_motoshige_kanai_

I’m not American actually. Just out of curiosity, when you say you’re a near neighbour of Korea, which country are you from?

One of the best k-drama I’ll would never hesitate to recommend to anyone

2 weeks??? Time flies by so fast

Don’t worry, your point came across clearly. Even if we don’t agree on every detail, I appreciate that you took the time to explain your perspective respectfully

I think I understand your point better now. To me, it sounds like what affected you the most wasn’t just the case itself, but the way discussions around it were handled. If you were insulted, dismissed, or treated unfairly simply for asking questions or expressing your opinion, then I can understand why you’re frustrated.

Personally, I don’t think anyone should be condemned without evidence, and I don’t think anyone deserves to be harassed because of their opinion. At the same time, I also try to be careful about viewing entire groups of people through the actions of the worst individuals within them. Some people acted with hostility, some acted emotionally, and some were genuinely trying to understand a situation that became incredibly complicated and emotionally charged.

I also agree that what happened to Kim Sae-ron reflects a much bigger issue about public judgment, online pressure, and how quickly people can turn against someone. It’s a reminder that behind every headline is a real person. The same principle applies to anyone facing public scrutiny, regardless of which side people are on.

What stands out to me from your comments is that you’re not only talking about one actor or one case — you’re talking about a culture where people are often judged before they’re fully understood. I think that’s a concern worth discussing, even if people may disagree on certain details of this particular case.

At the end of the day, I don’t think empathy, evidence, and respectful discussion should ever be controversial. We may not agree on every conclusion, but I think we can agree that no one benefits when conversations become driven by insults, assumptions, or the desire to see another person destroyed

I think we agree on one important thing: people shouldn’t be judged, harassed, or condemned before facts are properly verified. I also agree that there are people online who become emotionally invested in a narrative and stop caring about evidence once they’ve made up their minds.

Where I see things differently is that I don’t believe everyone who had questions, concerns, or doubts should be placed in the same category as those who actively spread hate. Public controversies are rarely that simple. Many people were trying to make sense of a situation where information was constantly changing, being disputed, and interpreted in different ways.

I also think one of the biggest problems with online spaces is that the loudest and most extreme voices often end up representing entire groups, when in reality they don’t. The people harassing others don’t speak for everyone who had concerns, just as the most aggressive supporters don’t speak for everyone who believed in him.

As for controversies in general, whether it’s this case or something like Perfect Crown, I think every situation deserves to be examined on its own facts rather than through the lens of either support or outrage. Sometimes criticism is unfair, sometimes it’s justified, and sometimes the truth is more complicated than either side wants to admit.

Personally, I try not to see these situations as a battle between supporters and haters. I think it’s healthier to stay open to facts, avoid assumptions, and remember that disagreement alone doesn’t automatically come from hatred.

I think that’s understandable to a certain extent. When discussions become hostile, people naturally become more defensive. At the same time, I believe it’s important to remember that not every question comes from a place of hate, just as not every defense comes from blind support. Sometimes people are genuinely trying to understand a situation, and I think meaningful conversations become possible when we give each other the benefit of the doubt instead of assuming the worst intentions right away.

I’m not, are you?

np^^

This is the only way I could watch it using coins. it will definitely be uploaded later on any app.

I respect your opinion, but I personally think it’s too early to speak in such absolute terms. Public opinion can change, and people will ultimately make their own decisions about whether they want to support someone’s work or not. I just don’t think it’s fair to assume that everyone who sees the situation differently must have bad intentions.

That’s probably one of the biggest problems with this whole situation. So many people became emotionally invested that conversations stopped being conversations and started feeling like battles. Once that happens, even neutral questions can be misunderstood because everyone is already on edge.

I understand your frustration, and I actually agree with some of what you’re saying. I don’t think people should throw around serious labels or treat accusations as established facts, and I also agree that cyberbullying has caused a lot of harm in cases like this.

At the same time, I think the issue becomes more complicated when we start assuming that everyone who disagrees is acting out of hate, or that everyone who supports one side has the full picture. Public controversies rarely work that way. People react differently, interpret information differently, and sometimes change their views as more information comes out.

I also think it’s possible to acknowledge that both Kim Sae-ron and Kim Soo-hyun were affected by public opinion in different ways without turning it into a competition over who suffered more. What happened to Kim Sae-ron should make people reflect on how harsh online culture can be, and the same principle applies to anyone facing intense public scrutiny.

Where I differ from you is that I don’t see every disagreement as bad faith. Some people genuinely believe the situation is clear, while others still think there are aspects worth questioning or discussing. That doesn’t automatically make one side intelligent and the other hateful — it just means people are reaching different conclusions.

In the end, I think it’s healthier to focus on facts, evidence, and respectful discussion rather than viewing the conversation as a battle between supporters and haters. That’s simply how I see it.

Yes, there are romantic elements, but they’re not the main focus of the story

I think you’ve misunderstood my point. I never said that people who supported Kim Soo-hyun from the beginning caused the same damage as those who spread hate, nor did I say that everyone who supported him was wrong.

My point is simply that this situation became extremely emotional and divided people into two sides very quickly. Some people rushed to hate, some people rushed to defend, and many people were just trying to understand what was actually happening.

I also don’t think it’s fair to assume that everyone who still has questions is automatically a hater. Just because someone doesn’t fully agree with your conclusion doesn’t mean they’re acting out of malice. People can look at the same information and reach different conclusions.

As for whether everything is completely clear now, that’s where our opinions differ. You’re convinced the situation is settled, while others still believe there are aspects that continue to be debated. That’s not necessarily hatred it’s simply a different interpretation of the situation.

And honestly, I think you’re confusing me with someone else I genuinely don’t know who you are, so I’m not sure where the part about changing my profile picture and name came from.

At the end of the day, I don’t support cyberbullying, I don’t support spreading false information, and I don’t support blindly attacking anyone. I just think discussions like this are more productive when we focus on facts rather than assuming everyone who disagrees is an enemy.

ain’t we did not see it :XDD 😭

I understand where you’re coming from, and I agree that people shouldn’t treat accusations as facts before everything is properly investigated. I also agree that cyberbullying is a serious issue and that the way Kim Sae-ron was treated online was often cruel.

My only point is that I don’t think the discussion is as simple as “haters vs supporters.” Some people genuinely have questions or concerns, just as some people genuinely believe he’s innocent. I don’t think it’s fair to assume that everyone who disagrees is acting out of hate, just like it wouldn’t be fair to assume that everyone who supports him is ignoring facts.

Personally, I think this whole situation became so emotional and complicated that people on both sides started making assumptions. That’s why I prefer to focus on verified information rather than deciding that one side is completely right and the other is completely wrong. That’s just my perspective.

you can watch it on app called Lezhin snack so basically you can type your account and your age must include at least 18 then when i watched it i reached 7th episode and then it stopped and asking for payment to continue so it has many options you can use coins but it did not cut from your money just to watch the whole episodes whenever it stops just click coins to continue it other option is you can made subscription for the whole app if you want to watch freely eveything in the app but it to expensive thats why i used just coins for continuing watching the whole epsiodes.

I watched it using coins because the subscription is very expensive, so I just watched the series. But thanks anyway.

How did you manage to watch all 60 episodes? I literally watched 7 episodes, and then episode 8 requires payment to continue.