AleksandraSucur

Yes, I agree with your statement. ML said today something about A Sheng being unapproachable or distrustful towards people (with the FL being an exception) but very straightforward in expressing her standings. In casual speech today we would say she is very... no bullshit, no nonsense person and this particular trait is actually... charming, relateable in a different way, we know exactly what to expect from her.
I also agree with you that the FL is way less fascinating, but unlike you, I don't think it's the actress's fault. The root is in the script and the problem isn't in the fact FL's character contains certain contraddictions (Xin Mei actually lamented several times she is confused, asks for directions or explanations for what she perceives as problematic/confusing and is also aware she is not always in a control of her emotions and temper), but in the fact we've seen more than a half of this drama and still a) have no clue what to expect from this character, b) have no clue what triggers her shifting from rational, meek and goodhearted girl to a badass ready to punish and kill while seeking justice for complete strangers, not only without asking for the other side's opinion (as she would do in her "rational mode") but refusing even to hear the name of the person she is to fight, dismissing his/her presentations as "too much talk" and c) what she lamented (confusion etc.) is insufficient to mitigate OUR confusion about her character.
These three facts combined brought me to a logical conclusion: her character is simply inconsistently written (and how the FL is written is not the only flaw in the script). Any other actress in this role would give the same inconsistent vibes. Maybe, before this actress, the role was offered to those who are more experienced in leading roles and they've said: no, thanks, this character isn't properly written.

I don't get why everybody is upset with A Sheng. Her possessive behaviour towards Mei is totally consequential to her persona, abused and traumatised as a child. Yesterday I've noticed there's no normal parent in this drama, almost all characters suffered some form of trauma as children. Yet the only person who behaves consequentially to this fact is A Sheng, who is showing typical symptoms of abandonment syndrome - the thought she could be separated from the only person who gave her warmth and security freaks her out: that's why she went after her in the first place after binding her teacher.
Truly irritating is this swarming horde locusts, pieces of sh*t who think they are stars and heroes. "Immortal cultivators" which - what an irony - destroy cultivation, convinced they have every right to do it. I can't stand them any more, must FF each time they appear on screen. Writers should have mercy on us and send them to hell asap

As "protection providers" of the commoners, sects enjoy high privileges, reputation and payments from taxes. If the commoners regain the knowledge to create sophisticated arms and defences, ie. if they become able to protect themselves without special powers of cultivators, the role of the latter will greatly diminish, that's why they see as their vested interest to prevent the commoners to acquire any further knowledge

Yeah, because that's a separate type of bad parenting and bleak surrounding a (usually narcissist) parent created: the one aimed to create mercilessness, blind obeyance and competiveness espc. in pleasing the parent. Actually, this type is more realistic, while the first one is far from realistic. Once grown-up, traumatized children tend to lack self confidence, as they percieve themselves not worthy of love or responsible for the abuses suffered... not to mention the abandonment syndrome which impedes them to control emotions and manage their daily tasks.
I def. dislike the fondness for this trope and it isn't actually only Chinese, I have a feeling that Asian writers in general are convinced that the harsher is one's childhood, the more extraordinary the child will be once grown up. Even in rare cases when such children succeed to excell in something (eg. sports or arts), the past traumas backlash in form of abuse of substances and disfunctional emotional relations.

Not a single normal parent in this drama. C-drama authors seem to be a little bit too obsessed with the idea that all heroes must have had a horrible childhood, as if their extraordinariety is somehow linked with a past trauma. And to make the trope complete, that traumatic experience will always push them to long for a "normal", quite & peaceful life.

The authors must have reached their exhaustion limits in creation of annoying characters after they've written Jiang Ji and Nangong guy with the flute - their only purpose in the story is to irritate the audience with their self-importance. These two left them with no energy to dedicate to a love rival's trope, lol

When will this drama finally be out?

