I mean ya a bit disappointed in the turn of events (c'omon ... all that for money and the US was really played here? Their ability to invent danger and then go get rid of it is not even science fiction they could have used exactly that for credibility) and the scene when she realizes who the agent is and takes him to the cliff... a bit overplayed there, all the talk and the gun pointing seemed off and waaay to much of a clisee.... SO, me still loving it despite all that.... is something. Still getting 9.5 at this point from me.
Also... the kiss in the water, totally awesome and beautifully edited.
My theory is that he liked her even before the events leading to their meeting in ep1, about the time she was…
I assumed that too but we didnโt get to see him before that 1frame and didnโt know that detail and he played it well, his face screams โgive me romantic dramasโ he has the most charming gaze i have ever seen on an actor (for a romantic gaze i mean) really awesome.. would be a shocking turn of events to be something else than what he seems ๐ Also, happy to see it have 9 eps because that way nothing seems rushed .. itโs what chaos looks like. I have many arguments as to why i find this a great drama but yeah, his gaze is one of them ๐
This is, so far, the best drama I've seen this year and it is not even done so maybe I am a bit ahead of myself..but.... 1. dude looked in love since the first frame... 2. I AM SHOCKED by the ending of episode 5... I mean... it is my worst nightmare these days, to enjoy something precious to me and in that very moment have it all taken away by that one announcement. These days... that is the most scary threat.
all this talk about love and we didn't get at least a hint ... a hint man, i didn't want much ... a hint to show a bit of flirt.
ML : Well I think love is.....
.... always a different experience and what you've known about it ends when you start again. FL: Will you tell me when you find a new answer then? ML: I think I might. *smile* *smile* FL: Soo... the food was great. ML: It was. FL: Would you.. ML: I would. FL: ... join me sometime again? ML: I thought you meant now. FL: I am not that eager. ML: .... FL: OK, yes I meant now.
That was all, no kiss no hug, i did not need that but they made it all like big talk about love and yet none for them. He seemed kind of accepting of the fact that it's not a good idea and she looked like: oh well, i get it, ok, at least i learned something.
I need no steamy kiss it was clear from episode 1 we ain't getting that but MAN... let the man finish and give me a hint that he is at least considering her.
Cases were good, still liked the drama, not many rushed things but... *sigh* .... god damn it.
- so this was a legal case? like ... in court? ... so if I was bullied by other kids in high school is it normal…
I agree that the first is attempted murder (you may argue the intention, which you typically do in these cases) but you may prove the aggressor has accepted the outcome, even though it was not the main purpose, when the hit is in a vital area (like head or heart). So "I did not want to kill the person" is irrelevant when you throw a knife to the heart and somehow the person lives. Yes, the first one should have been attempted murder.
The disruption of events is correct, but the prosecutor should have argued that "yes, she often crosses the street illegally but given the stare she was put in by the aggressor, her chances to avoid the collision were dramatically reduced, therefore you cannot say i hit this person with my car because she took a blow to the head and probably did not see the car come. Yes she often drinks and often crosses the street illegally but the result, that evening, was of direct contribution of the aggressor. "
the reality of it is that you can use the law to help both innocent and not so innocent people, that is where the lack of feeling in the law stands. It's people who bring life to law, law is just a means.. and can be used by smart people to either help the good or the bad. No one there committed any crime in the way the law was used to defend the doctor.
I mean ya a bit disappointed in the turn of events (c'omon ... all that for money and the US was really played here? Their ability to invent danger and then go get rid of it is not even science fiction they could have used exactly that for credibility) and the scene when she realizes who the agent is and takes him to the cliff... a bit overplayed there, all the talk and the gun pointing seemed off and waaay to much of a clisee.... SO, me still loving it despite all that.... is something. Still getting 9.5 at this point from me.
Also... the kiss in the water, totally awesome and beautifully edited.
Also, happy to see it have 9 eps because that way nothing seems rushed .. itโs what chaos looks like. I have many arguments as to why i find this a great drama but yeah, his gaze is one of them ๐
1. dude looked in love since the first frame...
2. I AM SHOCKED by the ending of episode 5... I mean... it is my worst nightmare these days, to enjoy something precious to me and in that very moment have it all taken away by that one announcement. These days... that is the most scary threat.
ML : Well I think love is.....
.... always a different experience and what you've known about it ends when you start again.
FL: Will you tell me when you find a new answer then?
ML: I think I might.
*smile*
*smile*
FL: Soo... the food was great.
ML: It was.
FL: Would you..
ML: I would.
FL: ... join me sometime again?
ML: I thought you meant now.
FL: I am not that eager.
ML: ....
FL: OK, yes I meant now.
That was all, no kiss no hug, i did not need that but they made it all like big talk about love and yet none for them. He seemed kind of accepting of the fact that it's not a good idea and she looked like: oh well, i get it, ok, at least i learned something.
I need no steamy kiss it was clear from episode 1 we ain't getting that but MAN... let the man finish and give me a hint that he is at least considering her.
Cases were good, still liked the drama, not many rushed things but... *sigh* .... god damn it.
btw, i thought ML can't drive a car
The disruption of events is correct, but the prosecutor should have argued that "yes, she often crosses the street illegally but given the stare she was put in by the aggressor, her chances to avoid the collision were dramatically reduced, therefore you cannot say i hit this person with my car because she took a blow to the head and probably did not see the car come. Yes she often drinks and often crosses the street illegally but the result, that evening, was of direct contribution of the aggressor. "
The sentence itself was too light.