Details

  • Last Online: 5 hours ago
  • Gender: Female
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: December 20, 2023
  • Awards Received: Clap Clap Clap Award1
Replying to chewii Jun 28, 2025
Li Yitong is so natural with comedy. She cracks me up all the time. She's really versatile actress. I feel the…
I truly admire Li Yi Tong. Her talent, versatility, and emotional depth are simply phenomenal. She's one of those rare actresses who can make you laugh, cry, and reflect—all within the same scene.

That said, I agreed it's not fair to compare her or this drama to other actresses or shows. Each one is different and unique in their own right. They deserve to be appraised and enjoyed individually for what they bring to the screen.
0 0
Replying to MoFan-IC Jun 27, 2025
I hope after this drama Li Yitong,will be more popular and I really like that both leads are in their 30's.☺️
Indeed! Both leads definitely deserved more awesome scripts and opportunities to shine brighter
4 0
On A Dream within a Dream Jun 27, 2025
An Absolute Gem! ✨

I truly didn’t expect to fall this hard for this drama but Wow, it completely swept me off my feet. It’s such a refreshing and creative blend of modern-day humor and historical charm. Two genres I never imagined could mix so effortlessly, yet here, they collide in the most delightful way.

From the very first episode, I was laughing so hard my stomach hurt… and just when I thought it was all fun and games, it hit me with waves of unexpected emotion—gasping, giggling, tearing up. It’s a rollercoaster, but the kind you never want to get off.

What really struck a chord with me was the female lead. Watching her roast overused drama tropes with that sharp wit and chaotic energy? I felt so relatable. That raw honesty and unfiltered passion— is so me when I’m binge-watching Wkwkwk 🤣

There’s something magical about a show that makes you laugh until you can’t breathe… and then quietly reminds you of why you fell in love with stories, characters, and make-believe in the first place.

No skips. No filler. Just clever writing, bold humor, and emotional whiplash in all the best ways.

And let’s talk about Li Yi Tong, her talent and emotional range are simply phenomenal. She brings so much heart, nuance, and charm to every scene. I’m in awe.

Easily a 10/10 from episode one. 💯🔥
20 6
Replying to bailang Jun 24, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Keep spamming and snorting your sewage-grade filth. It's the only thing that matches your worth.

Every word you type reeks of desperation for the world to confirm you're not only without a functioning brain but beyond salvage.

Got too much time and nothing better to do? Go join your grandma spinning in her grave. Maybe that'll stop her from being as boring as you.

Meanwhile, I’ll keep laughing at your idiocy every time you wake up just to snort and spam like it’s your life’s only achievement.

🤣😂🤣
0 0
Replying to bailang Jun 23, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Hahaha your existence is so far beyond salvage, even mosquitoes make more impact than you.

Cling to that wall—it’s the only thing pathetic enough to tolerate your desperate craving for attention.

😆😆😆
0 3
Replying to bailang Jun 23, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Good morning. Don’t forget to donate to a mental health charity—maybe they’ll fast-track your admission. Oh wait, you can’t even afford that, considering you've been drowning in sewage-grade filth your whole life. 🤣🤣🤣
0 6
Replying to bailang Jun 23, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Omg! You're hopelessly drowning in sewage-grade fifth. Keep on snorting and driving your grandma spining in grave

😆😆😆
0 1
Replying to bailang Jun 23, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Hahaha — now it all makes sense. Your grandma can’t rest in peace, not just because you’re without a functioning brain and beyond salvage, but because you’ve clearly been drowning in a nonstop high on whatever illegal sewage-grade filth you’ve been snorting all day.

No wonder she’s turning in her grave — even death can’t shield her from the sheer disgrace of your existence.

You didn’t just fail her in life — you haunt her in death.

🤣🤣🤣
0 15
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Hahahaha, mad? No, I’m actually amused — it takes a special kind of desperation to keep broadcasting and confirming to the world that you’re without a functioning brain and beyond salvage 🤣🤣🤣

Honestly, I pity your grandma. She probably spent her whole life hoping her legacy would mean something — only to end up with a defective glitch in the bloodline like you.

