Sunny Day

I couldn’t give a short answer because it involves many important terms and details. So I’ll need to break it down into parts.

Yes, it can be embarrassing to support a celebrity simply because you like them — just as it is equally embarrassing, and dangerous, to declare someone guilty before any evidence has been presented, examined, and verified. I do not support blind loyalty to public figures. However, I am even more strongly opposed to the manipulation of public opinion to condemn individuals without the benefit of a fair and just trial. This practice violates fundamental human rights and has caused significant harm throughout history.
A healthy society is sustained by laws — but only when those laws are just. In a truly free and democratic state, unjust laws can be challenged and declared unconstitutional. There are always remedies, though they often require patience and persistence.
We must strive to live in a peaceful and harmonious society. Otherwise, we risk descending into chaos, no different from a lawless jungle.

I really like people who are not manipulated by the media. Until he is proven guilty it is not fair to discredit him. Chapeau 🎩

It’s painfully obvious that this news was dropped just to cover up other real, actually important stuff (hello, Garosero appeal rejections and friends 👀). Honestly, I love how sometimes reality feels like it's just borrowing plots from movies and dramas.
Take Mr. Robot, for example —Season 2 is practically a playbook for this move. Angela and E Corp are out there releasing real, but dusty-old news like it’s breaking, all just to keep the spotlight off their fresh sins.
It’s a perfect case of:
“Look over here at this scandal from 5 years ago, while we quietly burn down the house today.”

If the courts were truly corrupt, we would be living in a state of chaos. The only point on which I might agree is that the justice system can sometimes move slowly, whether due to external influences or simply because of the volume and complexity of the cases it must address. However, I firmly believe in the integrity and resilience of the judicial system. Precisely because it maintains its independence, it continues to be the target of criticism and pressure.
https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/southkorea/20250424/nearly-half-of-judges-say-they-have-faced-external-pressure-during-trials
Even so, we have clearly seen that no one is above the law. Several former presidents of South Korea—Park Geun-hye, Lee Myung-bak, Roh Tae-woo, and Chun Doo-hwan—have been prosecuted and convicted. Former President Yoon Suk-yeol is currently on trial for insurrection, and the sitting president is also facing legal proceedings. The principle of accountability before the law continues to be upheld, regardless of rank or position.
I have, at times, questioned the connections and backing that Garosero may have benefited from (perhaps still does) but I remain confident that, regardless of any lobbying efforts, justice does not recognize hierarchies.
( What’s really behind the Garosero buzz? Corruption, influence, or something deeper?
https://www.logosian.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=3019 )
Temporary influences may exist, but once domestic remedies are exhausted, international courts remain available. The truth will emerge—whatever it may be.
It’s true that delays can sometimes lead to the statute of limitations expiring, but this generally applies to criminal matters. In civil cases involving damages, if a claim has been filed, this action interrupts the limitation period for exercising the substantive right.
Therefore, even if a criminal offense becomes time-barred, the right to seek compensation remains. The perpetrator may not face imprisonment, but they can still be held financially accountable for the harm caused.
Appealing to public opinion for justice is dangerous—unlike judges, the public can't be held accountable for the harm it may cause. This is exactly why justice must remain independent.

They call themselves seekers of justice, but I can't help but wonder: what kind of justice is it when public opinion seems to matter more than actual evidence or court decisions?
Anyone who truly wants justice for KSR knows that speculation only clouds the truth. Real justice means identifying and punishing the actual culprits, not rushing to condemn without proof.
It’s a deeply sad situation to see people take pleasure in someone else’s downfall in the name of justice, while those truly responsible remain untouched.
Maybe we should all take a moment and watch Stranger (Secret Forest) – Season 2. There, justice is painfully slow, the powerful escape for far too long, but at least in the end, the truth prevails where it matters most: in the court of law, not the court of opinion.

In fact, he refused to make the payment, as confirmed by his legal representatives.

Under Korean law, a creditor may, under certain conditions, pursue the debtor’s own debtors through a legal mechanism known as oblique action (also referred to as indirect action). This allows the creditor to seek satisfaction of their claim indirectly, by targeting assets held by third parties who owe obligations to the original debtor.

The process is relatively straightforward: the debtor refuses to pay, prompting the initiation of a seizure. Simultaneously, Kim Soo Hyun institutes a seizure of Garosero’s assets. This creates a chain of enforcement. If Kim Soo Hyun lacks the funds to satisfy the debt, the creditor (in this case Classys) may seek recovery directly from Garosero’s accounts.

