It's quite different from normal storylines. He doesn't hide it nor he reveals it. The main story behind him being…
Oh no, I appreciate your response. I’m a picky watcher, and I need quite a bit of persuasion. So, I’m glad that you articulated your ‘essay-like’ response. :)
this one is really mid, I can’t understand the hype at all
There could be many reasons for the hype surrounding a drama, but for me, this one stands out primarily due to two factors: refreshing representation and a feel-good factor. Many K-dramas often lean into tropes such as miscommunication, aloof characters, or emotionally distant leads. However, this drama breaks away from these norms—at least so far—offering a fresh perspective that appeals to viewers tired of toxic or unrealistic portrayals. By avoiding outdated tropes like the cold male lead, while ensuring he is not portrayed as a doormat, the creators have brought a breath of fresh air. I’m not speaking on behalf of every drama viewer, so I can’t comment on universal preferences. However, I believe there is a particular group of viewers, including myself, who enjoy dramas where love is portrayed in a healthy way, offering emotional comfort and positivity. Not to forget, all of this wouldn’t really work without good acting to back it up. So, I suppose that’s more of a meta-reason.
Guys, I want to ask something about this drama: does Ga Min hide his strength and let everyone walk all over him? I want to know because I’m repugnant to dramas/webtoons like that.
The bestfriend of FL... so ridiculous.....when ask her..why she fall in love with a single father.... absurd the…
Your assumption that romantic relationships ought to take precedence over other relationships doesn’t sit right with me. Healthy relationships are based on mutual respect, understanding, and love for each other. Expecting one’s partner to centre their world around them and prioritise the romantic relationship above all other relationships and commitments is unfair and unrealistic, in my opinion, and it seems rather possessive to me.
Prejudices are rooted in societal stereotypes rather than genuine concern. If somebody shows ‘concern’ that’s not based on facts or actual experience, then it’s a prejudice cloaked in the semblance of concern. These kinds of ‘concerns’ hurt the most. She should know that if her friend felt unloved or not prioritised, she would leave the relationship herself. People with good intentions may repeat stereotypes because they believe them to be true or helpful. Prejudices can only be challenged when they are brought to the table and critically examined.
These dramas are helping to bring such prejudices to light, forcing the audience to question them rather than accept overgeneralised and oversimplified stereotypes at face value. This will surely contribute to the edification of society at large.
As for the propaganda, shouldn’t they be de-incentivising relationships with single parents if they want to boost the birth rate? Single parents already have a child, so they may only have one more, which could weaken the overall birth rate.
It’s nice engaging in dialectics with you; it has truly deepened my understanding. Thank you.
The bestfriend of FL... so ridiculous.....when ask her..why she fall in love with a single father.... absurd the…
If her remarks are due to the aforementioned reason, then that’s fine. However, I believe—and I could be wrong—that they stem from her negative prejudice against single parents. When her husband was pushing the leads together, she explicitly stated that Ji-Yun was out of Eun-Ho’s league, thereby insinuating that he is somewhat lower in “class” than her. By the way, I believe that one can have multiple ‘first priorities.’ The choice of words also plays a significant role in how we define someone’s first priority. For example, we might say that his child is his first priority, but changing the word to ‘family’ would make it more inclusive. Sorry, just wanted to share my two cents on this. :)
I don’t really understand her job.Can someone explain it to me please?
Their job is to find a candidate for the role their commissioning company is asking for, whether the candidate is actively seeking the position or not, and to make them take the role.
Many K-dramas often lean into tropes such as miscommunication, aloof characters, or emotionally distant leads. However, this drama breaks away from these norms—at least so far—offering a fresh perspective that appeals to viewers tired of toxic or unrealistic portrayals. By avoiding outdated tropes like the cold male lead, while ensuring he is not portrayed as a doormat, the creators have brought a breath of fresh air.
I’m not speaking on behalf of every drama viewer, so I can’t comment on universal preferences. However, I believe there is a particular group of viewers, including myself, who enjoy dramas where love is portrayed in a healthy way, offering emotional comfort and positivity.
Not to forget, all of this wouldn’t really work without good acting to back it up. So, I suppose that’s more of a meta-reason.
Prejudices are rooted in societal stereotypes rather than genuine concern. If somebody shows ‘concern’ that’s not based on facts or actual experience, then it’s a prejudice cloaked in the semblance of concern. These kinds of ‘concerns’ hurt the most. She should know that if her friend felt unloved or not prioritised, she would leave the relationship herself. People with good intentions may repeat stereotypes because they believe them to be true or helpful. Prejudices can only be challenged when they are brought to the table and critically examined.
These dramas are helping to bring such prejudices to light, forcing the audience to question them rather than accept overgeneralised and oversimplified stereotypes at face value. This will surely contribute to the edification of society at large.
As for the propaganda, shouldn’t they be de-incentivising relationships with single parents if they want to boost the birth rate? Single parents already have a child, so they may only have one more, which could weaken the overall birth rate.
It’s nice engaging in dialectics with you; it has truly deepened my understanding. Thank you.
8/10 for me.
By the way, I believe that one can have multiple ‘first priorities.’ The choice of words also plays a significant role in how we define someone’s first priority. For example, we might say that his child is his first priority, but changing the word to ‘family’ would make it more inclusive.
Sorry, just wanted to share my two cents on this. :)