The real tragedy? She can’t even rest in peace while you’re out here causing shame to her, repeatedly.
Do her one last act of mercy: admit yourself to a mental hospital now and spare her the daily heartbreak of knowing you carry her defective genes.

🤣🤣🤣
0 18
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
I would never insult the elderly — they deserve respect, not insult. But in your case, I genuinely feel sorry for your grandma. She must be suffering from dementia for you to be this desperate and confused, mistaking me for her.

I get it — you're working desperately to prove you're completely without a functioning brain and beyond salvage. But dragging your own grandma into your mess? That’s a whole new level of pathetic even I didn’t think you could reach. Bravo.

👏👏👏
0 1
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Hahaha, i like your desperation to keep on confirming you're not only without a functioning brain but beyond salvage

🤣🤣🤣
0 29
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Thank you for Keep on confirming you're not only without a functioning brain but also beyond salvage

🤣🤣🤣
0 34
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Thank you for confirming AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN that you're without a functioning brain and beyond salvage.

🤣🤣🤣
1 36
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Thank you for confirming AGAIN and AGAIN and AGAIN that you're without a functioning brain and beyond salvage.

🤣🤣🤣
1 38
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Thank you for confirming AGAIN you're not only without a functioning brain but also beyond salvage 🤣
0 40
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
Thank you for confirming you're not only without a functioning brain but also beyond salvage 🤣
0 1
Replying to bailang Jun 22, 2025
Review Feud
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let…
You came armed with a PhD thesis in keyboard fury — all to prove… what? That I don’t blindly worship at the altar of slow burns like you?

Let’s get something clear: My opinion isn’t a courtroom testimony. I’m not under oath. I don’t owe anyone full episodes of devotion just to say, “Nah, this ain’t it.”

If a drama fumbles four hours of my life and gives me recycled tropes, dumb plots, and characters with the emotional depth of a dead wood — I’m allowed to walk out and call it trash. That’s not “intellectual dishonesty.” That’s inteligent time management.

You mock me for dropping Lament of the River Immortal at episode 4 while rating The Glory a 10/10 after finishing it. Here’s the reality: when a show holds my attention, develops its characters well, and earns my emotional investment, I stick with it and judge it based on the full journey. That’s what The Glory did. When a show stumbles through its opening, squanders its setup, and bores me to the point of second-guessing my life choices, I don’t keep watching out of masochistic loyalty. That’s what Lament did. These aren’t contradictions. They’re cause-and-effect.

In a nutshell, The Glory didn’t challenge my patience — it commanded my attention. That’s the difference.

Some shows grip, others trip.
I don’t owe equal loyalty to both.

You throw out the “Pulitzer novel” analogy—something about how I wouldn’t judge a book by its first 10 pages. Cute, but wrong. In real life, people absolutely do judge books by their opening chapters. That’s why sample chapters exist. That’s why trailers exist. The beginning matters. If a story can't hook a viewer with four full episodes—that's not a "me" problem. That’s dumb storytelling.

You claim I “missed the payoff” of Lament by not sticking around longer. You’re essentially admitting the first few episodes are bad and asking viewers to endure them on faith. That’s not how good storytelling functions.

If a show needs dozen of hours just to justify its own existence, then it’s not misunderstood—it’s badly constructed. I don’t hand out participation trophies for “eventual development.” If your story can’t hook me within its own opening act, you’ve already failed the most basic test of narrative engagement.

I have no obligation to stick around just to make you feel better about liking it. “Slow burns” still require spark. A match that never lights isn’t a slow burn—it’s a burnout.

You throw around the phrase “you missed the point of storytelling,” but it sounds like you’ve mistaken mediocrity with genre tropes for actual depth. Good storytelling isn’t just about delayed gratification—it’s about earned payoff. That payoff has to be built on a strong, compelling foundation. And no, I don’t need to finish every xianxia to prove I understand the genre.

