yeah after reading yalls comments yall will hate on me for sure
hey I won’t be hating on you. I love this show, everything about this show has me hooked but i can also understand that this might not be your cup of tea. I also have not liked many shows that were popular. It just depends on person and their taste. I used to watch many romance kdramas before, now I can’t even watch one even when they are so popular. Maybe because im past that stage of my life or i prefer smth else. So its not wrong of you to not like hyped shows and it also doesn’t mean that they are bad.
All though the last two eps were a let down, this drama still kept me hooked. For me, this drama was like a treat after watching all the botched dramas with messy plots being released this year of this genre. It could have been better but I still thoroughly enjoyed it.
The parents themselves are so flawed, they keep creating more “defective” offsprings. This butch body b is pointing fingers at everyone but herself. She is the definition of imperfection, how can she expect her “daughters” that she raised herself to be perfect?
So you’re not gonna watch this just because there’s no lesbian romance? Seriously, just enjoy the music and…
Hey, just to clarify — it’s not just about not having a lesbian romance. It’s about the consistent pattern of erasing queer elements from source material, especially when they’re central to the story. People aren’t saying there’s a conspiracy, but it is fair to question why queer stories keep getting rewritten to center straight narratives. You can enjoy music and acting and still want respectful representation — the two aren’t mutually exclusive.Calling people’s frustrations a “victim mindset” is dismissive and harmful. Wanting respectful and accurate representation isn’t about victimhood — it’s about visibility, dignity, and fairness. Marginalized people speaking up about consistent exclusion isn’t playing the victim; it’s demanding better. If you’re more upset about people asking for representation than the erasure itself, maybe ask yourself why.
It's so annoying that people always mix up the two and make it look like it's the same. You just can't enjoy a…
Thank you for your thoughtful reply. While I can see you’ve invested a great deal of passion into your arguments, I’ll gently point out that volume doesn’t equal clarity, nor does moral certainty equal moral superiority.
It’s interesting that you accuse others of being intolerant while simultaneously framing any disagreement with your worldview as a form of oppression. That’s a bold move — and one that doesn’t quite land, considering you're the one insisting certain perspectives shouldn't be spoken or even speculated upon unless they align with your own.
People interpret stories through their lived experiences, their identities, and yes — sometimes their hopes for better representation. That isn’t a threat to your existence. But reacting to it as if it is, kind of underscores the very discomfort you claim not to have.
No one is stopping you from disliking shipping culture or from speaking your mind. But if you post strong opinions in a public space, expect strong opinions in return. That’s not oppression. That’s just what dialogue looks like.
Lastly, if you're going to frame yourself as the "silent" side, you might want to reflect on why your monologue spans several hundred words and touches every square inch of your worldview. Silence isn’t the issue here. Volume, maybe.
Still — I wish you peace, and I hope one day you’ll learn that not every disagreement is an attack, and not every difference is a threat.
It's so annoying that people always mix up the two and make it look like it's the same. You just can't enjoy a…
Here’s a thought: if you’re this bothered just because people interpret emotional closeness between two men as possibly romantic, maybe ask yourself why it hits such a nerve. Because honestly, that kind of knee-jerk defensiveness says a lot more about you than it does about the people asking.
No one is stopping you from enjoying platonic friendship. No one’s saying every male bond must be romantic. But when you act like it’s some kind of crime to even wonder if two men might love each other — in a world where queer stories are still rare, censored, or buried in subtext — you're not “defending friendship.” You're just being dismissive.
Let’s not pretend this is about “confusion.” If the exact same dynamic was between a man and a woman….people would be yelling “they’re in love!” without a second thought. But when it’s two men? Suddenly it’s “ugh, stop thinking they are gay.”
And while we’re at it: stop acting like “BL” automatically means sexual. It doesn’t. BL is about romantic connection between men — emotional, psychological, sometimes yes, physical — just like any other love story. How is this mocking or an insult to anyone? The fact that you instantly reduce it to sex says more about your own assumptions than it does about the genre or the people asking about it.
Calling it “BL-crazy” or mocking people for looking for queer subtext is lazy and ignorant. Just say you’re uncomfortable with anything that isn’t straight and go. You don’t get to police what others see, especially when queer people have had to scrape for the tiniest bit of representation for decades. That curiosity? That hunger for possibility? It exists because we've been denied open representation for so long.
You can love platonic friendship without acting threatened every time someone else sees something romantic. The problem isn’t that people interpret things differently — the problem is your over-the-top, almost hostile reaction to the idea of queerness. That’s what really needs checking. You want to enjoy bromance, great — then let others enjoy it however they interpret it. “Making it all gay” ????????You just refuse to see anything outside straight norms. Two men getting close? Some might see love. You see a threat in that. Ask yourself why that is. ‘Making everything gay’ is just code for ‘I’m uncomfortable with anything that isn’t centered around straight people.’
