I made no attempt to change your opinion of anything. I don't know why people like you feel the need to fantasize that a reply to a comment you post on an open thread is somehow offensive. I don't "feel a need" to be negative. I feel the jovial urge to reply to comments, including those I disagree with, because that's what discussion threads are about.
Had I replied, "omg, you are so right, this show is EVERYTHING!!!," something tells me you wouldn't have suggested that replying to you was...offensive.
Maybe set up a private discussion forum somewhere on this site or elsewhere. You can invite only people you know will thumbs-up your every utterance, and be protected from negative Nancys like me.
Why do you feel the need to police what other people say?If you like the show, go ahead and enjoy it; no one is…
"...hate propaganda..." lol
You poor critter. It can't be fun to be so painfully oblivious.
I policed nothing, child. That you and OP interpret negative criticism of your pet bad show as being out of bounds is the problem. You and yours, so defensive of the show because you know it's weak, are actually sort of cute in your immature, fangirl sort of way.
I'm always grateful when a weak show reveals itself as such within the first 10-15 minutes, as this one has.
1. That hilariously bad, awful, lame, amateur pedestrian-car "impact," even worse than in most Thai BLs. 2. Terrible acting, no doubt the result of terrible direction. 3. Details such as coma patients wearing lip gloss. Three strikes and you're OUT.
Is this addressed to me? I ask because I just checked, and I did NOT say you were not "entitled to have" your own opinion. I checked the rest of the thread, too. Nobody said that.
Why do you feel the need to police what other people say?If you like the show, go ahead and enjoy it; no one is…
lol Why do you feel the need to police what other people say?
Accusing people who disagree with you of being "angry" and thus overly emotional and irrational is the oldest and lamest tactic used by people like you. Cuts zero ice with me.
No one, least of all me, said the person above is not "allowed to have an opinion." She can have all the opinions she wants. And I can have all the opinions of her opinions that I want. What are you crying about?
This show shares the same director as Secrets Happened on the Litchi Island. Its producers are Lin Fengsong and…
Please see a comment I posted above. I expect every show to be well-made, regardless of who made it. This is being presented as a follow-up to Addicted; so, ummm, that's what it is.
This show shares the same director as Secrets Happened on the Litchi Island. Its producers are Lin Fengsong and…
I expect every show I watch to be well-made. If not in production quality, then at least in script, acting, and most of all, that elusive quality called "heart." I have watched and loved many low-budget shows that overcame all their limitations by virtue of having that one, irreplaceable attribute.
1 
1 
Yeah, I thought the same thing, but didn't care if it got me a link to this movie. :)
Don't flatter yourself, Mr. ALL-CAPS.
I've been around. We must just be watching different shows, for the most part.
Take care and be well!
I'm your typical, English-only American.
How many languages do you know?
I made no attempt to change your opinion of anything. I don't know why people like you feel the need to fantasize that a reply to a comment you post on an open thread is somehow offensive. I don't "feel a need" to be negative. I feel the jovial urge to reply to comments, including those I disagree with, because that's what discussion threads are about.
Had I replied, "omg, you are so right, this show is EVERYTHING!!!," something tells me you wouldn't have suggested that replying to you was...offensive.
Maybe set up a private discussion forum somewhere on this site or elsewhere. You can invite only people you know will thumbs-up your every utterance, and be protected from negative Nancys like me.
You poor critter.
It can't be fun to be so painfully oblivious.
I policed nothing, child.
That you and OP interpret negative criticism of your pet bad show as being out of bounds is the problem.
You and yours, so defensive of the show because you know it's weak, are actually sort of cute in your immature, fangirl sort of way.
Nah...actually, not cute at all.
Touching, funny, heartbreaking, hysterical, excellent.
Highly recommended.
10/10
1. That hilariously bad, awful, lame, amateur pedestrian-car "impact," even worse than in most Thai BLs.
2. Terrible acting, no doubt the result of terrible direction.
3. Details such as coma patients wearing lip gloss.
Three strikes and you're OUT.
Dropped 1/10
I ask because I just checked, and I did NOT say you were not "entitled to have" your own opinion. I checked the rest of the thread, too. Nobody said that.
What a strange reply.
Why do you feel the need to police what other people say?
Accusing people who disagree with you of being "angry" and thus overly emotional and irrational is the oldest and lamest tactic used by people like you. Cuts zero ice with me.
No one, least of all me, said the person above is not "allowed to have an opinion." She can have all the opinions she wants. And I can have all the opinions of her opinions that I want.
What are you crying about?
You should have scrolled by my reply to OP.
Indeed.
Wow, I couldn't disagree more.
I expect every show to be well-made, regardless of who made it.
This is being presented as a follow-up to Addicted; so, ummm, that's what it is.
If not in production quality, then at least in script, acting, and most of all, that elusive quality called "heart." I have watched and loved many low-budget shows that overcame all their limitations by virtue of having that one, irreplaceable attribute.