I’ve watched plenty of slow burns, from Nirvana in Fire to Love Between Fairy and Devil. The difference? They gave me something early—atmosphere, intrigue, characters worth caring about. Lament gave me bad setups, aimless pacing, and the plot logic of a wet sock.

Tropes aren’t shields—they’re tools. When they’re well used, they support the story. When they’re dumb, lazy and predictable, they sink it. I’ve watched enough xianxia to know the difference.

Accusing me of being “impatient” or needing “instant gratification” is just delusional. I’m not asking for action every five minutes. I expect the basics: compelling characters, coherent pacing, and engaging story that values my time. If you need me to push through dozen of bad episodes before the payoff starts, that’s not “maturity”—that’s sunk cost syndrome.

You argue that my ratings are based on vibes. They’re not. They’re based on engagement. If a show is so bad I can’t finish it, it gets rated accordingly. If it’s strong enough to carry me through to the end and land its final act, I rate it as a complete product. That’s not vibes—that’s earned judgment.

And your Nirvana in Fire example betrays your whole argument. The reason I didn’t drop it when Mei Changsu was coughing in a boat is because it had built intrigues, mood, stakes, and tension from the start. It showed competence. It earned my curiosity. It respected my attention. That’s the difference. Lament did none of that. If that show had bored me, I’d have dropped it too.

And let’s kill this whole “you must finish it to judge it” nonsense:

If you take one bite of a rotting apple and spit it out, no one says, “But did you eat the core? Maybe it gets better!”

What you see as inconsistency is really just critical thinking. I don’t hand out participation trophies to shows that waste my time. I don’t finish dramas out of obligation, and I don’t elevate ones that fail the basics. If I’m giving a drama a 1/10 after four episodes, it’s because it earned that rating the hard way—through wasted time and dumb plots.

You call my critique “whining”?

Let’s talk about your 700-word tantrum defending a show I dropped weeks ago. If that’s your standard for “objective critique,” congrats — you’ve mastered the art of delusional attachment to mediocrity.

And your whole “slow burn” sermon? Please. Slow burn doesn’t mean aimless drift. It means purposefully paced, not “throw nonsense at the screen and pray for patience.” Don’t confuse "deep lore" with "lazy writing hidden behind sparkly robes and divine titles."

Bottom line?

What you’ve done is confuse discernment with hypocrisy, and preference with some imaginary obligation to finish every piece of media like it’s a homework assignment.

You can camp through entire episodes of celestial soap opera hoping for a divine payoff. I’ll be watching something that respects my time from the start.

That’s not impatience.
That’s discernment.

And that is exactly why I don’t waste time entertaining fanatics like you, who don’t even realise their idiocy is infinite and proudly self-replenishing. You're not discussing — you're ranting on and on without a functioning brain to even understand basic thing that people are entitle to their opinion.

Arguing with fanatic like you is like debating gravity with a brick. Pointless, exhausting, and deeply embarrassing for the brick.

So here’s your choice:

Walk yourself out with what little dignity you’ve got left or keep ranting, and confirm that you’re not just missing a functioning brain, but you’re truly beyond salvage.

Mic dropped.
1 45
Replying to bailang Jun 21, 2025
Review Feud
It honestly infuriates me how often we get beautifully made C-dramas completely ruined by terrible script writing.The…
I dropped the drama over half a month ago, and honestly, I’ve already flushed most of the details from memory (mental health first, y’know?). 😅 That said, what I do remember is the script and storyline in the first four episodes — which is exactly what made me walk away.

The plot was painfully silly, overly repetitive, and seemed to be going in circles without building real foundation, tension or emotional weight. It felt like it was relying on recycled tropes. At some point, it became less about entertainment and more about endurance.

To be clear, my opinion has nothing to do with the actors — they’re fine. This is strictly about the writing and how it was executed. I don’t expect every show to be groundbreaking, but at the very least, I expect it not to waste my time.

