What kind of ending do you want/guess?

I think just like all the others (or even more so) she deserves to die. We didn't see one redeeming action from her. It's like she is pure evil.

However her blood will not be Dong Eun or Ms. Kang's hand. They will not go to jail.That is the point. If society will not punish them, somebody has to.  We will know more in March.

I just want Yeon Jin and Jae Joon to PAY!!!!

 Disgursting Sheet:

What will be the endgame of Yeon Jin? What should be her punishment?

I personally want to see YeonJin being punished for her crimes, Im not entirely sure how because I do believe she has underlying mental issues and part of it stems from her upbringing, her mother’s parenting is very questionable and so I think her behaviour is partly learned behaviour from her own mother’s teachings.

And similar for the others JaeJun ( I think his name is) I mean his parents were constantly away abroad, leaving him behind with no true guidance. They’re all messed up tbh.

I’m more concerned about the little girl because YeonJin does love her and she will be hurt in all this it seems.

 Winter:

Death is a  little harsh. True revenge doesn’t spell Death, it’s way too final as the dead does not feel, taste nor see, that would only hurt her innocent child.

The best revenge is for YeonJin to experience rock bottom, losing everything she holds dear and unable to buy her way out.

Idk... after everything she did, I do not think death is a little harsh. And although her child is innocent, she'd be better off without having a mom like that. 

I can understand a moral opposition to killing the bullies, but would it be narratively inappropriate for that to be the final stage? If Yeon-jin really drove So-he to kill herself, is it a poor form of revenge to eventually do the same to her? Further, if Dong-eun were to feel satisfied by killing the bullies, wouldn't that technically be the best revenge (since it is her revenge)?

Now, I agree with you that flat-out murdering the bullies isn't particularly satisfying from a narrative standpoint (which is why it was never going to be step one, if death is even in the plan at all), and I'm not suggesting anything about the moral opposition to killing someone in cold blood. But I think there's a clear separation between what feels like a reasonable outcome (because this is a story) and what would be the most equivalency-appropriate balance for what the bullies got away with in the past. 

Death is too quick, certainly--but that doesn't mean the bullies didn't forfeit their humanity by their past (and, conveniently, still mostly current) deeds and, as such, forfeit their rights to be treated humanely.

On the other hand, death is quick, which means that there's way less chance of innocent people wandering into the crossfire by accident like an elaborate scheme leaves room for. 

The other thing to consider is that our protagonist is out for revenge, which is itself an immoral act. Which, to me, means we're looking at the guilty attacking the guilty in an isolated pocket of guilt, which--narratively--means everything's fair game.

...until the innocent start getting hurt, and then we're back to square one. 

 Winter:

I disagree. There is not 1 perfect human on earth and another human should not decide who lives and who should die. I will never agree with it. Whether in real life or a Tv show.

They literally burned her and tried to kill her and in the previews, it looks like they are still going to try to kill her. At this point, it's fair game. 

...okay, it won't let me quote anyone--but regarding the moves and countermoves of both sides of this revenge scheme:

I think one of the flaws in either her plan or the storytelling is that Dong-eun reveals herself and her intentions to the bullies...whose first (or second) move should logically be to just make her disappear. After all, they are powerful people operating within a corrupt system, and she is not.

If it is a mistake of the writing, this was done for dramatic effect and is ignoring what I would call an obvious snag in the believability of the story. If it's a flaw in her plan that the makers of the show are aware of, then we should see this come around to bite her in the patoot (and also sit around wondering why she didn't think this was something that she should prepare for). 

I'd hope that this is a flaw in her otherwise careful plan--in that I'd hope her emotions clouded her judgment and made her think that striking from the shadows (and making them destroy each other, which seemed to be working pretty well) wasn't satisfying enough. At which point I think her seeming aversion to killing them would become a necessary debate for her to have with herself on screen: she's goaded her targets into open combat, so...how committed is she to hurting them, once it stops being a game of Go and becomes checkers? 

(One of my big questions for the show is what exactly the arc is supposed to be. Because we stopped at the halfway mark...and I'm not sure what details are supposed to be setup and what's just flavor.)