Your review is an attack on the characters not on the storyline. That's why I feel like it's a prejudiced review…
Slythe
"Isn't it too harsh to brand someone like that when you don't even seek an explanation from them or listen to their views?"
How do you know?
"You even quoted Love by Chance here, which means you really have something against the author, as some critics criticize her for spreading rape culture."
Culture?
Seriously, how can you call that culture???
"The thing is, you want to have a different take on that scene. You have that assumption that all rape victims act the same or have similar approaches in dealing with certain situations that trigger their trauma. There is a fallacy in this kind of perception as you don't really have a grasp of individual weaknesses, especially in differences of male personalities."
That's no wonder, they prefer to interview psychologically healthy men, and then only those who are willing to talk about it and don't dismiss it as a joke.
"Approach the characters with an open mind and without prejudice."
I don't understand how you come to the logic that you can make prejudices about something you don't know, haven't seen or something similar???
"Having watched now both T/T and LBC, and read a bit here and there about the other storylines of the novels, it seems that virtually every storyline in this story universe has some element of sexual assault in the backstory or conflict (even Ae/Pete, which is a wholly consensual relationship, is triggered by a sexual assault and blackmail that Pete is trying to deal with). These plot device assaults are not dealt with well, the effects on the characters come and go as suits the storyline, and there are no consequences for rapists. When characters we are supposed to like commit assaults, it's treated as part of the romantic development rather than called out for what it is."
"Why I find this paragraph problematic is that you want a different take that suits with your perception or beliefs."
I can't tell that the story is being reshaped according to their wishes. It's more of a statement that the themes aren't handled well, and I agree, because I don't think you want someone who has caused you great pain by your side forever.
"This is not a series that attempts to be morally right."
Then why, like, are others correcting things without permission?
"Your approach to the characters is completely wrong, as you want to adapt the character to your taste. As a viewer, you don't have that right. Your right is to see the characters develop as they struggle with their inner demons. This series doesn't attempt to be morally correct."
Yes, I recognize that in your assessment, too. If they did it the way they're asking here, they would of course realize that it isn't at all what they're portraying.
"The agenda for self-righteousness and being moralist is very strong. The series isn't even promoted to be a representation of any community. Yet, there are people who see the characters as toxic and then immediately regard them as not good representations of being homosexual or their relationship not a good representation of homosexual relationships."
I think they're putting too much emphasis on orientation. That's not what it's about; it's about a good relationship. And in this case, it won't last, if only because Type doesn't make a free decision. Someone who is persuaded will always end up correcting their decision.
"Type is known for his compliments about Tharn when he moved into the same room with him." "Before knowing Tharn's orientation, Type often remarked that his roommate was very attractive. Therefore, there's a sense of attraction here, albeit not sexual."
Sorry, but when does Type say he likes Tharn? And not that Tharn is great. There's a difference between finding out whether someone is good and whether you like them. If they're good, then people and their leadership have convinced them. If you like them, then you like the person. As if men can't tell when someone is being courted by many or is above average.
I think a lot of perspectives are missing, and psychology is especially missing here.
"How do you think Type should be treated for his PTSD?"
Just as it really is, not some invention that makes people believe it's really like that, and let's be honest, there are a lot of people like that.
"But because the story is fast-paced and Type's homophobia is addressed, the show has to include a scene that resolves this issue. In this case, Type invites Tharn for sex, even though Tharn knows about Type's homophobic behavior. Type used this invitation to get revenge on Tharn because he only thought so." "Note that Type's weakness is his lust." "By the way, this is BL with gay love and even gay sex. The fact that you even failed to consider the male sexuality and the need for a character to have sex proves of your lack of understanding of the characters."
How can Type desire male sex even though he's never had male sex??? It's not about homophobia
"But after that, it made Type more confused."
Of course, realizing you're attracted to men is confusing.
"Maybe you asked, but Type is a rape victim?"
And why didn't they consider that?
"But then his weakness is lust." "Why did Type desire to have sex with Tharn?"
