Lee Hyeok

Defend her? He admit that he don't verify the information he's getting. All the evidence were debunk as false or out of date since they were all from when she was an adult. And what is so disrespectful as the call her the "deceased" it show more respect that her so called family who nevr cared for her before

Why would he apologize? Up until now he's still innocent. If proof show he's guilty, he should be pubish, but not by us, we are not judge and jury. All the so called "evidence" have been debunk by metadata and only show that they in fact were dating, but only after she was an adult. If new evidence that can't be debunk and show he's guilty, then he should be punish, but not by us.

And i still can't believe there people who will still ask as judge and jury and condamn someone without any proof or evidence at the end. It's innocent until proven guilty, not thr other way around. Until now, all the evidence the family shown was debunk by analysis and metadata.

He's not the perfect person, he's just showing lies. His other so called evidence have been debunk, those will be to

He's not the perfect person, he's just showing lies. His other so called evidence have been debunk, those will be to

We should keep tab on how much gri is showing fake evidence

Cult? Let me laugh if someone is in a cult it's the haters and all the so proclaimed judge and jury you seem to think you are and siding with the so called family who didin't care about her when she need them the most. All the proof they shown have been debunk with data analysis and the only thing that stay true to this story is that they date, but only when she was an adult

The only confirm evidence have all been debunk by KSH side, who use metadata and analysis to debunk them and show that he's a victim in this story. They are onlybafter his money.

Well, they are bullying him and defaming him should he let them? No

yes, but only when she was an adult

and they show that what the family is claiming is false.

Well, we can't believe that people like yourself, you know those who believe every rumors and allegation without any proof and hard evidence. but hey, here we are. It's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the family didn't release anything that prove he may be guilty, none, Everything they release was contradict by analyze and research. If they did show something that prove he's guilty, I'll say he should pay, but they didn't and until they do, he's innocent.

he's not a criminal, rumors and allegation doesn't mean that it's true. In fact, all that they have show KSH side was able to prove it was false. all the family is doing is trying to make us believe their story, if it was true, they wouldn't say thing like ''we don't have to prove anything'' when ask by reporter.

he doesn't deserve that hate, since he was not proven guilty, on the contrary, all the evidence are pointing to the not guilty verdict since the evidence the family is showing can't be verified.

It's innocent until proven guilty, even if you don't like that principle. And why would you be happy when he was proven innocent?

Exactly and it's not like if he was proven guilty, if that was the case, I could understand, even if I would still like to see the drama because the other actor also work hard making it. But it's the contrary, he was proven innocent by the evidence and the fact that you can see that the family is showing false evidence daily.

it's rich coming from a mother wasn't even close to her.

How?
The family side show text and other ''proof'' that they can't prove are true or even authentic (the family even said to a reporter asking them to prove that the text were authentic that they didn't have to prove anything, which is false, they have to prove their accusation is true), while his side as back their evidence with metadata and reliable proof.

Their "factual proof" was a sinister mix of "trust me, bro, we have evidence"

That's exactly what the so called ''parent'' of KSR have been doing since the start. While KSH have been showing proof that contradict and back their claim, KSR parent are saying we should believe them without showing any proof.

during their conference, they admit that the text they show was not the original text and that they had it at home and a reporter ask them how they could prove it was real, the family then told them they didn't have to prove it. What? they don't have to prove it? yes, they in fact have to prove it.

GM and KSH side have show metadata, backing their claimed and until now, all they show was back and showing he wasn't guilty at all.

Yes, I'm a fan and I have no shame in admitting I admire his work, but I'm not a crazy fan either. In my view and in logic, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, he prove he's innocent. But, of course, if something came out and prove that he is guilty, then yes, he should pay for his crime, but until that happen, in my eyes, he's innocent until proven guilty.

Unlike you, (who already jump to guilty at the start) I only believe in the evidence and to this date, KSR family didn't show anything that back their claim. If they did, I'll change my mind, but until then, I won't play the judge, because I and you are not judge nor jury.

With source? oh please, don't try to make me believe you actually believe that. During their press conference, the family literally respond to a reporter who ask them if they had proof that the letter they were showing was from KSR and they said they didn't have to prove it. Yes, you have to prove it. KSH side already back their claimed with factual proof and have confirmed them, while the family just think we will take their words for it, when they are in fact not close to KSR at all.