When good-humoured Golf is tasked with scouting locations, he meets unfeeling Pond. The two end up in a situation where they're forced to share a hotel room, and their differences bring about new feelings in each other. (Source: Thai = DoubleM Studio TH YouTube || Translation = MyDramaList) Edit Translation
- English
- ภาษาไทย
- Español
- Português (Brasil)
- Native Title: สเกาท์รักที่พักใจ
- Also Known As: Scout Rak Thi Phak Jai , Scout Rak Thi Phak Chai
- Genres: Comedy, Romance
Where to Watch Love on Lo
Free (sub)
Cast & Credits
- Golf Witchayapong KrungsrimuangGolfMain Role
- Pond Phatkawin HanklaPondMain Role
- Jam Bantita KannasutJamSupport Role
- Khwan Khwanruedee Wongphat Support Role
- Jaturong Yuankrathok Unknown
Reviews
Love on Lo - feels like a very looooong advert or music video
Ok so reading the synopsis suggested it was more BL than it was. You have two guys staying at a 2 bed resort and one loses his keys and has to share with the other on NYE.This is a 2 episode series with very little happening. I left thinking maybe they were advertising one of the following
1. Lo
2. The photo /video app on the phone
3. The OST??
4. New Years Eve
I really don't know. The one thing is that the beach IS beautiful and if you can ignore the staff at the resort it's not a complete waste of time but, it either needed to be longer or have more of a point .
I'd skip this one as it feels more like a pilot for something or an advert
Was this review helpful to you?
seaside romcom
Overall: there were some nice parts in this short seaside romcom which has exaggerated humor from the side characters. Aired on WeTV in 2 parts with 55 minutes of total runtime.What I Liked
- cute moments
- beach/seaside setting
- kind of made sense why they had to room together
Room For Improvement
- they needed to cut out 2 of the 3 supporting characters and use that time more on the leads getting to know each other
- over the top humor and the comedy sound effects weren't funny
- needed just a little bit more at the end
Was this review helpful to you?