Damn it's flopping so hard. They butchered the remake. Thats why they should have just left it be, instead of…
o projeto pode ter sido bem planejado e executado tecnicamente, mas se não conecta com o público, a recepção muda rapidamente — e nem sempre a equipe prevê isso.
Wow it's sad... douban score of 3.2 i can see why the points are low... after princess got defiled she became…
O drama sofreu com roteiro inconsistente + expectativas altas + rejeição do público. A nota reflete o conjunto, não apenas o desempenho individual dos atores.
wow the rating is it that bad? was planning to starting this right now. I started part of ep.1 but stopped as…
Nem todo projeto vai agradar. A recepção depende de gosto, expectativa e execução. Orçamento alto ajuda na qualidade visual, mas não garante aceitação do público.
Don't hate me, but this is trash. She can't act, the plot is just to chopped. Things happen that shouldn't and…
Não é apenas culpa dela. É uma combinação de expectativa alta, decisões de produção e execução do drama. A melhora com o tempo é algo comum, principalmente se houver bons projetos e direção.
I know everyone has their own likes and dislikes but things like directing, cinematography, VFX, and post-production…
What many viewers are noticing now is a concerning pattern in casting decisions in some C-dramas. Instead of prioritizing suitability and coherence between actors and their roles, there appears to be a “favor exchange” system between streaming platforms and talent agencies. When a highly popular actor is cast in a project, the platform often ends up taking a “package deal” with the agency, bringing in other actors from the same agency as part of the agreement. As a result, casting choices are sometimes made not based on what fits the story, but to fulfill business arrangements. This directly affects the quality of the drama. Casting actors who are not suitable for their roles — including cases where there is a mismatch in maturity, such as underage actors being placed in roles that require greater emotional depth and experience — undermines the credibility of the story and the audience’s immersion. Audiences are not against new talent or giving opportunities, but they expect casting decisions to be based primarily on suitability and performance. When decisions are driven mainly by agency favors, the result is often criticism, negative reception, and loss of viewership. It is important for platforms to reconsider this approach and place greater value on balancing commercial strategy with artistic quality.
I know everyone has their own likes and dislikes but things like directing, cinematography, VFX, and post-production…
What many viewers are noticing now is a concerning pattern in casting decisions in some C-dramas. Instead of prioritizing suitability and coherence between actors and their roles, there appears to be a “favor exchange” system between streaming platforms and talent agencies. When a highly popular actor is cast in a project, the platform often ends up taking a “package deal” with the agency, bringing in other actors from the same agency as part of the agreement. As a result, casting choices are sometimes made not based on what fits the story, but to fulfill business arrangements. This directly affects the quality of the drama. Casting actors who are not suitable for their roles — including cases where there is a mismatch in maturity, such as underage actors being placed in roles that require greater emotional depth and experience — undermines the credibility of the story and the audience’s immersion. Audiences are not against new talent or giving opportunities, but they expect casting decisions to be based primarily on suitability and performance. When decisions are driven mainly by agency favors, the result is often criticism, negative reception, and loss of viewership. It is important for platforms to reconsider this approach and place greater value on balancing commercial strategy with artistic quality.
Like what others are saying, she's still young and inexperience but she has potential and acting skills and she'll…
Nem acho que o principal problema seja só a idade da protagonista, e sim a falta de coerência no elenco. Teria sido muito mais acertado escalar um ator mais jovem para equilibrar, ou então escolher uma atriz mais velha para assumir o papel principal. Colocar uma atriz mais jovem nessa posição, quando a história exige mais maturidade, acaba não funcionando tão bem. Sinceramente, ela combinaria muito mais com dramas escolares, onde a idade dela faria sentido e poderia até brilhar mais. Nesse caso, talvez fosse melhor colocá-la como coadjuvante e ganhar experiência aos poucos, em vez de assumir um papel principal que não favorece nem ela nem a narrativa. Ser protagonista carrega um peso enorme, com muita pressão e críticas, e talvez seja cedo demais para lidar com tudo isso ao mesmo tempo.
Ainda não assisti mas eu vi que na china eles não gostam da atriz principal pq o pai dela é um funcionário…
There are comments circulating about a possible past controversy involving the actress, as well as criticism regarding the age difference between the lead actors, which some viewers consider inappropriate. In addition, the change in the original cast has caused dissatisfaction among some fans, which has contributed to the drama’s rejection by part of the audience.
When a highly popular actor is cast in a project, the platform often ends up taking a “package deal” with the agency, bringing in other actors from the same agency as part of the agreement. As a result, casting choices are sometimes made not based on what fits the story, but to fulfill business arrangements.
This directly affects the quality of the drama. Casting actors who are not suitable for their roles — including cases where there is a mismatch in maturity, such as underage actors being placed in roles that require greater emotional depth and experience — undermines the credibility of the story and the audience’s immersion.
Audiences are not against new talent or giving opportunities, but they expect casting decisions to be based primarily on suitability and performance. When decisions are driven mainly by agency favors, the result is often criticism, negative reception, and loss of viewership.
It is important for platforms to reconsider this approach and place greater value on balancing commercial strategy with artistic quality.
When a highly popular actor is cast in a project, the platform often ends up taking a “package deal” with the agency, bringing in other actors from the same agency as part of the agreement. As a result, casting choices are sometimes made not based on what fits the story, but to fulfill business arrangements.
This directly affects the quality of the drama. Casting actors who are not suitable for their roles — including cases where there is a mismatch in maturity, such as underage actors being placed in roles that require greater emotional depth and experience — undermines the credibility of the story and the audience’s immersion.
Audiences are not against new talent or giving opportunities, but they expect casting decisions to be based primarily on suitability and performance. When decisions are driven mainly by agency favors, the result is often criticism, negative reception, and loss of viewership.
It is important for platforms to reconsider this approach and place greater value on balancing commercial strategy with artistic quality.
Sinceramente, ela combinaria muito mais com dramas escolares, onde a idade dela faria sentido e poderia até brilhar mais. Nesse caso, talvez fosse melhor colocá-la como coadjuvante e ganhar experiência aos poucos, em vez de assumir um papel principal que não favorece nem ela nem a narrativa. Ser protagonista carrega um peso enorme, com muita pressão e críticas, e talvez seja cedo demais para lidar com tudo isso ao mesmo tempo.