41 votes for wooden acting. tff fans are crazy. fake 300 votes with 10s and now this.
I have given up with cdrama ratings and at first I disagreed but after repeatedly seeing how fans of cdramas behave, I think its fair to say that all ratings on MDL and popularity on lists is not trust worthy. Its not just tff...that drama is probably ML's worst performance for me because I liked his acting more in almost all other dramas in the list but...when cdrama fans/PR chooses to increase ratings, yes, a dedicated group works and they attack anything and everyone who disagree. MDL does nothing about bots as well.
Legend of Yunxi and Are you the one have high rewatch value for me. I don't even know why. Same with love between fairy and devil. Its so simple that I have watched it many times. I don't rewatch dramas at all and yet, I have rewatched these. Some dramas i loved more don't have rewatch value for me
I swear this person is allergic to bl, why watch something when you don't like the concept
Edit: As you can see, some child got soo triggered by an honest review that I have 4 replies for some reason (the same person giving multiple replies and calling me hater...i guess I am a hater of abuse rapist whitewashing) and it contains a lot of personal insults which actually tell you how real audience is not only denying abuse but also really going after the throats of people who are simply didn't like what they liked. This is peak harassment
Lmao! Left it soo long ago...I swear the crazies won't stop doxxing. Nice try but the review says nothing about the genre. This deflection won't work when the male lead is a rapist and an abuser in general. I guess watching abusers makes people think bullying is alright. It really affects psyche unlike what some people think. Generally,people give baf reviews under other dramas as well. Negative reviewers are generally not harassed. People seem to be learning from such behaviors and think harassment is okay
I am sorry but I don't actually like 2nd MLs more generally. There are exceptions like school 2015 but a lot of 2nd MLs are actually FLAWLESS KEN DOLLS. I don't think any human beings regardless of gender are like that. As a person who might have disagreements with humans but doesn't demonise flaws, I actually understand why a well written female lead falls for a human rather than a novel character written for audience.
Extraordinary you was a good example. I think he was more interesting but he had the personality of a lead in the original story. He had actual flaws and was grappling with real and fake world later like most of them...as for the ML, he was more like the traditional second leads in the drama. I didn't care for love story abd who should end up with who...but as a character, he was more interesting than Haru for sure (and the actor was more talented than the lead actor as well)
She had two expressions all through : deer-in-headlights and watery eyes. Plus why did we have to hear about her…
I don't even get the beauty. Its probably a thing in korea because she has eurocentric features...which are... well, its obvious! The work. The first FL in season 1 was gorgeous though. The ML also stood out to be because of unconventional beauty
Apparently, the ml is also a r@p'st because he orders gang r@p' of his rival. But, the PR is trying hard to hide…
No. Massive difference between a reg flag and a criminal/rapist. Also massive difference between showing the rapist as a rapist and trying to romanticise him
Apparently, the ml is also a r@p'st because he orders gang r@p' of his rival. But, the PR is trying hard to hide…
This is not false rumors and the attacks first happened on all negative reviews of this drama including this one. The reviewer has pointed it out before. I quit this in the first half and the harassers are hounding people like leeches...for agreeing with opinions. Why are you telling people to quit under a review that says "dropped". People who think similarly will talk about it.
This review section is for audience. The coordinated attacks prove my points
Lol! Because it isn't even worth considering. I found the acting to be loud and cringe. The audience is free to judge acting. You never need a certificate for that...no one is history has said audience can't judge acting. Besides, its one of the things. The main points are about writer as well as direction. There's always space for growth. Maybe it was the director's fault...they might get to improve in the next one
Look, no one's white washing anything, I'm a woman and no I am not defending SA, I have a cousin who was SAd and…
Reviewing a drama fairly for mocking consent and SA is not narrow minded.
It is clear to see that all negative reviews which fairly criticised writers and directors have been attacked. For what? Pointing out romanticisation of an abuser which continues throughout the drama.
Tags of series? No series writes "rapist romanticisation" as a tag. If it was there, I would have avoided it but it would should still be open to criticism.
No, this is beyond fiction. Yoy have come under people's review section to attack them (including mine). Clearly, you are defending SA more than you should.
Besides, whitewashing a gang rapist shows that the narration is flawed IN THIS FICTION. Its a criticism of writing and direction. If the writer doesn't undermine SA, then why has she romanticised a gang rapist and tried to whitewash him despite repeated incidents of SA and rape attempts even in later episodes?
Why can't she show him as who he is - an abuser? These reviews you are attacking point out the flawed direction and narrative of this whole drama.
This review section is for audience. The coordinated attacks prove my points
There's no need to be a fan of abuse. Besides, fan can do their own thing? Do they teach to attack people...and call relevant points useless. A rapist is a rapist
🤣 I don't see sexuality before watching dramas. If its bad, its bad. Besides, considering all the fetishization,…
This is purely a lie. A lot of other dramas are also similarly ranked. The hatred for negative reviews shows how hostile few people are. None of those dramas had a rapist being romanticised. Kudos on defending that. I stand with my opinion regardless of attacks. I will be pretty proud of not being a SHEEP who got scared of rapist romanticisers... Nope! Even if i have to stand alone, i know I am right in pointing out the abuse of that man as well as fetishization of these men. There's a lot of incels who like degenerate content against women...incels defend it to death. Does that make the content less degenerate? No! The same argument goes for this BL. Regardless of so called fans defending it, it remains disgusting in its narration. Even if you come here 10 years later (when you grow up), my opinions won't change. I am proud of the people wjo saw through this sexual abuse romanticisation said NO
This person doesn't even watch bls, all of what they watch are just straight dramas
🤣 I don't see sexuality before watching dramas. If its bad, its bad. Besides, considering all the fetishization, I have realised that certain people like to launch attacks on people who point out abuse. Its almost like incels ...but drama incels
Edit : apparently, my review also got attacked. All negative reviews of this drama have been getting attacked.…
I have skipped it. It says "dropped" but you came under my review to crush opinions. So, people who disagree have the right to talk. Its badly written fiction with bad direction and sub par acting
Lmao! Left it soo long ago...I swear the crazies won't stop doxxing. Nice try but the review says nothing about the genre. This deflection won't work when the male lead is a rapist and an abuser in general. I guess watching abusers makes people think bullying is alright. It really affects psyche unlike what some people think. Generally,people give baf reviews under other dramas as well. Negative reviewers are generally not harassed. People seem to be learning from such behaviors and think harassment is okay
Extraordinary you was a good example. I think he was more interesting but he had the personality of a lead in the original story. He had actual flaws and was grappling with real and fake world later like most of them...as for the ML, he was more like the traditional second leads in the drama. I didn't care for love story abd who should end up with who...but as a character, he was more interesting than Haru for sure (and the actor was more talented than the lead actor as well)
The first FL in season 1 was gorgeous though. The ML also stood out to be because of unconventional beauty
There's always space for growth. Maybe it was the director's fault...they might get to improve in the next one
It is clear to see that all negative reviews which fairly criticised writers and directors have been attacked. For what? Pointing out romanticisation of an abuser which continues throughout the drama.
Tags of series? No series writes "rapist romanticisation" as a tag. If it was there, I would have avoided it but it would should still be open to criticism.
Besides, whitewashing a gang rapist shows that the narration is flawed IN THIS FICTION. Its a criticism of writing and direction. If the writer doesn't undermine SA, then why has she romanticised a gang rapist and tried to whitewash him despite repeated incidents of SA and rape attempts even in later episodes?
Why can't she show him as who he is - an abuser? These reviews you are attacking point out the flawed direction and narrative of this whole drama.
Its badly written fiction with bad direction and sub par acting