It is important to note that such a seizure serves only to freeze assets and prevent their dissipation, thereby securing potential compensation. It is a precautionary measure rather than an act of forced execution.

Should it ultimately be determined that Kim Soo Hyun’s position is justified, liability for damages will rest with those who contributed to the situation. Conversely, if the evidence submitted by Garosero is found to be authentic, Kim Soo Hyun would be responsible for any resulting damages. However, considering that much of the evidence presented by Garosero has already been discredited, what are the real chances of this latter scenario prevailing?

Too many messages based on a single news item, so an analysis is welcome.
In Korean contract practice, it is common for parties to include two types of clauses aimed at discouraging breaches: liquidated damages and punitive penalties.
• Liquidated damages (손해배상액의 예정) refer to amounts agreed upon in advance by the contracting parties, intended to compensate the non-breaching party for losses resulting from a contractual breach. These are enforceable under Article 398 of the Korean Civil Act, provided they are not excessively disproportionate to the actual damage.
• Punitive penalties, by contrast, are amounts imposed not strictly to compensate, but to penalize a party for failing to perform, and to deter non-performance. That said, this distinction becomes especially relevant in high-profile cases such as the dispute involving Kim Soo Hyun and Garosero Research Institute (Kim Se-eui).
Although recent media coverage may give the impression of a new development, this is, in fact, a familiar legal scenario. The contracts included standard penalty clauses, and the court approved asset seizure on May 20—a move that reflects the contractual enforcement of those clauses. However, this only became widely reported after the seizure of Kim Se-eui’s assets and accounts became public.
From a legal standpoint, the situation is relatively straightforward:
• Kim Soo Hyun had pre-established contractual penalties protecting both parts in the event of breach;
• Garosero, by contrast, now faces potential tort liability for defamation—specifically, the spread of false information that allegedly damaged Kim Soo Hyun's public image and commercial value.
This damage could not only justify the termination of certain contracts involving Kim Soo Hyun, but also trigger additional claims under tort law (Civil Act Article 750).
So far, Garosero has failed to present any conclusive evidence supporting their claims. The court proceedings are ongoing, and the longer the reputational harm and commercial impact persist for Kim Soo Hyun, the greater the potential financial liability for those who instigated the issue.
This case is a textbook example of how contractual remedies and tortious liability operate in tandem in Korean civil law—and a reminder that reputational damage can carry heavy legal and financial consequences.

Exactly — it’s like watching an experimental solo sketch where the performer blocks the audience, forgets who she blocked, then still delivers dramatic monologues to empty chairs. It’s not even stand-up... it’s more like a blackout performance with no stage lights and no exit. If I wanted to see someone play every role in their own echo chamber, I’d rather stick to Jung Seung Min — at least her characters know they’re fictional.

Wow, thanks for the population stats, “Professor” Chomsky. Next time, maybe compare BTS’s popularity to Earth’s oxygen supply while you’re at it.
And of course, thanks for the breaking news about Kim Soo Hyun’s luxury apartment being seized by Classys. Truly terrifying — one out of three apartments in Galleria Foret got a lien. We’ve already discussed this for hours, but sadly, you must’ve missed it.
I do appreciate your concern, though. As I said before, the bill will be paid by whoever threw this little “party” — Garosero, the “devoted aunt,” and the rest of the circus. Meanwhile, Kim Soo Hyun’s drama is airing in Brazil and Taiwan, and if you’re still panicking, feel free to scroll back and read how much he earns globally: it’s not pocket change.
It doesn’t matter that Kim Soo Hyun is still topping real-time polls and starring in international hits — no, the ‘backlash’ is definitely coming. Any day now. We’ll wait with popcorn.
Here’s a brilliant suggestion: go watch Love Your Enemy. At least that drama knows it’s being ridiculous — unlike some people here. Honestly, it’s become a must-watch… mostly for the accidental comedy.
And if you're still craving justice fantasies, add Killing Vote to your list. You might finally get the vigilante ending you keep projecting onto real life.

Although Endfeel appears on the MDL page, there is no official confirmation. We hope to see him again in a doctor role, different from the one in Doctor Stranger.

Apologies to those expecting a thrilling scandal about the mysterious mortgage guarantee. Plot twist: mortgage guarantees are set up at the start of a contract, not years later like some dramatic betrayal. But hey, try explaining that to people who treat every legal term like it’s the climax of a soap opera they barely understand.

