I'll answer your first question, about why the release of evidence in this manner.It's tactical.1. Make a statement…
#1, that's not a lie, because it's something common in SK to hide the artist relationship.
#2, yes they are baseless and clearly false.
#3, all the evidence shown by KSR family have been debunked by factual proof and with metadata that prove that even if they date, it was when she was in fact an adult.
Those idiots are paying so much for these fake people. First fake best friend, now ex-boyfriend from nowhere.…
No, i'm not stupid, i just wait until bashing someone like you people who believe this story from her so called aunt, just because it was on his birthday. A person is innocent until proven guilty.
We and you (since you think you are all knowing) are not judge nor jury. I'm waiting for the evidence and until now, everything seem to contradict her family claim.
You can't fabricate a wedding paper (well you can, but then it would be easy to see if it's authenticate or not and it's been authenticated)
So to me, it seems you only want a person to blame and have an actor you hate and he was relate to KSR so for you it's enough. But unlike you, I will wait for proof that can't be denied and if he's guilty, again he should face justice.
Suggestions for imaginary people for KSH & GM to make up next:- The secret sister (birth secret! Let's use this…
Wow, now they're making people up... didn't know how far you would go to try to bash him. You don't believe his side, but are readybto believe that he's guilty just because what? She did it on his birthday? Seriously? That's your proof that all of that is true? Serisouly?
Let me tell you something. It's innocent until proven guilty and of course, if he's guilty, he should face justice and there no question there from my part. But, until now i have seen nothing that prove he's guilty.
A reply (as you were typing this) to the post just below yours claims the "ex-husband said that he only met KSR…
what people don't understand is that all this bashing is destroying someone career and that if he's proven guilty, his career will still be over, but would they apologize? no, because they don't care, they need someone to blame for what happen to KSR and her family (who was proven by her ex-boyfriend, didn't care about her until now) have found the perfect person.
Then they will ask, why did the family didn't go after the husband then? well maybe because, unlike KSH, he wasn't famous and couldn't pay them anything, so they had to fabricate a story to get money.
Once again, if all of this is true, he should face justice, 100%, but not from us, we are neither judge or jury and so many celebrities have lost their career and in some case way more because of allegation and rumors that were proven false way too late.
A reply (as you were typing this) to the post just below yours claims the "ex-husband said that he only met KSR…
I agree with you on one thing ''We do not have to believe him'' but the same goes with the allegation against KSH. If he's guilty, he should face justice, but until then, it's only rumors and allegation, nothing confirmed to be true and the so called ''Evidence'' were all debunk to be after, when she was an adult. Of course, if new evidence come to light and that he's in fact guilty, he should face justice, but yet again, we need to have real proof and not just allegation and rumors.
watch gold medalist or that lee jinho guy say this imaginary husband of hers shares a same birthday with ksh lmaooo
imaginary? the certificate of marriage was provide as proof that he exist. and the date have no significance at all. it's innocent until proven guilty, we are not judge or jury. I'm not a fan obsess, yes I like his acting, but if he's proven guilty without a doubt, then I will boycott him, but until then, we should wait.
Garosero published the name and location of the so-called ex-boyfriend who she dated for one week like it is stated…
First your judge and jury and now, you start conspiracy theory. Seriously..... if he's guilty I'll boycott him, but until then it's innocent until proven guilty and again, yes, if he's guilty I'll boycott him, but until then, i'm not judge or jury and neither you.
It's so heartbreaking she suffered all alone until she decided to end her life. Even after her death, they are…
No one is making her a villain, she's.....well, she was a good actress and I really loved her in bloodhounds and was shock when she disappear without a word (then i learned about the incident) still she shouldn't have lost her job over this, but this is how Korea work sadly. But like I said, it's not her that they are making the villain, it's her fake aunt and family whom until this point weren't interest in her and it's sad.
People are still asking for proof because that's what we need, actual proof. All that was shown until now only show that KSH isn't guilty at all and that actually, they did date, but when she was an adult. On the other hand, if he did date her way before that, then count me in, I'll boycott him without hesitation, but we all see what rumors are doing to celebrities or even ordinary people. That's why proof and fact are important and we shouldn't judge before getting anything other than fact and proof.
Her friends and ex-boyfriends have all come forward saying that the blamed shouldn't be on KSH, but on her husband.
Again, if at the end, they come forward with proof that KSH side can't contradict, then yes, I'll believe he's guilty and will boycott him, but until then, we are not judge nor jury and shouldn't judge someone before having all the fact.
