Now I'm curious, please tell me why this is so bad
The acting, on behalf of the leads, was very, very poor. Both were near expressionless for much of the time, including in moments of high drama/emotion. I don't think it was a direction/writing fault. No director has EVER said "here's a really poignant scene, please make it look like you're having a stroke" but also the story was utterly nonsensical.
I guess generally it's same everywhere, especially for underage kid. Adding the fact that the son isn't his biological…
I don't know who the 'we' is, or how you 'hear' of so many cases but in my experience there's almost no relationship between one's performance as a parent and a spouse. As in this drama, too.
I guess generally it's same everywhere, especially for underage kid. Adding the fact that the son isn't his biological…
Wow, I would have thought that the needs of the child were front and centre (you can be a bad spouse but a good parent and vice versa) not whether one parent has pissed off the other, but I suspect that's something that's universal, sadly.
One was lying to him a decade or so-that is beyond obnoxious, it's fraud-and the other is just young and rich…
I think a some of the people who comment on dramas are very young, or have never been in relationships and see them only in terms of what they see in 'cute, fluffy' dramas, but I don't think the relationship between Chan Young and Jin Seok is just a friendship. Its clearly an affair - even if they don't have sex. It's emotional betrayal - except there's nothing to betray, the marriage was entered into under false pretences/fraud. Where I'm from that's ground for invalidating a marriage (annulment) which is the same as the marriage not existing at all.
In the UK Family Courts favour the mother in matters of custody (not officially, but most of the time in practice). Is it the same in South Korea? And will the fact that he's not that little boy's biological father mean that he has no rights at all?
The tone for this drama is set in the very first episode when, in a fit of pique the FL throws a spike-heeled stiletto at the MLs face, drawing blood. And then they fall in love.
I, too, finished Eternal Monarch solely for Woo Do Hwan
Woo Do Hwan, Kim Kyung Nam and Jung Eun Chae kept me watching for a while, but I still couldn't finish it. The garbage 'plot' and some of the acting (particularly Lee Min-Ho) eventually killed even that spark of interest.
She's very expressive (which I like - I hate the mute, blank-faced staring school of Korean acting) but she doesn't always pick the best projects. In my top 10 for her mad skills, but not in any of my top 10 dramas. I'd love to see her in something like Taxi Driver.
Well, Song Hey Kyo isn't a very good actress AND she only seems to accept roles were she can mack on to much younger…
Saying she isn't a very good actress is not 'character assassination' - she isn't. I've said the same about Lee Min Ho and Ahn Jae Hyun. And it's fine to judge actors on their acting ability - just like its fine to judge plumbers on their ability to fix a leak. The other half is a simple statement of fact; she is currently doing back to back dramas were she's playing an older woman macking on a younger man. Other actors - male and female - mix it up a bit. Sometimes they play with older, young or same-aged people. for example. Sometimes they play roles where they're not macking on anyone. A 'character assassination' would be if I said something about her character. But I don't do that because who she is as a person is none of my business.
I was just saying the other day that I wish drama makers would focus more on Korean literary novels when making adaptations, not just webtoons, etc, so this is excellent news.
I was just saying the other day that I wish drama makers would focus more on Korean literary novels when making adaptations, not just webtoons, etc, so this is excellent news.