Now do you understand why Kim Se-eui didn’t turn himself in to the police? He wants a more dramatic departure, with a bigger audience—to afford the “paycheck” for his grand finale. He clearly didn’t expect the real cost of his actions, hoping Kim Soo Hyun would just quietly quit like the others. Surprise: this show isn’t ending anytime soon.

Of course, all damages suffered through the loss of contracts and profits that he could have obtained must be recovered from them. Brr, I don’t even want to start counting—just thinking about it sends chills down my spine!
"Fun" costs.

I agree!

And she's not even a protagonist in the series Now You See Me. 🥱

It’s honestly amazing — someone really out here thinking this page is about them. Let’s be real: this page is about Kim Soo Hyun, not random background users making dramatic exits like they’re the main character. That only show their high level of megalomania. And for those who think Kim Soo Hyun's entire career is teetering around that apartment like it's the end of the episode, hey, no stress - I'm sure Kim Se-eui (Garosero) will happily foot the bill. Anyway, thanks for your Ted Talk.
Of course, you need to know that Korean actors can earn substantial sums for both episodes and rerun rights. Top stars like Kim Soo-hyun can earn over ₩200 million (approximately $170,000) per episode, according to Wikipedia. Rerun rights and international streaming deals can also provide additional income.
https://www.allkpop.com/article/2025/06/netizens-discuss-the-huge-increase-in-how-much-k-drama-actors-earn-per-episode#:~:text=Lead%20actors%20in%20regular%20dramas,1%20billion%20KRW%20per%20episode.
Shows sold to overseas channels and stations are sold on a per episode basis that varies greatly depending on the popularity of the drama and the size and wealth of the market is sold to. The highly successful drama “My Love from the Star” was sold to China for US$40,000 per episode.
https://factsanddetails.com/korea/South_Korea/K-Dramas_Television_and_Film/entry-7293.html
Yes, it is also broadcast in Brazil, after the copyright and broadcasting rights have been paid.
So depressing for those who actually thought he would lose an apartment.
I’m not a KSH fan, but I absolutely cannot stand seeing people take pleasure in the idea of his bankruptcy or downfall. Wishing failure on someone, no matter who they are or what they’ve done, isn’t just petty, it’s deeply toxic. We can criticize, debate, and hold people accountable without becoming cruel or vindictive. True humanity shines through even in disagreement.

In a world increasingly obsessed with scandal, clicks, and public takedowns, it’s worth stepping back and remembering what actually matters. Real human values — integrity, compassion, accountability, growth — are not measured by trending hashtags or tabloid headlines. They are shown through consistent actions over time, through how we treat others when no one is watching, and how we choose to rise after a fall.

No one is perfect. But if we reduce human worth to cancel trends, assume guilt without due process, or mock others’ livelihoods for entertainment, then we are eroding the very empathy that holds society together. Popularity can fade, but dignity, kindness, and resilience build the foundation for real, lasting respect. Let’s not forget that.

It's absolutely adorable how some people think their bitter little website comments are more powerful than actual public data. Kim Soo Hyun is literally topping the Brand Power List — yes, even after the so-called 'scandal by association' with KSR. But sure, their downvote and smug comment are totally canceling him, right?
The man remains one of Korea's most bankable stars, scoring over a million votes and sitting comfortably at the top of fan-driven rankings, while they struggle to get a like. Keep typing. Maybe next time the algorithm will care.

Today, the court admitted Kim Soo Hyun’s and GM's claims, proving he was right all along. Yet, some people just can’t stop sending meaningless messages. It’s impressive how much energy they waste on nonsense—truly exhausting to be that irrelevant

As I said before, not everyone can understand long and detailed messages. Don't bother replying, they won't read it anyway, because a certain type of person doesn't care about learning but wants to show off what he/she knows (you know what I mean and where it's written, pv 18v2). As for the way she interprets the love you're talking about, it shows that in her case it's possible that it's a case of antis*cial pers*nality dis*rder or perhaps alexithymia.
But today is the day when things that I said would happen have already happened, even though some called me pessimistic and depressive. Those guilty will be forced to pay. Some made money on YouTube from this, but KSR's family is going deeper into debt. Today, an insurance seizure was granted against Kim Se-eui, but we know that compensation claims are also being filed against KSR's family. And this is not pessimism, it is reality. Sad.