It's not at all like he wants to sleep with Tharn just because he feels like it, "Tharn is gross. Just awful. He has zero respect for Type's boundaries. He sexually assaults him multiple times: in the shower; while he's sleeping; tells Type to "watch his ass" after they friends again and after Tharn knows about Type having been kidnapped and raped; pushes him into a wall and threatens him when he thinks Type is flirting at a bar... just horrible. He agrees to have sex with Type even when Type explains that he is offering because a) he feels like him owes Tharn and b) he's afraid Tharn is going to do it at some point anyway so he wants to get it over with." No, not at all, because based on Type's experience, he sees no other way to end the whole thing "with his control, which was taken away from him as a child" in order to live a little more freely again, instead of in fear and having to watch every minute that nothing happens to him. That's also the reason why he doesn't want to be near Tharn.
"Type's approach to sex is even more aggressive as he always finds time to relieve himself when he's alone in the room."
It isn't stated how often Type relieves himself.
"It was even revealed that he already experienced sex with girls, so there's a possibility that sex for him is relieving tension from his body."
Yes, of course, you want to satisfy your desires, which is why he always has sex with girls; he's in control there.
And the most normal thing in the world: masturbation. Victims also masturbate. And it's a relief for everyone. I'm sorry if you haven't had the experience yet, but that's exactly why you masturbate.
Sex victims deal with their experience the way they experienced the assault, which is basically a mirror image.
Research it if you doubt it.
"With Type's strength, he could take Tharn down anytime."
What strength?
"But then his weakness is lust, sex as shown in the shower scene with Tharn, though people see it first as sexual assault, which I agree, but it ended up being a mutual activity for both of them."
How an assault ends is irrelevant, because before it's over, the other person has long since been convinced with their body rather than their mind, especially with a man. Or do you tickle someone until they can't anymore, instead of listening to their stop and no? Why do you think that through physical reactions, the mind also wants it? Just because you know what reactions your body has to different touches doesn't mean the other person wants them. "If someone tells you they can't say no to sex with you because of factors unrelated to their immense desire for sex, then having sex with them anyway is rape." Here, it's obvious that a victim is supposed to fall in love with an enemy, and that's exactly what's psychologically sick.
No one has the right to touch strangers without their prior consent, to use them for their own purposes, to make decisions for them, and to determine their lives.
Another person's word is final.
You may only decide for yourself, not for anyone else.
"Now the question is, how do you go about this? With the moralistic approach of turning Tharn into a sheep after soaking him in cold water?"
In any case, there is not only this perspective, there is always another way
"Have you even interviewed any rape victim? There are many types of rape victims and their personalities have been affected during their teen years to adulthood. There are victims that may find sex gross and there are those whose perception of sex has evolved. I don't want to speak on behalf of them but based on the interview I had when I visited a sanctuary of these victims, there are victims that tend to be sexually aggressive. Again, different victims have different approaches to their trauma from rape incidents. Some victims may not agree to this but the interview was done first hand."
"There are many types of rape victims, and their personalities have been affected during their teen years to adulthood. There are victims who may find sex gross, and there are those whose perception of sex is evolved. I don't want to speak on their behalf, but based on the interview I had when I visited a sanctuary for these victims, there are victims who tend to be sexually aggressive. Again, different victims have different approaches to their trauma from rape incidents. Some victims may not agree with this, but the interview was done firsthand.
You belong to the group that simply looks at the pictures instead of thinking things through, let alone without questioning why all the characters act the way they do.
You'll definitely be offended very often because you don't really question anything and accept everything as it is."
It's great that you're gaining experience and now know everything about it, but let's see how the people interviewed assess these characters and their relationships, especially those who are in therapy.
"In this case, the author conveys a character who dares to bury his tragic past, but as a consequence, a new demon arises, and that is his being homophobic."
I'm slowly starting to think that you haven't had any experience yourself.
"He helps Type by approaching the characters who accused Type of homophobia. That's a risk on his part considering Type was not fond of him yet at that time. But he worked on making Type less stressful and depressive upon knowing of Type's tragic past and the usual approach of Type in dealing with stressful situations involving him."
Why do we have to be told how to behave correctly towards other living beings?
I mean, everyone who needs to be told this seems to want to be treated that way themselves.
