Exactly, if he hasn't harmed anyone then what do I care what he gets up to in his personal time?
How do you know who he's harmed? It's fine as long as you're not the one affected? With that attitude to the law, you will be affected, when it's ok for someone far away, it reaches your doorstep eventually, without obstruction. And don't you find it dishonourable to condone crime, just as a matter of principle?
sk letting rapists and abusers being in every drama but drawing line for a man harm himself but no other people
You seem to be a strong proponent of justice. Except for Yoo Ah-in. And people falsely accused of something - those are guilty and should be stoned. You're a proponent of virtue signalling, you pick and choose crimes which you think are cool and those which are egregious. Your ignorance disgusts me. All crime is shameful. All crime hurts people - but it's ok when it's not you I guess.
the director isn't the one who writes the script... its the screenwriter
Do you understand the concept of drama? Or should drama only contain scenes that meet the virtue signallers' handbook of mock outrage? You sound brainwashed, you should write and produce your own drama, you'd win the prize of Most Boring Fuck Of The Year.
Are you one of those people that can't separate real life from entertainment?
Wouldn't that be convenient for your little virtue signalling scenario. You set quite a low bar, are you living in a ditch, are you a guttersnipe maybe?
You sound immature. Do you hate Korea? It's a bit arbitrary. And why do you bluntly call him "Yoo", if you respect…
Ha ha. That's bullshit. Social media comments are reflective of what exactly? Don't live in a social media bubble, when you come out, the real world is not the same. Look at those idiots on the left in the US who couldn't believe the real world was not the way they thought.
A case of over egging the pudding *, more than once. It could have been great with a little subtlety. Instead we got over the top re-editing, trying to salvage something off the cutting room floor. Here's what I think was originally shot - and if it wasn't, they missed an opportunity:
A mysterious nanny appears, two men become besotted and a sordid affair begins - even more shocking to reveal the nanny is a man in drag, it was a homosexual love triangle. Of course the wife would react with horror.
As for what was shown, it made little sense, I feel betrayed at being strung along by an accidentally surreal cacophony of sequences in the final third of the finale.
No idea what happened to the children either, they all forgot they had kids.
Ridiculous.
* The painting scene would have been splendid if it had ended sooner, they really killed the idea, like a comedian spending 10 minutes explaining his own joke.
Plan to watch, hope it's on a good ott. Jeon Hye-jin played the working mom perfectly in Uncle, the scene where she sent her son off in the car to his father was something.
You sound immature. Do you hate Korea? It's a bit arbitrary. And why do you bluntly call him "Yoo", if you respect him? Netflix can cut ties with Korea if it wants to go up against the state - it will lose money, content and ground to its competitors, I doubt it would do that. I'm one person outside Korea that gives a fuck.
If I lived to be 1000 years old, I will never understand this kind of fandom. To me, its evidence of mental imbalance.…
After just 10 more years you'll be less narrow minded than you were yesterday. Does China allow stalking then? No... Any mitigating circumstances? The accuser is an attention seeker your honor! A disingenuous cry baby? Case dismissed.
Calling them insane is bashing them. I don't mean literally. What is insanity? Isn't the world insane and we're all to blame? He could be more sensitive to why they're doing it, I doubt shouting "go away!" will help - I think it goes with territory of fame is my point, I've never liked actors that can't see fame for what it is. A good role model to all young actors on the subject of fame and how to handle celebrity would be someone like Jackie Chan.
I was walking my dog the other day, a young fox cub popped up across the street and stared at us for a while. We stopped for a moment, then walked on. When I looked back, he'd crossed over and started following us and did so for a few blocks. He'd ventured out onto the sidewalk, I guess he'd lost his parent and was hungry. My dog normally barks at foxes, but not this time. I had nothing to give him, but was happy for him to tag along until I got home so I could give him some food. When I looked behind one last time he'd vanished, it broke my heart, but was probably for the best.
A mysterious nanny appears, two men become besotted and a sordid affair begins - even more shocking to reveal the nanny is a man in drag, it was a homosexual love triangle. Of course the wife would react with horror.
As for what was shown, it made little sense, I feel betrayed at being strung along by an accidentally surreal cacophony of sequences in the final third of the finale.
No idea what happened to the children either, they all forgot they had kids.
Ridiculous.
* The painting scene would have been splendid if it had ended sooner, they really killed the idea, like a comedian spending 10 minutes explaining his own joke.
I'm one person outside Korea that gives a fuck.
No... Any mitigating circumstances?
The accuser is an attention seeker your honor! A disingenuous cry baby?
Case dismissed.
I was walking my dog the other day, a young fox cub popped up across the street and stared at us for a while. We stopped for a moment, then walked on. When I looked back, he'd crossed over and started following us and did so for a few blocks. He'd ventured out onto the sidewalk, I guess he'd lost his parent and was hungry. My dog normally barks at foxes, but not this time. I had nothing to give him, but was happy for him to tag along until I got home so I could give him some food. When I looked behind one last time he'd vanished, it broke my heart, but was probably for the best.