andStace

😂 It's true though! Although, I loved the king, I thought he was so antagonistic at the beginning that I thought the writer would never be able to redeem him, but eventually you see that he did cared/loved Tian Ming as much as Tian Ming cared/loved him which was just 🥰.

Not necessarily. Giving birth is one of the most painful experience a woman has to endure. If she didn't love Hwal, why would she go through another pregnancy again when they already have a son, their lineage. Plus, this was during historical time so giving birth back then was even riskier so why risk her own life and risk having another cursed child? She "supposedly" married Hwal due to her father or due to filial obligation, but that doesn't mean she has to become a baby maker. Plus, she seems like the type to voice her opinion or say whatever she feels like without bottling them in due to modern references showing her having a temper and argumental, but also softness and care so I doubt she'd be the type to just give Hwal a baby just because they had to.

Lemme message you then.

It's better if you see it for yourself to understand because it has to do with the ML having a rare bond blood called Baishi. If you don't understand Baishi then you won't be able to understand the ending and why it ended the way it did.

That's what I'm thinking too because the climate is cold.

I don't think the drama showed much of the history of Beimang yet unless we've got viewers here who has read the novel.

It's an open ending for the main cp; I see it as a hopeful happy ending though. I was more invested in the second cp.

I think the writer/director did not express it clearly. For me, what I got out of it was, if they weren't in love, how could they have had 2 kids together? I can understand that it was due to a filial obligation if they only had a son, but then they had a daughter too. This means that they knew the son got cursed but both were willing to have another child and why is that? Plot service?...or the writer was just trying to pull some cr*p haha. Anyways, Si ho's motherly love and agony for her kids could have had a big hand in making her hate Hwal and it probably diminished any love that she had for him so she spatted out any hate word towards him, but it doesn't mean that they "possibly" (I'm using possibly because I know the writer might just pull something else here) weren't in love before. Vice versa with Hwal, he distant himself not showing any love/affection because of his curse; his son's blindness was probably a wake up call for him and his daughter's death cemented that fact.

He (the son) always wanted his dad's approval so I don't think he hates his dad, but I think Hwal will be disappointed in himself again because it looks like he might push (the son) away yet again.

Yeah, no love triangle.

He stays wise throughout. He's the most insane but sane one lol.

Second ml is the king and he has his own couple storyline.

🤣🤣🤣

Agreed, even Eul tae said gapsangdo's name out loud meaning he knew Sang un was in deep sh*t.

🤣 i agree

Lol, I vaguely remember. But if she did randomly leave it, Idk how he would be able to find her?...All I remember is ML calling her an art student. I wouldn't be surprised if he took some side jobs and this was one of it.

ML never met her but I think he made her portfolio and didn't have time to give it to her so he asked the brother.

Main point: Sang un has some memories of her past life contradicting her claim of not being bulgasal. Sang un and Eul tae are connected; whenever Eul tae kills Sang un or kills the soul, he feels the pain also.

Now that I have thought about it, former one does make more sense; he probably does not want to become human anymore since he has talked of human betrayals before.

This speculation sounds about right, but my question is why didn't Eul Tae take back his soul if it originally was his?