JeanneBB

I feel like we’re watching a bunch of drunk college students pass around a Watt’s App round robin story game, and they’re all just feeding off each other’s last idea. In all honesty, when I thought of my scenario, I was laughing with my husband and said, “Watch the writers come up with this stupid storyline: “Dracula is the baby daddy …etc.” And we started throwing off ideas of the most stupidist plot the writers could pull out of their nether regions. Truth be told, I once went to a haunted house, scared the crap out of me. I threatened one of the actors with murder if he didn’t leave me alone, I was so scared. I hated every bit of that terrifying adventure, but it was still thrilling at the same time. The minute I stepped out the door and saw daylight I turned to my husband and said,”That was fun! Let’s do it again.” I’m 100% positive I’m going to say the same about this show.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 This show is a hot mess. Yes, as I navigated through this 💩storm throwing spaghetti at the wall to see if it would stick. We pretty much are on the same track.
My theory was Dracula did it for revenge and control. Revenge over her giving up their first child and his ability to control his child’s destiny. Except it didn’t work out as planned. But yes, I believe the brothers are true brothers. Nurture/nature theory here too. Back-ho overcame his evil bloodline via nurture from Lawyer-Mama and that half-assed dad of his. Junk-Ho couldn’t because he was not nurtured until later, by Suk-Hee and then by Lawyer-Mama. His mean selfish bitter streak already took root. Cain and Abel with a bit of psychology at play.

When she mentioned that second frog, Dracula’s face looked like the child who was caught pooping behind the sofa.

Someone laughed at me when I gave my theory about Dracula, Cruella and Back-Ho weeks ago. It was the very episode Lawyer-Mama first pulled out the frog. Question remains as to why he did it. I still say it’s because he was angry over her throwing away their first child.

Unfortunately, Back-Ho will pull a JM and keep secrets. He will break-up with her believing they are siblings.

I truly believe at this point the writers are allowing us to write the story as they go. They completely forgot that on the first episode, the chairman voiced his disdain for Suk-Hae, because she was an orphan, to his son who was an orphan.
He slso forgot about the part that any DNA test Cruella took wouldn’t mean squat because his son was presumed dead and the chairman was not SR’s grandfather by blood.

Basically they’re saying, “Screw it, we’re lost and will take any suggestions at this point.”

Have you been reading my posts? I promise I’m not the writer. 🤣🤣🤣

Bsck when Seo-Ri was a baby Cruella had a DNA test saying Soe-Ri was the chairman’s granddaughter. Did he ever question how, since his son is not his own flesh and blood? Had he not reflected on that? can he not draw the simple conclusion that her mother must be related? Also, I said it a week or so ago, a few days ago, and yesterday, now it’s apparent. All evidence from the hints of today’s show point to Back-Ho being Cruelka’s and Dracula’s son too. We will see why Dracula had Cruella miscarry and he have control over where his child ended up as well as the child’s ultimate destiny. Prediction: Back-Ho will pull away from Jang-Mi because he will think they are siblings.

JM taped into SR’s slush fund? I’m sure Cruella stashed some cash in SR’s bank account. Or it’s the companies CC.

it’s like we’re in a really bad relationship with an extremely attractive wealthy partner who smells good. We simply can’t let go.

Didn’t the chairman freeze those assets? Thsts why she and Dracula were meeting in a broken buildings storage room.

I’m like, where is she getting her money from, besides selling bonsai on the side of city street corners, and why is she always in her old “unbugged” office. I would have wire tapped those psycho’s a long time ago.

That’s what I’ve been saying since it was first revealed he was adopted, about a month or so ago.

I have two theories I’m holding on to. The other is he’s Cruella’s child that she believes was stillborn. See, he’s the same age as JM. And the professor brokered him, gave him the items so HIS child would inherit the fortune one day. He wanted control of his destiny when the first child was given away without his consent. The items are truly the Ma’s. Maybe he stole them from the chairman’s son right before he threw him off the boat? I do believe Cruella and him had him killed because the son knew they never had sex.

I noticed what Junk Ho said to him today about not being related at all, now. It’s a Cain and Abel story.
The writers are ridiculous enough to write this.

I guess the writers figure (if they are going to torture those of us in this toxic rollercoaster of a relationship we have with this show) they might as well make it fun. Widow Gump didn’t kick her hard enough, IMO. Furthermore, if she’s gonna prank Cruella, then prank her good. I was really hoping she would give her the 💩 💩 💩’s with that drink.

If she wasn’t so busy playing Steve Austin with her slow motion (I swear I heard the music playing) drawer snooping, she would have had plenty of time to snatch that necklace and the other items. She needs to get her a$$ back in that drawer tomorrow and switch out the necklaces. Since she had proven to be smarter than everyone else, when she was Widow Gump, I hope she doesn’t lose those smarts simply because she has her alleged genius IQ back, again.