"Tharns Aktion erreichte Type durch Techno, der auch enthüllte, dass Tharn Type mag. Type konfrontierte Tharn mit dessen Bewunderung für ihn. Type ist danach verwirrt. Es wird aber auch angedeutet, dass sich ihre Beziehung von Feinden zu Freunden verbessert hat." "It's also implied that Type's attraction towards Tharn became strong but he tried hard to suppress it."
How old are you?
???
Even your report, probably as an intern, didn't help you.
"I agree. His character is awful, but throughout the series, he tries to redeem himself in the eyes of Type."
It's not about how Tharn develops in Type's eyes, but rather that he should rethink his actions.
"Type's homophobia stems from a past rape incident. How does the series approach his story? By opening up to Tharn about his being a rape victim. The dialogues between Tharn and Type, with the latter revealing his being a victim, are very important in Tharn's character development."
Exactly, quelling is a good start instead of using proper dialogue.
And just to be clear, this guy isn't homophobic—he's protecting himself and doesn't want to have anything to do with them anymore. When has he ever just attacked someone, let alone slandered them for their decision? Because that's usually what homophobes do.
That's a decision that must be respected, just like the decision that a man likes a man must be respected.
That's none of our business, it's not ours to decide.
Does your penis become stiff just because you tell it to become stiff? They have really pushed other people's boundaries according to their own ideas.
Hmm... It doesn't sound like you liked the series. In fact you appeared to have given a rather lengthy review…
I can read English well and translate it into my language as befits my status, but I have problems with the writing style, which means I almost compose in German-English.
I would like to know at what age you think I was watching this series. Because I was basically in my last 30's…
Okay, I see, we were talking past each other. ??? The review is two years old??? Does that mean your apprenticeship certificate is no longer relevant? "Manner of Death" well, it could be that Thai is more to blame, because "Manner of Death" was clearly recognizable. I think so, because this one is the opposite of "Manner of Death." By the way, I'm also over 40 and didn't just see that on my list. I'm still missing a lot, and I've also gained more experience in real life than I'd like. everything's fine you'll do it
It sounds to me more that you don’t like the reviewer. That being said, when you ask what normal person would…
Sorry, but with no words or actions did Payu make it clear that he wanted to get Rain to do this, let alone that he was interested in Rain from the beginning. To this day, it seems to me as if Rain was just a toy, because when could you tell that Payu wanted to know who Rain was? Did he look for Rain or ask him, or did he try to get close to Rain? No, more like repulsed, and actions speak louder than words. At least for me. Sorry, but I missed the drama, which looks exactly like you describe.
??? Why shouldn't I like someone I don't even know??? This is all about the pressure.
You have too large a circle of acquaintances to even know what's real.
You have no idea about real life. I definitely won't tell you where my knowledge comes from.
Because your statement is that you know for sure, because you were there and others around you are or were in mental health treatment as a result. That's exactly the point. They were friends, not close people. And on top of that, you don't just stop trusting other people in one thing. If you only knew how many people.................... I regret your logic.
Sorry not everything can fit in your vision. saying that it wont work out bc you don't find them aesthetically…
I don't know JJ, despite having seen his series, so how can I be against him? Your logic leaves a lot to be desired. I'm not biased, I just see the possibility that it will be that way, based on JJ's file here in MDL. Why I see it that way is also explained in the comment, and the end of it also says that I'm not prejudiced. Anyone who does that isn't quite up to scratch.
First of all, Net didn't choose JJ just for Luat. Second, they would have prepared if it weren't for the fact…
Your comment suggests that you didn't get the main point from my comment.
I want a good drama!!!
And that doesn't include provocative nude shots that take years, even worse, filming the entire intimate act, or the greatest actors instead of the best.
Hmm, I still can't remember which character JJ played in "I Saw You in My Dreams." Yes, I already looked at which role JJ played, but it was still nothing. That's why I don't judge a series based on an actor, but rather on their work. I'm not interested in who chooses whom, but rather why. Who is Luat?
I'm not one of those people who chip, or that only a couple belongs together, that would be complete nonsense, because they're still actors with their own lives. End of story. I don't think it's correct that you make this claim that it's because of childish chipping. Because there isn't a single word indicating this. If that were the case, JJ would be a perfect fit for Net.
