Something is telling me that if there's planning for at least another season (or a movie ?)...I'm not sure the…
There are talks of a second and third seasons but that would depend on the success of this first season. Hopefully this won’t end in a cliffhanger coz a season 2 is never guaranteed.
I remember this guy was arrested for crypto investment fraud in 2018 with his siblings and it was all over the…
Boom is innocent (corrections welcome lol)
So I’ve finally refreshed my memory of his case which I’ve read during Chains of Heart. So here it goes:
In 2018, Boom was charged with money laundering in relation to his brother’s fraud case wherein the brother together with other individuals defrauded a foreign investor of his cryptocurrency valued in millions.
Allegedly, some of this crypto was transferred to Boom which he used to buy property. Thus, he was charged with money laundering. Ultimately, the fraud case involving his brother and the foreign investor was settled in 2018. However, Boom’s money laundering case was not settled so it wasn’t dismissed.
Thailand, like many countries/state, files and prosecutes money laundering cases. The state/Thailand is considered the victim. Meaning, in Boom’s money laundering case, the foreign investor was not the complainant. The state/Thailand alone was the complainant for his case. The foreign investor had no say in Boom’s case.
What does this mean? Simple, the settlement of the fraud case had nothing to do with Boom’s money laundering case. Facts show that the fraud case was settled in 2018 yet the money laundering case against Boom persisted until 2021. Otherwise stated, the settlement of the fraud case did not cause the dismissal of Boom’s money laundering case. Boom’s case was simply dropped around 2021 without news of why it was dismissed.
As there are no news articles about why Boom’s case was dismissed, I can only surmise that despite prosecuting Boom for three years (2018-2021), the state/Thailand with all its powers and manpower did not prove that Boom committed money laundering. Thus, Boom is innocent.
So I’ve finally refreshed my memory of his case which I’ve read during Chains of Heart. So here it goes:
In 2018, Boom was charged with money laundering in relation to his brother’s fraud case wherein the brother together with other individuals defrauded a foreign investor of his cryptocurrency valued in millions.
Allegedly, some of this crypto was transferred to Boom which he used to buy property. Thus, he was charged with money laundering. Ultimately, the fraud case involving his brother and the foreign investor was settled in 2018. However, Boom’s money laundering case was not settled so it wasn’t dismissed.
Thailand, like many countries/state, files and prosecutes money laundering cases. The state/Thailand is considered the victim. Meaning, in Boom’s money laundering case, the foreign investor was not the complainant. The state/Thailand alone was the complainant for his case. The foreign investor had no say in Boom’s case.
What does this mean? Simple, the settlement of the fraud case had nothing to do with Boom’s money laundering case. Facts show that the fraud case was settled in 2018 yet the money laundering case against Boom persisted until 2021. Otherwise stated, the settlement of the fraud case did not cause the dismissal of Boom’s money laundering case. Boom’s case was simply dropped around 2021 without news of why it was dismissed.
As there are no news articles about why Boom’s case was dismissed, I can only surmise that despite prosecuting Boom for three years (2018-2021), the state/Thailand with all its powers and manpower did not prove that Boom committed money laundering. Thus, Boom is innocent.
But he proved he is innocentIf you know that he got arrested then you also know that he prove his innocence. I…
Those so called evidence means nothing. Unless the police/prosecution can prove that he knew where those funds came from and/or knew the funds are proceeds from a crime, him withdrawing funds from his own account which is under his very own name proves nothing. To say otherwise would result in absurdity.
Example: One day you want to buy bubble tea so you withdraw money from your own account, the account where your generous and rich brother/parents transfer money regularly. After enjoying the bubble tea, the police comes and accuse you of fraud just because you withdraw money from your account and bought bubble tea with it. If that’s the only evidence the police have then no wonder the complainant agreed to a settlement.
Settlement could mean that the complainant and the prosecution didn’t have evidence to prove his guilt. Not all people accused of a crime who enters into settlement agreement are guilty. Most people don’t like going to court and would do anything to avoid it. Legal fees alone would dissuade even the innocent from going to court.
The police can arrest a person on mere suspicion. The degree of evidence required for the police to arrest a person is not the same as the degree required in court to find an accused guilty or not guilty of a crime.
Also, innocence is presumed. A person accused of a crime need not prove their innocence. It’s the job of the police/prosecution to establish the guilt of the person accused of a crime in court. Only when the prosecution has established his guilt is there a need for the accused to present evidence of his innocence.
i mean akin could have simply convinced people the photo was from one of his upcoming shows😭 why being so dramatic
What dtt said plus he doesn’t have a show that involved him getting kissed by a guy. His fans, haters and the media would certainly ask for proof and they would scrutinize any proof he would present. I mean look at real life celebrity scandals, people just love playing detective so even if Akin say it’s for an upcoming show, multiple someones on the internet will present evidence to the contrary. Akin will just be forced to lie and lie and lie and lie with the controversy never laying to rest.
With Jin and Judy, they have their show as proof. Judy also has the reputation of someone who dates all men so her having a thing with Jin is easily acceptable. Their fans, the fans of their ship and the fans of their show would also eat up and hype this ‘shipping moment’ and would drown anyone claiming the opposite.
