atom951

If he comes out of it well, how can the family find closure?

It isn't Left at all. Those are the values of all good people, left and right. It's just that the left has monopolised those words and expressions to make it seem as if they're the only side that supports them. Manipulation.

Like a bike 😆
I don't have a bike, I blame Kim Soo-hyun. Why is he indifferent to her death?

That big staircase breakdown scene in It's Okay, he peeks out of the corner of his eye at the end before the director calls "cut", he's too aware of the camera and needy for validation. Editing disaster, but revealing.

No it isn't. Creeps with bad intentions hide themselves from the family. Give me a concrete example of an occasion where the family should have "[brought] this up", how, and to whom.

Johnny Depp used that one, they copied him - but failed.

Virtue-signalling platitudes. "the public should stay out of it" includes yourself. Remember a girl died whilst revelling in your blissful indifference.

You can't have both of those.

Thanks - I'm pointing out that the news is using the age of 15, which is the Korean age. In international terms that could be 13 or 14 years old.

Woke advocates are narcissistic.
And leftists have to be woke.
Do you know why?
Because leftists believe the left is the 'good' side, the kind side. Leftists are people that want to appear to be 'good'. A mild type of narcissism that we all possess.
The moderate left really are good people - but they made the mistake in thinking that the further left they go, the greater their virtue. It's a flawed way of thinking.
Whilst you're pretending to be 'good', you tolerate bad things happening. The current left is not kind, it's manipulative. The evidence is before us already - leftist authoritarian governments gaslight us into believing otherwise, if you live in Europe you're probably not even noticing its insidious creep into autocracy - because the 'good' people are being told that the other side are thugs, racists, far right, lunatics, it's all nonsense - but it makes those 'good' people stand in line, afraid to step out, afraid to ask, comfortable they're 'good people'. Therefore they (the authoritarians) get away with lawfare to remove political opposition, abuse of the law to achieve a goal. They get away with racism, sexism and more in the name of DEI. They spin the narratives they wish through mainstream media (which the leftists believe is the 'good' and 'righteous' media), hence the left continues to be cheered on by the 'good' - no consideration for those harmed, because they're being 'good'.
If you forget about trying to appear good for 5 minutes you'll be able to see the damage you're causing.

It says 'leftist'. Yoon's on the right.

I love her. Thanks LA. Troll @Etoks21, this is for you since you knew nothing about this story, but blindly followed the narrative.

I'm not a leftist but don't think martial law was acceptable either, only a lunatic can harass IU for buying coffee for the protesters who sat outside in the cold for days.

Anyone that says anything bad about IU is mentally unstable, possibly deluded or deranged.

Even her response to the criticism is the perfect response.

Every drama. It's Not Okay To Be A Pedo, that stupid anguished wail.
He did it back in 2009 in Will It Snow too. He's a one trick pony, he hasn't evolved in acting - as a psychopath he has a blinkered view in his observations, he can't empathise so just goes through the motions without ever knowing if he's right.

Korean age = 1 + n
Where 'n' is the number of 1st Januarys that have passed after birth.

The quoted age of '15' looks to be expressed in Korean age. Witness Ms A, auntie, stated:

"Kim Sae-ron met Kim Soo-hyun in 2014 when she was in the second year of middle school"

In international age, she only just turned 14 on 31-July 2014

It's preposterous.

I suspect foul play, anyone with something to lose if the news came out should be suspected. I also suspect that if KSR was able, the details could be even more shocking than what the family has pieced together.

Sigh. Do you know what self contradiction is? You say you don't condone AI content, then you condone it. Why's it okay to use buzzwords on topics that only you approve of? We are discussing actors. What's your definition of toxic positivity? Am I not allowed to discuss this in a "fucking drama forum", who's the arbiter of that? I don't want to talk to AIs, please respond appropriately. And specifically, which virtue am I signalling? That I don't approve of AI in person to person scenarios? How is that virtue signalling?

Sure. I think it's a question of honesty, I don't really get people that pretend they didn't use it.
Also I'm pretty sure there are an increasing number of bot accounts. It's not difficult to write a bot program that knows how to create an MDL account, add a few items to a drama list and post AI generated comments and replies using any biases the programmer implants.

I can't see Kim Ji-won as Doctor X.
Itashimasen.

That's called toxic positivity, what you said there. It matters.

If he was innocent he'd take questions and answer them diligently.
Imagine how cringe worthy it would be to see him try to answer just one of these.
If he goes ahead with his lawsuit against the family, maybe he'll have to face questions like these in court:
"What stopped you attending Sae-ron's funeral?"
"Why did you ignore her text messages?"
"Why did you harass her like a loan shark?"
"Were you afraid Sae-ron would talk about you after she leaked the photo?"
"Do you feel any responsibility for the plight of Kim Sae-ron?"
"Can you see why people might find your words and actions egregious?"
"Have you or your associates ever coordinated a hate campaign in the media?"
"What's your relationship to Kwak Tae-young?"
"What's your relationship to Lee Jin-ho?"
"What's your involvement in business affairs at Gold Medalist?"
"Can you think of anyone who would benefit from the permanent silencing of Sae-ron?"
"Why do you need Korea's most expensive law firm?"
"What's your history with Garosero Research Institute?"
"What's the age of the youngest girl you've been sexually attracted to?"
"Have you ever given a straight answer to a straight question?"

What is the literal evidence he produced?