1. They could have cast a different actress to play the younger version of the female lead (FL).2. They should…
Thank you... Hahaha, true! The point they were making was to understand the victim as well through Nicotine story. There are two types: one who harms themselves and others who harm others...
That is just common sense in any investigation. You have to examine why the victim became a victim in the first place. Yet, our ML never investigated Yuna’s uncle—he is fixated on Yuna being the killer without any solid evidence for 10 years.. Lol
Exactly, child killing is too much of exaggeration… he may want to hit him….
Talking about real life, an 8-9-year-old kid (less than 10) very, very rarely will have the intent to kill. They may want to hurt the other—that’s very likely—but in most cases, if a death occurs, it would be accidental.
This kind of case is definitely exponentially rare, as per my understanding.
In my opinion, the guest role may only appear in one or, at most, two episodes.
Here, she gets screen time in every episode, interacts with the male lead (ML), and is involved in the plot. There are even some speculations that she could be the mastermind.
Having said that, I agree her role is more than just a guest but less than an active supporting character—unlike the other policewoman in a supporting role (assuming she will have more significance in future episodes).
It was okay, nothing exceptional, especially the plot felt average, however the psychiatrist’s performance stood…
1. They could have cast a different actress to play the younger version of the female lead (FL).
2. They should have developed a 30-minute backstory segment showing her college days and it would have added depth to her character
3. The male lead (ML) had no proper background story, which made his motivations unclear.
4. The whole nicotine addiction subplot felt unnecessary. That screen time could have been used to explore the FL’s past (point 2) or the ML’s origins (point 3).
5. Portraying kids as murderers is too extreme and unrealistic; it feels like an exaggerated plot twist rather than a believable narrative choice.
Hahaha, true! The point they were making was to understand the victim as well through Nicotine story. There are two types: one who harms themselves and others who harm others...
That is just common sense in any investigation. You have to examine why the victim became a victim in the first place. Yet, our ML never investigated Yuna’s uncle—he is fixated on Yuna being the killer without any solid evidence for 10 years.. Lol
This kind of case is definitely exponentially rare, as per my understanding.
Here, she gets screen time in every episode, interacts with the male lead (ML), and is involved in the plot. There are even some speculations that she could be the mastermind.
Having said that, I agree her role is more than just a guest but less than an active supporting character—unlike the other policewoman in a supporting role (assuming she will have more significance in future episodes).
2. They should have developed a 30-minute backstory segment showing her college days and it would have added depth to her character
3. The male lead (ML) had no proper background story, which made his motivations unclear.
4. The whole nicotine addiction subplot felt unnecessary. That screen time could have been used to explore the FL’s past (point 2) or the ML’s origins (point 3).
5. Portraying kids as murderers is too extreme and unrealistic; it feels like an exaggerated plot twist rather than a believable narrative choice.
mdl below 7.5 are generally bad most of the times esp Korean …