News Details
- Last Online: Aug 27, 2026
- Location: | ᐕ)⁾ Hey! [closes the door & goes back in, that's enough socialising for today]
- Contribution Points: 203 LV3
- Roles:
- Join Date: October 7, 2019
- Awards Received:
8
13
3
News
K-Drama
Editorials
8
13
3
Meanwhile, in this season she—who's literally from the future—forgot what gender equality even means when she made EVERYONE in her manor switch their jobs just because women being guards and men doing house chores was 'too weird' for her to handle. The ml had to explain to her that a meaningful reform should be appointing people based on their merit rather than their gender, which is true gender equality, but it was really occ of him since he used to have slightly sexist beliefs and was nagging at her about how men are supposed the handle serious affairs and women should take care of kids in the beginning of this season, I could've taken it as a character development if they had shown him changing rather than gaining such 'profound knowledge about gender equality' out of nowhere just to educate the ~oH sO nAiVe~ fl again. In my opinion, it actually should've been Xiao Tan to educate him on gender equality and him finally trying to understand women's struggles (in his original world, not this one) for it to make sense.
In previous two seasons, Xiao Tan was pretty easy-going yet ambitious and unashamed of her 'shallow' desire to be rich (as she should) but in this one all she cares about is Cheng Cheng so I can't help wondering, did the writers have something against the fl in this season? Or they're just biased towards the ml? :/
Btw I agree that it was unnecessary to give him the throne because Joseon needed a wise and responsible ruler more than ever, I get that Lee Chang wanted to investigate the cause of zombies himself but what can a child even do? Alright let's just assume, they thought zombie apocalypse finally ended when he was made the king, but how's he supposed to deal with the aftermath? Joseon's economy has probably collapsed by now, lack of resources is inevitable, more than half of the population is homeless and many soldiers died while fighting the zombies which would overall increase the chances of other nations eying Joseon. There's no way a kid can handle this all by himself.
If Lee Chang wanted to keep the baby alive, he could've had lied that he did turn into a zombie thus was killed, then give him away to Seobi and replace him with some random baby corpse they found at the Queen's place. At this point, it's kind of making me laugh how Joseon didn't have a zombie king just once but TWICE. XD
Hope you'll like 'Come and Hug Me' though, Happy watching!
Second, here's how I saw her character:
↪She turned her villagers into zombies purely because she, as a child, couldn't accept their deaths. It wasn't her intention to use the method for keeping them 'alive' as a weapon for revenge, until she had no other choice but to resort to this since the country she was counting on for revenge turned out to be her own enemy.
↪The reason behind becoming a slave of Joseon was a mix of her desire for revenge in a 'fair' manner and aspiration to be like her father. Her father had a huge influence on her and also plays a part in why she chose to stay loyal to Joseon, since she fully believed the country her father lived and died for could bring her revenge. Young Ashin saying that she's willing to wait for years or even decades for revenge after her whole village got massacred, clearly showed that she's a human being just like everyone else, whose decisions are not always fueled by rage but other emotions like trust and helplessness too.
↪She wasn't always evil. She did had a shred of humanity left in herself and cared about the living, judging by how she never fed humans to her zombie villagers (of course, except during the ending). She wanted revenge only on those she thought were the sole reason for her family and village's massacre, if she had unleashed her zombie villagers on them it would result in other people also getting hurt (since it's not like she can fully control where an whole army of zombies would wander to) and the zombie villagers getting burned or lost when her wish was to accompany them forever. But In the end, she just became numb to it all and no longer cared about the living, whether they're her enemies or not, after getting betrayed by the authorities and realising that she has actually been helping her enemies during these years.
Many characters in Kingdom are like this, they change and grow just like everyone else. For example, Moo Young was the kind of person to never betray Lee Chang/the crown prince yet he did, because he was forced into the corner by his difficult situation; Lee Chang wanted to be the king and kill the little prince thinking he has turned into a zombie too but he suddenly changed his mind and gave up the throne after finding out that the little prince was 'disinfected' (and let's be honest, it was really kind of him but not exactly logical either). Ashin went from running away from a wild boar to fearlessly and mercilessly shooting it, there's no reason to believe her character wouldn't make any further development/changes that are far different from her past aims and moral values.
Btw 'Come and Hug Me' had one of the best chemistry and most healthy relationship between the main leads, you'll surely enjoy it.
Edit: Is there a reason why some users are having a hard time expressing their opinion respectfully by making a separate comment instead of replying under mine, despite knowing my views are different? I'm not going around replying to those who don't like Ashin, so why are some people trying to start an argument with me?
Also, may I add that just because an antagonist is given a sad backstory, it doesn't necessary mean that it's an attempt to collect sympathy or to make their actions seem valid (I mean, they're called 'antagonist' for a reason lmao) it's only supposed to show what caused/lead upto them making such decisions. Nobody wakes up one day and think 'Oh I want to destroy the world' so some depth in a fictional character is needed, whether they're good or evil; a character's flaws are there to make them more humane, rather than to sugar-coat their actions. It was indeed wrong of Ashin to bring innocent civilians into her revenge on the corrupted authorities but this movie is about what, why & how she did this, it wasn't supposed to make her actions seem moral.
Ps: Dear roaches, feel free to reply and wail under this comment too, though I'm not even going to bother sending you the info related to this case that's everywhere but you willfully ignore, I'd love to see how brain dead a human being can get. Come, bring out the idiocy inside of you! For every word you say, I've an well-deserved insult ready for your rapist fave. ♡