I agree. Every single evidence so far is circumstantial. Not a single one proves one way over the other . Bottom…
We also know that her family is lying ;)
So we have four facts total and no more: 1) Yes, but they were both adult 2) Yes, but yet again, they were both adult 3) Yes, but first, he was wearing short, her family just cover that part to make her story work for them.
+++
it's not just in court, buying all those rumors (which are only rumors and have been proven false as of now) can destroy people lives.
+++
the audio and photo that were released recently have been proven authentic, by the fact that one of her friend confirmed the story about her being married and having an abortion and her problem with her husband.
I agree. Every single evidence so far is circumstantial. Not a single one proves one way over the other . Bottom…
None of that is true. I agree, if he's guilty of that, then he must pay, but nothing have been proving. Otherwise, evidence from his side were verified and prove that he's innocent.
Of course, if new evidence and not just rumors come to light and prove that her mother was telling the truth, then yes, like I said, he should pay, but nothing was proven, only that he's innocent.
+ in the new evidence shown, an audio of her talking about her husband and how she was mistreat by him when given and even a friend of hers said that the audio was true.
and last time I check, everyone is ''Innocent, until proven guilty'' but with netizen, it's the contrary and even if he's proven innocent, they won't believe it. For me, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the evidence only show that he's in fact, innocent. If new evidence and again, not rumors, come to light and show that he's guilty, I'll change my mind, but until then, he's innocnet.
There are names like boomerang snake or whale return. I know nothing about tennis but they didn't seem real.
Well, in the show, the coach said that the ''Twist Serve'' is a technique use by Rafael Nadal, which he use in real life and the boomerang snake is also something use in real life, but only by pro of maybe a real life Lu Xia.
#2, yes they are baseless and clearly false.
#3, all the evidence shown by KSR family have been debunked by factual proof and with metadata that prove that even if they date, it was when she was in fact an adult.
You know you're not all knowing and you're neither judge and jury.
Like i said to a lot, it's innocent until proven guilty, if he's guilty he should of course face justice, but not by us either.
We and you (since you think you are all knowing) are not judge nor jury. I'm waiting for the evidence and until now, everything seem to contradict her family claim.
You can't fabricate a wedding paper (well you can, but then it would be easy to see if it's authenticate or not and it's been authenticated)
So to me, it seems you only want a person to blame and have an actor you hate and he was relate to KSR so for you it's enough. But unlike you, I will wait for proof that can't be denied and if he's guilty, again he should face justice.
Let me tell you something. It's innocent until proven guilty and of course, if he's guilty, he should face justice and there no question there from my part. But, until now i have seen nothing that prove he's guilty.
Then they will ask, why did the family didn't go after the husband then? well maybe because, unlike KSH, he wasn't famous and couldn't pay them anything, so they had to fabricate a story to get money.
Once again, if all of this is true, he should face justice, 100%, but not from us, we are neither judge or jury and so many celebrities have lost their career and in some case way more because of allegation and rumors that were proven false way too late.
People are still asking for proof because that's what we need, actual proof. All that was shown until now only show that KSH isn't guilty at all and that actually, they did date, but when she was an adult. On the other hand, if he did date her way before that, then count me in, I'll boycott him without hesitation, but we all see what rumors are doing to celebrities or even ordinary people. That's why proof and fact are important and we shouldn't judge before getting anything other than fact and proof.
Her friends and ex-boyfriends have all come forward saying that the blamed shouldn't be on KSH, but on her husband.
Again, if at the end, they come forward with proof that KSH side can't contradict, then yes, I'll believe he's guilty and will boycott him, but until then, we are not judge nor jury and shouldn't judge someone before having all the fact.
So we have four facts total and no more:
1) Yes, but they were both adult
2) Yes, but yet again, they were both adult
3) Yes, but first, he was wearing short, her family just cover that part to make her story work for them.
+++
it's not just in court, buying all those rumors (which are only rumors and have been proven false as of now) can destroy people lives.
+++
the audio and photo that were released recently have been proven authentic, by the fact that one of her friend confirmed the story about her being married and having an abortion and her problem with her husband.
Of course, if new evidence and not just rumors come to light and prove that her mother was telling the truth, then yes, like I said, he should pay, but nothing was proven, only that he's innocent.
+ in the new evidence shown, an audio of her talking about her husband and how she was mistreat by him when given and even a friend of hers said that the audio was true.
and last time I check, everyone is ''Innocent, until proven guilty'' but with netizen, it's the contrary and even if he's proven innocent, they won't believe it. For me, it's innocent until proven guilty and until now, the evidence only show that he's in fact, innocent. If new evidence and again, not rumors, come to light and show that he's guilty, I'll change my mind, but until then, he's innocnet.