Any evidence you can give to support your argument?.
I think you direct it to the like given by him toward one of the actor. And you said the like given showed he support ped*. Now, i genuinely ask you how did you know the actor was ped*; any proof ?.
If you do had give it to the police and check the validity. Up until now, the police had cleared the allegation surrounding the actor; but you may said he can bribe and manipulate. Let me ask you back do you think that level of celebrity rich can bribe police in SK. Much so fabricated it; dont you also think to at least manipulated sk enforcement agency you need at least a leverage on them. What an actor had to made them obey the actor. They are more lovely to indict if he was surely wrong caused he was an easy target.
it become valid if the accused was an political power or chaebol but the actor only the actor. That pitifull amount of money are nothing compared what chaebol can give to silent people.
I can said so caused im law practicioner; remember the same allegation can happened to your family and it also can have same level of destroy.
Why some people instinctively thought that although the police had clear his allegation they still said that him was guilty regardless. Why? because the narrative doesnt allow them to hate him.
So what some people said “ He is rich and powerfull of course he can manipulate it however he want”
To understand the above statement we must see the accused - Rich = Sure -Powerfull = Nuh Why i said so the limit of his power only in the entertainment industry and that also limited toward his work not entire. He is not powerfull enough to direct enforcement agency to backup him. He does not had political power nor he had leverage on the enforcement agencies. He doesnt control their budget only state does?. Enforcement agencies are more in love to investigate him because he doesnt had political power and his case can help them to boost someone career if they managed to get him indicted. The limit his can do was had a good legal team thats all. From my point of view, he is no that overpowered to consider capable of manipulating things.
To consider someone was groomed there must be evidence to support the claim and various element need to be prove. However, there are no evidence that support that claim and if its true that the accused do it than should be the paparazzi and dispatch had knewn it early in the day when he wasnt as rich and powerfull like right now. The plaintiff however doesnt show any indication getting groomed and i also doubt if she was so because the plaintiff was involved at the entertainment agency from childhood. She is not your average child she was trained enough about entertainment and being educated heavily . She had direct supervision from her parent and entertainment agency. It is more likely if she wasnt groomed. Too add more, wasnt if she indeed get groomed should she be his gf until her death and why after the first year of dating. She leave the relationship and had a boyfriend. Thats indicated she was not stupid and being capable to break free not being caged like a damn slave. There are too many contradiction to said she was being groomed but let said you are correct what evidence stated she was groomed and if you had it give to authority and let them analyze to see it was a truth or not.
Maybe for somepeople wait until her legal age to get dating was consider weird but wasnt there are so many people said in their childhood i want to married this person man/woman in the future although they never being groomed. As their feeling to the person maybe awed or respect enough the mentor or someone older. Its normal ? In china there are many rich woman with young man even the one who only age 18 (just passed).
So i dont understand the double standart.
And dont said i was his supporter i am not his fans, nor i get money from him, nor any benefit i just someone who somehow knew both stories and learn their both statement. My account althought new i am long user of this website so im am not bot. Nor i use an AI
Keep the hate inside your heart. There is no need to spread negativity and seek the therapist if you felt hate toward someone. Reading and verifying sources was a noble thing to do. Made an argument based on fact that are strong not some rumour. Dislike when there is fact not because see on the X. Think what if my close one who received it or myself. If you want other to respect you respect other first. Think before type , heard something verified and if you give opinion also give evidence that unrefutable and can be tested. Culture of hate before think are something only uncivilized people do. Thats all.
Im not bot ! Not being paid! i had use this website very long time and this my first time had the account .
Hope you guys are more critical thinking and not conspiracist theory.
I think you direct it to the like given by him toward one of the actor. And you said the like given showed he support ped*. Now, i genuinely ask you how did you know the actor was ped*; any proof ?.
If you do had give it to the police and check the validity. Up until now, the police had cleared the allegation surrounding the actor; but you may said he can bribe and manipulate. Let me ask you back do you think that level of celebrity rich can bribe police in SK. Much so fabricated it; dont you also think to at least manipulated sk enforcement agency you need at least a leverage on them. What an actor had to made them obey the actor. They are more lovely to indict if he was surely wrong caused he was an easy target.
it become valid if the accused was an political power or chaebol but the actor only the actor. That pitifull amount of money are nothing compared what chaebol can give to silent people.
I can said so caused im law practicioner; remember the same allegation can happened to your family and it also can have same level of destroy.
So what some people said “ He is rich and powerfull of course he can manipulate it however he want”
To understand the above statement we must see the accused - Rich = Sure
-Powerfull = Nuh
Why i said so the limit of his power only in the entertainment industry and that also limited toward his work not entire.
He is not powerfull enough to direct enforcement agency to backup him. He does not had political power nor he had leverage on the enforcement agencies. He doesnt control their budget only state does?. Enforcement agencies are more in love to investigate him because he doesnt had political power and his case can help them to boost someone career if they managed to get him indicted. The limit his can do was had a good legal team thats all. From my point of view, he is no that overpowered to consider capable of manipulating things.
To consider someone was groomed there must be evidence to support the claim and various element need to be prove. However, there are no evidence that support that claim and if its true that the accused do it than should be the paparazzi and dispatch had knewn it early in the day when he wasnt as rich and powerfull like right now. The plaintiff however doesnt show any indication getting groomed and i also doubt if she was so because the plaintiff was involved at the entertainment agency from childhood. She is not your average child she was trained enough about entertainment and being educated heavily . She had direct supervision from her parent and entertainment agency. It is more likely if she wasnt groomed. Too add more, wasnt if she indeed get groomed should she be his gf until her death and why after the first year of dating. She leave the relationship and had a boyfriend. Thats indicated she was not stupid and being capable to break free not being caged like a damn slave. There are too many contradiction to said she was being groomed but let said you are correct what evidence stated she was groomed and if you had it give to authority and let them analyze to see it was a truth or not.
Maybe for somepeople wait until her legal age to get dating was consider weird but wasnt there are so many people said in their childhood i want to married this person man/woman in the future although they never being groomed. As their feeling to the person maybe awed or respect enough the mentor or someone older. Its normal ?
In china there are many rich woman with young man even the one who only age 18 (just passed).
So i dont understand the double standart.
And dont said i was his supporter i am not his fans, nor i get money from him, nor any benefit i just someone who somehow knew both stories and learn their both statement. My account althought new i am long user of this website so im am not bot. Nor i use an AI
Culture of hate before think are something only uncivilized people do. Thats all.
Im not bot ! Not being paid! i had use this website very long time and this my first time had the account .
Hope you guys are more critical thinking and not conspiracist theory.