atom951

You see how self-important you are? You think actors care what you or I write on MDL? "Eh?" "Woah!"
You're treating people who are better than you as if they're inferior. It's condescending - you mention a person's mistakes, being needy, hitting rock bottom - you think you're better. Wake up to the real world, you're not special.

Actually this has got me thinking, LA. Why not write/transpose an article that explains just what the appeal of this movie was? The exotic cast, the story, the wide demographic appeal? What's the average box office for horror movies? I'm also curious what the average cost of cinema tickets is in South Korea...

Great, amazing!
The actors look as if the novelty's worn off a little from these publicity shots 🤭

In what way, can you provide a quote as evidence?

Thanks for the link, interesting results, and disappointing. It isn't an illness or a disease... It's only treated as such to facilitate using the health infrastructure. A heroin addict that switches to propofol, or whatever, can make it look like those schemes work, but it's a management system for places that are overwhelmed. It would be nice if the cost and the fallout of those schemes was born solely by people like you that support it.

Agree, she's become one of my favourite singers too since castaway diva, I might never have got to hear her voice without Woo Young Woo.

That's more like it. My guess is otherwise, glass half empty, yours is half full.

True.

Ok, let's end the discussion, you've gone all emotional.

Ok thanks, I see what you mean. I was implying she had potential and I often wonder why it doesn't work out, I wasn't inferring that all actors that don't become leads are bullies. It's a bit like if I said all bears are animals therefore all animals are bears.

Thanks, well written. Are you saying that addiction is written into law? From what you said, it's consumption and possession which are illegal. Anyway, I feel we're splitting hairs there. I'm just one that believes the laws in SK are right.

Here's a scenario...
Imagine a society strictly segregated based on legal or illegal drugs. Imagine your capital city where the north allows drugs, the south does not, with an enforced partition line across the centre. Which half would you assume is the better place to live and which would be economically greater, which would provide the better world for your children? Would the south have a problem with drug addicts?

Good point - it's possible. I think news outlets verify the details before releasing a story, they will be sued heavily if their reporting is flawed. When there's smoke without fire it dissipates before we get to hear about it.

Addiction is not criminalised. Criminality depends on the legality of the means/substance and the behaviour of the individual.

Who is "us"?
I specifically included a condition to those I regard as supremacists.
I look at empirical evidence where drugs are concerned and don't accept your vague assertions to the contrary - do you have any evidence to support what you said?

Explain your reasoning. I'm pointing out a lack of motive for making this up and that checks on the quality of information will have taken place... what do 90% of actors have to do with it?

I agree with your sentiment, and I like your optimism where teachers and adults are just and honourable, and children return to school after the designated lunch interval - but alas there are naughty children who disobey the rules and teachers without the power or will to combat them... and unfortunately I've knowledge of some places where nobody intervenes and the victim is isolated, it's frightening and instils a sense of desperation when they see nobody is going to help.

A 90 minute beating by a man on an average man might cause a loss of consciousness or death.

A weak girl, on the other hand, wouldn't inflict much damage nor have the stamina to go hard for 90 minutes, not even 5 minutes. I'd guess she did sporadic spells over a 90 minute period. So adjust your expectations and let me know if you're still as certain as you seem.

It can happen, witnesses walk on by, don't report. 🙈🙉🙊

What do you mean 'sometimes'. It's always. You don't learn to be a psychopath - that's just a person pretending to be a psychopath.

It does seem pretty straightforward - I guess it's true what they say, that average criminals have low IQs. School bullying is one for the low end of that, low double digits. (In contrast, acting amongst highest IQs - unlikely a top actor will ever have been a school bully.) All these low-level actors/agents handle these crises in a stupid way too. If the truth is out there, best to acknowledge, repent, rehabilitate, take off again after a break... but transpose that onto a greedy, stupid idiot... how would they handle it? Badly!

What would be the point of dealing with this quietly? It's called leverage.