Details

  • Last Online: 5 hours ago
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Mexico
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: September 13, 2025
  • Awards Received: Golden Tomato Award5 Clap Clap Clap Award1
Replying to Sometimes1 • Aug 8, 2026
Did Netflix fire you after you served burnt coffee in their HQ?Are you an angry barista that wanted to be a Hollywood…
So, do you judge the quality of a show by its popularity rather than by your own criteria?
0 3
Replying to Sometimes1 • Aug 8, 2026
Did Netflix fire you after you served burnt coffee in their HQ?Are you an angry barista that wanted to be a Hollywood…
That's an interesting theory about me. Now, which part of the review is wrong?
0 5
On Our Sticky Love • Aug 8, 2026
Sugar Coated is a mass-produced series. Just another title in Netflix's endless catalog, designed to fill hours of content rather than leave a lasting impression. It's the kind of show you can leave on while cooking, cleaning, or scrolling through your phone because it rarely demands your full attention.

First, because of its constant tonal shifts. It opens like a dark thriller, only to immediately turn into a comedy, without ever succeeding at either. Second, because it falls back on one of the most overused character templates in recent television: an exceptionally capable, intelligent, and resourceful female lead surrounded by corrupt, incompetent, or foolish men. It's a formula we've seen so many times that it no longer feels fresh.

Background entertainment. Perfect to leave playing while you do the housework.
7 7
On Genius Girlfriend • Aug 6, 2026
Is it really worth spending 28 episodes on a coming-of-age romance we've already seen countless times?

Genius Girlfriend is, at least through episode 10, neither about a girlfriend nor much about a genius.

The story begins when the two leads meet in fourth grade. He arrives from Singapore, only to leave again before the school year ends. Five years later, she is still deeply in love with a boy she barely knew at the age of ten. That premise never felt convincing to me.

From there, the series settles into a long sequence of familiar high school situations: math competitions, band practice, cafeteria conversations, bike rides, jealousy, misunderstandings, and love triangles. These aren't inherently bad ideas, but after ten episodes they create the feeling of watching the same emotional conflict play out in different ways rather than the story truly moving forward.

Ironically, the first episode opens with the protagonist as an adult, suggesting that her adult life will be the main focus. Yet ten episodes later, the story is still entirely set in high school, and the romance itself has barely progressed.

I don't think this is a bad drama. It simply embraces an extremely slow, slice-of-life approach to young romance. For viewers who enjoy watching every small emotional step, that may be exactly what they're looking for. For me, however, the pacing became its biggest obstacle.

By the end of episode 10, I was left asking one question: Is it really worth spending 28 episodes on a coming-of-age romance we've already seen countless times?
13 5
On My Bias, My Boss • Aug 4, 2026
Episode 1 left me with the feeling that I've seen this story too many times before. An ordinary office worker, a celebrity CEO, forced "accidental" encounters, a heroine whose personality changes whenever she gets drunk, and a love triangle that feels inevitable from the very beginning. None of it felt fresh. The leads have little chemistry, the comedy rarely lands, and the entire episode follows a formula that has been recycled countless times. So far, this feels like the same old recipe, only more diluted.
2 0
Replying to InspectorMegre • Aug 3, 2026
Hm... In supernatural everything is possible :) How did that dude end up in a flooded elevator... ? :) Why dont…
Because I can't cover every plot hole in a single review. I focused on the hospital scene because it's a technical filmmaking issue, not just a story inconsistency
0 2
On Spooky in Love • Aug 3, 2026
What started as a supernatural mystery quickly collapses into one of the sloppiest scripts I've seen this year. The series constantly breaks its own rules, sacrifices internal logic for cheap cliffhangers, and relies on coincidences instead of coherent storytelling.

The infamous hospital sequence is a masterclass in poor direction and editing: a character is declared dead, revived, and moments later casually appears fully dressed and unharmed without any attempt to bridge the events. It's the kind of continuity error film schools use to explain why editing matters.

The comedy is painfully unfunny, the paranormal elements become increasingly arbitrary, and the ghost mythology changes whenever the plot needs it. Once a fantasy story stops respecting its own rules, all dramatic tension disappears.

