ebonwilde

zero argument about the social context in korea in which this was made? like there wasn't just a man who was arrested for starving his wife to death and letting her get eaten by maggots while she was still alive. but what can we expect from you socially illiterate incels?

you sound just like a misogynist male lmao "fanatic" like are you going to call me hysterical and say i need a lobotomy next? 1950s ass misogyny lmao get with the time s at least.

THANK YOU

if you like solo leveling type webtoon adaptations with thin plots mostly focused on cooking yes, otherwise no. it's one of the better airing dramas currently though.

the men being the main antagonists isn't the point? i'm talking about this specific case that's odd. you're acting like it's revolutionary for women to be villains like we haven't always been portrayed as evil lying jezebels. if they did it with an adult case even, it would be less odd, but teenage girls reporting are literally socially crucified already, they didn't have to add on to it. yk there's cases in korea of girl students forcing other girls to make nude videos? that's an actual thing that happens that they could have talked about if they wanted a female villain so bad, but they had to take am example of a case type that's already so rarely believed or prosecuted.

oh you're a kim soo hyun fan LMAOO this convo is over. that freak was naked doing dishes in her house when she was a minor. do not ever address me again loser.

you realize its real people writing this show? this is showing the real sentiments around sa in south korea, which is what i'm talking about. not the in-show events. it's strange what they're pushing with this and you're not going to change my mind.

it's weird bc of the current rhetoric around sa in south korea. we can talk about both, but pretending one thing happens on the same scale as something else when it doesn’t isn’t helpful. (which they've done by showing this case as one of the early eps. i don't even know if they get more sa cases later)

that's crazy bc you see how i didn't say anything about the other 7 episodes talking about male issues? when did i say we should only talk about girls' issues?

reading too much into it bc i see the social context in which it was made? alright.

do you think i'm disagreeing with that? i said the punishment was disproportionate. which it was.

am i talking about her or am i talking about what generally happens with sa cases? let's think. when an sa is reported, who's face is usually all over the news? the victim's or the perpetrator's? if they can hide the perp's face when it's actual sa, they should let her live out her life too. but clearly the writers had some sort of incel revenge fantasy they wanted to push.

idgaf about her wrongdoing or not lol can you people READ. i'm saying her punishment is disproportionate and the rhetoric itself harms irl victims.

aww what are they fighting india for the title

not remotely. maybe if actual criminals got punished in sk but they don't. not only do they not get punished, they get to live out their lives in complete anonymity, so it's weird that she has her face posted everywhere.

and this rhetoric is what harms victims and stops them from reporting it irl. it's not strange to you that middle aged men in korea are pushing the sentiment that female students who report sa are lying?? in korea, the country with molka and the most violent sex trafficking cases? you're a bit strange if you don't see what this episode is pushing. plus since you love male victims so much, this harms them too? you think people who believe girls are liars believe men who report sa?

oh it happened once out of every one thousand harassment cases, so we should devote all our time talking about it? you realize magnifying these cases harms the actual victims too bc it portrays everyone as liars? and it's just bizarre to want false accusers to be punished when actual rapists and sex traffickers walk free and even get elected president.

AND they showed her face and address all over sns just so what? the incel rapists with revenge fetishes can find her? mind you they always censor actual criminals' faces on the news, they just wanted to torture her. and this is all stuff that happens to real victims it's making me so mad.

ep 3 is completely pissing me off. wdym they blasted a baby's face + address across social media in the most misogynist sexually violent countries in the world as punishment? like there's not pedophile stalkers crawling all over the place over there? mind you irl they always censor faces of rapist minors AND adults, and it's always a 3 month sentence for student rapists so their bright futures aren't ruined, but they completely destroyed this girl's whole life for what?? the punishment for actual rapists vs "false accusers" is so disproportionately cruel. what's worse is this is true irl too, rape victims are consistently violated on sns + tv while perpetrators hide their face, this isn't even fake comedy you can laugh at. AND the director and screenwriter are MALES hyperpushing the idea of teenage seductress "false accusers" in the era of epstein. this is actually so vile.

is this going to be about a failed abortion like the original 😭

"she had everyone's support on her side." no she didn't? everyone assumed she was lying but they were scared to say anything bc of her social media followers lol.

and i'm not even talking about characters in the show, i'm talking about the 50 year old MALE screenwriter and director making this garbage to villify teenage girls. do you know how much the sentiment that young girls accusing their teachers of sexual harrassment only do so for attention harms actual victims? it's bizarre to make a whole case out of something that never happens, and then for it to be an episode BEFORE one that deals with a real victim is incredibly cruel and vile. especially in korea, where they don't prosecute rape cases anyway.