Sorry, in my eyes, Latte is more of a fit for Net, and Tonnam also fits JJ well, purely visually. Because I'm too precise in every respect. Based on JJ's career paths, I don't see any major developments to make this series the way many hope. Either because they're trying so hard that many scenes seem exaggerated, or, based on experience, not authentic enough.
And in the end, it's my opinion, which has nothing to do with you at all, let alone attack anyone. Because, as here at the end,
uma perspectiva diferente sobre sua interpretação do final. Como se sabe que Deus não permite a homossexualidade, o relacionamento está fadado ao fracasso desde o início. Já que sempre há algo indesejado presente, como não cair em depressão? e além disso, casais que não têm fé são mais felizes Para ser honesto, não há lógica na minha maneira de pensar. Por um lado, isso significa que somente Deus pode determinar como você vive e, por outro lado, que as pessoas religiosas não têm uma vida ruim. Parece irreal para mim, porque isso significa que as pessoas que acreditam em Deus deixam Deus decidir suas vidas em vez de decidir por si mesmas e eu ainda me pergunto hoje quem deu a Deus a permissão de decidir como alguém deve viver
One should not make unclear things clear Net should have chosen a different series. When I look at Net and JJ together, they don't fit together visually, in my eyes. I doubt the acting will work. This is JJ's first main role, and based on his acting history, two supporting roles and a guest appearance aren't enough to immediately take on a leading role. I can't remember JJ's roles in "I Saw You in My Dream" and "Your Sky" either. This series will be a flop despite a good story.
But I hope I'm proven wrong.
And no, I never watch thousands of videos before a series to find out what the series might be like. I watch the series directly to find out what the series is like.
Hmm... It doesn't sound like you liked the series. In fact you appeared to have given a rather lengthy review…
no, I don't want to, it's too much effort for me. also, I never go into the smallest details. I usually only see when someone is wasting time in their life because they are wavering and can't make it clear what they want, or unrealistic things that don't work at all. or inappropriate connections. OK, then there's the general stuff that everyone can see, like acting, type of story and music. that's all I see in a series. I don't pay attention to how well the actors did their nude scenes, or what rank the actor has. because that belongs to the actor and not to the series.
sorry, you didn't understand me. by the 18-year-olds, I don't mean you, but all 18-year-olds. yes, I also gave spoilers, but you can't do much with them. and I didn't mean that you have to do what I say, I just gave you a hint, because you wrote exactly what happens when and how. what you do with my hint is up to you, so don't feel forced. yes, I also forgot to tick the box XD. and besides, you didn't recognize my joy that I meant it more as a joke??? finally, I'm interested in what other topics you analyze? because this is and remains a series, with actors and a story told. in which music, environment and actions flow. bye, see you soon
"Isn't it too harsh to brand someone like that when you don't even seek an explanation from them or listen to their views?"
How do you know?
"You even quoted Love by Chance here, which means you really have something against the author, as some critics criticize her for spreading rape culture."
Culture?
Seriously, how can you call that culture???
"The thing is, you want to have a different take on that scene. You have that assumption that all rape victims act the same or have similar approaches in dealing with certain situations that trigger their trauma. There is a fallacy in this kind of perception as you don't really have a grasp of individual weaknesses, especially in differences of male personalities."
That's no wonder, they prefer to interview psychologically healthy men, and then only those who are willing to talk about it and don't dismiss it as a joke.
"Approach the characters with an open mind and without prejudice."
I don't understand how you come to the logic that you can make prejudices about something you don't know, haven't seen or something similar???
"Having watched now both T/T and LBC, and read a bit here and there about the other storylines of the novels, it seems that virtually every storyline in this story universe has some element of sexual assault in the backstory or conflict (even Ae/Pete, which is a wholly consensual relationship, is triggered by a sexual assault and blackmail that Pete is trying to deal with). These plot device assaults are not dealt with well, the effects on the characters come and go as suits the storyline, and there are no consequences for rapists. When characters we are supposed to like commit assaults, it's treated as part of the romantic development rather than called out for what it is."
"Why I find this paragraph problematic is that you want a different take that suits with your perception or beliefs."
