I'm curious: Is the villain you refer to as "gay," actually gay in the film or not? Wondering what the…
I'm back, after watching the film, to express amazement that out of all that mayhem, blood, guts, and madness, your focus is on a 40-second scene involving a blowjob. That "villain" gets no other screen time, and we learn almost nothing else about him. Why can't one of many villains be gay? There are about 40 other villains in the movie.
I am the opposite of a fan of gore for gore's sake, and I found this movie to be substantially awesome, partially because it was so wildly over-the-top. The whole thing was chaotic af, just like such a mad-ass situation would be if it actually happened.
The comments of people below, looking for character development, painstaking logic, and more, who apparently can't read a synopsis, are unintentionally hilarious.
For what it is, and for not trying to be anything else: 8.5/10
Stefania, you take yourself, your screenwriting skills, and your status as an amateur film critic much too seriously.
I am the opposite of a fan of gore for gore's sake, and I found this movie to be substantially awesome, partially because I did NOT know what would come next. The whole thing was chaotic af, just like such a mad-ass situation would be if it actually happened.
Please don't attempt screenwriting as a profession. Your formulaic, by-the-numbers expectations for this film suggest that your own work would be in that by-the-numbers mode.
I'm curious: Is the villain you refer to as "gay," actually gay in the film or not? Wondering what the…
First of all, how nice of you to drop a massive spoiler without warning me and putting it behind a spoiler button. Well done.
Secondly, did someone die and make you the Queer-Coding-the-Villain-When-His-Violence-Is-Already-Enough-To-Mark-HimAs-Bad Police? Did the director forget to send a pre-release copy of the film for your approval? Why do you see a BJ as a bad thing? I'd be tempted to regard such a person more highly after seeing that. Perhaps you have some internalized homophobia to work on.
Regardless, please put your above reply behind a spoiler button so you don't spray it all over unsuspecting people. I don't want the blame for asking an innocent question, not knowing I'd get a political mini-rant in response.
So, where's the spoiler tag now? My first comment was the opposite of aggressive. That changed when you refused, as you still do, to use the spoiler button.
There are a fair number of spoiler-lovers like you on MDL. Always pretending not to know what they're doing.
What did you like about it? Asking because of all the negative comments here.
Thank you for the clarification!
I'm going to give it a go and see what I think. I've learned there's no shame in dropping a flick part-way in, if it sucks. :) Actually, I do that quite a bit. :D
It IS obvious who you mean, as you well know, and yet now, even after being politely asked to use the spoiler button, you refuse to do so because you get off on passive-aggressively spoiling plot points while pretending NOT to spoil plot points.
So, now we know you're a spoiler fan who is also an ass. Thanks.
I wish MDL ratings were of use/value to me, but they aren't.
Here, we have an almost universally panned show, absolutely raped in comments, yet somehow it's a SEVEN out of TEN stars/points? If you looked up "wtf?" in a dictionary, this show's rating would be the thumbnail (along with the "Bad Buddy" rating, of course).
Seven out of ten is objectively a positive score; there is no way around it. The show should be at 3/10 or thereabouts, max. Why do MDLers refuse to use the bottom five/six stars on the ten-star rating scale? Most here seem to play around with the decimal points between six and nine, and that's about it.
If I'm wrong, please provide links to prove your assertion.
Thanks.
"masterpiece," the most overused and meaningless word on MDL.
After posting it, I was, of course, assailed and insulted by the usual fangirls. lol Goes with the territory. :)
"Queer coding." lol
The comments of people below, looking for character development, painstaking logic, and more, who apparently can't read a synopsis, are unintentionally hilarious.
For what it is, and for not trying to be anything else:
8.5/10
I am the opposite of a fan of gore for gore's sake, and I found this movie to be substantially awesome, partially because I did NOT know what would come next. The whole thing was chaotic af, just like such a mad-ass situation would be if it actually happened.
Please don't attempt screenwriting as a profession. Your formulaic, by-the-numbers expectations for this film suggest that your own work would be in that by-the-numbers mode.
Well done.
Secondly, did someone die and make you the Queer-Coding-the-Villain-When-His-Violence-Is-Already-Enough-To-Mark-HimAs-Bad Police?
Did the director forget to send a pre-release copy of the film for your approval?
Why do you see a BJ as a bad thing?
I'd be tempted to regard such a person more highly after seeing that.
Perhaps you have some internalized homophobia to work on.
Regardless, please put your above reply behind a spoiler button so you don't spray it all over unsuspecting people. I don't want the blame for asking an innocent question, not knowing I'd get a political mini-rant in response.
So, where's the spoiler tag now?
My first comment was the opposite of aggressive.
That changed when you refused, as you still do, to use the spoiler button.
There are a fair number of spoiler-lovers like you on MDL. Always pretending not to know what they're doing.
A beautiful flop.
4/10
My comment is somewhere among the other 1,900 comments on the 10dance thread. If you want to read it, let me know. I'll hunt it down and DM it to you.
I'm going to give it a go and see what I think.
I've learned there's no shame in dropping a flick part-way in, if it sucks. :)
Actually, I do that quite a bit. :D
It IS obvious who you mean, as you well know, and yet now, even after being politely asked to use the spoiler button, you refuse to do so because you get off on passive-aggressively spoiling plot points while pretending NOT to spoil plot points.
So, now we know you're a spoiler fan who is also an ass.
Thanks.
Here, we have an almost universally panned show, absolutely raped in comments, yet somehow it's a SEVEN out of TEN stars/points?
If you looked up "wtf?" in a dictionary, this show's rating would be the thumbnail (along with the "Bad Buddy" rating, of course).
Seven out of ten is objectively a positive score; there is no way around it.
The show should be at 3/10 or thereabouts, max.
Why do MDLers refuse to use the bottom five/six stars on the ten-star rating scale?
Most here seem to play around with the decimal points between six and nine, and that's about it.
I dropped this very early on and gave it a 1/10.
Anything so bad I have to run screaming, gets a 1/10 from me.
Can't believe this is from my fave BL studio, Strongberry.
More like WeakMary.
It would be best if you stopped proclaiming this and that as if you were the savior of all of Earth's oppressed peoples. You're embarrassing yourself.