Life’s short, and my watchlist’s long. Hope that clears it up, fam. Peace ✌️
0 1
Replying to felixiee Jun 21, 2025
Review Feud
Sigh... yet another pitiful comment. I love 白鹿's dramas but if you were to say I defend everything related…
Ah, the classic "you’re not allowed to judge until you’ve watched the whole thing" sermon. How original. Let me guess — next you’ll say I need to sit through a five-hour root canal before deciding if it hurts.

First off, your sighing concern is noted — truly, the emotional labor you put into defending mediocrity is admirable. But let’s be clear: liking 白鹿 doesn't make you a walking drama tribunal. You say you’re not defending everything about her, but your comment is basically a softcore fan manifesto wrapped in faux objectivity. Cute.

Now onto your real issue — the fact that someone dared to form an opinion before enduring the entire series. Shocking, I know. Here’s a wild idea: some of us have standards. If a drama is already a mess by episode 4 — with chaotic pacing, wooden acting, and scenes that feel like they were written by a sleep-deprived AI — why on earth should we waste more time “waiting for it to get better”? That’s not patience; that’s masochism.

You preach “don’t judge a book by its cover,” but here’s the catch: I didn’t judge the cover. I read four chapters. And if the first four chapters are trash, odds are the rest of the book belongs in the recycling bin. No amount of fan loyalty or plot gymnastics justifies dragging viewers through hours of narrative slop hoping for a miracle.

And please — save the “education is needed” line. If you think blindly watching all episodes before forming any critique is a sign of intelligence, I suggest you get a refund on whatever enlightenment you bought. Critical thinking involves knowing when to walk away, not clinging to the hope that bad writing will magically fix itself at episode 12 or more.

So no, I’m not “unreasonable” for sharing my opinion. You love it? Great. Others don’t — and that’s allowed. Not everyone’s standards are as low as your tolerance for mediocrity.

Now go enjoy your drama — in peace, ideally without lecturing others for using their time, brains, and judgment wisely.

I won't waste more time argue with fanatics who think criticism is a crime.
1 47
Replying to Shin Jun 21, 2025
Review Feud
Watched one episode and reviewed the whole series? Your psychic abilities are unmatched! Ever thought of reading…
LMAO. So let me get this straight — you skimmed exactly nothing I wrote, then confidently waddled in to deliver a psychic diagnosis on my "personal hate"? 😂 Impressive. Did you graduate magna cum stupid from the University of Delusion & Idiocy, with a double major in Clown Studies and Advanced Comprehension Failure?

Let me repeat this slowly for the back row: I said I dropped it at episode 4, not 1. That’s four painful, soul-numbing hours I’ll never get back. And you're upset because I didn’t keep torturing myself through the whole series to earn the right to say it sucked? What kind of warped logic is that? Am I supposed to swim through sewage just to confirm it stinks?

On what planet does it make sense that someone has to watch five or more episodes, or even the whole series, just to be “allowed” to comment on it?
That’s like saying you can’t call a rotten egg “rotten” until you’ve choked down the whole dozen. If the pacing is dead, the acting’s flatter than a broken screen, and the plot’s dumber than a brick sandwich, I don’t need a full tour to know it’s trash. It’s called discernment — look it up. Or maybe that’s too advanced a concept for you.

Let’s break it down real simple: If I go to a restaurant, take four bites, and it tastes like spoiled disappointment soaked in expired soy sauce, do I need to lick the plate clean before I’m “allowed” to call it garbage? Hell no. I drop the fork and walk out. Same logic applies to dramas. It is not rocket science.

MDL is a review platform, not a brainwashed fan cult. People are allowed to share their thoughts — yes, even the brutally honest ones. If all you want is blind praise and sugar-coated delusion, may I suggest starting your own propaganda platform? North Korea might even sponsor you — they’re really into that “no criticism allowed” lifestyle.

Next time, try reading with a functioning brain, not just your bruised ego. It might save you the embarrassment of looking like a clown fumbling through a debate with a pie in your face.

Anyway, I don’t argue with people who mistake fanboy rage for intelligence. You’ve already lost the plot — just like the drama I dropped.
2 0