Details

  • Last Online: 2 days ago
  • Gender: Female
  • Location:
  • Contribution Points: 0 LV0
  • Roles:
  • Join Date: June 12, 2022
Replying to alicemia 7 days ago
Title Spooky in Love Spoiler
he is her childhood friend i guess
Let's remove the ghosts and the curse entirely, because they actually distract from the real question.

Imagine this in real life.

You meet a woman three times.

The first two meetings are brief. Once, you pull her away from a car. Fine - that's an emergency.

The next day, you go to her house to return shirt. During that visit, you grab her hand and drag her into another room. A few minutes later, you grab her hand again and pull her somewhere else.

At this point, you've known her for less than a day, you've met only a handful of times, and you have no close relationship.

Would anyone honestly call that respectful behavior?

Notice that I didn't even mention the curse. I don't need it.

Whether she avoids touch because of trauma, illness, personal preference, religion, or no reason at all is irrelevant. You don't need to know why someone avoids physical contact to respect the fact that they do.

"She only said 'keep your distance' afterward."

People don't have to announce every boundary before others should avoid unnecessary physical contact. Respectful behavior is not grabbing first and asking questions later.

Saving someone in an emergency and repeatedly grabbing someone during ordinary conversations are completely different situations.

You can like Gang Uk. You can think he's brave, kind, and a good romantic lead. None of that changes the fact that these specific actions ignored another person's physical boundaries.

Friendly reminder: even if you're not studying to become a prosecutor, "don't grab strangers you've met three times unless it's an emergency" is a pretty good rule to remember. 😉

Also, the romance defense doesn't apply here. In Episodes 3–4 they are not a couple, not close, and barely know each other. He is a stranger who has met her a few times. Judge the action in that context, not through the lens of a future romance that hasn't happened yet.
2 1
Replying to Jkat778 8 days ago
What are you talking about? When she was falling off a cliff and he tried to grab her? What show are you actually…
Episode 3: In her house he grabbed her hand and dragged to closet. Minutes later near his house he grabbed her hand again and dragged few meters to the side of the house.

Episode 4 he grabbed her hand saying it's first day so he doesn't care if month countdown starts again.

Call it a "romance trope" all you want, but physically manhandling someone who is actively trying to maintain distance is objectively poor boundary enforcement.
2 6
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
The problem is that you’re analyzing this without the actual context of the scenes.

This isn't just me personally being uncomfortable with a fictional trope. The character herself is shown going to extreme lengths to avoid physical contact - she literally falls into the ocean rather than risk touching him because she is afraid of what her condition can do to other people. That is not a subtle hint; that is the character communicating that physical contact is a serious boundary for her.

Also, "she should tell him her boundaries" ignores what the audience is shown. She does tell him to keep distance afterward. Her actions already show fear and avoidance. A person doesn't need to give a formal verbal statement every single time before someone can understand that grabbing their hand and dragging them somewhere is unwanted.

And "people probably bump into her all the time" is not really comparable. Accidental contact is not the same as someone deliberately grabbing you and moving you. Intentional physical contact requires a different level of consideration.

The issue isn't that the drama has a romantic trope. Fiction can portray anything. The issue is that the show frames behavior as charming that, in this specific context, ignores the character's fear, condition, and clearly demonstrated desire for distance.

ML is huge red flag.
1 7
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
She's still a person - you can't just grab someone without consent, even if you know them. And they're not even friends.

On top of that, her touch has serious consequences in the story: it can make others "mystic ill" and see ghosts.
3 9
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
I freaked out and she probably even more as she have some "mystic illness" so she can't touch people because they will become also "mystic ill" that see ghosts. Also few minutes later she tells him to keep distance between him and her that means she clearly doesn't want to be touched and someone to be in less than 1 meter close.
2 11
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
Basic bodily autonomy means you don't physically grab and haul people around without their consent, period.

And regarding the timeline: the childhood friend reveal didn't happen until after he was already pulling and pushing her around uninvited.
4 17
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
That's not how personal boundaries work
2 19
Replying to alicemia 8 days ago
he is her childhood friend i guess
"Childhood friend" isn't a magic pass to ignore personal boundaries. Grabbing and dragging someone without consent crosses a line regardless of past history - especially when the character's explicit condition means physical touch carries high stakes.
4 0
On Spooky in Love 8 days ago
WTF is with that prosecutor touching her like she's his girlfriend?

I'm only on episode 3, but this already feels so unrealistic. IRL, he'd probably be prosecuted for assault.
3 30
Replying to love triangles anti 24 days ago
I think they're just normal human characters that you see all around you in everyday life? nothing to do with…
Married man who has 2 kids go to other woman making kid and leave his family for other woman?

Maybe it's average nowadays. Last 12 years i rarely go outdoors and even when I do, I don't interact with humans. I usually don't talk even with cassiers, as most of times there's self cassier terminal.
2 1
On Family Register 24 days ago
Amount of toxic characters here is high.
Are we moving to western genre, where every character is bad?
2 4
Replying to meko 24 days ago
Dohee is kinda cute (appearance wise), but she's villain so...
She is tall, slim, enough pretty, and cute - for most men she's more than enough.

And I like her appearance more than fl.
1 1
Replying to potatoes_uwu 25 days ago
I can't stand Dohee, but the ML freaking out over her having a public social media account had me ded. His assumption…
Dohee is kinda cute (appearance wise), but she's villain so...
2 5
On Family Register 25 days ago
Does in korea school pupils care about other pupils parents so much? To bully...

When i was at school nobody knew anything about parents of others and didn't care.
3 2
On My Royal Nemesis May 15, 2026
Need more funny dramas to watch untill new week...

I like that fl is kinda strange, great fit for such role.
4 1
Replying to bidulgi May 12, 2026
this isn't made by netflix though just distributed. it's an SBS production
I watched 10 episodes of perfect crown, while it's ok, i can't get rid of green screen / ai feeling.
Also the plot of perfect crown is weird to say the least, but more importantly pacing is all over the place. Half of time are commercial beauty shots.

Here the plot, pacing is tighter, and I feel real locations (or they did much better job).
5 1
On My Royal Nemesis May 12, 2026
Started watching and production wise seems much better than perfect crown which has so much visible cgi/ai cheap scenes.

Weird times, netflix making better quality than disney.
7 5
Replying to inmyrare May 12, 2026
im just not able to buy the fact that her father and brother are suddenly so caring abt her. if they cared abt…
Maybe they always were okayish. Harsh but okayish and fl character was in her victim era (cosplaying victim) all life.
1 0
Replying to fatima May 12, 2026
genuinely want's to know who forced sister iu to sign this mess of a drama?
Money from Disney. And why not, silly drama without need big range of emotions, half of scenes are beauty shots.
Who would decline ez money?
6 0
Replying to wanseong May 12, 2026
I honestly don’t understand where the impression came from that the ML was treating him like a puppet, when…
So what?
He died before it even started to process.

Died as king, so his son still legitimate heir.

Even if we close eyes on how stupid it is to be tired of cutting ribbons, while freeloading.
1 1