His story is "too good" to the point that he will continuously hurt both people he said he care for He Na and…
The one that interpreted my post wrong was you, to start with: 1: I said "his story is too good", you take "good" out of context as if I had meant Afu is good, when I meant the story is good, interesting;
2: Clearly when I said Afu story is more interesting than the main CP hit a nerve on you, as you say it is rude to say so, but no, it is not rude to say so, it is MY OPINION, that his story is more interesting. Being rude is reply me with irony like you did: "too good". For me, the main couple is the same story on every other Xianxia, lovers from other lifetimes reincarnated with memory loss, the second couple offers me another story to look at;
3- You put words I never said on my post when you say "what you like doesn't equate to making it interesting for everyone in here.". I NEVER SAID OR IMPLIED THAT. Since my first post I made clear it is my opinion I even started with "I have a theory" which means what I'm saying came from my imagination. Also, you said "See, this is why we all have different preferences when it comes to liking something.". Again, I never said everybody thinks equally! You repeatedly answer to things I never said.
4- Finally, yous passive aggressive "we can agree to disagree". This expression means giving your opinion respectfully, but you did not, as I said above, you could never, because you, yourself, said that my opinion sounded rude to you, again, you took personally that I don't like the main CP, that is why you reply me with irony taking my words out of context, that is why you reply me with passive aggression, that is why you reply as if I was not respecting you opinion when I never target you with my post.
If you agree to disagree you should give your opinion with respect not with irony. Have a nice day.
His story is "too good" to the point that he will continuously hurt both people he said he care for He Na and…
I never said what I like or think equate to what everyone else thinks. This is what you don't seem to understand. The fact the post is public does not mean you are allowed to be rude in your replies. You disagree and you don't like what I said, great, you can comment about that. But your comment implies that what I have written is not truth, when, in fact, it is my opinion, you can disagree as much as it pleases you, but you cannot say what I have written is wrong. Disagree is not the same as trying to correct other comment, you can say your opinion without make mine seem wrong. The arrogance that your post exudes say a lot about your attitude here, it is not about you, dear. And again, I can reply as much as I like, I don't care if you like my replies or not, please end you passive aggressive behavior if you are going to be rude.
His story is "too good" to the point that he will continuously hurt both people he said he care for He Na and…
Yes, we can disagree, the point is that you came to my comment to criticize my choice of words, so I have the right to reply. You need to disagree respectfully not criticizing my opinion and getting sensitive when I reply because you took personally something I said about my perception.
His story is "too good" to the point that he will continuously hurt both people he said he care for He Na and…
It’s good in the sense it is interesting at least for me. He is contradictory and I want to see where he will go what he will do next and how it will end, I don’t feel the urge to skip his scenes as I would do in other dramas when the second character shows show. I don’t think he is a filler, there is really a story. And yes, he is bad, manipulative and everything you say, after all, he is a villain not a hero, he is bad and he should be bad, that is the whole point of being a villain.
I have a theory. I’ve read somewhere that cdramas can’t have villains as main character. Maybe the writters just like Afu, as they should his story is too good, but couldn’t make him the mc so they just give him a lot of scenes even as a side character. Anyway I don’t care I find his development more interesting than the main cp
lol it's call makeup. You must be hater or blind to not see it.
She was not ugly before, she was not ugly in the first season, her eyes are still different, the inner corners are completely different. Again, I’m not a hater I don’t think she was ugly before or got ugly after PS, I do think her eyes was fierce and got more personality before. But that is South Korea, female celebrities getting their faces generic with PS to fit the standard.
lol it's call makeup. You must be hater or blind to not see it.
I’m not a hater, I could say the same about you, idolizing her got you blind. Makeup doesn’t not change your whole face. I don’t care if she wants to do PS or not, I don’t care if she is natural or not. What I care is that she lost her fierce eyes for childish doll eyes she has now.
The prosecutor giving all the information about the investigation before getting the answer to where the painting is...they really think we are idiots to watch it and finding it not bad writing
I like the messages this drama gives in each episode, positively and equality between man and women. Also, everybody talks their feelings, so refreshing. Some dramas give me some anxiety and makes me want to skip scenes, but with this one I don’t get distressed.
I swear Yin Zheng must write "I like you" with pork ribs to Li Wei understand because her brain is fueled by food, boy is saying he likes her every episode in different ways and she just doesn't get it lol
1: I said "his story is too good", you take "good" out of context as if I had meant Afu is good, when I meant the story is good, interesting;
2: Clearly when I said Afu story is more interesting than the main CP hit a nerve on you, as you say it is rude to say so, but no, it is not rude to say so, it is MY OPINION, that his story is more interesting. Being rude is reply me with irony like you did: "too good". For me, the main couple is the same story on every other Xianxia, lovers from other lifetimes reincarnated with memory loss, the second couple offers me another story to look at;
3- You put words I never said on my post when you say "what you like doesn't equate to making it interesting for everyone in here.". I NEVER SAID OR IMPLIED THAT. Since my first post I made clear it is my opinion I even started with "I have a theory" which means what I'm saying came from my imagination. Also, you said "See, this is why we all have different preferences when it comes to liking something.". Again, I never said everybody thinks equally! You repeatedly answer to things I never said.
4- Finally, yous passive aggressive "we can agree to disagree". This expression means giving your opinion respectfully, but you did not, as I said above, you could never, because you, yourself, said that my opinion sounded rude to you, again, you took personally that I don't like the main CP, that is why you reply me with irony taking my words out of context, that is why you reply me with passive aggression, that is why you reply as if I was not respecting you opinion when I never target you with my post.
If you agree to disagree you should give your opinion with respect not with irony. Have a nice day.