Why reject audiovisuals when they propose to debate issues such as internalized homophobia?

Why reject audiovisuals when they propose to debate and reflect on complex issues, such as internalized homophobia? Are we able to understand, as spectators and critics, that creators seek with their works to spark debates and reflections on complex and taboo topics? Doesn't the creator have creative freedom when adapting a work?

Hello: I don't know how to hate, not even those who hate me for being the person I am. But my comment is not about hating or rejecting actors or characters for a role in a play. I am referring to ourselves, as viewers, who are not able to value or understand the message of the work in question, when it proposes to debate or offers a message about internalized homophobia, homophobia or other complex topics. No, I don't hate the character named by you. I admire him: despite suffering from internalized homophobia, despite knowing that he could be the object of ridicule, harassment, discrimination, he is capable of growing, overcoming himself and his circumstances, and accepting himself as he is and accepting to the boy he loves. This is worthy of admiration. If you had to hate someone, it would be the homophobic, patriarchal and heteronormative society in which you live, including on many occasions your own family. That is what has “educated” him to despise everything that escapes the “normal”.