I can't tell that the story is being reshaped according to their wishes.
It's more of a statement that the themes aren't handled well, and I agree, because I don't think you want someone who has caused you great pain by your side forever.
"This is not a series that attempts to be morally right."
Then why, like, are others correcting things without permission?
"Your approach to the characters is completely wrong, as you want to adapt the character to your taste. As a viewer, you don't have that right. Your right is to see the characters develop as they struggle with their inner demons. This series doesn't attempt to be morally correct."
Yes, I recognize that in your assessment, too.
If they did it the way they're asking here, they would of course realize that it isn't at all what they're portraying.
"The agenda for self-righteousness and being moralist is very strong. The series isn't even promoted to be a representation of any community. Yet, there are people who see the characters as toxic and then immediately regard them as not good representations of being homosexual or their relationship not a good representation of homosexual relationships."
I think they're putting too much emphasis on orientation.
That's not what it's about; it's about a good relationship.
And in this case, it won't last, if only because Type doesn't make a free decision.
Someone who is persuaded will always end up correcting their decision.
"Type is known for his compliments about Tharn when he moved into the same room with him."
"Before knowing Tharn's orientation, Type often remarked that his roommate was very attractive. Therefore, there's a sense of attraction here, albeit not sexual."
Sorry, but when does Type say he likes Tharn?
And not that Tharn is great.
There's a difference between finding out whether someone is good and whether you like them.
If they're good, then people and their leadership have convinced them.
If you like them, then you like the person.
As if men can't tell when someone is being courted by many or is above average.
I think a lot of perspectives are missing, and psychology is especially missing here.
"How do you think Type should be treated for his PTSD?"
Just as it really is, not some invention that makes people believe it's really like that, and let's be honest, there are a lot of people like that.
"But because the story is fast-paced and Type's homophobia is addressed, the show has to include a scene that resolves this issue. In this case, Type invites Tharn for sex, even though Tharn knows about Type's homophobic behavior. Type used this invitation to get revenge on Tharn because he only thought so."
"Note that Type's weakness is his lust."
"By the way, this is BL with gay love and even gay sex. The fact that you even failed to consider the male sexuality and the need for a character to have sex proves of your lack of understanding of the characters."
How can Type desire male sex even though he's never had male sex???
It's not about homophobia
"But after that, it made Type more confused."
Of course, realizing you're attracted to men is confusing.
"Maybe you asked, but Type is a rape victim?"
And why didn't they consider that?
"But then his weakness is lust."
"Why did Type desire to have sex with Tharn?"
It's not at all like he wants to sleep with Tharn just because he feels like it,
"Tharn is gross. Just awful. He has zero respect for Type's boundaries. He sexually assaults him multiple times: in the shower; while he's sleeping; tells Type to "watch his ass" after they friends again and after Tharn knows about Type having been kidnapped and raped; pushes him into a wall and threatens him when he thinks Type is flirting at a bar... just horrible. He agrees to have sex with Type even when Type explains that he is offering because a) he feels like him owes Tharn and b) he's afraid Tharn is going to do it at some point anyway so he wants to get it over with."
No, not at all, because based on Type's experience, he sees no other way to end the whole thing "with his control, which was taken away from him as a child" in order to live a little more freely again, instead of in fear and having to watch every minute that nothing happens to him. That's also the reason why he doesn't want to be near Tharn.
"Type's approach to sex is even more aggressive as he always finds time to relieve himself when he's alone in the room."
It isn't stated how often Type relieves himself.
"It was even revealed that he already experienced sex with girls, so there's a possibility that sex for him is relieving tension from his body."
Yes, of course, you want to satisfy your desires, which is why he always has sex with girls; he's in control there.
And the most normal thing in the world: masturbation. Victims also masturbate.
And it's a relief for everyone. I'm sorry if you haven't had the experience yet, but that's exactly why you masturbate.
Sex victims deal with their experience the way they experienced the assault, which is basically a mirror image.
Research it if you doubt it.
"With Type's strength, he could take Tharn down anytime."
What strength?
"But then his weakness is lust, sex as shown in the shower scene with Tharn, though people see it first as sexual assault, which I agree, but it ended up being a mutual activity for both of them."