Let’s clear the air.Bromance (although an unnecessary term) = good friendship between straight men, Like brotherly…
Let’s actually clear the air then — because what you're doing here isn’t about “clearing confusion.” It’s about shutting people down for daring to ask if there’s queer representation. That’s the real issue.
No one is confused about what BL means. People are just asking if there’s something romantic between two male characters — the same way people constantly speculate about romance when it’s a man and a woman, often with way less emotional depth. But that never seems to bother anyone, does it?
What is weird is the way you’re practically yelling “THERE’S NO HOMOSEXUALS!!” like it’s a crime to wonder otherwise. If someone asked if there’s a straight love story, I doubt you'd write a whole paragraph defensively “clarifying” it. So ask yourself — why are you so pressed when the question is about gay romance?
You say you “have no idea” why people ask. Really? Maybe because queer people exist. Maybe because they have grown up with little to no representation and learned to look for it wherever they could. Maybe because emotional intimacy between men is so rarely shown that when it is, people wonder if it means more. That’s not confusing — that’s human.
So if you want to love a good bromance, go ahead. But acting like people are somehow ruining it just by asking a question? That says a lot more about your own discomfort than anything else.
1 
1 
I feel the exact same about thier whole dynamics
It’s interesting that you accuse others of being intolerant while simultaneously framing any disagreement with your worldview as a form of oppression. That’s a bold move — and one that doesn’t quite land, considering you're the one insisting certain perspectives shouldn't be spoken or even speculated upon unless they align with your own.
People interpret stories through their lived experiences, their identities, and yes — sometimes their hopes for better representation. That isn’t a threat to your existence. But reacting to it as if it is, kind of underscores the very discomfort you claim not to have.
No one is stopping you from disliking shipping culture or from speaking your mind. But if you post strong opinions in a public space, expect strong opinions in return. That’s not oppression. That’s just what dialogue looks like.
Lastly, if you're going to frame yourself as the "silent" side, you might want to reflect on why your monologue spans several hundred words and touches every square inch of your worldview. Silence isn’t the issue here. Volume, maybe.
Still — I wish you peace, and I hope one day you’ll learn that not every disagreement is an attack, and not every difference is a threat.
No one is stopping you from enjoying platonic friendship. No one’s saying every male bond must be romantic. But when you act like it’s some kind of crime to even wonder if two men might love each other — in a world where queer stories are still rare, censored, or buried in subtext — you're not “defending friendship.” You're just being dismissive.
Let’s not pretend this is about “confusion.” If the exact same dynamic was between a man and a woman….people would be yelling “they’re in love!” without a second thought. But when it’s two men? Suddenly it’s “ugh, stop thinking they are gay.”
And while we’re at it: stop acting like “BL” automatically means sexual. It doesn’t. BL is about romantic connection between men — emotional, psychological, sometimes yes, physical — just like any other love story. How is this mocking or an insult to anyone? The fact that you instantly reduce it to sex says more about your own assumptions than it does about the genre or the people asking about it.
Calling it “BL-crazy” or mocking people for looking for queer subtext is lazy and ignorant. Just say you’re uncomfortable with anything that isn’t straight and go. You don’t get to police what others see, especially when queer people have had to scrape for the tiniest bit of representation for decades. That curiosity? That hunger for possibility? It exists because we've been denied open representation for so long.
You can love platonic friendship without acting threatened every time someone else sees something romantic. The problem isn’t that people interpret things differently — the problem is your over-the-top, almost hostile reaction to the idea of queerness. That’s what really needs checking. You want to enjoy bromance, great — then let others enjoy it however they interpret it. “Making it all gay” ????????You just refuse to see anything outside straight norms. Two men getting close? Some might see love. You see a threat in that. Ask yourself why that is. ‘Making everything gay’ is just code for ‘I’m uncomfortable with anything that isn’t centered around straight people.’
No one is confused about what BL means. People are just asking if there’s something romantic between two male characters — the same way people constantly speculate about romance when it’s a man and a woman, often with way less emotional depth. But that never seems to bother anyone, does it?
What is weird is the way you’re practically yelling “THERE’S NO HOMOSEXUALS!!” like it’s a crime to wonder otherwise. If someone asked if there’s a straight love story, I doubt you'd write a whole paragraph defensively “clarifying” it. So ask yourself — why are you so pressed when the question is about gay romance?
You say you “have no idea” why people ask. Really? Maybe because queer people exist. Maybe because they have grown up with little to no representation and learned to look for it wherever they could. Maybe because emotional intimacy between men is so rarely shown that when it is, people wonder if it means more. That’s not confusing — that’s human.
So if you want to love a good bromance, go ahead. But acting like people are somehow ruining it just by asking a question? That says a lot more about your own discomfort than anything else.