"He is innocent, but he has been stained forever."It is said that this was the phrase written by a journalist…
There has never been a criminal trial in which Kim Soo-hyun was tried over allegations of dating Kim Sae-ron while she was a minor. There was no courtroom testimony or witnesses testifying under oath about those allegations.
The claims that the allegations were false came from a South Korean police investigation conducted as part of a case involving YouTuber Kim Se-ui (HoverLab). Police stated that some of the evidence they examined, including certain KakaoTalk messages and an audio recording, had been manipulated or fabricated. That was not a court ruling on whether Kim Soo-hyun was guilty or innocent of the underlying allegations. It was a police investigation into whether false evidence had been created and distributed.
A court’s role in that case would be to determine issues such as arrest, prosecution, or guilt on charges like defamation, not to independently determine every aspect of the alleged relationship unless those issues became part of a later trial.
I also think it’s reasonable to question how much weight should be given to a police investigation alone. Some people have criticized the handling of other high-profile cases by the same police jurisdiction and believe that history warrants scrutiny. Regardless, a police investigation is not the same as a final court judgment.
Regardless of where someone stands on the legal questions, The concern isn’t only about whether they officially started dating after she turned 18. By Kim Soo-hyun’s own agency’s account and his tearful confession conference, he already knew Kim Sae-ron years before that, when she was still a child, and he has acknowledged sending her letters while he was serving in the military. Whether someone believes those letters were romantic or not, They are deeply troubling. The issue is the broader relationship and power, not just whether a legal line was crossed.
People are free to form their own opinions based on the available information, but continuing to defend that dynamic without acknowledging those concerns contributes to the problem.
1. never said she did not do a great. I think Seol In Ah is beautiful and talented. 2. LIKE I SAID I understand her storyline. it still would have been better in another drama
But it was shot in 2018, so it should rather be 6 years, right ?
they cast the actors 7 or 8 years ago. Plus the 1 year it probably took to film. Plus another few months the directors tried to get this drama approved..... 6 years ago the last adaptation of this drama was four years before that. that is why i estimated 10 years
She was supposed to be the "villain" in the sense of preventing Ha Eun Gyeol from getting his parent together. (at first )then it slowly turned into a love between her and Ha Eun Gyeol. Like it was somewhat weird. If she were a guy(truly trying to break their family and not be born) I think it would have made Eun Gyeol realize that what he had with his family was always good sooner ( in the ending being he could not change the past) and possibly more screen time about how Chan and Cheong Ah reconnected now that both of them are deaf .... but LIKE I SAID I understand her storyline. it still would have been better in another drama
I do not understand why they would promote Tao Shu Na (Sun Qian) and Zhang Xiao Yan (Chen JingKe) with the main lead couple. when they barely were in episodes and barely had 10 minutes. ANDDD they cut out most of their scenes together!!!!!
The claims that the allegations were false came from a South Korean police investigation conducted as part of a case involving YouTuber Kim Se-ui (HoverLab). Police stated that some of the evidence they examined, including certain KakaoTalk messages and an audio recording, had been manipulated or fabricated. That was not a court ruling on whether Kim Soo-hyun was guilty or innocent of the underlying allegations. It was a police investigation into whether false evidence had been created and distributed.
A court’s role in that case would be to determine issues such as arrest, prosecution, or guilt on charges like defamation, not to independently determine every aspect of the alleged relationship unless those issues became part of a later trial.
I also think it’s reasonable to question how much weight should be given to a police investigation alone. Some people have criticized the handling of other high-profile cases by the same police jurisdiction and believe that history warrants scrutiny. Regardless, a police investigation is not the same as a final court judgment.
Regardless of where someone stands on the legal questions, The concern isn’t only about whether they officially started dating after she turned 18. By Kim Soo-hyun’s own agency’s account and his tearful confession conference, he already knew Kim Sae-ron years before that, when she was still a child, and he has acknowledged sending her letters while he was serving in the military. Whether someone believes those letters were romantic or not, They are deeply troubling. The issue is the broader relationship and power, not just whether a legal line was crossed.
People are free to form their own opinions based on the available information, but continuing to defend that dynamic without acknowledging those concerns contributes to the problem.
2. LIKE I SAID I understand her storyline. it still would have been better in another drama
6 years ago the last adaptation of this drama was four years before that. that is why i estimated 10 years
Sun Qian and ChenJingke