Jumpsuiter

If I received a ‘breakthrough’ award from an industry I’d worked in for 20 years, I’d probably be rather annoyed 😬.

No watchlist. No other dramas watched. No other reviews. Fishy.

With all of these the answer is more closely matched to the question 'What have you watched the most recently?' rather than the actual question asked.

Not offended. Observant.

Opinion is: ‘I don’t like this. It’s not for me.’

Rage baiting is using passive aggression to be broadly dismissive of its overall merit.

Or perhaps Pilates. Good for the core. It’ll make you feel better.

Rage baiting is not a good hobby. Have you tried crochet?

This is such a textbook reply. With your own argument in tatters, you turn to the classic formula of demeaning insults and passive aggression. It’s pretty much exactly where I thought you might take this.

You are missing the point by quite a margin. In these films/dramas, made 90% of the time by men, how many conversations between woman are about anything other than men? That’s the test. Whether characters are poorly written or poorly portrayed is moot. Just because they are made largely for a female audience doesn’t mean they benefit women in society. In many cases they perpetuate outdated notions. I would be interested in your examples of male characters who are largely just ciphers.

The test measures how many conversations are had between women in media where the topic isn't a man. I don’t understand your comment, though?

Rather hyperbolic, don’t you think? Two posts. Two comments. They took about 4 minutes to write. Not a great deal of time.

Quite right - you are not obliged to know every English word…just the ones you use.

It is targeted at a female audience, that's different. It is built around a relationship between a man and a woman, which is not a female-led story. Most of these stories wouldn't pass the Bechdal test.

Alright, mate. It's an issue, everyone with at least half a brain knows it. Don't try to deflect. Also, 'victimist' is not a word. Use Google. It's your friend.

This is inaccurate. The quality of someone’s performance isn’t based on something as superficial as ‘looks’.

This is the worst kind of passive aggression. What happens on Twitter should stay on Twitter.

The OP is correct about the confusing title. It’s terrible English. The position of the adjective ‘married’ suggests ‘woman killer’ is a compound noun, ergo she is married and kills women. Or, ‘married woman’ is a compound adjective and she is a killer of married women. The title should be more like ‘The killer is a married woman.’

It’s big if you are fourteen years old, which I assume you are. When you get to adulthood, you’ll have a broader mind. I hope.

9 years is not that big an age gap.

I haven’t seen be drama but wasn’t she like 23 when she made it?

No violence, no gore?

Total rage bait. Boring day?

That was so sad :(