MickeyMouse

OMG, I never thought I have to explain such a simple text, but yeah here we go:

1. You compared it to a "teacher taking any job that allows them to teach" — except I never said actors should take *any* role. What I said was that an actor’s worth isn’t defined by *what* position they play (main or second lead) but *how* well they portray their character. That’s a big difference.

2. You said “there are different levels and qualifications.” Sure, but that has nothing to do with what I said. My comment wasn’t about *qualifications* — it was about the pointless obsession over lead tags, as if screen time equals talent.

3. Then you added that Lomon “isn’t in a position to reject a second lead role.” Again, nowhere did I say he *should* reject it because it’s a second lead. I literally stated that I *personally* hope he rejects it only because the **synopsis looks weak** to me— not because of the characters's label.

So if we’re being “pretty sure” about things, I’m pretty sure you misread, misinterpreted, and then congratulated yourself for proving a point that didn’t exist.
Next time, maybe read and actually understand the context several times before commenting like this.

My point was the same. Please ready properly.

Are we still crying over the whole “main lead vs. second lead” nonsense? An actor’s job is to act — to prove they can bring any role to life, not to chase screen time. There are plenty of actors who’ve had multiple lead roles yet failed to make an impact, while others have created waves even with a short cameo. It’s all about how well you portray the character.

That said, I honestly hope Lomon rejects this one, only because the synopsis looks pretty weak to me — no other reason. Of course, the final decision is his. And just to state it — no offense to anyone, both Sang Min and Lomon are undeniably gorgeous actors, but when it comes to acting skills and performance, Lomon clearly stands out.

You did watch “Genie, Make a Wish,” right? Because the description you gave says otherwise.

Cry all you want — being delusional is a convenient way to cope with reality, so I’ll let you have that.

Sorry but who is giving you all these wrong information, Her being critically acclaimed that's the joke of the millennium. And she is only appreciated for her beauty in korea, and so does every other idol actor in korea.

Bon appetite was just a food show case nothing more than that, worst story of the year -wait there was no story in it. On other hand chinese dramas are indeed better.

I too genuinely wish him well. He’s got real potential and stands out as one of the more promising young actor. That said, I still believe that while his performance was good, it wasn’t nearly as extraordinary as the online hype suggests.
I would also like to add one more thing: BAYM is the best example of -"All that glitter is not Gold".

The hypocrisy is staggering. Recently, a drama gained massive popularity featuring a character with proven and documented crimes in history (basically facts) like murder, torture, and the assault of women. The audience accepted and even celebrated it, despite the fact that this character clearly deserved scrutiny—simply because it didn’t challenge anyone's religion or cultural identity.

Yet when another drama portrays a completely fictional character—one that isn’t just hypothetical within the story of the drama but also uncertain from a religious perspective, since the existence of "Genie/Satan/Iblis" is purely a matter of belief—the outrage erupts immediately. So, glorifying or romanticizing a real criminal is fine, but portraying a mythical being suddenly crosses the line? Just because the latter touches on religion while the former doesn’t? That contradiction highlights how selective outrage often is.

Personally, I don’t care much about either show. For me, they’re just entertainment—something to watch and move on from. And since I don’t know much about Islam, I won’t make any remarks on that either. But seeing all the recent developments it makes me question how we, as humans, determine what’s truly right or wrong, when so often our judgments are guided more by personal beliefs and emotions than by facts or consistent principles.

**Disclaimer:** This is not a critique of any religion or culture. Nor am I suggesting that creators shouldn’t be held accountable for the misuse of anything in general—not just religion. This writeup is simply a reflection on human behavior, especially after observing the recent outrage. Please read the full paragraph before commenting; on MDL, people often react to only a few words without understanding the point or the context next to what’s written.

Wow, you’ve turned this comment section into your full-time gig — you’re literally everywhere. Honestly, the most free person here is you. Quit pestering people with your weird drama obsession. Your immature, overdramatic antics are getting out of hand, and it’s starting to look like a serious problem. Maybe get yourself checked before it gets worse.

That’s literally what I wrote—"it works both ways". Try learning how to read and grasp context instead of latching onto four random words and rage-batting like a fool. Here’s some free advice: read the whole thing before commenting, or just stop bothering people with your shallow, brainless replies.

At this point, the fans of this drama are seriously overreacting to everything around it. Just because someone points out flaws or found it uninteresting doesn’t make them a “hater,” yet this label is being thrown around far too easily. The thing is, if someone genuinely wants to watch a show, they’ll watch it—if the genre interests them and they have the time, no amount of criticism will stop them, and vice versa. Calling anyone who doesn’t blindly praise the show a hater is shallow and dismissive of genuine critique. The overly emotional attachment of some fans has clouded their judgment, so even a single word that isn’t in favor of the drama seems to set them off. But why? It’s just a drama—they come and go every week. There’s no need to be overdramatic. If you don’t like someone’s review, you can always write your own. And if the so-called “hate” bothers you that much, spread the “love” instead. Problem solved.

Lee Chaemin did well in this drama, but the level of praise surrounding his performance feels disproportionate to what he actually delivered. Though I won't call him mediocre actor, he is better then that. He’s certainly ahead of those actors who have gained recognition not through their own talent, but by starring alongside talented female leads whose performances actually carried the show. In comparison, Chaemin does hold his own, but even so, his work in BAYM, though good, doesn’t quite justify the level of acclaim it has received or receiving. At this point one can say his performance has been overhyped.

I agree with you when it comes to NJH, but I honestly don’t understand what makes you think BWS is any different. By now, it’s pretty clear that in Lovely Runner, all the heavy lifting was done by his female co-star, he mostly served as eye candy for the female audience, which is what truly boosted his popularity. (Kindly don’t defend him on this by saying no one can become famous solely based on face value—because they absolutely can. Korea is full of such cases, and he’s one of them, including NJH.)

And if you’re going to credit NJH’s agency for securing him impressive roles, then BWS’s management deserves the same recognition. Just look at his filmography—there hasn’t been a single project where he wasn’t part of the main cast. Despite his poor acting skills (prior to LR, at present I would put him in "mediocre at best" category), he’s consistently been placed among the leads, while others with similar or even better talent often struggle to get noticed. His agency has clearly done a solid job of positioning him well. And post-Lovely Runner, the kind of PR campaign they’ve executed for him has been genuinely commendable—strategic, well-timed and effective.

So while I agree that NJH is just an okay actor, but calling him out while giving BWS a free pass seems a bit hypocritical, because, in reality, they’re really not that different.

Oh!! I too am a huge fan of the manhwa. Same pinch😁

I agree with your perspective overall, though I must respectfully differ on the assessment of Byeon Woo Seok as an experienced actor.

I don’t believe Byeon Woo Seok can yet be considered an experienced or credible actor. After reviewing his filmography, nothing stands out as evidence of a strong foundation or notable range. His sudden rise in popularity, largely driven by a single character in one breakout show, has brought him significant attention and a growing fanbase, but he still has a long way to go before he can be regarded as a truly versatile and credible performer. *(Popularity is loud but fleeting. Credibility is quiet but enduring.)*

And I don't think his two upcoming projects, one with IU and *Solo Leveling* will do much to change that. The first feels nearly identical to his character in *Lovely Runner*, while *Solo Leveling*’s Sung Jin-Woo is a role that mostly involves looking cool and fighting, hardly a stretch for BWS. While these roles may help sustain his popularity, they offer little room for artistic growth or any meaningful display of range.

That said, I too would have preferred a fresh face in the lead—someone new and undiscovered who could have brought a sense of originality to this live adaptation (the one no one really asked for).