I just realized that besides his anger, Jin turned around and approached Akin in that elevator scene to make sure Akin did not misunderstand that cheek kiss given by Judy. We can see that when he deliberately displayed the necklace before he leaned down towards Akin’s face. Dude was mad, and probably nervous about the success of his plan with Judy yet still had the wherewithal to care for Akin’s perception in that moment.
Because sigmas plan was it to ruin akins career and not their own artists. If they released the real pics that…
Yes, plus it would ruin the Jin’s and Judy’s series which looks to be very successful. Jin and Judy managed to make the photos into a shipping moment to promote the show. Sigma may hate akin but just like any business they value profit above all else.
What got you confused so it can be discussed more specifically?
At least three months, maybe 6, maybe 8 months. They started dating but not officially boyfriends when they finished filming gemini and when they both started doing their own projects. From that time, we had akin’s stage play rehearsals, jin started filming his series with judy, akin’s stage play ended but got extended for two more showings, and akin and jin got nominated for their roles in gemini with jin winning best new actor. Then jin & judy’s series is now currently airing during the breakup.
If we base the timeline on Jin’s series with Judy, the filming and post production of a series typically takes considerable number of months so I’d say Akin and Jin had been together for at least six months to less than a year.
Though definitely they have been together for three months before the leak as per that flashback at the end of ep 9.
So I’ve finally refreshed my memory of his case which I’ve read during Chains of Heart. So here it goes:
In 2018, Boom was charged with money laundering in relation to his brother’s fraud case wherein the brother together with other individuals defrauded a foreign investor of his cryptocurrency valued in millions.
Allegedly, some of this crypto was transferred to Boom which he used to buy property. Thus, he was charged with money laundering. Ultimately, the fraud case involving his brother and the foreign investor was settled in 2018. However, Boom’s money laundering case was not settled so it wasn’t dismissed.
Thailand, like many countries/state, files and prosecutes money laundering cases. The state/Thailand is considered the victim. Meaning, in Boom’s money laundering case, the foreign investor was not the complainant. The state/Thailand alone was the complainant for his case. The foreign investor had no say in Boom’s case.
What does this mean? Simple, the settlement of the fraud case had nothing to do with Boom’s money laundering case. Facts show that the fraud case was settled in 2018 yet the money laundering case against Boom persisted until 2021. Otherwise stated, the settlement of the fraud case did not cause the dismissal of Boom’s money laundering case. Boom’s case was simply dropped around 2021 without news of why it was dismissed.
As there are no news articles about why Boom’s case was dismissed, I can only surmise that despite prosecuting Boom for three years (2018-2021), the state/Thailand with all its powers and manpower did not prove that Boom committed money laundering. Thus, Boom is innocent.
So I’ve finally refreshed my memory of his case which I’ve read during Chains of Heart. So here it goes:
In 2018, Boom was charged with money laundering in relation to his brother’s fraud case wherein the brother together with other individuals defrauded a foreign investor of his cryptocurrency valued in millions.
Allegedly, some of this crypto was transferred to Boom which he used to buy property. Thus, he was charged with money laundering. Ultimately, the fraud case involving his brother and the foreign investor was settled in 2018. However, Boom’s money laundering case was not settled so it wasn’t dismissed.
Thailand, like many countries/state, files and prosecutes money laundering cases. The state/Thailand is considered the victim. Meaning, in Boom’s money laundering case, the foreign investor was not the complainant. The state/Thailand alone was the complainant for his case. The foreign investor had no say in Boom’s case.
What does this mean? Simple, the settlement of the fraud case had nothing to do with Boom’s money laundering case. Facts show that the fraud case was settled in 2018 yet the money laundering case against Boom persisted until 2021. Otherwise stated, the settlement of the fraud case did not cause the dismissal of Boom’s money laundering case. Boom’s case was simply dropped around 2021 without news of why it was dismissed.
As there are no news articles about why Boom’s case was dismissed, I can only surmise that despite prosecuting Boom for three years (2018-2021), the state/Thailand with all its powers and manpower did not prove that Boom committed money laundering. Thus, Boom is innocent.
Example: One day you want to buy bubble tea so you withdraw money from your own account, the account where your generous and rich brother/parents transfer money regularly. After enjoying the bubble tea, the police comes and accuse you of fraud just because you withdraw money from your account and bought bubble tea with it. If that’s the only evidence the police have then no wonder the complainant agreed to a settlement.
Settlement could mean that the complainant and the prosecution didn’t have evidence to prove his guilt. Not all people accused of a crime who enters into settlement agreement are guilty. Most people don’t like going to court and would do anything to avoid it. Legal fees alone would dissuade even the innocent from going to court.
Also, innocence is presumed. A person accused of a crime need not prove their innocence. It’s the job of the police/prosecution to establish the guilt of the person accused of a crime in court. Only when the prosecution has established his guilt is there a need for the accused to present evidence of his innocence.
With Jin and Judy, they have their show as proof. Judy also has the reputation of someone who dates all men so her having a thing with Jin is easily acceptable. Their fans, the fans of their ship and the fans of their show would also eat up and hype this ‘shipping moment’ and would drown anyone claiming the opposite.
If we base the timeline on Jin’s series with Judy, the filming and post production of a series typically takes considerable number of months so I’d say Akin and Jin had been together for at least six months to less than a year.
Though definitely they have been together for three months before the leak as per that flashback at the end of ep 9.