This show is now focusing on everyone else but the couple. It's 7 yet no development on their romance. I love the show in the beginning due to how funny it is. Now, take away the comedy and we're not left with even the romance๐ฉ
Girl, what did you do and who pissed you off? ๐ This gay awakening always reminds me of a song called "Rude…
Yes, exactly. Every uncomfortable situation isn't SA and worse, these same people would actually excuse an actual SA. Claiming non-SA situations as SA is potentially dangerous as people won't take actual vicitims seriously because of "false accusations" like these. Granted Sorn was a little rough around the edges but that's all there was to it. If Jun had actually said No, I don't believe Sorn would have forced him.
he did it all and said 'no homo' after, right?//Not the "no homo".๐๐I call them the "Brotherhood of servicing…
Of course. You gotta be rich in order to help your friends relieve their hard ons๐ Money makes the world goes round and in this case, makes their balls go down๐
First, I want to note that if you watch the outro, you pretty much see the entire series. Second, holy crap! Not…
Finally, Fourth. why did Sorn's hand smell???!๐คข//
You just reminded me of what I wanted to forget. I really hope that smell is not from his time with that girl and it's even worse because he playfully "cleaned" his hands on Jun's hair when he ruffled it. I'll take it that Thai was just joking otherwise๐คฎ
Girl, what did you do and who pissed you off? ๐ This gay awakening always reminds me of a song called "Rude…
I won't be naming shows cos I'll have to try to remember them but a lot of shows did. SA is not limited to complete penetration. Touching someone in a sexual manner when the person clearly do not want to be touched by that person is SA, especially when they clearly said "No". Most times, writers brush it under the rug and it's romanticised as seen as "hot, domineering, dominance." It's always okay if "one of the main lead is the one SA'd the other lead" The same thing happens with the portrayal of domestic violence in BLs.
Nah, go away. I can't with you๐๐
Jun, Jun๐๐
I fear I'm gonna be saving all the iconic lines in this show just like I did with Playboyy๐๐
Granted Sorn was a little rough around the edges but that's all there was to it. If Jun had actually said No, I don't believe Sorn would have forced him.
Money makes the world goes round and in this case, makes their balls go down๐
You're so real for that๐๐
It gets to a point in our lives that we learn to throw shame away in pursuit of what we want.
Not the "no homo".๐๐
I call them the "Brotherhood of servicing our Bros"๐๐
Of course, what are friends for?๐
You just reminded me of what I wanted to forget. I really hope that smell is not from his time with that girl and it's even worse because he playfully "cleaned" his hands on Jun's hair when he ruffled it.
I'll take it that Thai was just joking otherwise๐คฎ
Most times, writers brush it under the rug and it's romanticised as seen as "hot, domineering, dominance."
It's always okay if "one of the main lead is the one SA'd the other lead"
The same thing happens with the portrayal of domestic violence in BLs.