DorianGrey101

Yes, even if he is depressed he still saw the messages because he was reading it.

So maybe the remembering part is more about the essence of her rather than the photos of her. Or maybe can't remember actual details of them being together.

The fact that he never even blamed his parent (mum) for causing her death because she hated her for being deaf (like she can help beingdeaf).

The fact that he is not in mourning for her but is more stone faced and angry but we are told he is angry because he can't remember.

Even if you accept that Asian folklore theory. She is being blamed for everything that happened but we are not really shown what Hyunmin is really thinking or why he is so resentful.

Let's go down the phone rabbit hole for a second.

If we assume that his parents didn't tell him about his girlfriend. Did they also remove all traces of her from his life?.

It seems impossible that they could remove all traces of a girl that he was planning to propose to. There has to be photos of them together somewhere (laptop, his flat etc) She had photos of him in her apartment, he must have loads of photos of her too.

This then still leaves you questioning the real reason he can't remember her. It's just not clear why?.

Yes it can be different but it seems there are different rules for different people, which is something that's confusing.

Yes experiences should vary but I just don't get why the mum could take a bulb for her child but the schoolboy was stuck even when he was trying to move and find his way out.

I also don't get why the shopkeeper would sell you another bulb knowing full well the bulb that you needed. He guided others but just drank tea with others and everyone is putting that to will, which still doesn't make sense to me.Then I have to ask what is will?. When do you start to have will? Do you only have will when someone tells you to find your bulb. But then gives rise to other questions.

The show didn't show why he would do that. I understand that maybe the girl needed closure with her mum. But the fact that the mum can't speak but she sent her daughter to buy a light. How did she do this if she was already dead and couldn't speak.

This is my problem with this drama, there is no consistency with the world building.

It's not really clear what is true "will" especially when we compare Hyunmin and the daughter. Both of them were forced to come back but face different consequences.

Also when he says it feels like "night to me" it could also be him expressing that he knows something is missing but he doesn't know what.

Don't you think you're now just assuming that he didn't have friends to tell him about dead girlfriend.

Also the phone had all the messages between him and his girlfriend. So he knew about her but maybe couldn't remember what she looked like or how their relationship was like even though he wants to remember.

I just saw that Johnny Huang has a new drama coming out (Dec 20) . Just put it on my to watch list. Hope it's gonna be good.

So excited to see Johnny Huang. Can't wait to watch him.

Public Service Announcement

Hello! A quick note for anyone who may have blocked me:

If you've chosen to block my account, I completely respect your decision. However, I would kindly ask that you avoid tagging my username in your replies. This generates email notifications for responses I’m unable to view.

Instead, if you'd like to share your thoughts or answer questions for others’ benefit, consider starting your own thread. This ensures your insights are visible to those who can engage with them.

Thank you for your cooperation and understanding!

I actually asked the same question. How is that different from being forced to live? If we say Hyunmin was forced to live, what about the daughter? Wasn't she forced too?

So, in Asian folklore, how does he remember when it's a curse that he can't remember and that she can't be remembered? I'm just curious. I've watched some Thai dramas on this subject, as ghosts and ghost stories/spirits seem to be their favorite subject as well.

So funny? Who cares if you don't engage? Do you honestly think, I'm sitting here waiting for your replies?.

I was just referring to your hypocritical stance and selective application of "respectful critique". It only extends to when we agree with each other. Not new to MDL, I'm used to all the crazy that happens here.

Have a pleasant day, having "respectful critique" with others.

respect can be subjective and influenced by personal values, tone, and context. The ‘standard’ for respectful critique isn't set in stone—it's more about a mutual understanding of civility, logic, and clarity. Constructive feedback focuses on the content, not personal attacks or dismissive language.

If you're all ears for respectful critique, perhaps consider that dismissing others as ‘stupid’ or ‘skipper watchers’ might not meet the very standard you're advocating. Respect goes both ways, even when we disagree."