To make matters worse, the show eventually abandons its most interesting premise and falls back on the same chaebol inheritance and forced marriage clichés we've already seen countless times.

An ambitious premise wasted by weak writing, poor execution, and a complete disregard for narrative consistency.
12 20
Replying to GalacticTheory • Aug 2, 2026
The police didn’t start connecting the dots now, this was the first time she left something for them to latch…
The sticker is evidence of identity. The pattern is evidence of existence. After 96 similar murders, I expected the police to have recognized the pattern long before finding a sticker.
2 1
Replying to A Bona Fide Killer • Aug 2, 2026
Replying to deleted comment
Reviews discuss the story. If you want to avoid any plot details, it's usually better to read them after watching.
0 1
Replying to Sarang Yahhh • Aug 2, 2026
so far, I kinda like it... it gives me more WANTED vibe without all of its good stuff lol... I like seeing how…
That's a fair interpretation. My expectation came from the premise itself. The series is marketed around a professional assassin, so I expected the thriller elements to be its strongest aspect, especially in the opening episodes. If the real focus is her family life rather than the assassin side, that's perfectly fine—it just isn't what the premise sold me.
2 2
Replying to moonchild • Aug 2, 2026
are you serious, rating it 1 after two episodes...??
Yes. My review is based on the first two episodes only. If it gets better, I'll gladly change my rating.
3 0
Title: Infidelity Is Only the Beginning

After two episodes, it's clear this series is trying something rarely seen on television.

It adopts a chapter-based narrative, dividing the story into titled segments while shifting perspectives between characters. Episode 1 follows Gyeong Hui (Kim Hye Soo), Episode 2 follows Su Jeong (Jo Yeo Jung). Some scenes are revisited, not to pad the runtime, but to reveal new information and completely reframe what the audience thought they understood.

Visually, it has a strong identity. It reminded me of Wes Anderson's storytelling approach, particularly The French Dispatch and Asteroid City. Not because it imitates his aesthetic, but because its chapter titles, editing, composition, and visual language actively support the narrative instead of merely decorating it.

The affair is only the beginning. Rather than treating infidelity as the central conflict, the script uses it as the first domino in a chain reaction. Every decision leads to larger consequences, gradually drawing more characters into an increasingly complex web of events.

The performances deserve equal credit. In a story that relies so heavily on subtle reactions and shifting perspectives, the cast gives every scene the weight it needs.

An outstanding opening. 6/5 stars.
9 1
On A Bona Fide Killer • Aug 1, 2026
After two episodes, I still can't buy the premise.

My biggest issue isn't that the series leaves questions unanswered. A good thriller is supposed to do that. The problem is that it never convinces me that its world actually works.

According to the show, Bo Na had already carried out 96 assassinations before taking a four-year break. They all followed the same pattern, yet the police only start connecting the dots now. Instead of making Bo Na look brilliant, it makes everyone investigating her look unbelievably incompetent.

The first assassination, which should have sold me on the idea of a highly trained sniper, is surprisingly underwhelming. There's almost no preparation, no tension, and none of the ritual that usually makes professional assassins fascinating to watch.

Episode 2 answers a few questions. We learn that she still trains, has a support team, and isn't a contract killer but a vigilante targeting criminals who have already been tried and sentenced by the Korean justice system. The organization simply decides those sentences weren't severe enough and replaces them with execution. That could have been an interesting moral dilemma, but so far the series seems more interested in justifying the killings than exploring the ethical implications.

One more observation: so far, every single target has been a man—the abusive father, convicted criminals who received lighter sentences, and even the supermarket harasser. I'm not drawing any conclusions; I'm simply pointing out what the series has shown in its first two episodes.

At the moment, the show feels like a blend of Death Wish, The Long Kiss Goodnight, and a bit of Mr. & Mrs. Smith, but without developing an identity of its own.

The premise had potential. Unfortunately, after two episodes, the execution hasn't lived up to it.
4 16
On Spooky in Love • Jul 21, 2026
After a surprisingly fresh first episode, Episode 2 already exposes the show's first major weaknesses.