How an assault ends is irrelevant, because before it's over, the other person has long since been convinced with their body rather than their mind, especially with a man.
Or do you tickle someone until they can't anymore, instead of listening to their stop and no?
Why do you think that through physical reactions, the mind also wants it?
Just because you know what reactions your body has to different touches doesn't mean the other person wants them.
"If someone tells you they can't say no to sex with you because of factors unrelated to their immense desire for sex, then having sex with them anyway is rape."
Here, it's obvious that a victim is supposed to fall in love with an enemy, and that's exactly what's psychologically sick.
No one has the right to touch strangers without their prior consent, to use them for their own purposes, to make decisions for them, and to determine their lives.
Another person's word is final.
You may only decide for yourself, not for anyone else.
"Now the question is, how do you go about this? With the moralistic approach of turning Tharn into a sheep after soaking him in cold water?"
In any case, there is not only this perspective, there is always another way
"Have you even interviewed any rape victim?
There are many types of rape victims and their personalities have been affected during their teen years to adulthood. There are victims that may find sex gross and there are those whose perception of sex has evolved. I don't want to speak on behalf of them but based on the interview I had when I visited a sanctuary of these victims, there are victims that tend to be sexually aggressive. Again, different victims have different approaches to their trauma from rape incidents. Some victims may not agree to this but the interview was done first hand."
"There are many types of rape victims, and their personalities have been affected during their teen years to adulthood. There are victims who may find sex gross, and there are those whose perception of sex is evolved. I don't want to speak on their behalf, but based on the interview I had when I visited a sanctuary for these victims, there are victims who tend to be sexually aggressive. Again, different victims have different approaches to their trauma from rape incidents. Some victims may not agree with this, but the interview was done firsthand.
You belong to the group that simply looks at the pictures instead of thinking things through, let alone without questioning why all the characters act the way they do.
You'll definitely be offended very often because you don't really question anything and accept everything as it is."
It's great that you're gaining experience and now know everything about it, but let's see how the people interviewed assess these characters and their relationships, especially those who are in therapy.
"In this case, the author conveys a character who dares to bury his tragic past, but as a consequence, a new demon arises, and that is his being homophobic."
I'm slowly starting to think that you haven't had any experience yourself.
"He helps Type by approaching the characters who accused Type of homophobia. That's a risk on his part considering Type was not fond of him yet at that time. But he worked on making Type less stressful and depressive upon knowing of Type's tragic past and the usual approach of Type in dealing with stressful situations involving him."
Why do we have to be told how to behave correctly towards other living beings?
I mean, everyone who needs to be told this seems to want to be treated that way themselves.
"Tharns Aktion erreichte Type durch Techno, der auch enthüllte, dass Tharn Type mag. Type konfrontierte Tharn mit dessen Bewunderung für ihn. Type ist danach verwirrt. Es wird aber auch angedeutet, dass sich ihre Beziehung von Feinden zu Freunden verbessert hat."
"It's also implied that Type's attraction towards Tharn became strong but he tried hard to suppress it."
How old are you?
???
Even your report, probably as an intern, didn't help you.
"I agree. His character is awful, but throughout the series, he tries to redeem himself in the eyes of Type."
It's not about how Tharn develops in Type's eyes, but rather that he should rethink his actions.
"Type's homophobia stems from a past rape incident. How does the series approach his story? By opening up to Tharn about his being a rape victim. The dialogues between Tharn and Type, with the latter revealing his being a victim, are very important in Tharn's character development."
Exactly, quelling is a good start instead of using proper dialogue.
And just to be clear, this guy isn't homophobic—he's protecting himself and doesn't want to have anything to do with them anymore. When has he ever just attacked someone, let alone slandered them for their decision? Because that's usually what homophobes do.
That's a decision that must be respected, just like the decision that a man likes a man must be respected.
That's none of our business, it's not ours to decide.
Does your penis become stiff just because you tell it to become stiff?
They have really pushed other people's boundaries according to their own ideas.
is in front of almost every bl
No, I speak Google English, mine is German
The points I mentioned are just the social context, not really the story or the setting, and they're just the most important ones in the category.