Also, I wonder if she got her sense of normal fashion back and cringes every time she gets dressed in her old outfits? I’m waiting for her to ask her daughter who chose her clothes?

Like a momma bear and her cubs, she knows when her junk drawer is going to be “in trouble.” It’s the only thing she loves.

Back-ho’s parentage.
The last (paragraph) scenario is wishful thinking on my part because I truly don’t want him being born out of evil. How did the chairman get the company after he lost everything he had to include a wife and daughter? Did he steal the biz from someone else? If so, did Back-ho come from them and is the rightful heir? Almost all of these rich families on k-dramas got that way via theft and murder, with a little child stealing thrown in for good measure.

Abd you don’t have to worry about anyone finding them because they won’t know to look for something untraceable and undetectable because undetectable and untraceable is exactly that.

🤣🤣🤣

One thing we got from the last two episodes: she was not cremated. There’s a strong possibility she’s lurking about somewhere, sleeping off her undetectable untraceable drug. I still want to know how HY-Biatch was able to put on a funeral for someone she had zero ties to? And how about that Junk-Ho not being there for the woman he considered his real true mother? Couldn’t face her because he helped murder her daughter? I hope they meet face to face and her reaction makes him commit harm-Kari with a dull pencil to his brain through his ear canal.


As for the dad. I think HY-Biatch had him killed. She needed him out of the picture because he would have said he never had sex with her and declared her mentally unstable, and taken her cash cow before she lost it on the staircase.

I still stand by my theory about Back-Ho and Jung-Ho.
We all know their first child (Jung-Ho) was given away without Dracula’s approval. We all know the next child she was pregnant with was not Chairman’s son’s child and more than likely Dracula’s. Or maybe it was just some John’s and Dracula was bitter about her giving away his son? Either way….
Follow me here: Dracula didn’t want this child taken from him in the same way without the child being able to find his father. What if Dracula gave drugs to cause labor intending all along to take his child from her and faking a still birth? She was having labor pains before she fell down the stairs. I went back to Ep. 1 and rewatched to make sure.

Her falling was just a convenient coincidence. He clearly had the power (with her money and clout) to pull this off. He already had a plan in place to give the child to better people, via a broker. In comes Lawyer Chang. He wasn’t going to have his child raised by HY-Biatch who hated children, and another man, shutting him out completely. In his twisted logic, this gave him some control over the situation. The items Chang has came from him.

If we look at the character of Manager Lee, he is a tortured soul. I feel sorry for him, to a degree, where I don’t for Prof Farquaad.

The plot twist and true Greek tragedy is both boys have the same parents. One is evil by nature, one is good by nurture.

Now, with Junk-Ho, that was unplanned, but with Back-Ho, she needed to get pregnant to trick her way into that family. She was obsessed with Chairman Ma’s son and was losing him to Suk-He. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

The only other thing it could be is Back-Ho is the rightful heir to Dream Conglomerate via the real owner, not this fake Ma family.

😂😂😂 Side note to my previous post. While I was yelling at my TV my husband, who’s my k-drama viewing partner, said, “Sush. I’m trying to hear this!” Mind you, we watch in subtitles. This is making us as batty as the characters in this WTF show. Even so, we will not let it defeat us. We’re in it for the long haul.

I vote Ep. 112 as having the most ridiculous line ever heard on any k-drama, real or parody. “SR took an undetectable untraceable drug. That’s why it didn’t show up in her bloodwork.” 👀👀

Yet Dr. Henchman found it within an hour of her death in his postmortem bloodwork? It must only appear during rigor mortis.🤔Maybe under black light? Or while standing on one’s head?

Me yelling at the TV: Grandfather Chairman Ma, if you bought that and still put HY behind bars you can kiss Dream goodbye, because that means you don’t have the mental fortitude to run a checkout line at H-mart, much less a conglomeration.


I came back to edit for one more thought. Now that I’ve seen the previews I might be wrong about that most ridiculous statement yet. The preview for Ep.113 shows their shell company is selling bonsai trees? Why am I not surprised? They have to be ones who furnish those dudes on the street corners selling $5 juniper bushes masked as $100-$200 bonsai out of the back of a white van??

Here’s one the writers missed, and do did the rest of us for that matter:

If they’re faking that it’s supposed to be Jang Mi who died WTF in all that is sacred, in dramaland and all things sensible, is HY doing at the funeral, even more so playing the grieving mother?

They should have stuck with the blood thinners, Diet pills? 🫢

They also wouldn’t operate on a patient in full make-up plus eyeliner, especially plastic surgery on the face. And why didn’t they do bloodwork before the surgery like most hospitals or clinics? Then there’s the part where there is no equipment but a heart monitor, and they allow a family member in a sanitary operating room. She probably still had on her heels.

The laziness isn’t just the writer, but the director and the film crew.