Geung-young. Make it make sense.