atom951

It's because she's so conspicuous that she gets analysed, it's natural. She has to ride the wave. I wouldn't have picked her out and analysed what she did otherwise, no way - if she wasn't who she is I simply wouldn't have noticed her.

Most actors learn how to stand, how to sit, how to walk, how to enunciate. She looked untrained in Snowdrop, an amateur.
Other actors are overflowing with charisma, naturally gifted, they sway people. Again, I wouldn't say Jisoo was in this category either.
She's ok. So-so. I wish her well, she should just go with the flow, she's not claiming to be anything she's not, she's popular and her fans like her acting, fair enough✌️

The director should be a politician, in fact he's too good to be a politician, he's a diplomat. He avoided commenting on her acting skills with great artistry, we hear you Mr Director.

Thanks, not really what I was expecting, but I'd expect it from AI - the poster referred to Jesus: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are the relevant books. You'll find context missing for the quotes you got from Matthew.
I think you might have framed the AI query imprecisely.

Your article didn't state if she was called by the defence or the prosecution, I had to evaluate that detail. It's not a coincidence that the money laundering art gallery has appeared numerous times in various dramas. In dramas the curator has studied/practiced art and carries an innate understanding of it, along with a 'je ne sais quoi' disposition... when they're depicted as the good guys.

P.s. here she is, mentioned alongside Park Min-young of all people, no idea why, PMY is as clean as a whistle (and any comment that suggests otherwise will rightly be removed):
https://m.seoul.co.kr/news/society/2023/02/20/20230220500199

Chae Jung-an is utterly captivating, the most beautiful K-actress I've seen. I like her when she's happy to be pretty, it's hard work.

Judy would be referring to the new testament. Can you give us some examples of what you mean? Or just one?

I did not watch Vincenzo, red flags in episode 1. She's (for me) a girl who studied hard, worked hard, but has no natural charisma.

I wish Lee Si-young all the best. I hope she doesn't feel she has something to prove in future, like the actress Charlize Theron who's abusing her children in the name of her activism. Embarrassing. It's why kids from normal families are grounded, wise and grow up better prepared to support families of their own.

Pro choice is a right exclusive to women. I believe in equal rights.

80% of adults born from unnatural methods have reproductive issues.
We're almost there, Children of Men.

Great news, wishing them a life of health, happiness and joy together. He's with Ha Ji-won's company, I didn't know that, he must be a great person. I hope Joo-wan will not let his wife skip her meals.

S2 failed to recapture the magic. There's no more humour. The cells' personalities went wrong, they were dull and too centric. The ML lacks charisma and I'm pretty sure he's the one Kim Go-eun said was insincere, a person without artistic merit, without artistic integrity, without the type of integrity possessed by intelligent and mature men, the type of beta male that calls into question the honour of his esteemed, award-winning co-star, a co-star so high above him he's treading water the whole time trying to keep his head above the water.

Saying all that, you need to catch up and it picks up towards the end, maybe around episode 6-8. There are some very special moments that stand out, a couple of great new characters and special appearances from episode 1 - you'll notice all of a sudden it clicks into groove as soon as she tries to buy or sell a rice cooker or something similar (can't remember, some sort of eBay or Craigslist type of transaction)

Platitudes from Park Bo-young

I don't think anyone can beat Woong. Season 1 was too good, probably unbeatable. Still, I might come out of retirement to watch S3 for Kim Go-eun, hope they can recapture the magic.

No context whatsoever, just 2 dial tones moping around for 2 hours.

A break up film without any hint of being together, no context. Perhaps it would work on stage, on film it didn't work. A vapid two hours in an apartment, no insights, no thoughts, no personalities. There's no value in watching a person take a saucepan, fill it with water and place it on a stove - a waste of a minute. There are 100 minutes like that in this film.

If any of those things happened, it would have at least made it a proper film.

Liar: "I will not continue this conversation."
Not that your credibility was ever established to begin with. You keep talking shit. You don't know the facts and believe propaganda as fact, as such, I'll defer to Mark Twain.

Yep, k-drama's on the way out, they're just throwing any 2 names together and cashing cheques these days, the art's not even a consideration. That's why I've quit. It's over.