The chemistry between the two leads is still the best part of the series. Whenever they're together, the comedy works naturally and the show feels genuinely entertaining. The problem is that, once they're apart, it turns into a fairly generic supernatural romance.

What bothered me the most were the forced encounters. The classic "waking up in the same bed" cliché happens way too early and relies on so many convenient coincidences that it completely breaks the natural feeling established in Episode 1. Later, another scene on an escalator does the exact same thing, using an over-the-top slow-motion rescue to manufacture a romantic moment instead of earning it.

It's not a bad show. The leads have great chemistry, and they're genuinely funny together. But Episode 2 gave me the impression that the writers don't fully trust that chemistry, so they keep relying on clichés and artificial situations to bring the characters together.

I'm still interested in watching more, but after this episode, the series no longer feels as fresh as it did at the beginning. If it continues to depend on forced coincidences instead of letting the relationship develop naturally, it may end up becoming just another average romantic drama.
8 3
Replying to Critica sin filtro • Jul 15, 2026
Title Dream to You
What chemistry? She carries the emotional weight of every scene. He mostly poses for the camera.
We're both judging the first two episodes. You see great chemistry; I see an uneven acting dynamic. That's the point of discussing a show while it's airing. If later episodes change my opinion, I'll say so.
1 0
Replying to Nilyem • Jul 15, 2026
Title Dream to You
you're lying if you say Soobin and Yijae don't have chemistry 😭 their chemistry is off the charts❤️‍🔥
What chemistry? She carries the emotional weight of every scene. He mostly poses for the camera.
0 2
On Dream to You • Jul 14, 2026
Title Dream to You
After two episodes, I think I finally understand why Dream to You hasn't fully clicked for me. I did the math. Across 110 minutes of screen time, approximately 50 minutes are flashbacks, around 20 minutes are devoted to the secondary couple, and another 20 minutes follow the two leads separately—either interacting with other characters or dealing with their own personal thoughts and conflicts.

That leaves only about 20 minutes for the two main leads to actually interact and develop their relationship in the present timeline. In other words, only about 18% of the first two episodes has been spent building the central romance.

This isn't a judgment on the entire series. It's simply an observation about how the story has allocated its screen time so far, and I think it explains why the reunion still hasn't fully taken off for me.
16 0
Replying to itwillneverbefar • Jul 14, 2026
Title Dream to You
You're completely misrepresenting the facts here-- the flashback is not a "long opening segment," it doesn't…
Approximately 27% of the entire first episode is dedicated to a single flashback about their high school romance. And regarding the ten years, I’m not only referring to the reason for their breakup, which has not yet been fully explained. I’m also referring to the lack of contact for an entire decade. Those are two different things, especially when he explicitly says that he has followed her career from the very beginning. The series still owes us a convincing explanation for that.
1 0
Replying to ms_hyde • Jul 13, 2026
Title Dream to You
You said it yourself, it’s way too early to judge the series. We need to wait for the later episodes, to fully…
That’s exactly what I said.
4 0
On Dream to You • Jul 13, 2026
Title Dream to You
Dream to You — Episode 1

Dream to You begins as a story about reunion and second chances: two young people who once shared both a romance and the dream of becoming directors, only for their lives to take completely different paths for ten years.

The main problem with the first episode is its pacing. The series spends a long opening segment on their teenage romance, and once it finally reaches the present, it continues relying heavily on flashbacks. Instead of allowing the reunion to move forward, the narrative keeps returning to the past, constantly disrupting the flow of the episode.

The series also owes us a convincing explanation for ten years without contact. In what appears to be a contemporary setting, it is difficult to believe that two people who meant so much to each other could simply disappear from each other's lives for an entire decade—especially when he becomes an internationally recognized director and she becomes a reporter.

It is only the first episode, and there is still a lot left to explain, so it is far too early to judge the series as a whole. But after all the hype and the massive marketing push surrounding the lead couple, the premiere, so far, feels more built around nostalgia than genuine chemistry in the present.
6 6