I think a lot of people forget that he was never really one of the “good guys” to begin with. He was fundamentally…
Agree to disagree. For example, I am not the good guy or the protagonist. I am not the one who would run into a burning building to save someone, but I would not push someone into oncoming traffic and become a murderer just because I suspect the person is an immortal. It does not matter how many years I have spent looking for him. That is logical, except I am mentally ill and all bets are off. The same logic goes to selling someone off to the black market for organs because I want to find my long lost mom. Obviously, we're not on the same page. That is totally fine. No need to further discussof the matter. I'm glad that one of us finds it enjoyable.
Let me get this straight... his only logic for confirming if she is the "Child of Eternity" is collapsing the old building on top of her so that she'll die and come back to life again? What kind of logic is that? What if she's not the person he thought she was? He could have killed an innocent person....And he sold her out to be a lab rat (knowing how traumatic his firsthand experience being Dr. Ha's lab rat) and all he did to help her was sliding in two packets of instant coffee in her pocket and hope for the best....all because he wanted his childhood record?
I dunno if the bttm eating super spicy food is a good thing or a bad thing lol....but why should he since he's not gunna be the one paying consequences 😆
So, you expect me to believe that some random local doctor managed to stop the bleeding, take the fetus out, stitch her up at the inn, and she survived??? LOL, nahhh, I'm just kidding. I've seen way worse, like having facial reconstructive surgery in a cave haha. Other than that, it was a good watch. 😁👍
This is an absolutely terrible take, that's the conclusion you came to? Your reasoning is an embarrassment to…
Not really. I just disagree. It's rather condescending when you are calling me I have poor taste. Your comprehension was off. I never said people can’t express disapproval, I said deliberately tanking a show’s rating with 0.5 or 1 star across the board is malicious, because that’s not thoughtful critique, it’s retaliation. Reviews are meant to inform, not to punish.
Second, nobody is mocking the seriousness of faith by pointing out that review-bombing will fade with time. That’s simply a fact. A temporary surge of ratings doesn’t erase a drama’s actual performance or legacy.
Third, I never insulted one's belief itself. What I said was that if a religion encourages its followers to attack art through mass downvoting, then that would reflect poorly. If you claim Islam does not teach this, then my statement doesn’t apply. Simple as that.
Finally, respect isn’t earned by silencing or punishing people. You earn it by dialogue and reason, not by trying to shut down entertainment platforms.
I’ve clarified my stance, and I won’t go in circles on this. and with that have a good night!!
I'm Atheist, I liked king the Land.But this drama is legit bad. I can't believe this came from same writer of…
If that's your reason you voted 1 star, that's your prerogative. I was talking about those who are downvoting for said reason. They said so in their reviews. Like I said, people will forget about it and move on. MDL manually adjusts the rating. I know I'm not going to lose my sleep over it. Have a great day!!
The review bombings... I've seen similar things happened here in the past with "King the Land." Looking back at it now, they were doing just fine. A week, a month, a year from now, people will forget about it and move on. One can respect voicing one's own opinion and sensitivity to one's beliefs, but rating it 1 star? They wanted to be respected, but how could one earn respect when maliciously downvoting something to 1 star? If that's what a religion taught us to do, I wouldn't want to be part of that.
I mean... Dhevi, her ass knows Krailert has been gay this whole time, and I bet she definitely knows his pen name and that he was flirting with Sawasawadee, aka Naran. She was even enjoying reading the column at one point, and their private library love nest existed even though it wasn't shown. So my question is, why didn't she have Naran killed like she did that poor actor? The affair had been going on for quite some time, and a woman like her wouldn't let that slide one bit.
rightttt, because obviously everyone’s lining up to take what you're saying seriously. Coming from someone who apparently has unlimited free time to create a troll account recently and actually invest effort into spewing trash, wow, impressive hobby. Normal people don’t do that. The bitterness is real, keep it up 😂
Obviously, we're not on the same page. That is totally fine. No need to further discussof the matter. I'm glad that one of us finds it enjoyable.
Second, nobody is mocking the seriousness of faith by pointing out that review-bombing will fade with time. That’s simply a fact. A temporary surge of ratings doesn’t erase a drama’s actual performance or legacy.
Third, I never insulted one's belief itself. What I said was that if a religion encourages its followers to attack art through mass downvoting, then that would reflect poorly. If you claim Islam does not teach this, then my statement doesn’t apply. Simple as that.
Finally, respect isn’t earned by silencing or punishing people. You earn it by dialogue and reason, not by trying to shut down entertainment platforms.
I’ve clarified my stance, and I won’t go in circles on this. and with that have a good night!!