👍😂😂😂

Heh, repeated push & pulls are also annoying. I imagine the scriptwriters couldn't skip the old sedimented animosity between the war demons and the immortal sects (which we've seen as arrogant hypocrites who don't care about the commoners, a trait typical for the universe built by the original creator), but the particular confrontation between LQQ and Mei should have been toned down, in line with their characters.
It isn't the first inconsistency btw.

yup, completely illogical

That was the lowest dialogue in the entire drama, less believeable than her lecturing sects' chiefs in Chongjing valley. Even the actress's perfect delivery of broken emotions couldn't cover up the lack of logic in her speech and the underlying unoriginal trope ("your clan killed mine, so you're my enemy")

that was a figure of speech, I was ironic. Ofc she didn't advanced tnx for her fight for injustice but the outcome of her fighting was that she advanced although the direct cause was smth else.

He indeed saw people killing for the tokens (required to obtain the pills) issued by the "medicine valley" and there's no question he was angry with Su for it. But when he angrily confronted Su Taiyi he didn't accuse him for issuing the tokens, opening a sort of hunger games among cultivators in order to obtain them, but for the immortality tax which induced people to starvation.
I raise an issue only when notice some basic logic seems to be missing, creating an incoherence in the storyline or in a character's basic trait.

She said herself she can't stand injustice when she sees it. It's true she warned him but that man was murdered and it's odd for her character not to be bordered who perpetrated that crime.
I don't remember it was mentioned that the immortality tax was applied only in several regions. If it was mentioned, it evidently wasn't sufficiently emphasised to make his not-knowing of it logical to a viewer.

That's what I've said precisely: her advance/regression in levels seems to be unrelated to her fighting for justice.
Btw, Qi level is the beginners' level. Yes, the flower gave her extra power, but of a depleteable kind.

Correct, that guy, Gui, used a time reverse technique thinking he'd overpower her turning time to the point when he was at his strongest and she was just a beginner. As you've said, unfortunately for him, she advanced (for the first time) to a Golden Core level when she was 18, so he couldn't beat her turning time to that level of her power.
Finally, she indeed said she regressed to Qi level several times bc "she couldn't stand injustice" but that was her explanation which may or may not be correct, we don't have sufficient details how this regression (and the subsequent failure to advance) precisely occurred: is there some sort of a "natural backlash" each time a cultivator "meddles into mortal affairs" or she was punished by her shifu or other seniors (maybe at the time when her teacher still hasn't split from Taiyuan sect) or something else. Only if her regression was due to a "natural backlash" her "fighting for justice" is related to her low level of power.
In a particular case of her "revenge of her husband", the sects sent people to punish her, there were no "natural backlashes" when she killed three people

Lets see what LQQ exactly said to Su Taiyi in his boiling anger (ep. 13 opening scene):
"9 out of 10 villages stand empty, (due to) taxes weighing down like mountains, the granaries are bare (...)... Staying alive only adds to the tax burdens (...) Outside is a land of starving corpses and piles of bones! Your dream of immortality is built upon their flesh and blood! (...) In this world, how many die each day from starvation and poverty because of the Immortality Tax!"
He mentioned the immortality tax at least three times, so you can't say he went mad because of the people dying bc of the pills. That tax is imposed to finance the production of the pills, throwing people in extreme misery. When LQQ asks Su: "Can you truly account for this blood debt?" - it wasn't a question, it was an indictment, he holds Su responsible for people's misery.
What is "minor" or "major" flaw is debatable (and often related to a person's perception). I've watched tons of dramas and movies, that's why I think I can tolerate "minor flaws"... but the things I've pointed out above - while may not be huge - still offended my intelligence.

her failures to advance in power levels are unrelated to her intolerance towards injustice. Actually, she advanced from Qi level thanks to the fact she fought the injustice Lu suffered.
We still do not know the real reason for her previous failures, but I expect this aspect will be addressed later in the drama

Ok, for now, I'll take all your opinions into account.
We can always re-discuss all these issues later, once we've seen the 3rd arc

Come on.She stole the token from her master to make him live forever, that act doesn't make her unrigtheous.
A smart argument he started to feel... among other things - the feeling of anger (for immortal tax) - due to his transformation to a human, lol.

Yes, I remember those lines. But he wasn't on the brink of death when we've seen the scene of her stumbling in pain in the hearth: it was just his scull still uncovered that provoked the pain in him and then in her