??? The review is two years old???
Does that mean your apprenticeship certificate is no longer relevant?
"Manner of Death" well, it could be that Thai is more to blame, because "Manner of Death" was clearly recognizable.
I think so, because this one is the opposite of "Manner of Death."
By the way, I'm also over 40 and didn't just see that on my list. I'm still missing a lot, and I've also gained more experience in real life than I'd like.
everything's fine you'll do it
Sorry, but I missed the drama, which looks exactly like you describe.
??? Why shouldn't I like someone I don't even know???
This is all about the pressure.
You have too large a circle of acquaintances to even know what's real.
You have no idea about real life. I definitely won't tell you where my knowledge comes from.
Because your statement is that you know for sure, because you were there and others around you are or were in mental health treatment as a result. That's exactly the point.
They were friends, not close people. And on top of that, you don't just stop trusting other people in one thing.
If you only knew how many people.................... I regret your logic.
I'm not biased, I just see the possibility that it will be that way, based on JJ's file here in MDL.
Why I see it that way is also explained in the comment, and the end of it also says that I'm not prejudiced.
Anyone who does that isn't quite up to scratch.
I want a good drama!!!
And that doesn't include provocative nude shots that take years, even worse, filming the entire intimate act, or the greatest actors instead of the best.
Hmm, I still can't remember which character JJ played in "I Saw You in My Dreams."
Yes, I already looked at which role JJ played, but it was still nothing.
That's why I don't judge a series based on an actor, but rather on their work.
I'm not interested in who chooses whom, but rather why. Who is Luat?
I'm not one of those people who chip, or that only a couple belongs together, that would be complete nonsense, because they're still actors with their own lives. End of story.
I don't think it's correct that you make this claim that it's because of childish chipping. Because there isn't a single word indicating this.
If that were the case, JJ would be a perfect fit for Net.
Sorry, in my eyes, Latte is more of a fit for Net, and Tonnam also fits JJ well, purely visually.
Because I'm too precise in every respect.
Based on JJ's career paths, I don't see any major developments to make this series the way many hope.
Either because they're trying so hard that many scenes seem exaggerated, or, based on experience, not authentic enough.
And in the end, it's my opinion, which has nothing to do with you at all, let alone attack anyone.
Because, as here at the end,
But I hope I'm wrong.
To sum it up in a nutshell
Como se sabe que Deus não permite a homossexualidade, o relacionamento está fadado ao fracasso desde o início. Já que sempre há algo indesejado presente, como não cair em depressão?
e além disso, casais que não têm fé são mais felizes
Para ser honesto, não há lógica na minha maneira de pensar. Por um lado, isso significa que somente Deus pode determinar como você vive e, por outro lado, que as pessoas religiosas não têm uma vida ruim.
Parece irreal para mim, porque isso significa que as pessoas que acreditam em Deus deixam Deus decidir suas vidas em vez de decidir por si mesmas e eu ainda me pergunto hoje quem deu a Deus a permissão de decidir como alguém deve viver
Net should have chosen a different series.
When I look at Net and JJ together, they don't fit together visually, in my eyes.
I doubt the acting will work.
This is JJ's first main role, and based on his acting history, two supporting roles and a guest appearance aren't enough to immediately take on a leading role.
I can't remember JJ's roles in "I Saw You in My Dream" and "Your Sky" either.
This series will be a flop despite a good story.
But I hope I'm proven wrong.
And no, I never watch thousands of videos before a series to find out what the series might be like. I watch the series directly to find out what the series is like.
I don't pay attention to how well the actors did their nude scenes, or what rank the actor has. because that belongs to the actor and not to the series.
by the 18-year-olds, I don't mean you, but all 18-year-olds.
yes, I also gave spoilers, but you can't do much with them.
and I didn't mean that you have to do what I say, I just gave you a hint, because you wrote exactly what happens when and how. what you do with my hint is up to you, so don't feel forced. yes, I also forgot to tick the box XD.
and besides, you didn't recognize my joy that I meant it more as a joke???
finally, I'm interested in what other topics you analyze? because this is and remains a series, with actors and a story told. in which music, environment and actions flow.
bye, see you soon