Choosing peace of mind and focusing on what you enjoy is completely valid. However, leaving constructive criticism or ‘bad reviews’ can also be important. Thoughtful feedback helps creators understand what worked and what didn’t, enabling growth and improvement in their craft. It’s not about perfection, but about fostering dialogue and accountability, which can elevate storytelling over time.

That said, it’s entirely up to the individual whether they want to engage critically or simply enjoy the work. Both approaches have value.
However, my brain is wired to Critically engage with content so, I will always have questions and deep analysis of stuff. I don't believe in agreeing with people, I'm happy with forming my own opinions. Sometimes I agree sometimes I don't.
Wishing you peace and happy watching—goodbye!"

Who sets the standard for respectful critique? How do you know it's respectful critique. You are not saying anything, this is not North Korea where there is censorship.

I've been on here for long enough to know how people don't like others to express their different opinion. You have to agree that boring shows are a "masterpiece" because some Oppa deluded Koreaboos can be happy.

I'm not here to make you happy.

The problem is we have different ways of seeing and understanding film. Do you even know what a plot hole means?

A plot hole is an inconsistency, gap, or error in a story’s narrative that contradicts the logic or established facts of the plot. It often occurs when events, character actions, or outcomes don’t align with the story’s internal rules, previously established information, or reality. Plot holes can break the audience's suspension of disbelief because they leave questions unanswered or unresolved.


It doesn't mean that they have to explain everything. The fact that most people find the Hyunmin storytelling confusing says something about how the writer tied the loose ends.

All I can say is there is usually general consensus if a drama is good, even people that are not fans of a genre or a writer will agree with the mastery of the drama.

If you're only getting people that like the author or genre then no the writer failed somewhere.

According to you it's the best you have seen. You can go online to check other reviews. There is a reason why the drama is getting those reviews. Ratings on other platforms range btwn 7- 7.5 ( not this blind praise on MDL)

Stop trying to make it a me issue.... Here is one review I just read from another newspaper

"Mawkish supernatural story of two halves. Despite some clever subterfuge on the part of its creator Kang Full, and some affecting scenes, the show’s narrative lacks proper exposition."

This was a review by a movie critics, so stop this weird narrative about all dramas not having plot holes.

Dismissing others as 'stupid' or 'skipper watchers' just because they don’t share your opinion seems like an oversimplification. Not everyone has to see the narrative the way you do—some people prefer critical thinking over blind praise.

People who don't agree with a narrative are often labeled as haters due to a mix of emotional, social, and psychological factors:

1. Defensiveness:
When someone challenges a widely accepted narrative, those who support it may feel personally attacked or defensive. Labeling the dissenters as "haters" dismisses their arguments without engaging with them.


2. Simplification:
It’s easier to label someone as a "hater" than to unpack their criticism. This oversimplifies the disagreement and avoids deeper conversations or scrutiny.


3. Emotional Bias:
People often connect emotionally to ideas, beliefs, or narratives. When someone disagrees, it can feel like an attack on their identity, leading to a negative, emotional response, such as calling them "haters."


4. Group Mentality:
In-group/out-group dynamics play a role. Those who disagree may be perceived as "outsiders" or antagonists, leading to dismissive labels like "haters" to reinforce group cohesion and unity.


5. Misinterpretation of Criticism:
Constructive criticism or a difference in perspective is sometimes misunderstood as negativity or hostility. The term "hater" generalizes all disagreement as malicious or unfounded.


6. Social Media Influence:
Online platforms amplify this labeling because nuanced discussions often get replaced by quick, emotionally charged reactions. Calling someone a "hater" can shut down debate and attract support from like-minded individuals.



Ultimately, labeling someone as a "hater" is often a defense mechanism that avoids engaging with differing viewpoints or critical feedback. It simplifies complex disagreements into black-and-white terms, which can hinder open dialogue and understanding.

He is alive, he wakes up from the coma but can still see ghosts.

Well it's mainly because the body of work belongs to the same writer (Kang Full) . So they maybe they thought a Marvel Cinematic Universe thing is fun. Or maybe the stories are connected or not connected. Remains to be seen.