Nan

It does not have an open end. It is quite clear and defined. It is not happy nor sad, it is REAL, as real as the plot story. No fairy tale, not our typical "BL" drama, it is a deep drama with gay male characters.

Thank you!
My thoughts are that because I have the website in my mother language, not English, there is no translation of the sinopsis... I'll check it if I can change.
You've been very kind!

That's the familiar spot for MDL but this one does not have it... or I'm completely blind.

Is there a sinopsis? Anybody knows what it is about?

Do you know when episode #3 will be free on YT?

Thanks! I'll give it a try

Thanks!

Oowww... I find them hard to see, is it with both leads? Do they romanticize it? That's a definite no for me.
And thank you! You help me a lot!

To those who already watched it, does it have a rape scene or situation? Thanks for answering!

I appreciate your concern on my wellbeing, I feel better commenting than keeping my opinion untold. I know we will maybe never know the truth about what happened, however, that does not mean we can not stand a position from what we've learnt.
And by the way, I'm not frustrated but concerned and as such I intend to clarify because we are not only spectators, we are participants of this matter, building awareness is important.

First of all, there is no such a thing as being neutral, being neutral means taking the side of the stronger.
Secondly, and I think it is the tenth time I'm writing it, I'm not accusing him, I'm stating the biased aspect of this article which is trying to show he has refuting evidence, which, by the way, feeds his fans with wrong concepts to keep defending him as you all can see in this comment section.
I'm not saying he took advange of a minor, but as well none can say he did not. So, please, for the love of the god you believe in, stop blindingly defending a possible abuser.

I'm only refering to what was accepted by both parts.
After years of denying it, he accepted he lied about his relationship with KSR. He accepted that he sent her a letter as a close friend when she was legally still a minor and he was almost 30 years old during his military service. And he accepted that he dated her when she was a legal adult of 19 years old and he was over 30.
Nothing else.
My first statement was clear, I am not saying he did. However, if he did groom her, the fact that he presents proves he had a girlfriend at the same time does not refute a thing.
Did I make myself clear? Can you not understand facts?

Thanks! I needed that spoiler.

I think is for teens and young adults. However, as an old lady myself I found it delightful and enjoyed it a lot. Probably just needed some fluffy in my life some times.

Maybe you'll change your mind by the end of episode #2.
His behavior is quite comprehensive.
^^;

I hope I'm not too late... DO NOT watch 20th century girl. DO NOT.

In my case, I do not consider you CAPABLE of a normal discussion, nor able to find an argument to sustain your point of view but simple fanatism.

Barely enjoyable.
It had potential, interesting base material and good cast, but terrible directing destroyed it.

I see, that's why you do not mind the facts.
How hypocritical of you, you do not bother writing your opinion against one part but get all fired up when others speak up against yours. If facts are only talked in court, stop commenting about it already and avoid deffending a possible groomer.

Exactly, justice is done in court not in a biased article written by fans.