This review may contain spoilers
Where a line ends between fiction and reality- reader's version
The character of Oh Mun-ho is an interesting one, one that symbolizes readers of unfinished stories. He got too obsessed in a novel of a young novelist in his class, and along the way, forced the story to where it is fueled by his own shame and inferiority complex of only finishing one novel.
A story that started by the original novelist, Lee Kang, which expressed the jealousy towards a classmate of his and his happy family, he wanted to be in his shoes- until that part it was truly written by Lee Kang. A boy who lost both of his parents in a truck accident was driven to become a boy with a happy family. Mun-ho shifted the story once he figured out who the dad is, by then, it became a hate story, not story of jealousy and healing.
The drama never told us Kang's intentions into doing all of this, making us believe in the same thing as the reader of the novel is, we saw first hand when the story shifted.
Lee Kang said by the end that by some point, the author shifted, that much is true, all though it is still considered stealing a story, we got to see Kang's true intentions of ruins by the end. Mun-ho who got 12 years old Kang to open up with a story, interested him with literature that day 12 years ago, but quickly turned his life story down due to being "too boring". That's when we learned his true intentions of revenge, and of malice to write an interesting story, to ruin the professor.
A story that started by the original novelist, Lee Kang, which expressed the jealousy towards a classmate of his and his happy family, he wanted to be in his shoes- until that part it was truly written by Lee Kang. A boy who lost both of his parents in a truck accident was driven to become a boy with a happy family. Mun-ho shifted the story once he figured out who the dad is, by then, it became a hate story, not story of jealousy and healing.
The drama never told us Kang's intentions into doing all of this, making us believe in the same thing as the reader of the novel is, we saw first hand when the story shifted.
Lee Kang said by the end that by some point, the author shifted, that much is true, all though it is still considered stealing a story, we got to see Kang's true intentions of ruins by the end. Mun-ho who got 12 years old Kang to open up with a story, interested him with literature that day 12 years ago, but quickly turned his life story down due to being "too boring". That's when we learned his true intentions of revenge, and of malice to write an interesting story, to ruin the professor.
Was this review helpful to you?
